I bet a two Longshot parlay in Sports and they BOTH won. :) I won $168 on a $1 bet. :) A two Longshot parlay bet in Sports is a RISKY bet, but it paid off for me. :)
What about you? :) What risky gambling bets have you made that paid off? :)
Printable View
I bet a two Longshot parlay in Sports and they BOTH won. :) I won $168 on a $1 bet. :) A two Longshot parlay bet in Sports is a RISKY bet, but it paid off for me. :)
What about you? :) What risky gambling bets have you made that paid off? :)
What an idiot.
My Tasha sympathy is starting to dwindle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG0yq2ATWbcQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So, I WON $168 playing a TWO bet LONGSHOT PARLAY and I get CRITICIZED? WHAT THE FUCK? :(
Karen, most of us (not counting you, obviously) are pretty savvy when it comes to the basics of gambling, and realize how parlays such as the one you bet are negative EV.
So you got lucky...big fucking deal: luck happens, even to mongoloid floor shitters with hideous handbags.
What was your point in posting, anyway: hoping to impress "your boyfriend?"
Or maybe you hope to impress lurking "casino friends" in the hope that they'll e-mail you requesting crotch pics...ka-ching.
But hey, you're funny...keep it coming, I always need new material for the "Gamblin' Gal KAREN" thread.
I thought I was going to get congratulated on my $168 win. I got INSULTED instead. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Yes, and let that be a lesson to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
That is a lie. You knew you knew you would be insulted. You are always insulted after you post about your gambling adventures. Since you know you are going to be insulted and post anyway, it indicates you like being insulted. Boz and V are satisfying your urges.Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaI thought I was going to get congratulated on my $168 win. I got INSULTED instead. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Bingo.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballs
Our sadism feeds her masochism.
Karen loves to be kicked in the ass by cruel shoes.
$168 is quite a win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Congratulations!
Perhaps you didn’t get congratulations from other folks because you didn’t post any proof like a picture of the winning ticket next to some gym equipment or a picture of your safe with the $168 sitting in it.
Thank you for sincerely congratulating me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen$168 is quite a win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Congratulations!
Perhaps you didn’t get congratulations from other folks because you didn’t post any proof like a picture of the winning ticket next to some gym equipment or a picture of your safe with the $168 sitting in it.
Was this you Tasha? Shitting in public and dropping off Mammie’s needles?
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/u-s-world...in-same-month/
“ The investigation began in November, when a resident found needles and feces on the cul-de-sac. Police looked into the situation and determined the feces was human, and also found toilet paper in the area.
More feces were found in the road Nov. 16, and a motion-activated camera was placed in the area to help identify the suspect.”
You're so stupid and dense you actually think he was "congratulating" your pathetic fat black ass. He was MOCKING you, you ignoramus!Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaThank you for sincerely congratulating me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen$168 is quite a win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Congratulations!
Perhaps you didn’t get congratulations from other folks because you didn’t post any proof like a picture of the winning ticket next to some gym equipment or a picture of your safe with the $168 sitting in it.
What a dipshit.
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...t=Rams+tickets
Post #66 and so on. That post does not show all the tickets, bit it gives a pretty good sampling.
Of what, your average bet size? Split among how many investors?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfOf what, your average bet size? Split among how many investors?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
LOL. That would be me and Bob Hurst, former president of Golden Eagle Distributing in Sacramento. You can check with his son as to the veritas of the story. As I said, not all tickets are in view. Hurst was an interesting guy -- he knew many "connected" scenarios in advance of civilians. For example, he knew when the great bust and seizure of the Millennium Sports/WagerMall/and all affiliates was in progress the day it happened...because he knew the people in Costa Rica who had leased them the buildings. That little incident (cost me 11K, and I'm ultra-careful) was partially covered by CNN and so on the day after the hijacking of the Millennium owner and his laptops. The owner had the audacity to go on CNN a few days before and announce that he wanted to pay taxes like any good businessman. Well, the feds, and a St. Louis judge cheerleading for CET, cut that "paying taxes" short when he landed in Dallas for a change of planes
Good try, though, Axel, considering this thread was supposed to be about longshot tickets that cashed. You hijack stuff better than the feds. I'm sure you have many similar tickets, right? I mean, it doesn't take an advanced degree in "APing" to recognize when odds are wrong on a 3-0 team. LOL.
This was actually not a Dietz-centric bit of brilliance, as I reported ad nauseum previously. Many people nailed the Rams. Bookmakers got fired (Strat, for one) because of their greed, basically. And their lack of eyeballs. Those of us with sports eyeballs (some APs have them; most do not) and a few working neurons used the football axiom "you can't disguise speed" to make our Rams play. What made mine different was that I had previously decided the Titans were the SB longshot I wanted, based on their triumvirate of offensive players who resembled the old Aikman/Smith/Irvin triple play. So I already had the Titans to win the AFC and SB, then I took the Rams, and well, the twain met, so to speak. Saved me from SB hedging -- I actually made money hedging versus these teams that year.
I'm sure Axel has many similar stories and copies of tickets to share, his being an LV-based "AP" and all.
The guy's name was Bob Hurst, by the way, and I have a nice story about him buying me lunch at Caesars' Palace. Before posting that story, however, I'll give Axel time to post his tickets.
And MDawg, feel free to copy and paste this.
Mdawg is a person with some money (not nearly what he wants people to think) that likes to gamble, loses more than he wins, can afford to gamble and lose and gets comped for it. Nothing more! Just a degenerate gambler that loses and gets comped and likes to make up stories about winning, like a lot of losing degenerate gamblers do. And EVERYONE knows it.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
So you continuing to cozy up to people like Dawg and Singer, tells anybody that might not have known anything about Bob Dietz, all they need to know. You just aren't doing yourself any favors by tying yourself to people like this. You might as well be buddying up to Tasha, for all that's worth. :rolleyes:
And while I am at it, all the name dropping that you do, often people from decades ago that are dead, often people in the academic world, that no one knows or has nothing to do with gambling or if they did, it was last century, all that name dropping isn't helping your cause either. Just makes you look more desperate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMdawg is a person with some money (not nearly what he wants people to think) that likes to gamble, loses more than he wins, can afford to gamble and lose and gets comped for it. Nothing more! Just a degenerate gambler that loses and gets comped and likes to make up stories about winning, like a lot of losing degenerate gamblers do. And EVERYONE knows it.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
So you continuing to cozy up to people like Dawg and Singer, tells anybody that might not have known anything about Bob Dietz, all they need to know. You just aren't doing yourself any favors by tying yourself to people like this. You might as well be buddying up to Tasha, for all that's worth. :rolleyes:
And while I am at it, all the name dropping that you do, often people from decades ago that are dead, often people in the academic world, that no one knows or has nothing to do with gambling or if they did, it was last century, all that name dropping isn't helping your cause either. Just makes you look more desperate.
That would be me...desperate and confused. Did I go to college for a year, for two years, did I get a degree, did I never go? Was I broke, did my uncle pay for Villanova at 65K a year, did I get a scholarship, did I allow my uncle to sink 65K into my education and then quit because I felt badly that he was spending too much? The options are numerous and unfortunately all documented here, all by the same idiot scribe(s). I find it hard to believe one person would fuck up their own alleged story so badly.
What must it say about someone who cozies up to a kewlJ? I mean, Jesus, whatever long-shot blather Singer and MDawg post, at least they have their stories straight. If you can't be consistent reporting your own life, why should anybody take anything you post as other than complete fiction?
And MDawg, you can quote me on this. LOL.
At least other people keep their bullshit the same color. The kewlJ(s) have no idea what they wrote months ago or yesterday. Their whole self-presentation is inconsistent and ridiculous.
At least MDawg and Singer require debunking. The KewlJ(s) debunk themselves. There is something bizarre about a poster who persistently debunks himself and then acts as if people should believe him. It's gotta be some kind of joke.
The point at which it became obvious that UNKewlJ is a male prostitute masquerading on forums as something else passed long ago.
REDietz you posted a while back that the Male Whore explanation was not so nutso but given the contradictions, outright lies, lack of any entries in any blackjack databases and that to this day still no one has observed the UNKewl one engaged in anything other than prostitution related activities makes it the only plausible explanation.
UNKewlJ has been inconsistent in most everything - other than in denying the one thing that he in fact is.