The "Infamous tap," how do you handle it?

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it? I remember a guy saying he felt happy at first when he felt the "tap," as he was winning and as he had been expecting it to be a Friend he had been with getting ready to congratulate him on his winning game but it was instead a "Suit," telling him that he had been put on a watch list for card counting and winning too much and needed to back off the game. His happiness turned to frustration in just seconds as he had to leave the winning game. How do you handle the "Infamous tap?"

Didn't you post this on another forum? A blackjack forum no less? Did you think you didnt get sound advice?

The answers at BJTF were for the most part spot on. A player with any interest in longevity will exit as quickly and quietly as possible. If you can, don't even cash out chips. The goal is to make yourself and the incident as non-memorable as possible.

And the real goal is to see that your play has crossed into territory that exceeds that casino's or shift personells comfort level PRIOR to any action taken and avoid that back off altogether.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Didn't you post this on another forum? A blackjack forum no less? Did you think you didnt get sound advice?

The answers at BJTF were for the most part spot on. A player with any interest in longevity will exit as quickly and quietly as possible. If you can, don't even cash out chips. The goal is to make yourself and the incident as non-memorable as possible.

And the real goal is to see that your play has crossed into territory that exceeds that casino's or shift personells comfort level PRIOR to any action taken and avoid that back off altogether.

---

Yes, I asked this same question on BJTF, but I also wanted to hear VCT Gamblers' thoughts on this. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Yes, I asked this same question on BJTF, but I also wanted to hear VCT Gamblers' thoughts on this. :)

---

But why? Have you ever even played a hand of blackjack Tasha?

Tasha...just curious. You have a 2 card 12 and the dealer had a 2 showing. Would you hit or stand? Keep in mind the cards have been running good so you don't want to Do anything to break up the flow. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Tasha...just curious. You have a 2 card 12 and the dealer had a 2 showing. Would you hit or stand? Keep in mind the cards have been running good so you don't want to Do anything to break up the flow. :)

---

I would choose hit and hope the next card is a 9 for Blackjack! :D

Hit. The dealer is at advantage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Hit. The dealer is at advantage.

---

My reference above was sort of baiting Tasha into the wrong answer with the "flow of the cards comment". ;)

If you are not counting cards and have no further information about the remaining cards (or the next card), then mathematically "hit" is the best option.

If you are counting, "hit" is the best option up until a TC of about +3 (hi-lo or equivalent) at which standing becomes the best option. It becomes the best option not only mathematically, but also you don't want to take unnecessary hits in +EV situations. So on borderline plays, you might want to not take a hit just to preserve cards. Not hitting 1 or 2 cards may allow for an extra round at your max bet +EV situation and that is worth far more than the few cents that a borderline hit is worth.

And finally on some of these borderline plays, like 12 vs 2, 12 vs 3, 16 vs 10 it is best play the same hands the same all the time rather than hit sometimes and stand others according to the count. There is a very minimal cost to this but a bigger reward in terms of longevity. There is a strategy known as "card counters basic strategy", in which you determine the correct play at TC's of say +3 or more and always play it that way. That way you are playing the hand correctly when your bigger bets are out and incorrectly at a very meniscal cost when your minimum bet is out, but always playing the same avoiding a huge card counter "tell". The insurance decision also falls into this card counters basic strategy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Hit. The dealer is at advantage.

---

My reference above was sort of baiting Tasha into the wrong answer with the "flow of the cards comment". ;)

If you are not counting cards and have no further information about the remaining cards (or the next card), then mathematically "hit" is the best option.

If you are counting, "hit" is the best option up until a TC of about +3 (hi-lo or equivalent) at which standing becomes the best option. It becomes the best option not only mathematically, but also you don't want to take unnecessary hits in +EV situations. So on borderline plays, you might want to not take a hit just to preserve cards. Not hitting 1 or 2 cards may allow for an extra round at your max bet +EV situation and that is worth far more than the few cents that a borderline hit is worth.

And finally on some of these borderline plays, like 12 vs 2, 12 vs 3, 16 vs 10 it is best play the same hands the same all the time rather than hit sometimes and stand others according to the count. There is a very minimal cost to this but a bigger reward in terms of longevity. There is a strategy known as "card counters basic strategy", in which you determine the correct play at TC's of say +3 or more and always play it that way. That way you are playing the hand correctly when your bigger bets are out and incorrectly at a very meniscal cost when your minimum bet is out, but always playing the same avoiding a huge card counter "tell". The insurance decision also falls into this card counters basic strategy.

---

So, I got your little test right by choosing "Hit!" :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

So, I got your little test right by choosing "Hit!" :)

---

You had a 50/50 chance. You guessed right. BUT before you get to "giddy", your statement that you would hope for a 9 on your 12 to make a "blackjack" is so wrong it almost overshadows your correct guess. :rolleyes: I'll leave it to someone else to tell you what's wrong with that. :cool:

Want to press your luck tasha? What is the optimal play for a player 16 vs dealer 10 or face card (also value 10)?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

So, I got your little test right by choosing "Hit!" :)

---

You had a 50/50 chance. You guessed right. BUT before you get to "giddy", your statement that you would hope for a 9 on your 12 to make a "blackjack" is so wrong it almost overshadows your correct guess. :rolleyes: I'll leave it to someone else to tell you what's wrong with that. :cool:

---

If I have a 12 and choose "Hit," and get a 9 card, I win automatically. 12+9 is 21, so I win! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Want to press your luck tasha? What is the optimal play for a player 16 vs dealer 10 or face card (also value 10)?

---

I would guess that the Player should choose Stand on this one this one and hope the Dealer's next card is a 5 for a win. Because with a card as high as a 16, you are very apt to bust by getting a 10 and ending up with 26.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Want to press your luck tasha? What is the optimal play for a player 16 vs dealer 10 or face card (also value 10)?

---

I would guess that the Player should choose Stand on this one this one and hope the Dealer's next card is a 5 for a win. Because with a card as high as a 16, you are very apt to bust by getting a 10 and ending up with 26.

---

This was also a bit of a trick question. The most optimal play is to surrender. But many places don't offer surrender and in that case knowing nothing else about remaining cards you should hit. There is such a small cost between hitting and standing in neutral counts that I won't penalize you even though technically wrong.:cool:

I don't think you have any interest in blackjack despite your posting as blackjack newbie on a blackjack forum and asking these questions on at least 3 forums, but even as a newbie if you have any real interest, you should at least learn some of these things (basic strategy).

My next question to Tasha was going to ask the most optimal play for player 16 vs 10 at a true count of -3?

I'll open it up to anyone. (For fun)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

My next question to Tasha was going to ask the most optimal play for player 16 vs 10 at a true count of -3?

I'll open it up to anyone. (For fun)

---

Obviously, the dealer has a.greater chance of 20.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Want to press your luck tasha? What is the optimal play for a player 16 vs dealer 10 or face card (also value 10)?

---

I would guess that the Player should choose Stand on this one this one and hope the Dealer's next card is a 5 for a win. Because with a card as high as a 16, you are very apt to bust by getting a 10 and ending up with 26.

---

This was also a bit of a trick question. The most optimal play is to surrender. But many places don't offer surrender and in that case knowing nothing else about remaining cards you should hit. There is such a small cost between hitting and standing in neutral counts that I won't penalize you even though technically wrong.:cool:

I don't think you have any interest in blackjack despite your posting as blackjack newbie on a blackjack forum and asking these questions on at least 3 forums, but even as a newbie if you have any real interest, you should at least learn some of these things (basic strategy).

---

You're assuming I even knew what Surrender was in Blackjack!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Obviously, the dealer has a.greater chance of 20.

---

While this is true, the dealer will make a good hand out of a potential bust hand more frequently, it isn't the answer I was looking for, Slingshot. I though one of the blackjack guys would chime in and say, at a true count of -3, you are playing at a greater disadvantage, about 2% disadvantage, and the best option is to not be playing at such a negative count. That is the way I play anyway. :cool:

That is the difference between blackjack card counting and something like VP. With blackjack the advantage is swinging back and forth between the house and player and you can pick and choose when you want to play and when you don't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

My next question to Tasha was going to ask the most optimal play for player 16 vs 10 at a true count of -3?

I'll open it up to anyone. (For fun)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Obviously, the dealer has a.greater chance of 20.

---

While this is true, the dealer will make a good hand out of a potential bust hand more frequently, it isn't the answer I was looking for, Slingshot. I though one of the blackjack guys would chime in and say, at a true count of -3, you are playing at a greater disadvantage, about 2% disadvantage, and the best option is to not be playing at such a negative count. That is the way I play anyway.

---

The correct answer is to hit at a TC of -3. If the question was worded differently I would agree with what you wrote for the answer but it was not. You presented the trick question with the player already facing that situation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it? I remember a guy saying he felt happy at first when he felt the "tap," as he was winning and as he had been expecting it to be a Friend he had been with getting ready to congratulate him on his winning game but it was instead a "Suit," telling him that he had been put on a watch list for card counting and winning too much and needed to back off the game. His happiness turned to frustration in just seconds as he had to leave the winning game. How do you handle the "Infamous tap?"

---

Only question is if you gave the crackhead you paid to suck off an extra $20 to tap you on the shoulder so you could fully enjoy it.

Hopefully you stole enough this week to blow his friend as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it? I remember a guy saying he felt happy at first when he felt the "tap," as he was winning and as he had been expecting it to be a Friend he had been with getting ready to congratulate him on his winning game but it was instead a "Suit," telling him that he had been put on a watch list for card counting and winning too much and needed to back off the game. His happiness turned to frustration in just seconds as he had to leave the winning game. How do you handle the "Infamous tap?"

---

Only question is if you gave the crackhead you paid to suck off an extra $20 to tap you on the shoulder so you could fully enjoy it.

Hopefully you stole enough this week to blow his friend as well.

---

Boz, stop bringing up that wallet thing. Once again, YOU are the only one constantly harping about it after everybody else treated it like a fart that stunk really badly but was then quickly forgotten about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it? I remember a guy saying he felt happy at first when he felt the "tap," as he was winning and as he had been expecting it to be a Friend he had been with getting ready to congratulate him on his winning game but it was instead a "Suit," telling him that he had been put on a watch list for card counting and winning too much and needed to back off the game. His happiness turned to frustration in just seconds as he had to leave the winning game. How do you handle the "Infamous tap?"

---

Only question is if you gave the crackhead you paid to suck off an extra $20 to tap you on the shoulder so you could fully enjoy it.

Hopefully you stole enough this week to blow his friend as well.

---

Boz, stop bringing up that wallet thing. Once again, YOU are the only one constantly harping about it after everybody else treated it like a fart that stunk really badly but was then quickly forgotten about.

---

What an odd analogy. But then again I wouldn’t expect anything else from a proven lying thief like you. You are the pile of human shit that stinks more every time she creates another sock, tells another lie or just acts the only way her menial brain know how.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boz

Only question is if you gave the crackhead you paid to suck off an extra $20 to tap you on the shoulder so you could fully enjoy it.

Hopefully you stole enough this week to blow his friend as well.

---

Boz, stop bringing up that wallet thing. Once again, YOU are the only one constantly harping about it after everybody else treated it like a fart that stunk really badly but was then quickly forgotten about.

---

What an odd analogy. But then again I wouldn’t expect anything else from a proven lying thief like you. You are the pile of human shit that stinks more every time she creates another sock, tells another lie or just acts the only way her menial brain know how.

---

Think about it. Farts stink really badly for like 10 seconds and then they get quickly forgotten about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Obviously, the dealer has a.greater chance of 20.

---

While this is true, the dealer will make a good hand out of a potential bust hand more frequently, it isn't the answer I was looking for, Slingshot. I though one of the blackjack guys would chime in and say, at a true count of -3, you are playing at a greater disadvantage, about 2% disadvantage, and the best option is to not be playing at such a negative count. That is the way I play anyway. :cool:

That is the difference between blackjack card counting and something like VP. With blackjack the advantage is swinging back and forth between the house and player and you can pick and choose when you want to play and when you don't.

---

This, to me, is hilarious! If I say quit playing while ahead in vp, I'm told it will have NO effect whatsoever on my income, but bj is different? And BTW, I'm also given all the math supposedly showing how misguided I am-mainly because they think I'm a Singer puppet and can't think for myself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

This, to me, is hilarious! If I say quit playing while ahead in vp, I'm told it will have NO effect whatsoever on my income, but bj is different? And BTW, I'm also given all the math supposedly showing how misguided I am-mainly because they think I'm a Singer puppet and can't think for myself.

---

Pretty foolish statement slingshot. I am not quitting because I am ahead or behind. I am quitting because the odds have gotten worse. The game at that point favors the house even more....so why do I want to play when there is a more favorable game nearby?

As I said the odds constantly changing from round to round is one of the differences between blackjack and most other games.

It would be like this comparison. You start playing a video poker game with a 99.5% return. Then all of the sudden the paytables change for the worse and the game now has a 96% return. Would you keep playing with the higher house advantage or move 2 seats down to another 99.5% return game?

Mr Kewlj that is a very good analogy that you just gave Mr Slingshot. I have a related question: how do you measure your edge or advantage in Blackjack? I understand the count is what determines your advantage but can you be specific?

For example, if all of the aces remain in the shoe after X number of hands, what is that worth?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewG

Mr Kewlj that is a very good analogy that you just gave Mr Slingshot. I have a related question: how do you measure your edge or advantage in Blackjack? I understand the count is what determines your advantage but can you be specific?

For example, if all of the aces remain in the shoe after X number of hands, what is that worth?

---

I am a little fuzzy on exactly what you are asking. But I will put it this way. All counts that card counters use to identify house advantage are an approximation or estimate.

As for aces, the most important card because of the 150% blackjack payout, it is worth a lot, which is why many players side counters separately.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewG

Mr Kewlj that is a very good analogy that you just gave Mr Slingshot. I have a related question: how do you measure your edge or advantage in Blackjack? I understand the count is what determines your advantage but can you be specific?

For example, if all of the aces remain in the shoe after X number of hands, what is that worth?

---

I am a little fuzzy on exactly what you are asking. But I will put it this way. All counts that card counters use to identify house advantage for the next round are an approximation or estimate.

As for aces, the most important card because of the 150% blackjack payout, it is worth a lot, which is why many players side counters separately.

If I have misunderstood your question, try to clarify and will try to answer later when I get home if no one else has given a satisfactory answer by then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

This, to me, is hilarious! If I say quit playing while ahead in vp, I'm told it will have NO effect whatsoever on my income, but bj is different? And BTW, I'm also given all the math supposedly showing how misguided I am-mainly because they think I'm a Singer puppet and can't think for myself.

---

Pretty foolish statement slingshot. I am not quitting because I am ahead or behind. I am quitting because the odds have gotten worse. The game at that point favors the house even more....so why do I want to play when there is a more favorable game nearby?

As I said the odds constantly changing from round to round is one of the differences between blackjack and most other games.

It would be like this comparison. You start playing a video poker game with a 99.5% return. Then all of the sudden the paytables change for the worse and the game now has a 96% return. Would you keep playing with the higher house advantage or move 2 seats down to another 99.5% return game?

---

Exactly! So if I get a good payout from one vp machine and quit THAT machine if play downgrades, and move to another machine I have accomplished the same.

You know what my problem with you is Slingshot? I can never tell if you are serious or are yanking my chain. So I always treat you as being serious. But I think most oftentimes you are yanking my chain. At least I hope that for your sake, because if you believe the nonsense you write (usually Singer's beliefs)....then WOW.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewG

Mr Kewlj that is a very good analogy that you just gave Mr Slingshot. I have a related question: how do you measure your edge or advantage in Blackjack? I understand the count is what determines your advantage but can you be specific?

For example, if all of the aces remain in the shoe after X number of hands, what is that worth?

---

I am a little fuzzy on exactly what you are asking. But I will put it this way. All counts that card counters use to identify house advantage for the next round are an approximation or estimate.

As for aces, the most important card because of the 150% blackjack payout, it is worth a lot, which is why many players side counters separately.

If I have misunderstood your question, try to clarify and will try to answer later when I get home if no one else has given a satisfactory answer by then.

---

Your answer will suffice. Thank you Mr Kewlj.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

You know what my problem with you is Slingshot? I can never tell if you are serious or are yanking my chain. So I always treat you as being serious. But I think most oftentimes you are yanking my chain. At least I hope that for your sake, because if you believe the nonsense you write (usually Singer's beliefs)....then WOW.

---

Don't have time for that nonsense-yanking one's chain. I love playing vp and have experienced all I believe. Just because Singer has similar experiences has nothing to do with it-save the fact I found merit in two of his strategies, as well as his thinking on win/loss goals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

This, to me, is hilarious! If I say quit playing while ahead in vp, I'm told it will have NO effect whatsoever on my income, but bj is different? And BTW, I'm also given all the math supposedly showing how misguided I am-mainly because they think I'm a Singer puppet and can't think for myself.

---

---

It would be like this comparison. You start playing a video poker game with a 99.5% return. Then all of the sudden the paytables change for the worse and the game now has a 96% return. Would you keep playing with the higher house advantage or move 2 seats down to another 99.5% return game?[/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by slingshot[/QUOTE]

Exactly! So if I get a good payout from one vp machine and quit THAT machine if play downgrades, and move to another machine I have accomplished the same.[/QUOTE]

Now this is really funny! Slingshot KJ was talking about how you should always be playing the highest upfront percentage (based by the pay tables) video poker machines that are available. I will add, of course based on your bankroll. What you are countering with is that you need to move around and try to find machines that are not cold, or turning cold and are paying out. Not knowing that the machine you just left may be ready to pay a large jackpot. Your way is voodoo thinking royally!

"Voodoo thinking royally" as in Royal flush. Very good Bosox. A+

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

"Voodoo thinking royally" as in Royal flush. Very good Bosox. A+

---

You are giving out grades now? You going bob21 on us?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcap

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

"Voodoo thinking royally" as in Royal flush. Very good Bosox. A+

---

You are giving out grades now? You going bob21 on us?

---

I don't know anything about Bob21 giving grades AND don't want to.:rolleyes:

I was just giving "Dad" (I read he was my Dad on another forum) a pat on the back.:D

Slingshot, I think all casinos should flat bet you to play on only one machine lifetime for nickels.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Slingshot, I think all casinos should flat bet you to play on only one machine lifetime for nickels.

---

I want sling in my casino with all of his money. Because it'll eventually be all mine!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jbjb

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Slingshot, I think all casinos should flat bet you to play on only one machine lifetime for nickels.

---

I want sling in my casino with all of his money. Because it'll eventually be all mine!

---

Pardon me, he has taken an extensive money management course to avoid those problems, and knows the secrets to success.

I think we should all lighten up on Slingshot. He has made it clear that he is not trying to be an AP or play with an advantage. he is just there to have fun. And he believes that a progressive betting system allows him to stretch his money and make his money last longer. This of course is a fallacy, but he can believe whatever he wants and play how ever he wants. :rolleyes:

I have to admit, I cringe each time I hear him repeat Singer's talking points word for word. But again, he can do and believe what he wants.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I think we should all lighten up on Slingshot. He has made it clear that he is not trying to be an AP or play with an advantage. he is just there to have fun. And he believes that a progressive betting system allows him to stretch his money and make his money last longer. This of course is a fallacy, but he can believe whatever he wants and play how ever he wants. :rolleyes:

I have to admit, I cringe each time I hear him repeat Singer's talking points word for word. But again, he can do and believe what he wants.

---

Ahhh, just ignore me. The past 4 years on this forum has made me sort of bulletproof. I realize my play is not the "norm".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I think we should all lighten up on Slingshot. He has made it clear that he is not trying to be an AP or play with an advantage. he is just there to have fun. And he believes that a progressive betting system allows him to stretch his money and make his money last longer. This of course is a fallacy, but he can believe whatever he wants and play how ever he wants. :rolleyes:

I have to admit, I cringe each time I hear him repeat Singer's talking points word for word. But again, he can do and believe what he wants.

---

Ahhh, just ignore me. The past 4 years on this forum has made me sort of bulletproof. I realize my play is not the "norm".

---

Sorry Slingshot but this has gone way beyond discussing your play alone when you pretend that you do not realize there is a difference between player and house edges playing video poker versus playing blackjack as you yourself referenced in post #24. To quote:

"This, to me, is hilarious! If I say quit playing while ahead in vp, I'm told it will have NO effect whatsoever on my income, but bj is different?"

You put that question mark up there where there should not be one. Damn right there is a big difference between the two games. Every new hand played at video poker is dealt from a fresh shuffle whereby the odds always remain the same before the draw and completion of the hand, (based on the pay tables) this cannot change. In blackjack, you can have many, many hands played between shuffling, each and every card seen between shuffles changes the fluctuating odds of the game. Winning long term is all about the math period.

One other comparison between the two games that I think sucks big time for video poker.

For Example: In blackjack, you may see two players playing side by side on a $10 minimum $500 max table. One player is betting mostly $10 a hand and the other guy is always betting black chips the point here is that both players are starting out each hand with equal upfront odds.

In video poker for the most part unless you are playing five coins a hand there will be a stiff penalty in the payout tables for not doing so. So two people sitting side by side playing the same exact game might be playing at different upfront odds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it?

---

Tasha, that is a fair question, considering that you most likely will never experience the occasion in your lifetime.

It is just part of the job, and you move on. Now how do you handle being banned from boards?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it?

---

Tasha, that is a fair question, considering that you most likely will never experience the occasion in your lifetime.

It is just part of the job, and you move on. Now how do you handle being banned from boards?

---

At least one website that banned me,I looked at website for about two more days, complained about being banned out of the blue and and then completely ignored website and never went back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Disclaimer. I know that I am supposed to cut down on the New Threads thing, but I feel that this is a decent idea for a thread and is not completely stupid like some of my threads are. I actually completely thought this thread through before hitting "Post."

The "Back off from this game/ the Banned Tap." How do you handle it?

---

Tasha, that is a fair question, considering that you most likely will never experience the occasion in your lifetime.

It is just part of the job, and you move on. Now how do you handle being banned from boards?

---

At least one website that banned me,I looked at website for about two more days, complained about being banned out of the blue and and then completely ignored website and never went back.

---

My Christmas wish is history repeats itself here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Tasha, that is a fair question, considering that you most likely will never experience the occasion in your lifetime.

It is just part of the job, and you move on. Now how do you handle being banned from boards?

---

At least one website that banned me,I looked at website for about two more days, complained about being banned out of the blue and and then completely ignored website and never went back.

---

My Christmas wish is history repeats itself here.

---

You are so mean, Boz. I was nice to you and only started talking shit about you after you turned on me.