Protect your family from eating Chinese made food.

I got this from a good friend. I assume it's accurate.

ALWAYS READ THE LABELS ON THE FOODS YOU BUY--NO MATTER WHAT THE FRONT OF THE BOX OR PACKAGE SAYS, TURN IT OVER AND READ THE BACK---CAREFULLY!
With all the food ...and pet products now coming from China , it is best to make sure you read label at the grocery store and especially Walmart when buying food products.
Many products no longer show where they were made, only give where the distributor is located.
It is important to read the bar code to track it's origin.
How to read Bar Codes .... interesting!
This may be useful to know when grocery shopping, if it's a concern to you.
GREAT WAY TO "BUY USA & CANADA " AND NOT FROMCHINA!!
The whole world is concerned about China-made "black hearted goods".
Can you differentiate which one is made in Taiwan or China ?
If the first 3 digits of the barcode are 690 691 or 692, the product is MADE IN CHINA.
471 is Made in Taiwan .
This is our right to know, but the government and related departments never educate the
public, therefore we have to RESCUE ourselves.
Nowadays, Chinese businessmen know that consumers do not prefer products "MADE IN CHINA", so they don't show from which country it is made.
However, you may now refer to the barcode - remember if the first 3 digits are:
690-692 ... then it is MADE IN CHINA
00 - 09 ... USA & CANADA
30 - 37 FRANCE
40 - 44 GERMANY
471 ... Taiwan
49 ... JAPAN
50 ... UK

BUY USA & CANADIAN MADE by watching for "0" at the beginning of the number.
We need every boost we can get! Pass this on to everybody on your E-Mail Contact List!!
If the government won't help us, we MUST help ourselves.

You are not wrong but what you suggest is near impossible these days for most people.
Most people don't have enough money to be able to afford what you suggest.
The governing bodies sold out long ago to China and China has infiltrated every aspect of American Life.
Even if you buy American you will find out the company has some sort of ties to China.
I bought a Ford Truck but you can trust that many of the parts are Made In China.
Even the Ham you buy at the Grocery Store that is Made in America is owned by China... etc etc.
You could blame Truman with the MacArthur situation but I am sure it started much earlier than that.
The world allowed Germany to rebuild its Army to 5th in the world just recently.
I think they are ranked 13th at the moment and this is less than 100 years after WW2.
Japan is currently ranked 5th.
We sold out to Sony long ago.
As I said before... America is a business and we are basically a bunch of whores.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vyo4urabLw

blackhole wrote:

I got this from a good friend. I assume it's accurate.

All due respect you believe in MDawg!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blackhole

I got this from a good friend. I assume it's accurate.

ALWAYS READ THE LABELS ON THE FOODS YOU BUY--NO MATTER WHAT THE FRONT OF THE BOX OR PACKAGE SAYS, TURN IT OVER AND READ THE BACK---CAREFULLY!
With all the food ...and pet products now coming from China , it is best to make sure you read label at the grocery store and especially Walmart when buying food products.
Many products no longer show where they were made, only give where the distributor is located.
It is important to read the bar code to track it's origin.
How to read Bar Codes .... interesting!
This may be useful to know when grocery shopping, if it's a concern to you.
GREAT WAY TO "BUY USA & CANADA " AND NOT FROMCHINA!!
The whole world is concerned about China-made "black hearted goods".
Can you differentiate which one is made in Taiwan or China ?
If the first 3 digits of the barcode are 690 691 or 692, the product is MADE IN CHINA.
471 is Made in Taiwan .
This is our right to know, but the government and related departments never educate the
public, therefore we have to RESCUE ourselves.
Nowadays, Chinese businessmen know that consumers do not prefer products "MADE IN CHINA", so they don't show from which country it is made.
However, you may now refer to the barcode - remember if the first 3 digits are:
690-692 ... then it is MADE IN CHINA
00 - 09 ... USA & CANADA
30 - 37 FRANCE
40 - 44 GERMANY
471 ... Taiwan
49 ... JAPAN
50 ... UK

BUY USA & CANADIAN MADE by watching for "0" at the beginning of the number.
We need every boost we can get! Pass this on to everybody on your E-Mail Contact List!!
If the government won't help us, we MUST help ourselves.

---

Hey, BH. You finally made yourself useful. Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

You are not wrong but what you suggest is near impossible these days for most people.
Most people don't have enough money to be able to afford what you suggest.
The governing bodies sold out long ago to China and China has infiltrated every aspect of American Life.
Even if you buy American you will find out the company has some sort of ties to China.
I bought a Ford Truck but you can trust that many of the parts are Made In China.
Even the Ham you buy at the Grocery Store that is Made in America is owned by China... etc etc.
You could blame Truman with the MacArthur situation but I am sure it started much earlier than that.
The world allowed Germany to rebuild its Army to 5th in the world just recently.
I think they are ranked 13th at the moment and this is less than 100 years after WW2.
Japan is currently ranked 5th.
We sold out to Sony long ago.
As I said before... America is a business and we are basically a bunch of whores.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vyo4urabLw

---

The Chi-Comm's have used the trade deficit money to buy up a lot of shit in the U.S.A.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blackhole

I got this from a good friend. I assume it's accurate.

ALWAYS READ THE LABELS ON THE FOODS YOU BUY--NO MATTER WHAT THE FRONT OF THE BOX OR PACKAGE SAYS, TURN IT OVER AND READ THE BACK---CAREFULLY!
With all the food ...and pet products now coming from China , it is best to make sure you read label at the grocery store and especially Walmart when buying food products.
Many products no longer show where they were made, only give where the distributor is located.
It is important to read the bar code to track it's origin.
How to read Bar Codes .... interesting!
This may be useful to know when grocery shopping, if it's a concern to you.
GREAT WAY TO "BUY USA & CANADA " AND NOT FROMCHINA!!
The whole world is concerned about China-made "black hearted goods".
Can you differentiate which one is made in Taiwan or China ?
If the first 3 digits of the barcode are 690 691 or 692, the product is MADE IN CHINA.
471 is Made in Taiwan .
This is our right to know, but the government and related departments never educate the
public, therefore we have to RESCUE ourselves.
Nowadays, Chinese businessmen know that consumers do not prefer products "MADE IN CHINA", so they don't show from which country it is made.
However, you may now refer to the barcode - remember if the first 3 digits are:
690-692 ... then it is MADE IN CHINA
00 - 09 ... USA & CANADA
30 - 37 FRANCE
40 - 44 GERMANY
471 ... Taiwan
49 ... JAPAN
50 ... UK

BUY USA & CANADIAN MADE by watching for "0" at the beginning of the number.
We need every boost we can get! Pass this on to everybody on your E-Mail Contact List!!
If the government won't help us, we MUST help ourselves.

---

The Taiwanese won’t eat “made in China” either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Hey, BH. You finally made yourself useful. Thanks.

---

Yeah, with the 690, 691, and 691+1, numbers. The D'COVI numbers. (061119.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Hey, BH. You finally made yourself useful. Thanks.

---

Yeah, with the 690, 691, and 691+1, numbers. The D'COVI numbers. (061119.)

---

For LMR and monet: I was completely unaware of this until a friend passed it along. So, for what it's worth, does this remind you of anybody?

Revelation 13:5

Revelation 13:5, "And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words, and it was allowed to exercise authority for forty-two months."

Gee, there's that number 42, again. "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)

Of course, the digits of the number 153, which, I guess, along with 173, forms the 42nd dimension.

153 ---> 135, as 173 ---> 137.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

For LMR and monet: I was completely unaware of this until a friend passed it along. So, for what it's worth, does this remind you of anybody?

Revelation 13:5

---

Trump and Fox News is really in your head huh lol??
It seems they really bother you.
I believe that CNN, MSNBC, FOX NEWS and the like are basically for entertainment.
I hardly watch them but recently with the Chink Virus I have flipped back and forth of all the stations.
It certainly isn't the news I grew up with.
To me it seems like some entertainment, propaganda machine.
And that is all of them not just the Liberal side or the Conservative side... they both are ridiculous.
What is with the Chink Virus Images in the background all the time??
I find those floating images to be very offensive.
However, I have to change the channel pretty quick as they both just talk complete, emotional nonsense.
You act as if Hilary won the election we would be on easy street.
It does not matter who is president as Lyndon Johnson basically proved that notion.
Corporate America has taken over long ago.

I am pretty sure we haven't seen the Beast yet.
It could be figurative and not a literal person and if it is a person these were stronger candidates than Trump.
Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Amin, Mugabe, Kim Jong, Brezhnev, Hirota, Hirohito, Kai-shek, Wilhelm II, Ho Chi Minh, Hussein... etc etc.
The list is much longer but I got tired of typing out leaders of the world in the last century or so that are completely worse than Trump.
You don't like Trump... ok ok... he won't be in office forever and you can complain about the next guy unless you agree with the next guy.
In which case you will have to defend instead of attack.

It figures that we would think the Beast or Anti-Christ would come from America lol.
Egotistical American Bullshit!
I see no ground for that line of thought.
Plenty of other countries for these entities to come from if they are actual flesh.
China is about to take over the world anyway.
If not through pandemic, trade or war they will just assimilate everyone through reproduction.

Is there any way to differentiate between US and Canada? Personally I prefer to try to not support the sport of hockey, if possible, and I don’t really consume syrup anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

The Chi-Comm's have used the trade deficit money to buy up a lot of shit in the U.S.A.

---

It's quite a good gig they have going. Their government prints them up fiat (paper with ink on it) and then they exchange it for physical assets here in the United States such as expensive real estate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

The Chi-Comm's have used the trade deficit money to buy up a lot of shit in the U.S.A.

---

It's quite a good gig they have going. Their government prints them up fiat (paper with ink on it) and then they exchange it for physical assets here in the United States such as expensive real estate.

---

Dollar denominated assets are purchased in dollars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

The Chi-Comm's have used the trade deficit money to buy up a lot of shit in the U.S.A.

---

It's quite a good gig they have going. Their government prints them up fiat (paper with ink on it) and then they exchange it for physical assets here in the United States such as expensive real estate.

---

Dollar denominated assets are purchased in dollars.

---

Holy smokes thanks for that !! I was thinking that Chinese Renminbi could be exchanged for USD and then the resulting USD could be used to purchase physical US assets. What was I thinking (I should have put the intermediate step in my previous post, but I just figured I wouldn't get nitpicked over semantics) ? Anyway thanks for setting me straight.

But the only reason they can exchange their currency for dollars is because the counterparties want their currency...to buy their goods.

I'm trying to understand what your "good gig" notion is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

But the only reason they can exchange their currency for dollars is because the counterparties want their currency...to buy their goods.

I'm trying to understand what your "good gig" notion is.

---

Trading paper with ink on it for physical assets - like getting a house for handing over a briefcase loaded with paper that has ink on it. A counterparty will take the action because they take a vig when they do the currency exchange (of Renminbi to USD).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

But the only reason they can exchange their currency for dollars is because the counterparties want their currency...to buy their goods.

I'm trying to understand what your "good gig" notion is.

---

Trading paper with ink on it for physical assets - like getting a house for handing over a briefcase loaded with paper that has ink on it. A counterparty will take the action because they take a vig when they do the currency exchange (of Renminbi to USD).

---

Market makers take a vig. Counterpartys pay the vig, because they want the currency, because there is an enormous demand for Chinese goods.

Furthermore your disparaging remakes about currency apply to all cash transactions...what does any of that have to do with China?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

But the only reason they can exchange their currency for dollars is because the counterparties want their currency...to buy their goods.

I'm trying to understand what your "good gig" notion is.

---

Trading paper with ink on it for physical assets - like getting a house for handing over a briefcase loaded with paper that has ink on it. A counterparty will take the action because they take a vig when they do the currency exchange (of Renminbi to USD).

---

Market makers take a vig. Counterpartys pay the vig, because they want the currency, because there is an enormous demand for Chinese goods.

Furthermore your disparaging remakes about currency apply to all cash transactions...what does any of that have to do with China?

---

A person who wants to pay for a house will pay the vig to the market maker to get the correct paper with ink on it (USD) so that they can exchange it (paper with ink on it that has the shape of a former US president) for the physical asset (the house). What it has to do with China is that the Chinese government prints up fiat, gives it to its citizenry (retired government officials and people closely affiliated with the Chinese government) and then they come over here and buy up real estate (exchanging it for US dollars first), like in Vancouver, Canada, or silicon valley for example.

I don't see why China would fund such purchases through ad hoc currency printing as opposed to normal budgetary avenues, but regardless why would it matter?

The Chinese government possesses enormous purchasing power ultimately because there is such high demand for Chinese goods.

If the paper currency for which you have some unexplained contempt were the key to China's purchasing power then countries like Vietnam or Somalia or Croatia would have exactly the same ability.

A Somali gets a briefcase filled with Somali cash and starts buying up US properties willy-nilly, right?

No. Because nobody wants Somali cash because Somalia does not produce anything that US purchasers want to buy.

It seems to me what you are doing here is connecting China making strategic purchases through proxies (sounds true to me) to Chinese currency manipulation (also sounds true but completely unlike what you are describing, it actually reduces Chinese purchasing power).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

it actually reduces Chinese purchasing power).

---

So having physical-asset (real-estate) backed currency weakens the currency ?
Delineating a strategy is not an indicator of contempt. I have no idea how you came up with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

it actually reduces Chinese purchasing power).

---

So having physical-asset backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency ?

---

Currency manipulation of the sort often attributed to China is a deliberate attempt to weaken the currency relative to the currency of an economic competitor.

What you were describing is not currency manipulation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

it actually reduces Chinese purchasing power).

---

So having physical-asset backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency ?

---

Currency manipulation of the sort often attributed to China is a deliberate attempt to weaken the currency relative to the currency of an economic competitor.

What you were describing is not currency manipulation.

---

So increasing the amount of physicaly-asset-backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency then right ? It's a yes or no question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

So having physical-asset backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency ?

---

Currency manipulation of the sort often attributed to China is a deliberate attempt to weaken the currency relative to the currency of an economic competitor.

What you were describing is not currency manipulation.

---

So increasing the amount of physicaly-asset-backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency then right ? It's a yes or no question.

---

I'm not sure what you're talking about but any purchase of dollar-denominated assets with Chinese currency should weaken the latter with respect to the former.

A lot of Americans have been eating Chinese food that they didn't know was Chinese food. This is the kind of companies China owns in the U.S.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrW...zocr313yVaqCI-

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Currency manipulation of the sort often attributed to China is a deliberate attempt to weaken the currency relative to the currency of an economic competitor.

What you were describing is not currency manipulation.

---

So increasing the amount of physicaly-asset-backed currency (real-estate) weakens the currency then right ? It's a yes or no question.

---

I'm not sure what you're talking about but any purchase of dollar-denominated assets with Chinese currency should weaken the latter with respect to the former.

---

So if a Chinese citizen buys dollar-denominated gold bars with Renminbi (by exchanging it with dollars and then making the gold purchase) it weakens the Renminbi I guess. A house is a different asset than gold but the same thing should apply. Having a gold-backed currency strengthens it - and so it is with any other physical assets like real estate.

You would just buy the dollars and hoard them if you wanted to weaken your currency, as far as I know. (Or maybe T-bills or something like that, I don't know.)

Your transaction costs would be much lower and dollars will always be more liquid with respect to a given currency (for when you want your money back) than assets that have to be converted to dollars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

You would just buy the dollars and hoard them if you wanted to weaken your currency, as far as I know. (Or maybe T-bills or something like that, I don't know.)

Your transaction costs would be much lower and dollars will always be more liquid with respect to a given currency (for when you want your money back) than assets that have to be converted to dollars.

---

But if your goal was to buy up a nation's physical assets so that you own that country (the original premise - not the currency manipulation strawman you inserted into the conversation), then you could give your citizenry fiat (paper with ink on it) and then have them purchase the physical assets (like real estate) of that country. On the other topic (the strawman), if you back a currency up with a physical asset, whether it's gold,silver.real estate, oil etc. you strengthen the currency.

Is there any way from the number code to separate between US and Canada?

Currency manipulation was not a strawman but my attempt to make sense of your fixation on China printing money, which remains mysterious to me.

Buying assets with a currency is not the same as backing the currency with them. Neither US nor Chinese currency is asset backed.

If China wants to buy American assets they can do so as far as US law allows. Farther than that they can do it illegally through proxies (although as I understand it countries like China and Russia do this in an ambiguous way that is not necessarily illegal).

Either way printing money has nothing in particular to do with this. The Chinese government has undoubtedly a vast budget to work with because China is a very wealthy country that has taxes. Printing money is no more or less essential to their revenue than it is for any other country as far as I know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Currency manipulation was not a strawman but my attempt to make sense of your fixation on China printing money, which remains mysterious to me.

Buying assets with a currency is not the same as backing the currency with them. Neither US nor Chinese currency is asset backed.

If China wants to buy American assets they can do so as far as US law allows. Farther than that they can do it illegally through proxies (although as I understand it countries like China and Russia do this in an ambiguous way that is not necessarily illegal).

Either way printing money has nothing in particular to do with this. The Chinese government has undoubtedly a vast budget to work with because China is a very wealthy country that has taxes. Printing money is no more or less essential to their revenue than it is for any other country as far as I know.

---

When physical assets are purchased with printed fiat handed to (not worked for or earned) its citizenry for the purpose of owning another country then it's a pretty good gig. I apologize for saying that US currency is asset backed. Oh wait, I never wrote that. If your money supply is converted to physical assets, you are effectively hedging against inflation which is also the primary purpose of backing a currency with a physical asset - so effectively, they are backing it up with physical assets. Regardless of how strong the Chinese economy is, I was writing about the process of taking unearned money and converting it to physical assets.

First of all governments do not normally fund their expenditures through printing money AFAIK. If they did there would be rapid annual inflation in countries like the US where the federal budget is 21% of GDP (per google).

But second even if they did...why would this not be "worked for or earned" any more than any other method of government funding?

Or if you think all purchases of assets by governments are bad for some reason, why single China out?

As I said earlier I think you are conflating the issue of a rival country making strategic purchases of US assets with some obscure notion that purchases by sovereign governments are cheating because they can print money. The former is a legitimate national security concern, the latter is just voodoo as far as I can tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

A lot of Americans have been eating Chinese food that they didn't know was Chinese food. This is the kind of companies China owns in the U.S.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrW...zocr313yVaqCI-

---

BTW, Smithfield Foods, owned by the Chi-Comms is a 5 billion dollar company. And they own plenty more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

First of all governments do not normally fund their expenditures through printing money AFAIK. If they did there would be rapid annual inflation in countries like the US where the federal budget is 21% of GDP (per google).

But second even if they did...why would this not be "worked for or earned" any more than any other method of government funding?

Or if you think all purchases of assets by governments are bad for some reason, why single China out?

As I said earlier I think you are conflating the issue of a rival country making strategic purchases of US assets with some obscure notion that purchases by sovereign governments are cheating because they can print money. The former is a legitimate national security concern, the latter is just voodoo as far as I can tell.

---

Giving people fiat and then having them bring that fiat to another country to buy up all the real estate is what I'm stating here. If you choose to believe this is not occurring or that it is but that it has no effect on the well-being of the economy of the United States or its citizens that is your business. I believe it does occur and that it does affect things adversely.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

Revelation 13:5, "And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words, and it was allowed to exercise authority for forty-two months."

Gee, there's that number 42, again. "The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)

Of course, the digits of the number 153, which, I guess, along with 173, forms the 42nd dimension.

153 ---> 135, as 173 ---> 137.

---

Getting back to the 153/173 numbers. There are two very basic ways in which these two numbers are connected.

Firstly, by sums of squares. 3^2 + 12^2 = 153; and 2^2 + 13^2 = 173. The progression that results from subtracting 1 from the first number to be squared, while, adding 1 to the second number to be squared. The next number in this progression is, 1^2 + 14^2 = 197. The previous number is, 4^2 + 11^2 = 137. Note that 153 is "on" 173 because of the way that the 2's, and 3's, shift about the other to make up the 153, and 173. Note also the numbers 137, and 197 involve the numbers 1, 4, 11, and 14. A bit of symmetry going on about the 153/173 turn-around spot.

Secondly, by sums of cubes. The pattern by which 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3 = 153, and, 1^3 + 7^3 + 3^3 = 371, may be extended by padding these numbers with the digits 0, 3, and 6.

1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3 = 153;
16^3 + 50^3 + 33^3 = 165033;
166^3 + 500^3 + 333^3 = 166500333;
1666^3 + 5000^3 + 3333^3 = 166650003333; and so on.

Similarly for the other side, with the padding in reverse, the new digits go on the other sides of the original numbers.

3^3 + 7^3 +1^3 = 371;
33^3 + 67^3 + 01^3 = 336701;
333^3 + 667^3 + 001^3=333667001;
3333^3 + 6667^3 + 0001^3 = 33366670001; and so on.

Another thing I noticed with the numbers from BH was that, eg, 692 = 4*173. Some other relevant "fun" numbers. 365 = 5*73 = (4 + 1)*73; 365 = (-1 + 53)*7 + 1; and 365 = 4*(13 X 7) + 1. As well, forty-two months amounts to 3.5 X 1 year.

How can the basic algebraic results and properties of numbers matter? Well, if we take the math to be numbers, and the physics to be dimensions, then there is a dimensional equation beginning with where the mathematical point coincides with the physical point. Then it can be determined which dimensions are the very basic ones, from where numbers such as the above coincide to form the turn-around dimensions.

Any and all corrections welcome. "Wonky" numbers are easy to get jumbled up. Maybe, tomorrow, I can get around to tying up some loose-ends about the number 644, from Deech, and the numbers that Monet seems to spout out without knowing it. I don't know that Monet knows what he's talking about, half the time, but some okay numbers come out of him. Ha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcap

Is there any way from the number code to separate between US and Canada?

---

Bump

I am honoring St. Micks Day!
Otherwise known as Nevada Casino Day.
I hope the plate, mat and food are made in America but I doubt it.
Basic New England Boil without Cabbage as I switched in roasted Cauliflower instead.
Most likely sacrilegious to any Good Irish Catholic.
Below are pictures of plates for Mick 1 and Mick 2.
Pass the Mustard Please!

Just cut that piece of fat off the meat and you'll be fine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

Maybe, tomorrow, I can get around to tying up some loose-ends about the number 644, from Deech, and the numbers that Monet seems to spout out without knowing it. I don't know that Monet knows what he's talking about, half the time, but some okay numbers come out of him. Ha.

---

Well, tomorrow is here. It's good to, again, have a bit of free time. If a few numbers aren't your thing, then just skip this post. I'm not so much into the internet betting stuff, but, I wonder that there will be another surge in virus cases, after this one plateaus, and, then, dips a bit.

Here is Monet's post, from the grocery thread. I will leave the number stuff at Monet's shopping trips to just this one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

I went to El Super today around 5pm.
Probably not a great time to go shopping.
No lines this time and they had everything I wanted in stock.
I didn't see any limits on any items but I didn't check everything.
I bought 11 lbs of chicken, 6 lbs of beef and 5 lbs of pork.
I got a bunch of oranges, lemons and other vegetables.
40 eggs, a gallon of milk, 2 loaves of bread and a marble cake.
Got a few other snacks as well and the cart was full before I realized it.
125 dollars later I was out the door.

---

The digits of the second part, of Monet's post, are, numerically, fairly straightforward, and, stand on their own.

40 + 2 = 42; or, 4121 = 317*13. And, 125 = (1)5^3.

The first part is what tied into the number, 644. I was amazing how virtually most of these early numbers tied together.

Put the 11, 6, and 5, lbs together for 1165 lbs / 5 pm = 233. 2*233 = 466 ---> 644, Deech's number, by doubling the 4 where the 6's are.

As with the post about 644, also 466 has representations by 4's, 6's, and 9's. Of course, though, these representations didn't work out nearly as neatly as with the number, 168.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deech

644 virus cases at the plant. I predict a LMR numerology compilation forthcoming.

---

644 = 9*72 - 4 = 9*9*8 - 4 = [9^(1 + 1)][10 - (1 + 1)] - [1 + sqrt(9)] ---> 91111119;

644 = 4*161 = sqrt(16)*161 ---> 16161;

644 = 14*2*(24-1) = (4 + 10)(1 + 1)(10 -1 + 14) ---> 41111114.

---

466 = 2*233 = 2{-[(9 + 1) / 2] + 2*119} = {-[9 + (1 + 1)^0] + 2*2*119] ---> 9111111119; and

466 = 2*233 = 2{-sqrt(9) + 2(-1 + 119)} = {-[sqrt(9)]2 + 2*2(-1 + 119)} ---> 91111111119.

466 = 2*233 = [2(116 + 1) - 1]2 ---> 111161111; and

466 = 2 + 116*2*2 = (1 + 1) + 116(1 + 1)(1 + 1) ---> 111161111.

466 = 2*233 = 2[(4 - 1) + 2(1 + 114)] = [(4 + 2) + 2*2(1 + 114)] ---> 41111111114; and

466 = (114 + 2)4 + 2 = [114 + (2 + 1 / 2)]4 = {(4 + 110) + [(1 + 1) + (1 + 1)^0] / (1 + 1)}4 ---> 4111111114.

So, there's a way to do each of these representations with eight 1's. Some have nine. I like to try for the same numbers, or, to have the numbers average out, in other ways.

Incidentally, I found another two ways to thusly represent 644, in terms of 6's.

644 = [(-10 / 2) + 166]2*2 ---> 1111661111; and

644 = 2*161*2 = (1 + 1)161(1 + 1) ---> 1116111.

Neither manner quite fits in with the separate 4's and 9's that have six 1's in between.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

If v = 22, with z = 26, then, I guess, off hand, kinetic E ---> (1 / 2)59 = (1 / 2)[6(10) - 1] ---> (1 / 2)611, so that we are, maybe, back to the alternative Jackie Robinson "method" of trying to make 42.

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post110269

---

Incidentally, the (1 +1)^0 trick seems a way to make the (1 / 2)611 work out. Well, (1 / 2)611 = {[(1 + 1)^0]611} / 2 ---> 11611 / 2 ---> 42 / 2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LMR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deech

As a Brooklyn native, the number 42 relates to one specific individual, Jackie Robinson. Since I try to stay way from politics and we have three inches of snow on the ground, I though I would glance at this Hall of Fame's statistics.

Damn, the virus and snow has caused me to become a hybrid of Monet and LMR (try putting them both together in the same room).

If you take Jackie's: RBI total minus Batting Average minus Home Runs minus Steals of Home (a major league record at the time) minus date of debut divided by number of all star appearances…...what do you get? Number 42

734 - 311 - 137 - 19 - 15 ./. 6 = 42

I showed my wife this equation with enthusiasm. She demanded that I take my first drink of the day.

---

Those numbers not including 42 add to 1222 = (1 + 1)*611 ---> 11611; 42 = 6^2 + 6 = 6^(1 + 1) + 6 ---> 6116. This is like the number 611 facing outward, or inward, with overlapping 6's, or 11's.

In other words, you can go from 1222 to 11611, to 6116, to 42.

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post102344

---

Anyway, always likely another error or two. It's not much fun re-trudging through a bunch of numbers.