The narcissistic, sadistic prick got a taste of his own made for TV medicine:
Printable View
The narcissistic, sadistic prick got a taste of his own made for TV medicine:
We'll see what happens in 2022 and 2024. Dems are afraid of Trump. That's why they are trying hard to disqualify him from holding office again.
They had to commit blatant election fraud to get Chinese-owned Biden into office. Thanks to that, along with the fact that Twitter banned the account of a sitting president, a much larger segment of the 1st world population now understands just who calls the shots and how corrupt things are.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
On the othre hand, due to recent events one might reasonably conclude that the claims of election fraud are completely unproven and wholly without merit; "Where's the Beef?"
So far as banning him from social media, it seems an extreme action taken against what they might reasonably believe to be an extreme threat, i.e. insurrection.
Is Trump culpable?
Maybe it's like a girl who is a real tease who strokes and sucks til the guy is ready to pop then stops and says "go home" and then feigns shock when he follows up and bangs her over her objections.
Then again he never told the crowd to go home, he said (falsely) that he'd join them on the march to the Capitol, so perhaps a different analogy would be more apt.
Why didn't he accompany the crowd to the Capitol like he said he would?
Were he leading the crowd he could have told them once they arrived to stay outside and protest, but he was MIA.
It should be obvious that Trump is a craven coward ("I cannot be drafted I have bone spurs").
Shut the fuck up you communist bottom scum feeding lawyer.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I'm a Libertarian, not a communist.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhole
Don't know what "bottom scum feeding" means exactly, but whatever I've done must have worked given the fact my net worth is more than I will likely need for the rest of my life.
Instead of flippant putdowns you might want to try posting something which is *cough* "cogent."
It's very hard to respond cogent when responding to a person that stands for everything wrong going on.
You wear blinkers like a thoroughbred in a race so you could only see what's in front of you. The hell with everyone around you. It's your way or the highway. As much as you hate Trump, it's assholes like you that got him elected and put China Joe and the phony Black bitch in our White House.
Really?
How did I get him elected, other than by not voting for Trump?
I voted for Jorgensen.
My long term antipathy for Trump has been proven to be well-grounded, given the insurrection.
Look, I know you and a lot of other Trumpies don't want things to change, certainly you don't want our country to adopt radical progressive policies; I don't either.
The recent election and following insurrection showed that you are not alone in that belief.
But this is a democracy; your candidate lost.
My candidate also lost and you don't see me storming the Capitol and oiling an AK-47.
This country needs something to try to unify us, but other than war (against another country, not against ourselves) I have no suggestion.
There was no insurrection. Repeat. There was no insurrection. I'll say again. There was no insurrection. You socialist bags of shit spout nothing but bullshit. There will never be unification because of you socialist assholes banning and canceling anything you don't like.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
WTF are you calling me a "socialist" for?
Oh, if the storming of the Capitol building was not an "insurrection," then what was it?
Just a couple of frat boys on a panty raid?
Fuck no!
For the fist time since the early 1800's the Capitol was attacked, its defenses breached, and at least one defender died during the attack.
What you call "patriots" others will soon call "convicted felons."
You DO recall that Trump used to be a Democrat, don't you?
That cocksucker is much more of a lying, conniving chameleon than I'll ever be.
I would like a tax rebate for all the dollars wasted on security spending. Pretty sad that they were even allowed into the building itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Then again there is video evidence of Capitol police opening the doors for them. Now there is evidence pointing to Antifa dressed as Trump supporters emerging as the ones who caused the violence. That is why the government is backing down the insurrection speak.
The government wants to go easy on these guys because they're "antifa" and not "proud-boys"? Thats basically what you're saying. Somehow I find that doubtful. Antifa are anarchists from my understanding. I've always seen anarchists as far right. I don't think these extremist anti-government groups are looked at that differently by government people.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenI would like a tax rebate for all the dollars wasted on security spending. Pretty sad that they were even allowed into the building itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Then again there is video evidence of Capitol police opening the doors for them. Now there is evidence pointing to Antifa dressed as Trump supporters emerging as the ones who caused the violence. That is why the government is backing down the insurrection speak.
When has government liked antifa?
Nonsensical manipulations.
Everything blamed on antifa. Even the fires which were most assuredly made worse by climate change was somehow blamed on these antifa. Crazy shit. Social media - where you don't get credit for being truthful, only for how many followers you have.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...merica/617631/ is a pretty good take.
LOL! Reagan used to be a democrat to. He said "I didn't leave the democrat party. The democrat party left me." Now, for all this overthrow the government bullshit you lefties keeping screaming....please name at least one individual that has been charged with sedition. You can't do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
There is no hurry for the government to file sedition charges, there's plenty of time, and I am sure the feds are investigating and discussing what to do and when.
If the rioters didn't break into the Capitol and murder people in order to overthrow the government, what then was their avowed purpose in doing so?
Honestly maxpen, I thought you were at least somewhat above the nonsense propaganda.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I saw this graphic on Facebook. The guy who posted it deleted my comments.
It conveniently skips the fact that a cop was bludgeoned to death (well died later after the scene).
5 people died there. This is more than Bengazi if we wish to play the stupid game.
Almost no one supported the ransacking of businesses of any of this other stuff. Looting Congress.. can you even name one of these other 150 federal buildings?
I could pick at it a bit more.
My bad for believing you were a thinking man.
The sharp people have realized a long time ago how powerful memes are for controlling people. People don't think. They just repost them.
Sure can. The Foley Federal building right here in Las Vegas sustained about 70k worth of damages. Along with the US Courthouse. We also had a cop shot in the head that almost died and will never walk again.. Along with many other police officers that were attacked in the streets.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHonestly maxpen, I thought you were at least somewhat above the nonsense propaganda.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I saw this graphic on Facebook. The guy who posted it deleted my comments.
It conveniently skips the fact that a cop was bludgeoned to death (well died later after the scene).
5 people died there. This is more than Bengazi if we wish to play the stupid game.
Almost no one supported the ransacking of businesses of any of this other stuff. Looting Congress.. can you even name one of these other 150 federal buildings?
I could pick at it a bit more.
My bad for believing you were a thinking man.
The sharp people have realized a long time ago how powerful memes are for controlling people. People don't think. They just repost them.
This was a scene repeated thruout the nation. I could probably Google something like "federal building damaged during riots" and find most of the 150 claimed. But why bother? I witnessed the Summer of Love destruction firsthand.
Who did they intentionally kill?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
LOL. Get some perspective, fellas.
The first line of the "category comparison" says it all.
This is going to wind up just like the "coronavirus is like the flu" nonsense. The comparison was made back in February and March and people screamed to holy hell how Covid-19 was no worse than the flu. Well, a year later, not so much like the flu.
See, that first line is (by choice) comparing seven months of one thing with one day of another, like that's a reasonable thing to do. The author conveniently presumes that the right wings protests will have a one-day, one-event duration.
That is prima facie ridiculous.
When the smoke clears from 2021 right wing damage and deaths, then you can compare them to seven months of protests.
Or, conversely, rather than choosing his specific purposeful starting points and ending points for the comparison, as the category author has done, one could choose to extend the date back to April 19, 1995 and compare that time bracket of right wing deaths versus BLM deaths.
I was driving cross-country and stopped in to see the Oklahoma City damage four months after the event. So I tend to remember it.
Choosing start and end dates to make a point. Just understand that is what the author is doing, and different points can be made with different start and end dates.
Welcome back red....
Fair enough. 70k in damages. I take it that wasn't stormed while occupied? Just external damages?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenSure can. The Foley Federal building right here in Las Vegas sustained about 70k worth of damages. Along with the US Courthouse. We also had a cop shot in the head that almost died and will never walk again.. Along with many other police officers that were attacked in the streets.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHonestly maxpen, I thought you were at least somewhat above the nonsense propaganda.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I saw this graphic on Facebook. The guy who posted it deleted my comments.
It conveniently skips the fact that a cop was bludgeoned to death (well died later after the scene).
5 people died there. This is more than Bengazi if we wish to play the stupid game.
Almost no one supported the ransacking of businesses of any of this other stuff. Looting Congress.. can you even name one of these other 150 federal buildings?
I could pick at it a bit more.
My bad for believing you were a thinking man.
The sharp people have realized a long time ago how powerful memes are for controlling people. People don't think. They just repost them.
This was a scene repeated thruout the nation. I could probably Google something like "federal building damaged during riots" and find most of the 150 claimed. But why bother? I witnessed the Summer of Love destruction firsthand.
Cop was shot in head, but he wasn't brutalized by a crowd? It is pretty easy for 1 person to shoot someone else.
I don't think the cop being shot was repeated that much and I can't think of one being killed without benefit of gun. You?
Still not seeing much quite comparable. We're talking about what is arguably the most important institution. The only worst thing that could happen would be Supreme Court stormed while in sesssion.
If I was the Justices/staff, I'd be asking Congress for some real guards going forward.
It is funny - Right says Ohhh! Peaceful? BLM Peaceful? Look at the antifa! They're not peaceful. BREAK IT UP
Then their guys storm the highest meeting point of our elected officials - trying to steal votes from Americans by preventing a lawful transition of power - tons of damage is done, cop is killed, others fear for their lives at times. Then we hear "Ohh it was the antifa! The only reason they weren't peaceful is because Antifa was there!".
Give the rest of America a fucking break with this bullshit, please. Not everyone has to be DiDi the lunatic and think on his level.
Or you could look at it in terms of level of violence, right? Add up all the violence in some quantifiable manner, then divide it out by the period over which is occurred. Why don't they do THAT?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Oh wait... that'd make the lunatic Trumper right look as dangerous as it is - which is to say just as dangerous as the Antifa.
...
Right blames the media for encouraging antifa when in fact that shit never happened but can't even begin to accept any level of culpability the President had in creating what happened.
Fact is, antifa people are not taking orders from CNN.
Look around here and you can see multiple brainless bots who would kill their mother if Trump told them it was the thing to do. Trump mocks their religion and values by his behavior, yet still, they're with him until the end.
Ha, I gave up on that here, about the time Mendelson suspended me under the username ThomasClines (anagram for slot machines).Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I had already deduced that Singer was a neurotic nut, so, I let him be. In the mean time (not meantime), though, over the summer of discontent, most of the posters here went from bad to ugly, with Crimm and Singer at the forefront. For a while, I thought that Buttplay/Tablepooey (along with Monet) might make some sense, but, he, too, perpetually found the deep end of the pool. Not even Johnny come lately, MrV, could compete with, counter this sort and degree of idiocy.
Yes, interesting times, but only to be on such a gambling forum. A tribute to the fact that a virus from the cold family outsmarted the world.
Anyway, to all the idiotic gamblers, I say that I am still here having some fun. But, what happened to you? I recall claiming, years ago, that if I had a nickel or two for every idiotic gambler who bad mouthed me, about my trying to keep things real, and, then, took off, well, then I'd be rich. Big talkers who just ran away into oblivion. Not a single one, ever, came back to say, gee, Garnabby, maybe, you were right.
Cops were beaten, shot, and rammed with an SUV in Minneapolis. Police stations were taken over/occupied by the mob and completely destroyed in Seattle. As well as residential areas that the police abandoned. Businesses were burned. People were killed in the streets. You had a rapper handing out ar-15 rifles to kids from the back of his Tesla. He got a government contract instead of charges. Numerous buildings federal and private were damaged and burned in Portland. The cops there were beat daily by the mobs.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionFair enough. 70k in damages. I take it that wasn't stormed while occupied? Just external damages?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenSure can. The Foley Federal building right here in Las Vegas sustained about 70k worth of damages. Along with the US Courthouse. We also had a cop shot in the head that almost died and will never walk again.. Along with many other police officers that were attacked in the streets.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This was a scene repeated thruout the nation. I could probably Google something like "federal building damaged during riots" and find most of the 150 claimed. But why bother? I witnessed the Summer of Love destruction firsthand.
Cop was shot in head, but he wasn't brutalized by a crowd? It is pretty easy for 1 person to shoot someone else.
I don't think the cop being shot was repeated that much and I can't think of one being killed without benefit of gun. You?
Still not seeing much quite comparable. We're talking about what is arguably the most important institution. The only worst thing that could happen would be Supreme Court stormed while in sesssion.
If I was the Justices/staff, I'd be asking Congress for some real guards going forward.
It is funny - Right says Ohhh! Peaceful? BLM Peaceful? Look at the antifa! They're not peaceful. BREAK IT UP
Then their guys storm the highest meeting point of our elected officials - trying to steal votes from Americans by preventing a lawful transition of power - tons of damage is done, cop is killed, others fear for their lives at times. Then we hear "Ohh it was the antifa! The only reason they weren't peaceful is because Antifa was there!".
Give the rest of America a fucking break with this bullshit, please. Not everyone has to be DiDi the lunatic and think on his level.
There was only one dude charged for throwing the fire extinguisher and beating the cop with the flagpole.
None of it is right or just. None of it is defendable. But the precedent has already been established to drop charges, forgive and forget, by the same people that want to overblow events and amp up charges when it is they themselves the targets........fuck off with the left right BS. Both sides are nothing but a bunch of useless idiots.
Could you please provide us a list of all your usernames?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Banned and Active.
I kind of enjoy how you constantly throw this in the face of Dan Druff.
You constantly post how you have had multiple banning's on this forum yet return again and again under another name.
LMR
Bill Yung
Garnabby
ThomasClines
USpapergames???
LMR= check Bill Yung= check. Garnabby= check. ThomasClines= to lazy to look non memorable. USPapergames= Zero chance :)Quote:
Originally Posted by monetCould you please provide us a list of all your usernames?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Banned and Active.
I kind of enjoy how you constantly throw this in the face of Dan Druff.
You constantly post how you have had multiple banning's on this forum yet return again and again under another name.
LMR
Bill Yung
Garnabby
ThomasClines
USpapergames???
DesertRunner= UsPapergames :) serious post
Mendelson used to permanently ban Crimm and Singer for much worse stuff, all(?) the time, but, then, always, within a few weeks reinstate them. He banned me once, if I recall, for something quite minor. There's nothing wrong with suggesting that someone has a gambling problem. I never asked him, to be reinstated. Why? Can you find one post of mine that was a bannable offence here? Where was I warned off, but, then, ignored the warning? Profanity is allowed here. And, what, exactly, is the harm in successive usernames, so long as none is contemporaneous? If you want to voluntarily go from Monet-0 to Monet-1, or another username, then who should care whether you decided to drastically alter your on-line persona?Quote:
Originally Posted by monetCould you please provide us a list of all your usernames?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Banned and Active.
I kind of enjoy how you constantly throw this in the face of Dan Druff.
You constantly post how you have had multiple banning's on this forum yet return again and again under another name.
LMR
Bill Yung
Garnabby
ThomasClines
USpapergames???
If I recall, my only other username here was Onehitwonder. A full list, from Dan, of everyone banned, would be an interesting read. Can't be that many. Regardless, what Dan does is his own business. I never once emailed or otherwise tried to contact him. I never once didn't let the "chips" fall where they may. If anyone thinks that I'm a (Garna-) bitch on here, well, you should see me in the flesh. The old finger up more than one ass pretty far. I'm the type that if you want to play "chicken", then you had better be prepared to go all the way.
Trump could just create a new Twitter Account and talk about how great he is and People will most likely just assume it is a huge Pro Trump Fan and not Trump himself....Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThey had to commit blatant election fraud to get Chinese-owned Biden into office. Thanks to that, along with the fact that Twitter banned the account of a sitting president, a much larger segment of the 1st world population now understands just who calls the shots and how corrupt things are.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
OnehitwonderQuote:
Originally Posted by monetCould you please provide us a list of all your usernames?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Banned and Active.
I kind of enjoy how you constantly throw this in the face of Dan Druff.
You constantly post how you have had multiple banning's on this forum yet return again and again under another name.
LMR
Bill Yung
Garnabby
ThomasClines
USpapergames???
OopsIdiditagain Gambling Forums All his socks are retarded. Tasha's are funny 1 out of 10 times and 1 of our other posters, all of his are quite comical and entertaining to say least. There's no shortage of them!!Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayOnehitwonderQuote:
Originally Posted by monetCould you please provide us a list of all your usernames?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Banned and Active.
I kind of enjoy how you constantly throw this in the face of Dan Druff.
You constantly post how you have had multiple banning's on this forum yet return again and again under another name.
LMR
Bill Yung
Garnabby
ThomasClines
USpapergames???
Welcome to our newest member NDnathan !Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyOopsIdiditagain Gambling Forums All his socks are retarded. Tasha's are funny 1 out of 10 times and 1 of our other posters, all of his are quite comical and entertaining to say least. There's no shortage of them!!Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayOnehitwonderQuote:
Originally Posted by monet
Ozzy, you come off as a sixty-year-old man who made it out of grade-4. Typical so-called AP material.
Anyway, too bad, for you, that, according to the other chronologically challenged moron here, I fucked up your wonderful gambling forum.
What's the grievance if someone has multiple user names, unless he uses them in the same thread?
ThomasClines, Onehitwonder, Garnabby...what difference does it make what his username is?
See rule #6: "6) Duplicate accounts are not allowed here. You may only operate one account on the system."Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
While all rules are of course subject to "interpretation," it's clear to me that if you have more than one active account (i.e. one or more active socks in addition to your "normal" handle) then you should be banned.
The rule does not explain the grievance, and the rule does not call for banning.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Who cares if you post as Mister V in one thread and Mister X in another...what operative difference does it make?
I disagree.
If any poster has active accounts here under two or more different names that sure seems to be a bannable offense.
You wonder what operative difference it could make?
Here's an example: can you imagine Tasha or Carnabby "arguing" with herself / himself?
"Normal" people might not be tempted to do that, but ...
Lots of potential for mayhem if a board isn't properly monitored.
You are talking about someone with multiple user names posting in the same thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Here's what I wrote 3 posts earlier....
What's the grievance if someone has multiple user names, unless he uses them in the same thread?
ThomasClines, Onehitwonder, Garnabby...what difference does it make what his username is?
So your example doesn't apply.
This isn't divorce court counselor, your weak shit don't play up in here.
They're Dan's rules; if you can't follow them, if you feel compelled break the rules then get the fuck off the board.
"Weak shit" my eye.
Besides, people flame one another on different threads; e.g. your sock in the Free Speech thread could say "You know, that coach belly cretin really is an ignorant cocksucker and a despicable, uncaring lout for what he told Mr. V in the America Speaks thread."
Why is that a problem for the members?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Why does it matter if Mister V flames them in one thread and Mister X flames them in another?
Like this stuff?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
What are you even talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Hawking had a theory of everything? I stole it? I have a numerology fascination? Keep me on a short leash? Zebras now? My "mad scientist" shtick may be heartfelt or bullshit?
Perhaps, you are headed for a case of Lewy Body Dementia, especially with those animals of yours. Certainly, the symptoms, usually, begin to show up years before the disease, itself. One need only know what to look for.
On the other hand, to start with a few far-fetched wordy words, and, then, to try to embellish the hell out of them is a waste of time. An "existence" whereby one part simultaneously dreamed up the other.
No wonder that all your "stewing" has led you to another such "fine" discourse, this time, about the "legalities" of internet bans. How about stick a "sock" in it? Real men don't always play by the "rules", no matter the consequences. Call it another form of enlightenment.
Looks like you brought a dull knife to a gun fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
P.S. Of course, you made my evening. Good night, to you, sir.
Because it is dishonest and deceiful.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Obviously such issues are of little concern to you.
How are the sentiments dishonest or deceitful based on the screen name of the author?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Final answer: because the rules prohibit having more than one active account, i.e. "socks."
I'm done arguing the point with you, it's like mud-wrestling a pig.
The sentiments stand on their own merits, the spelling of the author's screen name doesn't change that.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You don't understand, so yes it's best if you stop arguing the point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWelcome to our newest member NDnathan !Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyOopsIdiditagain Gambling Forums All his socks are retarded. Tasha's are funny 1 out of 10 times and 1 of our other posters, all of his are quite comical and entertaining to say least. There's no shortage of them!!Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Hmm. Maybe we should watch out for this "New Member," on another Website, a "New Member," showed up out of the blue with a name that sounded eerily similar to one of my Sock's names... And, posted my REAL personal information. I am NOT as stupid as I may come across, so instead of admitting that it was my real Personal information by saying something like,"Why the fuck did you post my REAL personal information? How did you get my REAL personal information on the first place?" I merely reported the post(Don't respond to offending posts, just report them)and the offending "New Member," offending post was blacked out and my personal information was removed. That "New Member," despite NOT being banned never showed up again, proving they only joined to post my personal information. I already have doubts about Ndnathan.....
ANTIFA SPEAKS!! They got a big riot planned for Portland on Wednesday.
You know who else is from Portland? Some major league new-age numerological nutter. You should have seen the numerology forum light up like a Christmas tree, yesterday, when I pointed this out.
A quote, from Hubbard,
"Zachary K. Hubbard (1983–) is a paranoid, science-denying conspiracy theorist, blogger, YouTuber, and crank. Essentially, he believes that the entire world is fake (or "scripted", as he prefers to say), being run by a hidden force of evil Jesuits, the (NWO), the Illuminati, powers that be, etc, who control elections, terrorist attacks, the weather, natural disasters, sporting events, and celebrity/politician deaths by sacrificing them "by the numbers" on a near-daily basis for no apparent reason.[note 1] Yes, this is actually what he believes. He "proves" this with his secret weapon: new gematria, his very own conspiracy which claims that the powers that be are the ones responsible for all of this.Quote:
What I've done in this world is monumental. I have broken a code that nobody broke before. I have made more correct predictions about sports, celebrity deaths, and news stories than anyone has before. My work is truly important. I can't think of anyone in the history of this nation, literally, who has done something that's actually more important and empowering to the people. The knowledge that I have put out, which I have given to people for free for more than 4 years, and taught, you know, with non-stop dedication: this work has the power to do more for people than anything you can learn at any university, that you have to pay all this money for. So I don't want to hear about how Wikipedia thinks I'm insignificant, that's bullshit!
He runs a blog site[2] where he posts his grand "proofs" that, usually, can't even be falsified: his Youtube Channels (he usually runs several at a time) fair no better: many of his videos are just rehashed material from his blog site. He also runs a Patreon[3] where he charges $1 to $20 a month (depending on the membership level) to access more conspiracy nonsense, some chapters of his books, and some other pointless stuff.
Hubbard claims to be a former teacher at a public school in Seattle, Washington, before being terminated for unknown reasons. A fan of his unsuccessfully petitioned for his reinstatement.[11] However, there is an extremely good case to be made for the simple fact that he never was a public school teacher to be terminated. A request to the State of Washington[12] will verify that one Zachary K. Hubbard was never a public school teacher to begin with. While adding “fluff” to his life story, he seems to have neglected the fact that records about public school teachers are open to the public."
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zachary_K._Hubbard
Are you on their email notification list? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
How do you know? Link?
What exactly is it that you Trumplicans want Mickey Crimm? Do you want a civil war and divide up the country?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If that were to happen (divide up the country), you will end up with a liberal country comprised of New England and running down the east coast, through Virginia.....maybe even as far as Georgia, and running across the north probably dividing Pennsylvania and Ohio in half and including Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin.
You would have a second liberal country on the west coast states, including California, Oregon, Washington State, Nevada (probably cut in half), New Mexico, Colorado and parts of Arizona.
The rest of the country, mainly southern and sparsely populated middle of the country would be your conservative, gun toting area. And guess what? If you look up each state and what they contribute and take from the Federal government, almost every one of those States that would make up your new homeland takes more, Texas being the exception. So you are going to end up with a very poor territory with lots of people running around with guns trying to take what everyone else has. Go for it!
Meanwhile, states that currently pay far more into the Federal government than they get out, like California, can keep more of their money and might actually be able to solve some of their problems.
And by the way Mickey Crimm, this means that you no longer get your Social Security, Medicare or even Medicaid supplements that currently pays your Medicare Premium. (Even though your Medicaid program currently paying your medicare premium is a state program, it is funded federally). So be prepared to give all that up.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You are going to have to go back to making a living off casinos, wheeling your wheelchair around and there won't be many casinos available in your new territory because people wont have any money to spend at casinos, so you may have to go back even further to your hobo days. Good luck in your new republic. :confused:
That pretty much sums it up. You could go to a bunch of economics lectures and not get as succinct and solid a summary as kewlJ just laid out.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhat exactly is it that you Trumplicans want Mickey Crimm? Do you want a civil war and divide up the country?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If that were to happen (divide up the country), you will end up with a liberal country comprised of New England and running down the east coast, through Virginia.....maybe even as far as Georgia, and running across the north probably dividing Pennsylvania and Ohio in half and including Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin.
You would have a second liberal country on the west coast states, including California, Oregon, Washington State, Nevada (probably cut in half), New Mexico, Colorado and parts of Arizona.
The rest of the country, mainly southern and sparsely populated middle of the country would be your conservative, gun toting area. And guess what? If you look up each state and what they contribute and take from the Federal government, almost every one of those States that would make up your new homeland takes more, Texas being the exception. So you are going to end up with a very poor territory with lots of people running around with guns trying to take what everyone else has. Go for it!
Meanwhile, states that currently pay far more into the Federal government than they get out, like California, can keep more of their money and might actually be able to solve some of their problems.
And this is what you get when a political party's leaders are representing cash poor states like South Carolina and Kentucky, and when your ostensible next big Prez candidate is from Missouri. You get a lot of broke people in broke states lecturing other states how to be successful and "American" and trying to define what "American" is.
The funny thing is, rural America has embraced and annointed a wealthy east coast rich elitist as its champion.
Trump could give two shits about rural America, he thinks only of himself.
Look at what he does, and has done, not at what he says.
It's all bullshit in pursuit of money and power.
If you want to keep up with Antifa then follow Andy Ngo on twitter.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenAre you on their email notification list? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
How do you know? Link?
You are out of touch, V. The working class was frustrated for years by good jobs going overseas and the importation of cheap labor. The demopublicans (democrats and republicans) allowed all that to go on. Basically the working class got shit on. Trump promised to end all that bullshit. That's how he got elected. He stopped up the jobs going overseas and shut down the illegal immigration (importation of cheap labor). He kept his promise.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
With Trump out of the picture Biden and the demopublicans will take us right back to jobs going overseas and the first wave of cheap labor is already on its way to the US. Biden would probably invite them to his inauguration if they get here soon enough.
The illegals would get front row seats with less vetting than the National Guard troops. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYou are out of touch, V. The working class was frustrated for years by good jobs going overseas and the importation of cheap labor. The demopublicans (democrats and republicans) allowed all that to go on. Basically the working class got shit on. Trump promised to end all that bullshit. That's how he got elected. He stopped up the jobs going overseas and shut down the illegal immigration (importation of cheap labor). He kept his promise.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
With Trump out of the picture Biden and the demopublicans will take us right back to jobs going overseas and the first wave of cheap labor is already on its way to the US. Biden would probably invite them to his inauguration if they get here soon enough.
A civil war and Mick the mooch (aka DiDi) would surely talk about how he wants to be on conservative side, but now he's deep on the socialized shit. What would his play be ?
Your constituents are working on eliminating the spreading of misinformation so watch what you write. California does not pay in "far more" than it gets. And states like California that have been totally fiscally irresponsible are looking for the feds to bail them out. That means states that have been responsible will be bailing out idiot Californians/New Yorkers, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhat exactly is it that you Trumplicans want Mickey Crimm? Do you want a civil war and divide up the country?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If that were to happen (divide up the country), you will end up with a liberal country comprised of New England and running down the east coast, through Virginia.....maybe even as far as Georgia, and running across the north probably dividing Pennsylvania and Ohio in half and including Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin.
You would have a second liberal country on the west coast states, including California, Oregon, Washington State, Nevada (probably cut in half), New Mexico, Colorado and parts of Arizona.
The rest of the country, mainly southern and sparsely populated middle of the country would be your conservative, gun toting area. And guess what? If you look up each state and what they contribute and take from the Federal government, almost every one of those States that would make up your new homeland takes more, Texas being the exception. So you are going to end up with a very poor territory with lots of people running around with guns trying to take what everyone else has. Go for it!
Meanwhile, states that currently pay far more into the Federal government than they get out, like California, can keep more of their money and might actually be able to solve some of their problems.
I don't think your plan for dividing up the country will come to fruition. And in a civil war you libtards will get your asses blown off. We have all the guns.
I'm not on anything I didn't pay for, cunt. Now go suck your daddy's dick again, homo.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Aww yeea, DiDi is BACK! Dickey Dimm !Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm not on anything I didn't pay for, cunt. Now go suck your daddy's dick again, homo.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
No one argued we don't all pay into socialism. You're the one quoting Lenin. I'm an idiot but you're the one incredibly confused about your own basic values.
Socialism- our armed forces that protect us, roads/bridges, education, healthcare, social security.......how did I get roped into this mess?:D:cool:
Mickey effortless trolling. Cunt try too hard.
How far will you go with these programs though?Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Before you know it our so called Democracy and Capitalism will turn into Communism.
Your Children's Children won't find your analogies so funny if and when that happens.
As I have said before.
The Two Camps can not co-exist much longer.
The Liberals have indoctrinated more of the children so over time those ideas will take over as they are already winning.
It seems pretty clear that an actual Civil War will take place eventually but nobody knows what it would actually look like in this modern era.
Checks and balances. I feel there enough Democrat moderates coupled with the conservative Republicans, together with the present Supreme court to keep sanity. As Biden himself said, just because a program is advanced, doesn't mean it will pass. I see this as a transition 4 years until saner minds appear. We first need to handle the pandemic.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetHow far will you go with these programs though?Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Before you know it our so called Democracy and Capitalism will turn into Communism.
Your Children's Children won't find your analogies so funny if and when that happens.
As I have said before.
The Two Camps can not co-exist much longer.
The Liberals have indoctrinated more of the children so over time those ideas will take over as they are already winning.
It seems pretty clear that an actual Civil War will take place eventually but nobody knows what it would actually look like in this modern era.
No, you are the one that is el stupido. Americans are libertarian socialists. Socialism comes in degree's. Taxation for the common good, in any form, is a socialist policy. There are taxes that I support but that doesn't mean I have to support all taxes to be consistent. Thats a belief for idiots like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionAww yeea, DiDi is BACK! Dickey Dimm !Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm not on anything I didn't pay for, cunt. Now go suck your daddy's dick again, homo.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
No one argued we don't all pay into socialism. You're the one quoting Lenin. I'm an idiot but you're the one incredibly confused about your own basic values.
I support welfare programs for the disadvantaged but that doesn't mean I have to support full blown communism to be consistent.
My belief is that the country is already socialist enough. We don't need anymore because it will begin to destroy the incentive to produce. The communist dogma "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" is a utopian dream that will never work. It just goes against human nature. Those that have the ability are not willing to produce enough to sustain those without the ability unless they are properly compensated. But the communist manifesto says the talented and the talentless should have the same standard of living. That's what wrong with unbridled socialism.
I'm not confused about anything and you have once again proved yourself an idiot.
I agree with the present SCOTUS, that is unless and until the dems try to pack it. Joe wouldn't answer that question before being elected, said we would have to wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshotI feel there enough Democrat moderates coupled with the conservative Republicans, together with the present Supreme court to keep sanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetHow far will you go with these programs though?Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Before you know it our so called Democracy and Capitalism will turn into Communism.
Your Children's Children won't find your analogies so funny if and when that happens.
As I have said before.
The Two Camps can not co-exist much longer.
The Liberals have indoctrinated more of the children so over time those ideas will take over as they are already winning.
It seems pretty clear that an actual Civil War will take place eventually but nobody knows what it would actually look like in this modern era.
I don't agree that there are "enough Democrat moderates". I'll spot you Manchin, but after him can you name another?
Oh since you explained out your views I now understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNo, you are the one that is el stupido. Americans are libertarian socialists. Socialism comes in degree's. Taxation for the common good, in any form, is a socialist policy. There are taxes that I support but that doesn't mean I have to support all taxes to be consistent. Thats a belief for idiots like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionAww yeea, DiDi is BACK! Dickey Dimm !Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
No one argued we don't all pay into socialism. You're the one quoting Lenin. I'm an idiot but you're the one incredibly confused about your own basic values.
I support welfare programs for the disadvantaged but that doesn't mean I have to support full blown communism to be consistent.
My belief is that the country is already socialist enough. We don't need anymore because it will begin to destroy the incentive to produce. The communist dogma "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" is a utopian dream that will never work. It just goes against human nature. Those that have the ability are not willing to produce enough to sustain those without the ability unless they are properly compensated. But the communist manifesto says the talented and the talentless should have the same standard of living. That's what wrong with unbridled socialism.
I'm not confused about anything and you have once again proved yourself an idiot.
Socialism is OK when you're sucking on government tit all day and night.
Otherwise it is NOT.
Back to the gutter with you where you came from, DiDi.
btw - love the term libertarian socialists. lol. can't make this shit up.
We've long used wetbacks / illegals to do the jobs that we won't do: picking produce is the biggest, but there are other fields too such as slaughterhouses, landscaping and sheet-rocking: all involve hard labor, which white Americans have not wanted to do since things got cooking in this country after WWII.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Trump mislead people: you can't bring the good jobs back without bringing back the factories and their pollution, and the clean air regulations prevent that from happening; plus steel and other things can be made much cheaper overseas.
You know what- the past couple of weeks have been so confusing I don't know if anyone knows where they stand. I'm glad the Turtle finally peeked outta his shell. Hoping there's more like John Kasich and enough Dems to soften the impact of Sanders, AOC, et alQuote:
Originally Posted by dannyjI agree with the present SCOTUS, that is unless and until the dems try to pack it. Joe wouldn't answer that question before being elected, said we would have to wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshotI feel there enough Democrat moderates coupled with the conservative Republicans, together with the present Supreme court to keep sanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
I don't agree that there are "enough Democrat moderates". I'll spot you Manchin, but after him can you name another?
I somehow missed the diet coke button news these past four years. I knew the fatty drank the stuff like water, but didn't realize he had it on tap.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, now it's gone.
It's the end of a very caffeinated era.
Biden removes Grump's Diet Coke button from the Oval Office.
Very misleading. "Jobs Americans won't do" means the wages are to low because of the imported labor. Americans will do those jobs for proper compensation but the illegals keep the wages to low. The overseas steel is made by slave labor. Factories and pollution was solved a long time ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You guys ridicules are really fucking stupid. I've seen plenty of soft drink fountains in offices. It really super stupid to ridicule something that's not even stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgI somehow missed the diet coke button news these past four years. I knew the fatty drank the stuff like water, but didn't realize he had it on tap.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, now it's gone.
It's the end of a very caffeinated era.
Biden removes Grump's Diet Coke button from the Oval Office.
You have no clue what is normal behavior in a professional setting. Truly, no clue. You've told us the best you could do is day laborer shit - presumably because of severe behavioral problems and or your cognitive defects.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYou guys ridicules are really fucking stupid. I've seen plenty of soft drink fountains in offices. It really super stupid to ridicule something that's not even stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgI somehow missed the diet coke button news these past four years. I knew the fatty drank the stuff like water, but didn't realize he had it on tap.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, now it's gone.
It's the end of a very caffeinated era.
Biden removes Grump's Diet Coke button from the Oval Office.
Fact is it is really bizarre to have a button made to summon a coke. I've never heard of such a thing. You have them program your phone and have a button on it for the butler, but I guess that means he'd have to talk to them? I don't know. Truth is stranger than ficition.
What'd Trump use to communcicate his need for a burger, the red phone?
What are you the only professional that is entitled to the finer amenities that life offers? I suppose that you use a stairlift every time you come up from the cellar to steal your parent's food and use their car. Such luxuries that life has provided you are the envy of all members.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYou have no clue what is normal behavior in a professional setting. Truly, no clue. You've told us the best you could do is day laborer shit - presumably because of severe behavioral problems and or your cognitive defects.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYou guys ridicules are really fucking stupid. I've seen plenty of soft drink fountains in offices. It really super stupid to ridicule something that's not even stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Fact is it is really bizarre to have a button made to summon a coke. I've never heard of such a thing.
Wash your cunt, bitch. It stinks to high heaven.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionOh since you explained out your views I now understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNo, you are the one that is el stupido. Americans are libertarian socialists. Socialism comes in degree's. Taxation for the common good, in any form, is a socialist policy. There are taxes that I support but that doesn't mean I have to support all taxes to be consistent. Thats a belief for idiots like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I support welfare programs for the disadvantaged but that doesn't mean I have to support full blown communism to be consistent.
My belief is that the country is already socialist enough. We don't need anymore because it will begin to destroy the incentive to produce. The communist dogma "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" is a utopian dream that will never work. It just goes against human nature. Those that have the ability are not willing to produce enough to sustain those without the ability unless they are properly compensated. But the communist manifesto says the talented and the talentless should have the same standard of living. That's what wrong with unbridled socialism.
I'm not confused about anything and you have once again proved yourself an idiot.
Socialism is OK when you're sucking on government tit all day and night.
Otherwise it is NOT.
Back to the gutter with you where you came from, DiDi.
btw - love the term libertarian socialists. lol. can't make this shit up.
Entitled to what? huh? Tell us more. You make no sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSoxWhat are you the only professional that is entitled to the finer amenities that life offers? I suppose that you use a stairlift every time you come up from the cellar to steal your parent's food and use their car. Such luxuries that life has provided you are the envy of all members.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYou have no clue what is normal behavior in a professional setting. Truly, no clue. You've told us the best you could do is day laborer shit - presumably because of severe behavioral problems and or your cognitive defects.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Fact is it is really bizarre to have a button made to summon a coke. I've never heard of such a thing.
You loser fucks are so far fucking up Trumps ass you think this behavior is normal and actually bother to justify it.
Sad.
I don't particularly care. The whole idea is just LOL to me.
it is even more LOL that you dipshits bother to defend it.
You "men" are so incredibly psychologically dominated my that carnival barker.
Why keep talking about Trump....It seems as though Biden voters are sore winners.
Why not congratulate Joe on cancelling keystone xl permit, thus killing many jobs and transgender use of girls locker rooms and their sports. All in his first week!