Just for fun, let's do an MDawg poll.
Do you believe Mdawgs claims of winning baccarat, winning nearly every session, over many years?
Printable View
Just for fun, let's do an MDawg poll.
Do you believe Mdawgs claims of winning baccarat, winning nearly every session, over many years?
The results here aren't what's important other than...it would make sense if nearly everyone here but me voted No, because that would simply re-affirm that it's not everyone who may win at casinos. Definitely the minority. If everyone won at casinos the lights would go out within a year.
In any case what this poll DOES establish:
1. That KewlJ knows nothing about Baccarat.
https://i.imgur.com/bwq6pLMl.jpg
Can't even spell the word correctly. Two c's. Baccarat is the game. (And while you're at it...i before e except after c.)
2. That, as I pointed out earlier today,
hence - the need for this poll.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
3. This is just representative of
In other words - given that this guy has already admitted that he lost at BlackJack in 2020, this means he lost other years too. This type of “out of bounds” no credibility person for him to admit one year of failure doesn’t just mean that he lost badly that year, it means that he has been lying his ass off about winning most of the other years too. Until he posts some PROOF that he has won at all, it must be assumed that he's just lying and lying about everything. I’d say Blackhole is right about this schmuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Finally, and I am not talking to Kewlj, that liar is nothing short of ridiculous, but the rest of you - how do you reconcile the fact that I won and posted proof of winning?
MDawg's 2020 Vegas Casino wins VERIFIED
MDawg's Recent Win/Loss in Vegas
What's the explanation for that I posted three years of day to day minute trip reports, complete with pictures of the play and markers and suites, and then at the end of each year posted verified win statements to corroborate the exact sums claimed.
I even posted proof of getting comp'ed. I've also posted proof of many of my stock trades on here, and here.
No one else in the history of these forums has ever posted anything close to this level of proof, and never will. Why?
Bah, humbug.
Hello, photoshop.
Hello, only reporting wins from casinos you won at and not showing statements from casinos you lost at.
We can all have a good year, but NOBODY wins all the time like you claim to do.
Nobody.
I didn't vote because I didn't want it to be misconstrued. Are we talking about the periods that were substantiated with visual evidence or the whole kit a kaboodle? I definitely don't believe the whole novel without having read it fully.
What if Mdawg is only reporting the winning 1/2?
Kind of like the guys that only show their sports book winners.
Wow, somebody just went off the deep end, spewing hate, anger and lies, after realizing that only Tasha believes his fiction writings. :rolleyes:
Until someone reminded me, I forgot that I had done a similar poll last spring. That is how irrelevant MDawg is...I forgot. lol.
Anyway in the poll last spring (link below), 8 people out of 29 believed MDawg. That would be 27%. So you are going backwards MDawg. The more you post, the harder you try to convince people, the fewer believe you. :D
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...776-MDawg-Poll
First off, Mr. V. is a stupid motherfucker.
lol
Secondly, if he thinks photoshop works on live video, he is an even stupider motherfucker.
Thirdly, if he thinks photoshop works on pictures taken of a cell phone or computer screen where the shadows, depth and reflections of the screen are apparent, he is a triply stupid motherfucker.
And finally, if it were possible to create live video of someone logged into a casino's webpage showing his casino win/loss statements, then there would be others on these forums who posted such things. No one has. Which means, that Mr. V. is a quadruply stupid motherfucker.
I'd add that even our resident AxelWolf who claims that he could fake some of what I have posted (but has yet to do so), concedes that the logins of the casino accounts are genuine, but thinks that they belong to someone else. I discussed why this is absurd, below.
As far as "I show only the casinos where I win" - am I psychic? How did I know when I started each year to report sessions and trips only from casinos where I would end up winning? Because at the end of each year I have posted the win/loss for every casino at which I reported any play during the course of the year.
Mr. V has arrived very late to this party, so it may be understandable that he doesn't grasp the magnitude of the proof I have laid out. But that makes him no less a mother fucker.
---
MP: I believe KewlJ is talking about 2018 - 2020, the three years for which I have presented trip reports and win/loss statements.
What's interesting is that for all these gambling charlatans on YouTube the forum members say, "Show us your win/loss statements." And none of the charlatans ever do.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why all the anger? oh...because people don't believe your fiction writing?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Must matter or you wouldn't be going off the deep end like this. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
No KewlJ, the difference between you and me is that I have a coolly analytic mind and respond to everything logically. Which is what I am doing here now.
You can't control your emotions and throw fits of KewlJ proportions. I could speculate as to why this might be, I mean for all I know you're as inbred and high strung as a French poodle, but let's just admit that you are in fact a hysterical type, for Whatever reason. That's part of why you keep getting perma-banned wherever you go, forums and live casinos alike.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CKBoOSE46o
And when I called Mr. V. a stupid m'fer it was so outrageous as to be straight hyperbole. Especially for anyone who knows me, and that I almost never use profanity. Try and read any of that with a straight face. I'm not surprised you didn't get it, KewlJ.
Yeah, you just proved that in the last 15 minutes, going completely berserk. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
MDawg, all you have is lies and attacks. You trolls all use the same playbook.
You should have stayed at WoV, where uncle Mike is protecting you for whatever reason. (probably so he doesn't have to listen to you cry).
You've never won much of anything at Blackjack and had plenty of losing years. You admitted to just one, which means, for someone like you, that you lost during many years. That's what bothers you isn't it - that someone else drifts coolly out of nowhere to land in Vegas' largest suites and knocks them for more money more consistently, all the while playing shorter time sessions, than you ever have.
The rest - is just you yapping uncontrollably out of the side of a rigid doll like face, while nursing a beer at a queer bar.
Let me make this clear MDawg. This isn't personal with me. It is just what you claim, being a long-term winning player, playing -EV, can't be true. I actually enjoyed your trip reports and seeing how higher end players that are significantly comped live. I am not that kind of player so I will never experience that. And that would have been fine if you were honest about losing. Hell, if you even sprinkled in occasional losing trips. :D But what you are claiming can not happen. It is fiction.
Well actually there is one way a player can play -EV and be a long term winning player and that is with a gigantic jackpot, (like a progressive jackpot) that exceeds all the losing he/she did to get there. But given enough time, even those players usually lose it all back.
Now, you will note that I frequently use the term 'long-term'. And that gets a little tricky, because there is no completely agreed upon definition for long-term. AND if there was an agreed upon number of trials or sample size, getting there can be very different. You certainly can't go by a term like years....losing years or winning years like Eliot used, because like I said, one player may make 1 trip a year for a couple days, while another plays every weekend for 20 hours. Both don't qualify as long-term, despite the word years. So, no offense to Eliot, but saying it is possible, 2 standard deviation, 3 standard deviation, whatever, for a player to be winning after 3 years, without stating what amount of play that amounts to.....means nothing.
I have a very low bar. The math must work!
Anyway, I will leave you to your anger and hate, which you are sure to fill these pages with. All because people with half a brain, don't believe your math defying fiction stories. :rolleyes:
The 4 people that voted unsure, in the last poll are pretty comical. At least you know the people that voted yes are biased and clueless. The unsure people are in a special category :)
Kewlj, my advice to you is to get in better touch with your powers of perception, because they are all loused up buddy if you think this is hate, or anger. Again, no wonder you lose so consistently at blackjack - if you can't read people, what can you read?
You are free to do a poll asking who believes my blackjack experiences and results. And I have no idea how that would come out, as there are people that don't like me for any number of reasons. Not liking someone is different than not believing them and I would hope people would be honest. I feel confident that I have conveyed I know what I am talking about in my narrow field of blackjack advantage play. But do a poll and let's see, if you are so sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Check #2 above. Learn to stand up on your own two feet, son.
Good idea, one poll about your blackjack and one for Axel's AP success. The only problem, are the biased haters. Will be hard to get honest assessment.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou are free to do a poll asking who believes my blackjack experiences and results. And I have no idea how that would come out, as there are people that don't like me for any number of reasons. Not liking someone is different than not believing them and I would hope people would be honest. I feel confident that I have conveyed I know what I am talking about in my narrow field of blackjack advantage play. But do a poll and let's see, if you are so sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
I'm also amazed, on how few people vote in the polls. Especially when it's anonymous. There's a few guys that I've noticed in the past, that are regulars that NEVER vote. Of course they have every right not to, just seems foolish, why not ?
Am I the only one who is cringing at calling biased people buyist?Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyGood idea, one poll about your blackjack and one for Axel's AP success. The only problem, are the buyist haters. Will be hard to get honest assessment.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou are free to do a poll asking who believes my blackjack experiences and results. And I have no idea how that would come out, as there are people that don't like me for any number of reasons. Not liking someone is different than not believing them and I would hope people would be honest. I feel confident that I have conveyed I know what I am talking about in my narrow field of blackjack advantage play. But do a poll and let's see, if you are so sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Fixed it professor, it's pretty funny, only a couple post from you, in the last month or so and its to correct a spelling mistake. What's a matter, there's too much attention directed towards MD, AXEL, SINGER and not towards you ?Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkozAm I the only one who is cringing at calling biased people buyist?Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyGood idea, one poll about your blackjack and one for Axel's AP success. The only problem, are the buyist haters. Will be hard to get honest assessment.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
MDawg, I admit to being "stupid" about many tech things, including photoshop; and I never viewed a video you might have posted.
I recall the hullabaloo you stirred up when you first got noticed, claiming you always won; that is what has stuck in my mind.
Oh, as for being a "motherfucker:" you might want to get a paternity test ...
The video feed could be faked and I have a feeling its his bosses account or something like that. Even if someone had the money, and was playing Baccarat, simply showing a few accounts winning is meaningless, they could just cherry pick the accounts they want to show.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Recently there was an article about big high roller who got backed off at the Golden Nugget for winning a boatload of money. I turns out the guy was a huge loser at all the the other casinos he was playing at. He just happened to run good at the GN. They went with a better safe than sorry approach. I bet they feel really dumb now.
Edit to add: If that person played a significant amount of hands over a long period of time then I would have to believe theres a good chance they have an advantage. It would also depend on what game they are playing and what type of bet sizing they were doing. Someone could be a $10 a hand player for 99% of their time at the table , but one day they slam out a 5k bet and win. There's a good chance that guy would be ahead for the year.
So two people voted yes. One was obviously Mdawg himself(ROTFLMA). And the other person has to be semi retarded.
I voted ‘yes’. Not because I believe him. Just that he’s a fucking idiot and he’d probably think someone actually genuinely believes whatever-the-hell he’s spouting off.
A+ on the trolling, though.
Click on the vote number to see that it was Tasha, Mdawg and RS__Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Whether people believe it or not this poll was a great idea and the real drama is about to begin. Come on Coach Belly why are you holding back from voting?
Pretty much the best "AxelAss" could come up with is that the casino logins belong to someone else or represent only some of the casinos I played at, but just to show what an inaccurate mind he has and how low his level of reading comprehension is, he must have (1) missed simple logic day at school (third grade), (2) not read or thought about what I already wrote.
And then, look at this! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
It's pathetic that the drunken fool wants to offer some of the same pieces of evidence that I have posted to try to prove himself. If only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet that is. Tens of thousands of posts later he still hasn't managed to figure that out.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
One of the most hilarious pieces of evidence he wants to offer is talking to "a casino executive" - he and his friend DarkAss had been going on about how it might be possible to bribe your casino host to tell someone that you had won, such that even if my casino hosts verified my play or wins that this might be meaningless, and yet here "AxelAss" is now saying that this piece of information would have to be accepted. As others have said on here, "You can't make this shit up."
The point is,I think the fact that he's trying to offer (again, if only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet) some of the same pieces of evidence that he claims are not genuine or prove nothing as posted at my end, just shows what a pathetic two-face this guy has.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Even if I had never posted any evidence to back up what I said, three years of chronicles and not any contradictions. If I were asked in person about any of these trips, which the Wizard actually did ask me about them during a half hour phone call we had, I'd simply relate what happened, and it would match what I posted here. That is what happened during my call with the Wizard - I didn't have to think about any of his questions other than by recollecting exactly what had transpired.
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
You are half correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyFixed it professor, it's pretty funny, only a couple post from you, in the last month or so and its to correct a spelling mistake. What's a matter, there's too much attention directed towards MD, AXEL, SINGER and not towards you ?Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkozAm I the only one who is cringing at calling biased people buyist?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
I have been reading and hitting the reply button only to change my mind quite often.
I just realized what's the point?
I already know MDawg's claims are false (I voted so).
I already know my own AP claims are true (regardless of what people believe I am living it.
I already know MDawg will make the same roundabout claims about his mathematically impossible claims and CoachBelly will troll that he believes him (which makes coach either a troll who knows better or a genuine fool.
I already know Blackhole will insist I personally hand him one billion dollars cash and then he will claim I still didn't win it at AP and the only way he will believe me is if I invent a time machine and take him physically along all my past adventures.
I just realized the futility of replying when I already know the truth.
But correcting bad Grammar seemed worthwhile particularly because"buyist" was used in a few posts.
I suddenly didn't want to "buy" into the "buyist"
The only thing you know for sure is that you'll be riding the bus again soon. The rest...is speculation. Your educators from your past would probably cringe more at your assigning certainty to hypothesis than if you misspelled a few words.
The pre- opened forty five minutes ago. I gotta get back to my "fake" :rolleyes: trades. TSLA reports tomorrow as does AAPL. Incidentally, when does CYDY report?
https://i.imgur.com/RnmwbIPm.jpg
The real poll should be...will CYDY continue to tank, and WHY didn't Dark"Ass" :o sell when he had a chance (two chances actually) @ 7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
That’s not true. That’s just you talking out of your ass again.
At least Axel offered up some proof to back up his claims.
All you offer is dead plays other people wrote about and try claiming them as your own.
If you handed me a billion dollars I'm positive I could bribe KewlJ to let you have your way with him.
This was posted in the Adventures of MDawg Thread post 2226
Today, 05:32 AM #2226
blackhole
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Any numbers or plays I have claimed are 100% true. None is or was that unbelievable. Again, I ask what would you accept as proof? And if I were to prove whatever claim, then what? Ill ask again since you seemed have missed it. What if a Casino Executive said I was and advantage player and beat his casino? What about A lawyer? How about court documents? Why would casinos 86 me for Advantage play if I wasn't making money? Would pictures of jackpot's and the W2G's to go along with it be satisfactory? How about pictures of cash added to it? What about an account log in that shows my deposits and my cash outs?
(my response)
I was going to leave this alone but find it irresistible not to take you up on a few offers you made.
Pictures of Jackpots and the W2G’s sound great, then throwing in a bunch of cash sounds like some added entertainment. I really like the offer of account log in showing deposits and your cash outs? A year’s worth would be sufficient. I do expect to view serious transactions. If you want to throw in some court documents, don’t let me hold you back.
So, start posting the pictures, and pm me details for the bank log-in. You could always delete the log in after whatever you decide is enough time. Even 10 minutes would do. Just tell me date and time and don't forget I'm on the east coast EST
P.S. I would also confirm your the real deal and should have more money then you'll ever need for the rest of your life. After that I'll just fade away and leave you and your forums in peace.
As I said, It's pathetic that the drunken fool wants to offer some of the same pieces of evidence that I have posted to try to prove himself. If only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet that is. Tens of thousands of posts later he still hasn't managed to figure that out.
One of the most hilarious pieces of evidence he wants to offer is talking to "a casino executive" - he and his friend DarkAss had been going on about how it might be possible to bribe your casino host to tell someone that you had won, such that even if my casino hosts verified my play or wins that this might be meaningless, and yet here "AxelAss" is now saying that this piece of information would have to be accepted. As others have said on here, "You can't make this shit up."
I think the fact that he's trying to offer (again, if only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet) some of the same pieces of evidence that he claims are not genuine or prove nothing as posted at my end, just shows what a pathetic two-face this guy has.
And as you guys can see they proved me right again.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
MDawg, Blackhole and Coach Belly gave their pathetic answers and boasts (while claiming nothing I predicted about them making their posts was predictive)
How sad and pathetic. That's why I haven't been posting here. The losers are sad and predictable and I have more important things to do like AP and enjoy my home theater
If you want any real proof MDawg is bullshit, he believes a stock that traded for 30 cents a year ago and now trades in the $4 and $5 range is a failing stock.(If I sold today I would still show a profit so even his "Darkoz didn't get out when he could"argument makes no sense)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
I'll say a pray that you keep this up as long as I'm a member here. (No offense to my atheist friends here) If Axel lives up to his offers of proof, I'll be out of here in no time.
Of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackholeQuote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
I'll say a pray that you keep this up as long as I'm a member here. (No offense to my atheist friends here) If Axel lives up to his offers of proof, I'll be out of here in no time.
I'd rather be making money than talking about making money like MDawg
The hypocrisy of these two guys (the one being AxelAss, the other DarkAss) is staggering.
On the one hand, AA proposes to post the very same ilk of evidence to back up his casino action that he says should not be believed because he claims it may so easily be faked.
On the other, DA posts at the rate of about one post an hour over at WizardofVegas.
As far as making money...without doing a single trade today my quality long term stock portfolio is up about forty-nine grand at this moment.
CYDY? Not so much.
https://i.imgur.com/2egF1L5m.jpg
And as far as this B.S. penny stock's once being much lower, sure it was. But DA got into it around five bucks a share average. Sure he'll lie without posting any evidence of actual purchases the way I do with my screenshots and pictures of my trading account, and DA will claim he bought in lower. I mean we are talking about a guy who said "I make $20,000. a week" then didn't understand why that meant he claimed to make a million a year. Here come the lies. But what is indisputable is that he had two chances to sell at 7 dollars and did not. That's public record.
Whereas I actually got into TSLA and held at an adjusted pre-split price of under fifty, and into AMZN at well under five hundred. I've been advising all of you to buy into TSLA and AMZN for over a year now. Did anyone listen? A couple of gullibles at WOV seem to have followed DarkAss into oblivion with CYDY though.
Anyway, DarkAss, can't you ride the bus and post at WOV at the same time? If I'm able to stock trade and post here you should be able to ride a bus and post. Looking forward to it.
Unlike you my Cytodyn investment is easily verified. I posted back in April and a few other times when I purchased and anyone can check the prices on that date.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
I have a $3.44 per share right now so still profitable.
I'm waiting for trial results something you clearly don't understand. But why should someone who lies about their stock portfolio care about how things work.
Anyone who claims to be up forty-nine grand without doing anything really wouldn't be so concerned about trashing another guy's stock choice.
Clearly you realize I am the real deal and being such a phony, your only recourse is to put others down.
You see, the poll shows no one believes you. In your puny mind that must really suck. A mountain of fake evidence that you worked so hard at and it still didn't convince more than three fools
Hmm, KewlJ must be crushed. Looks like we're at 60% now....
https://i.imgur.com/EKfi1Iah.jpg
It's like with a stock that seems down and out and is going down. People post that it is not going to recover, then next thing you know it's roaring back up. I am sure Dark is hoping this happens with CYDY. Let's hope so.
Similarly, you can't ever predict where these polls will go.
DrakAss, you've posted nothing but words. I post actual screenshots of my stock trading account, and other times as further backup I take an actual picture of my cell phone logged into the account. You've posted nothing to back up a single claim you have ever made...about anything.
As far as being up forty-nine grand (it's fifty-three grand at this moment...on Inauguration Day I was up over 9X even that), it's all paper profit, none is realized until the day it is sold. The same way you had some paper profit when CYDY was at 7 and you didn't sell....
Look, the bottom line is...compare what many on here have done with what I have done as far as my claims. I have posted detailed trip reports, a consistent chronicle never contradictory, backed up at the end of each year with live video of me logged into my win/loss on my casino accounts, that corroborate and match the actual claimed wins. There really isn't much more anyone could do. If you don't want to believe it, then there is really nothing anyone could ever do to prove any past casino play on these forums. I have done more than anyone before me to substantiate the truth. Believe it or don't.
Wait until the fraudulent mail in vote starts pouring in!!!!
Regnis, I'd like to buy your vote! :cool: Would that be considered fraudulent, too? :D
First I need proof of the legitimacy of your bitcoin account. Then we can talk price.
Another long term member out of the woodwork. This thread is getting people out of hiding.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Actually, just killing time while on a boring conference call. Thought I'd add a little levity.
Over and out.
Hey, I voted, yes, because the word, watch, shows up in his "profile".Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Shut it down, MDawg baccarat. --->
Da [Buttram] casino [DWG] W.A.T.C.H
Transit watchdog
Coast watching
Crowd watching
Automatic watch
Brandwatch.com
Aust. Bird Watch
Coast Guard Band
Actuator disc
Dubai Marathon
What.com Transit
Data broadcasting
Broadcasting Act
Data abstraction
AM Broadcasting
DC Broadcasting
Automatic Data
Data broadcast
Data custodian
Data Incubator
Datana robusta
Auto-transmit
auto-matching
Agnostic (data)
Abrahamic God
Atta (Buddhism)
autocandidata
Action Bastard
Bag Man dictator
A Thing About Rats
guard a casino
Man Without a Star
At War With Satan
Stomach-cutting
Cutting boards
Attic standard
BRCA mutations
Broad catching
Autism Canada
Dartmouthians
Caucasian goat
Caucasian Toad
Catacomb saint
Ambush in Waco
Dragon Stadium
Cataractonium
Drac's Night Out
Caught Crimson
Giant Shawarma
Cardiac asthma
antasthmatic
adumbrations
Astronaut Act
Astronautica
Bad Astronaut
Bad Samaritan
Anarchist Act
About Schmidt
About That Man
Human abstract
Graduation hat
Automatic Hat
Saturating math
Abstract math
Abstract Atom
Draughts woman
Acton's dictum
Abstract Dawn
Anti-Drug Show
Automatic art
Contract Whist
Baccarat (town)
.............T
and baccarat wisdom
.............u
.............t
.............h
Catriona casha
Harmonica bugs
Carta da musica
Acrobat Music
Bach cantatas
Angora Static
Antarctic Shag
Cattanoga Cats
https://anagram-solver.net/shut%20it...t?partial=true
"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority." ~ Lord Acton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiH8Ek3gE9A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Ex_LbRKEY
Regnis: "Conference Call." --- I was supposed to have to go to court this week again, but it's still being done by either MSFT Teams or WEBEX these days. The idea of having to put on a suit and be in court at 8:00am for an ex parte seems so tiring now. I am going to have to dry clean and mothproof all my suits, who knows when I will next need to wear one.
As far as the bitcoin, I had a thought, ONCEDEAR are you willing to pay me the $500. - the same challenge you suggested I do with AxelWolf - if I do what you proposed, between you and me? I'd love to take five hunny off you and prove a point at the same time. AW seems to have disappeared as far as responding to any of that he's still stuck on the past. What say ye?
The one thing you keep failing to present as evidence is mathematics.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Evidence that defies math is not going to be believed by people who subscribe to the math.
I actually have posted proof at WOV including calenders I have had but that would not support your agenda.
And my math is sound.
Person A: "I don't have any proof but 7x13=91"
Person B: "I have plenty of proof that 7x13=28. Here is the documentation"
Guess which one I believe.
As for the people voting it's a sad fact many Americans are math deficient. That's partially how Casinos thrive. It's why people believe 6:5 blackjack is worth more than 3:2 because of course 6&5 are bigger numbers. It's why people think the zeros at roulette are worth more (or conversely worth not as much. I have seen both claims)
People who don't get the number crunching will be inclined to believe you. Sad but true.
Anyway here is an example of MDawg math 7×13=28.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lzxVyO6cpos
You're silly.
This is not an epistemological debate. This is a simple recounting of past events.
I thought you were done posting? ;) THEY ALWAYS COME BACK.
As you might say DrakOz, being a comic book fan (I am NOT a comic book fan myself), Holy Tintinnabulation!
70% now.
https://i.imgur.com/oALJ5t8h.jpg
Damned dangling chad.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Off to the SCOTUS.
MDawg argues on his own behalf, I argue for the board.
Him: "I always win."
Me: "Liar."
SCOTUS: "Nobody always wins. Give the craven poltroon twenty lashes then stake him to an anthill. Apt."
Yes, but that is not what is happening here. Here it is about trolling and not being honest or taking it seriously. That is the danger when you ask people to be honest on a forum that encourages trolling and games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
Look at the people who voted they believe MDawg: There is Mdawg himself. There is a guy RS_ who stated he voted the opposite of what he believes for fun. There is Barney who does nothing makes a mockery of this forum. There is tasha and that is enough said on that "person". Blackhole and Garnabby...these are people with an agenda. And theywontpayontuesday. He/she is the only one I am not sure what was about. The others were sort of predictable.
One interesting thing: You will note MDawgs "wingman" coach belly didn't vote. Just as he didn't vote on the Singer polls. It is a rare instant of coach belly being honest. He will play his coach belly games, taking the contrary position on every subject, including the sky blue / grass green. But when asked if you "really believe" these things he argues, coach belly chooses not to sign his name to the crazy train.
But it is all fine, it exposes these members as trolls and playing games which is why this forum is what it is.
I have posted about winning sessions and losing sessions. And the results at the end of each trip, and each year. Yes, I have documented winning for three years now.
What, you're trying to put people down who vote the way you don't like now, KewlJ? Same with DrakOz trying to do the same. That's sad.
MDawg thinks 7 votes out of 17 is 70%. THAT sort of explains everything about him. It is all about Math MDawg and well....7 of 17 = 70% :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
No, what I meant is that 70% of the NO vote is now YES.
I like the sound of that.
LOL...a "NO" vote is legitimate, and a "YES" vote is not? Is that how it works?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Why bother creating the poll in the first place?
So far you got a free vote from RS, he clearly knows better, he never posts anymore, except to troll( shame) he WAS a decent poster, in the past. Also take into account, there are a handful of guys, that clearly would vote No, but they are to COOL to vote !! ( won't name them, you know who you are)
Holy Nightmare! (for KewlJ)
80% now.
https://i.imgur.com/MqzHyDch.jpg
That was good, regnis! See, the oldsters are providing some class.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Since regnis is in the house, I get to give a public shout out to my girlfriend, who decided to enter the first week of Beat the Host at the last minute and actually won the first week against a couple thousand people. To which Axelwof will respond something like, "Yeah, but she didn't win much money, and my great aunt won that six times last year. I stopped playing because I won it just twice."
And regnis, I will give myself a plug here because I don't think the folks at VCT appreciated the bargain I had found. I managed to take Texas A&M to win last season's college football title at 400-1. I hate judges and committees! Can I hear a hallelujah?
Like literally after I posted that MDrag math is like the Abbott and Costello routine 7×13=28 and we get 7 out of 17 = 70%.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMDawg thinks 7 votes out of 17 is 70%. THAT sort of explains everything about him. It is all about Math MDawg and well....7 of 17 = 70% :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
What a pathetic joke is Mdrag
ahh so you voted out of spite.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyLOL...a "NO" vote is legitimate, and a "YES" vote is not? Is that how it works?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Why bother creating the poll in the first place?
As for the no votes, lets just put it this way, anyone forming a team of players to beat casinos would not be choosing any of the names on the "No" list except for RS_ who was just trying to be funny.
This forum has always been divided in members that believe in Math and reality and those that play games and are flat out trolls. A polls like this just allows people to sign there name (handle) to it.
And the MDawg math just gets worse!Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
For god sakes the real percentage is listed right there next to the vote number.
If you believe 8 out of 18 is 80%, no wonder you think you are winning when you lose all your money.
Newsflash MDawg: if you go to the casino with 10 grand and leave with 7 grand, you haven't won 7 grand! :rolleyes:
Come on Red, make it 90%. For Esthetics' sake. Vote YES.
Well it's not about the spelling, because you also spelled believe wrong in the poll question, you dumb pinhead.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Whatever the outcome, this poll was worth it just to expose MDawgs Math. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
You had to have known, Belly would vote YES. That was a given. He did it within 2 minutes of your post. SURPRISE SURPRISE !!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJahh so you voted out of spite.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyLOL...a "NO" vote is legitimate, and a "YES" vote is not? Is that how it works?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Why bother creating the poll in the first place?
As for the no votes, lets just put it this way, anyone forming a team of players to beat casinos would not be choosing any of the names on the "No" list except for RS_ who was just trying to be funny.
This forum has always been divided in members that believe in Math and reality and those that play games and are flat out trolls. A polls like this just allows people to sign there name (handle) to it.
It's obvious that the "NO" voters voted out of spite, that list is 100% assholes.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
At least MDawg provided me with a new signature line.
Anyway, with the fresh overnight snow, heading up to the mountain for some snowboarding. You girls have fun in your alternate reality
See that's what MickeyCrimm was trying to say about KewlJ. He can't stop mindlessly saying the same crap over and over. I told him that my saying 80% means that 80% of the total NO vote is now represented by YES votes, but he just won't let it go. This is why he has no credibility at the forums. And I don't need to quote someone again, to say so, because I'm saying so.
In short, your poll is not turning out as expected, n'est-ce pas?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Ironically, I did a blog about recent polling last week. The title would fit here, too. It puts polling in perspective.
https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...m-polling.html
What? Good lord, you ARE actually retarted.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
This really explains everything about MDawgs claims. The guy wins 8 of 18 break even wagers and thinks he has won 80%!
Mad Dog, you spew so much shit on the forums that I've lost track.
Question: have you ever explained exactly what your system is at baccarat?
People come to these forums in order to learn something about gambling, not to kiss the feet of a narcissistic bullshit artist.
You're just another attention whore.
I actually have MisterV. I post some of it here, at WOV , at GF and at
https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
I am now a part of KewlJ's signature. He may have spelled my name wrong but - No press is bad press.
And if recent history has taught us anything - it's not what is before us but how you interpret it that seems to matter.
80%!
Thank you for the link explaining your system.
So, you are a Patrick player?
Nibble at the cheese?
Hit and run?
How about up and pull?
You say you bet big on a good shoe and bet small on a bad shoe.
How do you know a shoe is good or bad?
Interesting that you set up your own message board to post / pontificate so that all the world can dwell in your magnificence.
What's not quite as fun as gambling, but close? TALKING OR WRITING ABOUT IT.
That TruePassage forum is not actually mine, I was simply given a corner there. The forum is something like twelve years old or so, I joined just last year.
I will tell you what I do not do - any kind of Martingale.
He's a grade-school dropout, just like the little guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
He's weak in language and logic, his reading comprehension is at a 3rd grade level.
Emotionally he's like a pre-schooler.
Make up a bogus quote by him and use it as your tag line.
Turnabout is fairplay....maybe he'll wise up.
"Making a bogus quote" would be lying coach belly. Is that what you are advocating now lying? I used MDawgs actual words.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyHe's a grade-school dropout, just like the little guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
He's weak in language and logic, his reading comprehension is at a 3rd grade level.
Emotionally he's like a pre-schooler.
Make up a bogus quote by him and use it as your tag line.
Turnabout is fairplay....maybe he'll wise up.
A while back, I repeated what another member had stated that you (coach belly) were a child molester, having stalked boys in the locker room. YOU cried to Dan Druff, who said I couldn't say that. So where is the line coach belly? Now you advocate lying.
You people lie about my education, lie about my partners passing, lie about my results from last year. All you have is lies.
I lie about nobody. I simply say I don't believe someone claim because the math doesn't work.
So tell me, exactly who is acting like a 3rd grader.
If turnabout is fair play: Coach belly = Coach Sandusky (Penn State), raping boys in the locker room. How does that work for you?
OK, so how and when can you determine if your shoe is good or bad?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
What objective criteria cue you in that regard?
Is your system something that can be readily explained and learned by others, or is it more of the "I can't explain why, but I just know it when I see it?"
I give you shit for the reasons I previously enunciated, however I am always willing to learn something new if it is of value.
Your tag line is obviously not MDawg's actual words, you retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I never cried to Druff, what are you talking about? You're delusional.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Looks like PG managed to escape from the clutches of I.C.E. and crawl over here to vote. Canadians are allowed to vote? I mean when they are in the country on false pretenses?
He messed up the percentage though. Now only 73% of the total YES vote is represented by NO votes. Darn!
The greaseball either slipped through their grasp, or they let him go because they couldn't stand the smell.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Disregard that dirtbag's vote.
Have you ever had a winning streak?...or a losing streak?...or perhaps a hitting streak?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
How and when did you determine that you were on a streak?
Coach Belly you do not even deserve to be on any gaming forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyHave you ever had a winning streak?...or a losing streak?...or perhaps a hitting streak?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
How and when did you determine that you were on a streak?
POKERGRINDER is being a good boy, by not rolling around in the mud. He's scared of getting himself dirty.