Druff did not listen to me, but 2+2 sure did...

Since I was wrongfully censored on PFA, I am going to make my statement here.

First, for months on PFA, I told Druff publicly and in private that "personal attacks are killing your board". He ignored me and just didnt believe it. I even told him on PFa right here-"Respectfully, its not my political posts, its my one political view of supporting Trump. If I posted here that I did not like Trump, we wouldn't be discussing it now. You let the members freely attack others over political views and the bad behavior continues and kills your board. Thats how Ive seen it go for decades on other BBS sites, personal attacks always kills forums." This is only one example, but I have told him several times.

Link- https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...l=1#post956578

Second, I go on 2+2 and see what a horror show of a dumpster fire it is there. Yep, the personal attacks there are really screwing up and trashing their entire board. It looks horrible and very Junior High mode.Then it was sold and I haven't been back lately.

Third, I buy a nice poker themed URL and plan on launching a new BBS in the far future and specifically not allow any personal attacks on it. I still own the URL and plan on buying the software and hire a graphic artist soon. My motivation was to capitalize on the mistakes and weakness I see at 2+2. I even told Druff about this, my idea, my plan and how I want him to be very involved. He scoffs at the whole idea, so now I have to wait until it goes live and then he will still join in. 2+2 will be easy to defeat in the future.

Then there are new owners of 2+2 poker and suddenly they start a new policy of "no personal attacks" and I LOL hard because I TOLD DRUFF multiple times that PFA would be better without them, he ignores me again.

Now, last night, there is the PFA radio show and Druff addresses the "new trolling rule" on 2+2. Brother, there is a difference between "trolling" and "personal attacks". Trolling is joking, gas lighting and pushing buttons to evoke emotion in someone. Personal attacks are self explanatory and clearly trying to damage and hurt someone publicly online. There is a very obvious difference.

I'm posting it here so Druff finally gets it and believes me. The "no personal attacks" was my idea and I advised him long ago its a smart move, but he didnt listen. Well, the new owners of 2+2 listened to me and making an improvement on their website. To the owners of 2+2- atleast give me some credit for the idea you borrowed from me.

Side note- When I do launch my own poker BBS site, you'll know about it and Druff will be on there too. He'll say "No I wont go there" here, but he will still go there once it launches.

Also, this post is not a personal attack on Druff, this is me laying it out again for him since he didnt listen the first several times. Druff likes the personal attacks on PFA since it gives him and the board traction, movement and popularity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

Since I was wrongfully censored on PFA, I am going to make my statement here.

First, for months on PFA, I told Druff publicly and in private that "personal attacks are killing your board". He ignored me and just didnt believe it. I even told him on PFa right here-"Respectfully, its not my political posts, its my one political view of supporting Trump. If I posted here that I did not like Trump, we wouldn't be discussing it now. You let the members freely attack others over political views and the bad behavior continues and kills your board. Thats how Ive seen it go for decades on other BBS sites, personal attacks always kills forums." This is only one example, but I have told him several times.

Link- https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...l=1#post956578

Second, I go on 2+2 and see what a horror show of a dumpster fire it is there. Yep, the personal attacks there are really screwing up and trashing their entire board. It looks horrible and very Junior High mode.Then it was sold and I haven't been back lately.

Third, I buy a nice poker themed URL and plan on launching a new BBS in the far future and specifically not allow any personal attacks on it. I still own the URL and plan on buying the software and hire a graphic artist soon. My motivation was to capitalize on the mistakes and weakness I see at 2+2. I even told Druff about this, my idea, my plan and how I want him to be very involved. He scoffs at the whole idea, so now I have to wait until it goes live and then he will still join in. 2+2 will be easy to defeat in the future.

Then there are new owners of 2+2 poker and suddenly they start a new policy of "no personal attacks" and I LOL hard because I TOLD DRUFF multiple times that PFA would be better without them, he ignores me again.

Now, last night, there is the PFA radio show and Druff addresses the "new trolling rule" on 2+2. Brother, there is a difference between "trolling" and "personal attacks". Trolling is joking, gas lighting and pushing buttons to evoke emotion in someone. Personal attacks are self explanatory and clearly trying to damage and hurt someone publicly online. There is a very obvious difference.

I'm posting it here so Druff finally gets it and believes me. The "no personal attacks" was my idea and I advised him long ago its a smart move, but he didnt listen. Well, the new owners of 2+2 listened to me and making an improvement on their website. To the owners of 2+2- atleast give me some credit for the idea you borrowed from me.

Side note- When I do launch my own poker BBS site, you'll know about it and Druff will be on there too. He'll say "No I wont go there" here, but he will still go there once it launches.

Also, this post is not a personal attack on Druff, this is me laying it out again for him since he didnt listen the first several times. Druff likes the personal attacks on PFA since it gives him and the board traction, movement and popularity.

---

Shut The Fuck Up Pussy!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Shut The Fuck Up Pussy!

---

So youre for censorship?

Druff believes in pretty much anything goes.

He prioritizes free speech over censorship.

This is not necessarily a good thing nor likely to promote board growth.

Wizard of Vegas is tightly moderated and busier than this board.

But that's fine, I like keeping my toes in both ponds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

Since I was wrongfully censored on PFA, I am going to make my statement here.

First, for months on PFA, I told Druff publicly and in private that "personal attacks are killing your board". He ignored me and just didnt believe it. I even told him on PFa right here-"Respectfully, its not my political posts, its my one political view of supporting Trump. If I posted here that I did not like Trump, we wouldn't be discussing it now. You let the members freely attack others over political views and the bad behavior continues and kills your board. Thats how Ive seen it go for decades on other BBS sites, personal attacks always kills forums." This is only one example, but I have told him several times.

Link- https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...l=1#post956578

Second, I go on 2+2 and see what a horror show of a dumpster fire it is there. Yep, the personal attacks there are really screwing up and trashing their entire board. It looks horrible and very Junior High mode.Then it was sold and I haven't been back lately.

Third, I buy a nice poker themed URL and plan on launching a new BBS in the far future and specifically not allow any personal attacks on it. I still own the URL and plan on buying the software and hire a graphic artist soon. My motivation was to capitalize on the mistakes and weakness I see at 2+2. I even told Druff about this, my idea, my plan and how I want him to be very involved. He scoffs at the whole idea, so now I have to wait until it goes live and then he will still join in. 2+2 will be easy to defeat in the future.

Then there are new owners of 2+2 poker and suddenly they start a new policy of "no personal attacks" and I LOL hard because I TOLD DRUFF multiple times that PFA would be better without them, he ignores me again.

Now, last night, there is the PFA radio show and Druff addresses the "new trolling rule" on 2+2. Brother, there is a difference between "trolling" and "personal attacks". Trolling is joking, gas lighting and pushing buttons to evoke emotion in someone. Personal attacks are self explanatory and clearly trying to damage and hurt someone publicly online. There is a very obvious difference.

I'm posting it here so Druff finally gets it and believes me. The "no personal attacks" was my idea and I advised him long ago its a smart move, but he didnt listen. Well, the new owners of 2+2 listened to me and making an improvement on their website. To the owners of 2+2- atleast give me some credit for the idea you borrowed from me.

Side note- When I do launch my own poker BBS site, you'll know about it and Druff will be on there too. He'll say "No I wont go there" here, but he will still go there once it launches.

Also, this post is not a personal attack on Druff, this is me laying it out again for him since he didnt listen the first several times. Druff likes the personal attacks on PFA since it gives him and the board traction, movement and popularity.

---

Must be tough going thru life sucking on the short bus exhaust pipe....RIP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Must be tough going thru life sucking on the short bus exhaust pipe....RIP

---

Translation: Desertrunner is a ReTard!!

My experience is if a site is not moderated, then people will bitch about how it is nothing but trolling and personal insults---because it probably mostly is.

If a site is moderated, some people will bitch about it being moderated.

If a site is moderated, the people who do not bitch about the fact that it is moderated will typically bitch that it's not moderated well.

In any event, anyone who gets genuinely insulted or has their feelings hurt by what some internet rando says about them is probably kind of a pussy. I can't imagine a reason Dan would tell me to GTFO from here, but if he did, I would just do it and not bitch about it. Very little about my QoL (by little, I mean, virtually nothing) is based on my participating here.

Part of my motivation to post this story here is now Druff can brag that 2+2 stole an idea from PFA. He likes that stuff.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Druff believes in pretty much anything goes.

He prioritizes free speech over censorship.

This is not necessarily a good thing nor likely to promote board growth.

Wizard of Vegas is tightly moderated and busier than this board.

But that's fine, I like keeping my toes in both ponds.

---

Most of my issues with Todd stem from his not taking any action when someone says something to me on this forum that, frankly, if they said to my face, I would have no qualms about whipping out a gun and killing them. Todd likes the action, I suppose, and that makes him clearly part of the problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Druff believes in pretty much anything goes.

He prioritizes free speech over censorship.

This is not necessarily a good thing nor likely to promote board growth.

Wizard of Vegas is tightly moderated and busier than this board.

But that's fine, I like keeping my toes in both ponds.

---

Most of my issues with Todd stem from his not taking any action when someone says something to me on this forum that, frankly, if they said to my face, I would have no qualms about whipping out a gun and killing them. Todd likes the action, I suppose, and that makes him clearly part of the problem.

---

I think he more likes the power. But if a decision involves losing his popularity within the poker social, he wont do it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Druff believes in pretty much anything goes.

He prioritizes free speech over censorship.

This is not necessarily a good thing nor likely to promote board growth.

Wizard of Vegas is tightly moderated and busier than this board.

But that's fine, I like keeping my toes in both ponds.

---

Most of my issues with Todd stem from his not taking any action when someone says something to me on this forum that, frankly, if they said to my face, I would have no qualms about whipping out a gun and killing them. Todd likes the action, I suppose, and that makes him clearly part of the problem.

---

I think he more likes the power. But if a decision involves losing his popularity within the poker social, he wont do it.

---

Obvious that redietz hasn't any experience with directly facing anybody who presents a flurry of words that offend him. And it goes hand-in-hand with all the weird things he tosses around on several forums.

Like all internet-only tough guys, he probably gets his courage from drugs or a bottle. More intelligent people would never pull a weapon out on someone they know nothing about...for obvious reasons. Of course, he only has himself to blame for any dissing that comes his way in the first place. And his unfounded braggadocio when he fears posting any picks prior to the games being played.

THIS is the foremost definition of a coward and a fool. From A to Z.

"Todd" has little interest in patrolling psychos or keyboard-big mouths. He's too busy with the challenges that come with online gambling, paying California taxes, figuring out how to shuffle the bills around to fill his gas tank, and how to keep healthy. And anyone who worries about why anybody else does what they do, how or why they do it, or how it affects them if an adverse action is taken against them for any reason whatsoever, is nothing but a moron of the first degree.

Singer and I are both at the end of our life cycles, so it's interesting that he thinks whatever I have to say is online braggadocio.

Happy New Year, Rob. Why don't you put those "online tough guy" theories to the test. You're a traveling man. Here's my address.

1412 Forrest (two Rs, Rob) Dale Lane
Johnson City, TN 37604

No need to call in advance. Just drop on in. Anytime.

The street sign says Forrest with 2 r's but stupid Google Maps says Forest with 1.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jbjb

The street sign says Forrest with 2 r's but stupid Google Maps says Forest with 1.

---

My license also has one "R." I (and others) don't like explaining how the street was named after a Tennessee Confederate general who was the first Grand Dragon of the KKK. A street in Texas, also named after the same guy, had the same problem. They eventually officially changed the name to one "R" because for some reason people did not appreciate that he shot Union prisoners for no good reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Singer and I are both at the end of our life cycles, so it's interesting that he thinks whatever I have to say is online braggadocio.

Happy New Year, Rob. Why don't you put those "online tough guy" theories to the test. You're a traveling man. Here's my address.

1412 Forrest (two Rs, Rob) Dale Lane
Johnson City, TN 37604

No need to call in advance. Just drop on in. Anytime.

---

Hey Comrade, you should send the same invitation to cowardly weirdo Flash Gordon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Singer and I are both at the end of our life cycles, so it's interesting that he thinks whatever I have to say is online braggadocio.

Happy New Year, Rob. Why don't you put those "online tough guy" theories to the test. You're a traveling man. Here's my address.

1412 Forrest (two Rs, Rob) Dale Lane
Johnson City, TN 37604

No need to call in advance. Just drop on in. Anytime.

---

Hey Comrade, you should send the same invitation to cowardly weirdo Flash Gordon.

---

I think I more or less did, over at GF.

Rob, meanwhile, is ex-CIA. I'm expecting him for Valentine's Day.

Note: I did know a guy pretty well who, I learned after his death, was indeed CIA. I kind of always suspected something; people who listed past work for import companies in Florida -- well, that's a bit of a red flag. He was a good friend; always kept me in Belk coupons and kept me updated on free lunches and cheap excursions out of the local senior center. He figured it was his Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam that killed him. He was probably right.

It appears that Redietz and Mission are both big on executing people. Redietz for something that someone said. Yep, now there's an executable offense for you, not even a misdemeanor. At least Mission wants to execute people for committing misdemeaners. Like the Jan 6 protestors most of whom have been convicted of misdemeanor tresspass.

Atheism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

It appears that Redietz and Mission are both big on executing people. Redietz for something that someone said. Yep, now there's an executable offense for you, not even a misdemeanor. At least Mission wants to execute people for committing misdemeaners. Like the Jan 6 protestors most of whom have been convicted of misdemeanor tresspass.

Atheism.

---

Mickey, why don't you go back through my 6000 posts and see where it is that I describe myself as an atheist?

Good luck with that.

You've abandoned all data-based reasoning, mickey. You just make shit up to fit what you feel like posting today.

And yeah, to be crystal clear, someone walks up to me in a public place and says, "Your wife committed suicide, and it's because of you." And it's false and they know it's false? Yeah, I kill them. No qualms about it. I owe her memory that.

Doesn't matter if I'm Christian, Jewish, atheist, or worshipping the devil. Not a hard decision.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

It appears that Redietz and Mission are both big on executing people. Redietz for something that someone said. Yep, now there's an executable offense for you, not even a misdemeanor. At least Mission wants to execute people for committing misdemeaners. Like the Jan 6 protestors most of whom have been convicted of misdemeanor tresspass.

Atheism.

---

Mickey, why don't you go back through my 6000 posts and see where it is that I describe myself as an atheist?

Good luck with that.

You've abandoned all data-based reasoning, mickey. You just make shit up to fit what you feel like posting today.

And yeah, to be crystal clear, someone walks up to me in a public place and says, "Your wife committed suicide, and it's because of you." And it's false and they know it's false? Yeah, I kill them. No qualms about it. I owe her memory that.

Doesn't matter if I'm Christian, Jewish, atheist, or worshipping the devil. Not a hard decision.

---

You are the one that makes shit up. You did it to me twice in the last week. Your standard for executing people is very low. If not atheist then fascist.

Now, being the devil's advocate. If someone walked up to you pointing a rifle at your chest and said "Your wife committed suicide and it's because of you" would you still try to pull your gun out and shoot them?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

It appears that Redietz and Mission are both big on executing people. Redietz for something that someone said. Yep, now there's an executable offense for you, not even a misdemeanor. At least Mission wants to execute people for committing misdemeaners. Like the Jan 6 protestors most of whom have been convicted of misdemeanor tresspass.

Atheism.

---

Mickey, why don't you go back through my 6000 posts and see where it is that I describe myself as an atheist?

Good luck with that.

You've abandoned all data-based reasoning, mickey. You just make shit up to fit what you feel like posting today.

And yeah, to be crystal clear, someone walks up to me in a public place and says, "Your wife committed suicide, and it's because of you." And it's false and they know it's false? Yeah, I kill them. No qualms about it. I owe her memory that.

Doesn't matter if I'm Christian, Jewish, atheist, or worshipping the devil. Not a hard decision.

---

You are the one that makes shit up. You did it to me twice in the last week. Your standard for executing people is very low. If not atheist then fascist.

Now, being the devil's advocate. If someone walked up to you pointing a rifle at your chest and said "Your wife committed suicide and it's because of you" would you still try to pull your gun out and shoot them?

---

What do you think? You seem very cowardly to me. I would not have expected that. Nobody lives forever, mickey. That's not a theory. If you haven't had someone wave a gun at you before, I'm sorry, but I have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

If you haven't had someone wave a gun at you before, I'm sorry, but I have.

---

Therein lies a tale ...

*reaches for popcorn*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Mickey, why don't you go back through my 6000 posts and see where it is that I describe myself as an atheist?

Good luck with that.

You've abandoned all data-based reasoning, mickey. You just make shit up to fit what you feel like posting today.

And yeah, to be crystal clear, someone walks up to me in a public place and says, "Your wife committed suicide, and it's because of you." And it's false and they know it's false? Yeah, I kill them. No qualms about it. I owe her memory that.

Doesn't matter if I'm Christian, Jewish, atheist, or worshipping the devil. Not a hard decision.

---

You are the one that makes shit up. You did it to me twice in the last week. Your standard for executing people is very low. If not atheist then fascist.

Now, being the devil's advocate. If someone walked up to you pointing a rifle at your chest and said "Your wife committed suicide and it's because of you" would you still try to pull your gun out and shoot them?

---

What do you think? You seem very cowardly to me. I would not have expected that. Nobody lives forever, mickey. That's not a theory. If you haven't had someone wave a gun at you before, I'm sorry, but I have.

---

You had someone wave a gun in your face? Big fucking deal. I've been shot at.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Singer and I are both at the end of our life cycles, so it's interesting that he thinks whatever I have to say is online braggadocio.

Happy New Year, Rob. Why don't you put those "online tough guy" theories to the test. You're a traveling man. Here's my address.

1412 Forrest (two Rs, Rob) Dale Lane
Johnson City, TN 37604

No need to call in advance. Just drop on in. Anytime.

---

This is a chickenshit challenge. redietz knows no one is dumb enough to accept such a challenge. No one goes onto someone else's turf like that. It's stupid. If you go and he pulls a gun, but you pull yours out and shoot him first, what are you going to tell the cops? It was self-defense? When they see your ID the first thing out of their mouths will be "You live in Arizona? WTF are you doing here? Are you going to tell them "I came to visit the man I just shot?" GTFO. The law ain't going to let you get away with "self defense" if you came all that way. In their eyes you will have been "looking for trouble."

redietz, you've threatened to kill someone if they show up. No one is stupid enough to go onto your turf unarmed. But they are also not stupid enough to go onto your turf armed. If you draw first but wind up getting shot yourself the law is not going to believe they traveled so far with peaceful intentions and it was self-defense.

It's a lose lose situation for the person you invited and you know it. They either wind up dead or in prison. You're protected by the law. So your challenge is chickenshit.

You thread jackers suck.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

You thread jackers suck.

---

At least your thread is getting decent action. No offence but every other thread you started got little to no traction. All is not lost buddy, you still have a decent chance of gaining legendary infamous status over here. I personally thought you were hilarious and misunderstood over at PFA. As a side bonus you pissed off the AWOL biggest all time PFA jackass Walter Sobchak. Major bonus points for that amazing achievement :)

Oh, and this one time, at band camp, I stuck a flute in my pussy. - Direct Desertrunner Quote -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Oh, and this one time, at band camp, I stuck a flute in my pussy. - Direct Desertrunner Quote -

---

Monet, you seem to be quite the fan of Desertrunners. You don't usually bother with other posters drama, especially newbies to this site. He is however an infamous veteran over at PFA :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Monet, you seem to be quite the fan of Desertrunners. You don't usually bother with other posters drama, especially newbies to this site. He is however an infamous veteran over at PFA :)

---

He is one of these cry baby motherfuckers who come over here to bitch about DanDruff and run away.
Pussy.

DanDruff is the best Site Owner and Moderator I have ever seen!
God truly did bless the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

I'm going back to the Movie Thread to talk to the sensible tableplay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Monet, you seem to be quite the fan of Desertrunners. You don't usually bother with other posters drama, especially newbies to this site. He is however an infamous veteran over at PFA :)

---

He is one of these cry baby motherfuckers who come over here to bitch about DanDruff and run away.
Pussy.

DanDruff is the best Site Owner and Moderator I have ever seen!
God truly did bless the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

I'm going back to the Movie Thread to talk to the sensible tableplay.

---

Desertrunner, Ex-AP and US Papergames are all VERY EXTREME characters that rubbed people the wrong way. I think all 3 are very similar in the grand scope of things( quite possibly same person). Druff is the moderating 180 degree to Rusty Shackleford.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

You thread jackers suck.

---

At least your thread is getting decent action. No offence but every other thread you started got little to no traction. All is not lost buddy, you still have a decent chance of gaining legendary infamous status over here. I personally thought you were hilarious and misunderstood over at PFA. As a side bonus you pissed off the AWOL biggest all time PFA jackass Walter Sobchak. Major bonus points for that amazing achievement :)

---

- I dont care if my thread gets action or not. I dont really care about other threads either, this place is lame and I try to boost it up a little.
- I dont want to get "legendary infamous status" here. The PFA issue was that I was pissing off the liberals and they were threateneing Druff that they would leave. So Druff choose censorship and banned me to save a handful of liberals there. Oh well.
- Walter Sobchak has pedo behavior and the fact that someone actually called him out on it, he got really pissed and acted like a cry baby. Glad Pedo Walt is gone, hope its for good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Monet, you seem to be quite the fan of Desertrunners. You don't usually bother with other posters drama, especially newbies to this site. He is however an infamous veteran over at PFA :)

---

He is one of these cry baby motherfuckers who come over here to bitch about DanDruff and run away.
Pussy.

DanDruff is the best Site Owner and Moderator I have ever seen!
God truly did bless the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

I'm going back to the Movie Thread to talk to the sensible tableplay.

---

Desertrunner, Ex-AP and US Papergames are all VERY EXTREME characters that rubbed people the wrong way. I think all 3 are very similar in the grand scope of things( quite possibly same person). Druff is the moderating 180 degree to Rusty Shackleford.

---

Im not them, promise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Desertrunner

You thread jackers suck.

---

At least your thread is getting decent action. No offence but every other thread you started got little to no traction. All is not lost buddy, you still have a decent chance of gaining legendary infamous status over here. I personally thought you were hilarious and misunderstood over at PFA. As a side bonus you pissed off the AWOL biggest all time PFA jackass Walter Sobchak. Major bonus points for that amazing achievement :)

---

- I dont care if my thread gets action or not. I dont really care about other threads either, this place is lame and I try to boost it up a little.
- I dont want to get "legendary infamous status" here. The PFA issue was that I was pissing off the liberals and they were threateneing Druff that they would leave. So Druff choose censorship and banned me to save a handful of liberals there. Oh well.
- Walter Sobchak has pedo behavior and the fact that someone actually called him out on it, he got really pissed and acted like a cry baby. Glad Pedo Walt is gone, hope its for good.

---

I agree with you, I thought Druff made the wrong decision and sided with the far left whiners. I believe he didn't agree with them, but ultimately was strong armed into silencing you, due to sheer mass exodus( couple weeks boycott) Walter Sobchak is the worst forum douchebag of all time, not just PFA. He is/was a total fucktard. Good for you, for constantly getting under his skin and not backing down to that pompous know it all !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

I agree with you, I thought Druff made the wrong decision and sided with the far left whiners. I believe he didn't agree with them, but ultimately was strong armed into silencing you, due to sheer mass exodus( couple weeks boycott) Walter Sobchak is the worst forum douchebag of all time, not just PFA. He is/was a total fucktard. Good for you, for constantly getting under his skin and not backing down to that pompous know it all !

---

Thank you for your understanding and support on all points, its really appreciated. Glad you see the truth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

It appears that Redietz and Mission are both big on executing people. Redietz for something that someone said. Yep, now there's an executable offense for you, not even a misdemeanor. At least Mission wants to execute people for committing misdemeaners. Like the Jan 6 protestors most of whom have been convicted of misdemeanor tresspass.

Atheism.

---

Wrong. I've already said that they should be given a reasonable amount of time to leave, in all cases. I just refuse to treat one group who is being destructive differently than another group.

I'm also not an Atheist, for the 87th time. How would I know if there's a god or not? I seriously doubt it, at least, any version of a god(s) that I have heard of...but I obviously can't know.

I should also like to apologize to DesertRunner for my contribution to the thread-jacking. I have no idea why Mickey mentioned me in that context in this thread and my post (prior to that) in this thread was along the lines of what I thought the topic was meant to be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

I should also like to apologize to DesertRunner for my contribution to the thread-jacking. I have no idea why Mickey mentioned me in that context in this thread and my post (prior to that) in this thread was along the lines of what I thought the topic was meant to be.

---

Your pussy is showing.
This site has 5 active members.
No such thing as thread jacking on this site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

I should also like to apologize to DesertRunner for my contribution to the thread-jacking. I have no idea why Mickey mentioned me in that context in this thread and my post (prior to that) in this thread was along the lines of what I thought the topic was meant to be.

---

Your pussy is showing.
This site has 5 active members.
No such thing as thread jacking on this site.

---

Agree with first and 3rd line. 2nd line is off by about " 15 " members :)

Anyone who agrees with the first line is welcome to come find out. Especially Monet, as I happen to have Covid at the moment. (Kidding, but I do actually have Covid, atm, at least that's what the test said)

As far as apologizing for thread jacking, I don't see the need to be a complete dickhead for its own sake 100% of the time. My usual 90% is a rate I deem to be sufficient.

As long as a post that is not about Monopoly game pieces doesn't appear in the Monopoly game pieces thread, it is not thread jacking. The other case, a Monopoly game piece post, can appear in any section and is never thread jacking (following the restrictions in the Monopoly game pieces thread if it appears in that thread). So then if you want to be perfectly safe, just post about Monopoly game pieces .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

As long as a post that is not about Monopoly game pieces doesn't appear in the Monopoly game pieces thread, it is not thread jacking. The other case, a Monopoly game piece post, can appear in any section and is never thread jacking (following the restrictions in the Monopoly game pieces thread if it appears in that thread). So then if you want to be perfectly safe, just post about Monopoly game pieces .

---

That's funny because I was going to make a post about this Monopoly Exception but thankfully you did not let me down.
Keep up the good work!
Monopoly 2021 was so dead that I decided against making your post.
As a matter of fact, I have the only two responses to the OP in that thread and I never opened any of my game pieces.
The only thing that consoles me is Desertrunner opening this thread, like Tasha, to great disappointment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

I should also like to apologize to DesertRunner for my contribution to the thread-jacking. I have no idea why Mickey mentioned me in that context in this thread and my post (prior to that) in this thread was along the lines of what I thought the topic was meant to be.

---

No need to apologize as I was half goofing, I forgot to add a half wink face- ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

As long as a post that is not about Monopoly game pieces doesn't appear in the Monopoly game pieces thread, it is not thread jacking. The other case, a Monopoly game piece post, can appear in any section and is never thread jacking (following the restrictions in the Monopoly game pieces thread if it appears in that thread). So then if you want to be perfectly safe, just post about Monopoly game pieces .

---

That's funny because I was going to make a post about this Monopoly Exception but thankfully you did not let me down.
Keep up the good work!
Monopoly 2021 was so dead that I decided against making your post.
As a matter of fact, I have the only two responses to the OP in that thread and I never opened any of my game pieces.
The only thing that consoles me is Desertrunner opening this thread, like Tasha, to great disappointment.

---

Cheers M8. I'm looking forward to the Monopoly 2022 game piece thread and I'm sure you are as well. I'm still not quite sure how people get kicked off this forum - Black Hole should get some sort of reward.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

I'm still not quite sure how people get kicked off this forum - Black Hole should get some sort of reward.

---

You have to be a fucking brain-dead zombie, not to get the boot from here. --->

Education for Death: The Making of the Nazi.

https://anagram-solver.net/you%20hav...e?partial=true




Hehehe. Gotta love those 730 "ghostly" non-members online, yesterday.




Answers
'youhavetobeafuckingbraindeadzombienottogettheboot fromhere' contains the words:

Education for Death: The Making of the Nazi
'Round About Midnight at the Cafe Bohemia
The Hunt for Red October (book video game)
Government Of The Emirate Of Abu Dhabi
Bongee Bear and the Kingdom of Rhythm
Come and Get It: A Tribute to Badfinger
The Organization of Human Behaviour
Adventure at the Center of the Earth
Aftermath of the Armenian Genocide
Cobra: Game of the Normandy Breakout
Don't You Ever Get Tired (Of Hurting Me)
Doraemon: Gadget Cat From the Future
Grave robbery in the United Kingdom
Knight of the Order of the Dannebrog
Native Country of the Heart: A Memoir
Ta-Ch'ing Bank of the Board of Revenue
The Human Factor (Graham Greene book)
The Monument of Gratitude to France
Uniform Determination Of Death Act
Abu Dhabi Government Media Office
Another Fine Math You've Got Me Into
Anti-Counterfeit Trade Agreement
Audubon Center at Bent of the River
Authenticity of The Book of Mormon
Divergence(information geometry)
Federico II Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua
Giant Robo: The Day the Earth Burned
Government of the Region of Murcia
Gramercy (neighborhood), Manhattan
Henrietta Breckenridge Boughton
Hereditary angioneurotic oedema
Mother Orange Tree of Butte County
Our Angry Earth: A Ticking Time Bomb
The Emotion Detection Automation
The George Nethercutt Foundation
The Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
The Great Derangement (Taibbi book)
the morning after the night before
The Night Train to Kathmandu (movie)
The Ring magazine Event of the Year
The Rocketeer Adventure Magazine
Too Much Yangformation/ Aura . . . Or Not
Adagio and Fugue in C minor (Mozart)
Angioneurotic edema, hereditary
Anthracite budgerigar mutation
Antonio Fortunato de Figueiredo
Army Heritage Center Foundation
Automated theorem verification
Baie Comeau-Godbout-Matane Ferry
Baronetage of the United Kingdom
Big Brother (Nineteen Eighty-Four)
(Come 'Round Here) I'm The One You Need
Commander of the Order of the Bath
Confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh
Having your cake and eating it too
I Don't Think Much About Her No More


Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar

Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
560 <---------------------- Well, rounds it off a bit. To go with the 56 or so answers above.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garnabby

You have to be a fucking brain-dead zombie, not to get the boot from here. --->

---

By your own logic then Garnabby, you're a brain dead zombie.
Somehow Bill Yung and One Hit Wonder also managed to get kicked off - I'm not sure about LMR.