Regarding kewlJ / MDawg issue

I tried to let it play out on its own, but this has gotten completely out of hand, so I am going to have to take some control of the situation here so it stops dominating the forum.

1) kewlJ needs to stop with the gratuitous racism and anti-Semitism, just because he's pissed off that some people have made a few gay jokes.

2) MDawg needs to cool it. He's starting a million threads about kewlJ, and bringing up kewlJ in threads unrelated to him. I understand that this is a long-running feud, but I don't want it taking over this forum, which it has recently.

3) I don't want to see people trolling kewlJ's posts and threads simply because you don't like him. For example, he started a good thread tonight about a change to the Nevada trespassing law, and someone already jumped to troll him there. kewlJ did nothing wrong by starting that thread, and in fact it was useful content here.

4) kewlJ has to understand that he was caught in a lie, and spent a lot of time and effort fighting with people before admitting he lied (and only when his back was up against the wall). Therefore, he cannot play victim as if everyone is mean and picking on him. Nobody forced him to make up phony stories here. If you do that and get caught, expect the forum to make fun of you for awhile. With that said, this is going way too far, and needs to decrease its prominence here.

5) No new threads about kewlJ unless they have something new and compelling to say, which wouldn't fit in an existing kewlJ thread.


So let it be written, so let it be done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I tried to let it play out on its own, but this has gotten completely out of hand, so I am going to have to take some control of the situation here so it stops dominating the forum.

1) kewlJ needs to stop with the gratuitous racism and anti-Semitism, just because he's pissed off that some people have made a few gay jokes.

2) MDawg needs to cool it. He's starting a million threads about kewlJ, and bringing up kewlJ in threads unrelated to him. I understand that this is a long-running feud, but I don't want it taking over this forum, which it has recently.

3) I don't want to see people trolling kewlJ's posts and threads simply because you don't like him. For example, he started a good thread tonight about a change to the Nevada trespassing law, and someone already jumped to troll him there. kewlJ did nothing wrong by starting that thread, and in fact it was useful content here.

4) kewlJ has to understand that he was caught in a lie, and spent a lot of time and effort fighting with people before admitting he lied (and only when his back was up against the wall). Therefore, he cannot play victim as if everyone is mean and picking on him. Nobody forced him to make up phony stories here. If you do that and get caught, expect the forum to make fun of you for awhile. With that said, this is going way too far, and needs to decrease its prominence here.

5) No new threads about kewlJ unless they have something new and compelling to say, which wouldn't fit in an existing kewlJ thread.


So let it be written, so let it be done.

---

Good luck with all that. You better get yourself a Moderator since it's going to be a full-time job.

I think your points will be taken much more serious than mine were. I also started a thread stating the Kewlj and Mdawg Feud was beyond out of control and my Thread was laughed at. Seeing as how you're the Admin, I doubt your warnings will be laughed at and I fully think they will be taken seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

1) kewlJ needs to stop with the gratuitous racism and anti-Semitism, just because he's pissed off that some people have made a few gay jokes.

---

This isn't good enough for me, Dan Druff. It isn't "a few gay jokes". It has been well over a year that starting with seedvalue, but now repeated daily by others, people falsely claim I am a male prostitute preying on older men. This is an illegal, criminal activity, I am accused of daily. I wasn't allowed to do that with coach belly and I am requesting the same ruling. Nothing more, nothing less.

I don't think you would put up with someone posting daily that you are a drug dealer as your primary source of income. Accusing someone of any kind of criminal or illegal activity, is something that someone should have to back up with proof. That is not just "a few gay jokes".

So don't give me this "I actually like KJ" shit. If you are going to allow this repeatedly, on a daily basis, you are showing me that you don't want me participating here. Your forum, your call. But That is my stipulation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for Mdawg, he is really done now as far as his claims that I felt a need to challenge, so there is little need for me to keep going with the feud he is bating me with. Twice this year I actually proposed an end to all this and he refused. The fact that not just myself, but many people did challenge these repeated absurdities, and that they have grown even more ridiculous over time (like a $100-$5000 spread card counting) and threat of misleading people has been neutralized. Just like Singer and his many absurd gambling claims.

And therein lies the difference in what I lied about to protect myself, vs Singer and Mdawg lying. Their lying is their direct gambling claims, which defy either the math or the way Las vegas works. My lie was more about the back story and protecting myself from my identity getting out. If people don't was to recognize that difference, and conclude whatever they want about my blackjack play accounts, that is their right.

Maybe you could just start a kewl and dog subforum and divert their threads to there?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

And therein lies the difference

---

The difference is that UNKewLyingJ gets nailed for outright lies that he himself even admits were lies, while he devotes tomes to why so and so's claims can't be true just because he says so. :cool:

MaxPen on UNKewlJ's nonsense: All you've done is spent years trying to discredit the guy without providing one ounce of proof beyond the obvious as to what is really going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I didn't say pictures proved anything, moron. I said Mdawg had posted more proof. The pictures could not even have been taken by him and it is still more proof than what you have given. Even Singer has posted more evidence but nah you can't post a simple picture of a surfboard leaning against a wall with a paper taped to it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

It is amusing how apparently you ONLY lie about stuff which can be disproven. You can't fake your death and keep posting. You can't reference a lawsuit that can be conclusively proven to not exist. Anything else? NOT a lie. lol

All you can do is insist people prove things that can't be proven. If these claims were provable as lies then it'd happen and that would be lie #3. They're not disprovable so you just have your little tantrum trying to demand people prove the unprovable. Prove the negative. whatever. I'm being bullied. You people are the worst.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobSinger

How many times does he need to suffer thru "It just isn't fair that MDawg gets to claim he wins all the time with comps, gifts and special treatment, and he gets support & cover from Benedict Shack and other Richard Potatoes from the gaming forums' group of administrators!" "Can't you people see how much this HURTS me when I can't do anything about it?"

Yes....kew IS the architect of his own suffering. While other disbelievers aren't affected one bit by what MDawg does or says, kew let's it get so far under his skin that it's beginning to spell I AM A FOOL all over his wimpy body

How about some truth about his obsession for a refreshing change. Kew is so extraordinarily jealous of the guy because he knows he has wealth far beyond anything kew will ever see. He also despises him for being normal and not being afflicted with that short circuit in his brain. Covering up this ball of envy with rambling posts of "I'm an educator on LV gambling operation, and I say THAT'S NOT HOW THIS CITY WORKS!"

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

This is an illegal, criminal activity, I am accused of daily. I wasn't allowed to do that with coach belly

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

My lie was more about the back story and protecting myself from my identity getting out.

---

Was the lie that you told about me about a back story, told to protect yourself?

I never lied about you, but you considered it OK to lie about me.

You would likely continue that lie, if you weren't explicitly told by Druff that it is not permitted.

So then you may have your reasons for lying, but will also lie for no reason...other than that you're a compulsive liar.

You're sick in the head, and that's no lie.

He's still going on and on with the absurdity of that he lied about there being a lawsuit to "protect himself" but still hasn't come up with any reason for why that makes sense. Because it doesn't.

This shows complete unrepentance and unwillingness to at least admit that he lied just to back up his story.

A sociopath like that isn't going to ever stop lying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The difference is that UNKewLyingJ gets nailed for outright lies that he himself even admits were lies, while he devotes tomes to why so and so's claims can't be true just because he says so.

---

Wait a minute, WTF kind of double standard are you espousing here?

It seems to me that you and Singer have lied through your teeth for years about your gambling prowess and winnings, a continuous barrage of bullshit, and here you argue that's OK because unlike KJ, a soul with a conscience, you never fess up to lying?

Neither of you two birds have or will admit to being liars, but substantially all of us know that to be true, yet somehow your unrepentence gives you a bye?

Give me a break.

As for Duff jumping on KJ for the Jewish slurs: he says the board is about free speech but Jewish slurs are off the table?

WTF kind of fuzzy thinking is that?

He 's allowed various douchebags on this board to slam KJ and to a lesser degree myself and others with all sorts of lying bullshit and didn't lift a finger to object.

WTF is it about the Jews that warrants giving them protection, whereas in Dan's mind it's been open season on gays, blacks and other classes?

Fuck it: "Free speech" means EXACTLY that.

There is no double standard.

MaxPen on UNKewlJ's nonsense: All you've done is spent years trying to discredit the guy without providing one ounce of proof beyond the obvious as to what is really going on.

The UNKewl One just goes on and on about how "this can't be" with reference to whatever I am doing. Just opinion.

On the other hand he's been caught dead to rights in repeated lies and even admitted to them. Another key difference between why UNKewlJ is so despised is that during the periods when he is laying down the whoppers he is arrogant and aggressive to the point of trying to tell everyone how stupid we are for disbelieving him. Until the day comes when he backs down and admits that he lied, and even then he comes back with further arrogant nonsense about why he lied and how everything else he said is true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think kewlJ doesn't understand why so many people here dislike him.

It's not just that he lies. We've had lots of liars on this forum.

It's the seriousness with which kewlJ tells these lies, and then lashes out at those who doubt them. There's a certain arrogance to those posts, in the tone, "Of course this is fucking true, and you're a complete idiot for even doubting this."

Then, when the forum userbase turns out to be smarter than he expected and disproves some of them, we get the mea culpa that he wasn't telling the truth all along. Fessing up only gets you credit if you do it before people take apart the lie and prove otherwise. You get even less credit if you were arrogant/combative/condescending during the questioning of the story's veracity.

In fact, even this story doesn't make sense. He's insisting the backrooming really happened, but just the lawsuit part of it was fake. He said he told that lie in order to protect his privacy. Huh?? How does adding a fake postscript to the story protect your privacy?

It still sounds like he's trying to save face. He's now only admitting to the part which was proven to be false -- and sticking to the part of the story which nobody can possibly disprove.

---

And DanDruff made it clear that any sort of racist talk is not to be tolerated, which includes anti semitism and the n word.

By "gratuitous racism and anti-Semitism" he means, calling someone the n word or something anti-semitic "just 'cause" you're losing it and want to insult him. That's what "gratuitous" means.

Isn't today Monday, MrV? Seems like another prime business day morning is almost over and people claiming to be professionals that should be doing business related work are once again spending the entire morning and day online trolling on internet forums. But what do I know, I am not a lawyer or doctor. :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Isn't today Monday, MrV? Seems like another prime business day morning is almost over and people claiming to be professionals that should be doing business related work are once again spending the entire morning and day online trolling on internet forums. But what do I know, I am not a lawyer or doctor. :confused:

---

KJ, it's a new world: with smart phones etc. people can take a quick break from whatever, type a flame, send it, and resume as if nothing happened.

Add to that the ability to work remotely and yeah, someone COULD practice law yet still spend a lot of time in sin city, conversing via zoom with staff, clients and often the courts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

KJ, it's a new world: with smart phones etc. people can take a quick break from whatever, type a flame, send it, and resume as if nothing happened.

Add to that the ability to work remotely and yeah, someone COULD practice law yet still spend a lot of time in sin city, conversing via zoom with staff, clients and often the courts.

---

Yeah, I get that MrV, but I was not really talking about "taking a quick break". I was thinking more about someone that has posted 9 times in two hours, most posts complete with quotes that need to be looked up and take extra time. 9 times on THIS forum. Even more at 2 other gambling forums. That doesn't seem like a guy claiming to be a professional, getting any work done. But again what do I know? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

But again what do I know? :rolleyes:

---

Exactly. I mean you manage to keep your business going, even with all the time you spend online.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seedvalue

I’m also the only one who figured out what Jason does for a living. Blackjack was always a cover story, you guys just didn’t believe it lol.

To be fair Kewj didn’t get into the escort business until after his partner passed away. It’s my understanding that him, and his late partner did do some low rolling AP things around town just enough to get by.

Once I confirmed all this I kind of felt sorry for the dude. I let him be, because it wasn’t worth my time to do a full Mdawg report. The guy is literally just a pathetic lonely gay escort. Maybe he makes up all these lies for entertainment. Is clear that he spends most of his days reading, and posting on every gambling forum on the internet. Sad man real sad lol neighbor guy fucked his brain up real good

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

KJ, it's a new world: with smart phones etc. people can take a quick break from whatever, type a flame, send it, and resume as if nothing happened.

Add to that the ability to work remotely and yeah, someone COULD practice law yet still spend a lot of time in sin city, conversing via zoom with staff, clients and often the courts.

---

Yeah, I get that MrV, but I was not really talking about "taking a quick break". I was thinking more about someone that has posted 9 times in two hours, most posts complete with quotes that need to be looked up and take extra time. 9 times on THIS forum. Even more at 2 other gambling forums. That doesn't seem like a guy claiming to be a professional, getting any work done. But again what do I know? :rolleyes:

---

You thinking the quotes have to be looked up each time is a prime example of how things can only be a certain way in your mind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

[

You thinking the quotes have to be looked up each time is a prime example of how things can only be a certain way in your mind.

---

I actually don't think that. I am sure he has a list of quotes to pull from. But that is a pretty damn trollish thing to do isn't it? Seriously?

Maxpen, I am done arguing and fighting with you t0o. I have nothing against you. If you need to continue trying to discredit me, you do what you need to do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

[

You thinking the quotes have to be looked up each time is a prime example of how things can only be a certain way in your mind.

---

I actually don't think that. I am sure he has a list of quotes to pull from. But that is a pretty damn trollish thing to do isn't it? Seriously?

Maxpen, I am done arguing and fighting with you t0o. I have nothing against you. If you need to continue trying to discredit me, you do what you need to do.

---

If you really think that then why would you say this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Yeah, I get that MrV, but I was not really talking about "taking a quick break". I was thinking more about someone that has posted 9 times in two hours, most posts complete with quotes that need to be looked up and take extra time. 9 times on THIS forum. Even more at 2 other gambling forums. That doesn't seem like a guy claiming to be a professional, getting any work done. But again what do I know? :rolleyes:

---

We all know why. So you don't have to bother answering. It is because you will say anything regardless of facts, truth, or whatever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Isn't today Monday, MrV? Seems like another prime business day morning is almost over and people claiming to be professionals that should be doing business related work are once again spending the entire morning and day online trolling on internet forums. But what do I know, I am not a lawyer or doctor. :confused:

---

If you had a real job or had ever been successful you'd realize how your point is goofy. It really depends on your business but one thing is for certain - when you own your own business you have no one looking over your shoulder. If you want to work for 2 hours a day and spend 3 hours on this unhinged forum then who is to stop you? Either your business needs it or you don't.

Plenty of small business owners show up with a big sonic cup with a strong dose of vodka on a friday.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

If you had a real job or had ever been successful

---

You just can't give up your trolling can you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

If you had a real job or had ever been successful

---

You just can't give up your trolling can you?

---

You can't stop lying can you?

You're getting the same treatment you profess to give others. Grow up. You thinking you can have it both ways is typical.

Maybe Mdawg doesn't work or maybe he does. Him goofing around on this forum isn't particularly strong evidence yet you keep repeating it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

when you own your own business you have no one looking over your shoulder. If you want to work for 2 hours a day and spend 3 hours on this unhinged forum then who is to stop you? Either your business needs it or you don't. Plenty of small business owners show up with a big sonic cup with a strong dose of vodka on a friday.

---

But he isn't a "business owner" in the sense you are talking about.

Dawg is an attorney, and while he may have some proprietary interest in the firm he is the point man and needs to actually work quite frequently.

Sure, he can have staff, paralegals, investigators and clerks assist him but there are things he simply MUST do, such as appear in court for motions or trials, review cases to instruct underlings, and meet with and schmooze clients, both new and existing.

Much can be done remotely but the notion that he was able to maintain a viable practice while remaining ensconced in a suite in sin city for many months on end baffled me, as it seems logistically incongruent with reality.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

when you own your own business you have no one looking over your shoulder. If you want to work for 2 hours a day and spend 3 hours on this unhinged forum then who is to stop you? Either your business needs it or you don't. Plenty of small business owners show up with a big sonic cup with a strong dose of vodka on a friday.

---

But he isn't a "business owner" in the sense you are talking about.

Dawg is an attorney, and while he may have some proprietary interest in the firm he is the point man and needs to actually work quite frequently.

Sure, he can have staff, paralegals, investigators and clerks assist him but there are things he simply MUST do, such as appear in court for motions or trials, review cases to instruct underlings, and meet with and schmooze clients, both new and existing.

Much can be done remotely but the notion that he was able to maintain a viable practice while remaining ensconced in a suite in sin city for many months on end baffled me, as it seems logistically incongruent with reality.

---

Aren't there plenty of attorneys who almost never have to make an appearance in court? Attorneys who do contracts for one? I don't disagree that he would be an exception on the general case but I'm not sure how strong of evidence that is not an attorney.

Now if you were to ask how he makes so much money as an attorney who works remotely.. that is would be a stronger point. :) I really have no opinion but Kewl keeps harping on this as proof he isn't a practicing attorney.

My understanding is that he does primarily personal injury cases.

That line of work can be done almost entirely by staff members, but there are things the attorney himself must do, and if he has a high volume of cases he'd be kept pretty busy.

I suspect the dawg has good support staff but I still cannot get my head around the idea that he was able to live in Vegas for what, nine months, and still keep earning the big bucks.

But there may be something there that I just cannot see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

but Kewl keeps harping on this as proof he isn't a practicing attorney.

---

Where did I EVER say he wasn't a practicing attorney? Ever heard me say "it doesn't take that much to figure out......" The person we are talking about is so knowledgable about that law that I long ago had no question that he is an attorney or has a law degree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The difference is that UNKewLyingJ gets nailed for outright lies that he himself even admits were lies, while he devotes tomes to why so and so's claims can't be true just because he says so.

---

Wait a minute, WTF kind of double standard are you espousing here?

It seems to me that you and Singer have lied through your teeth for years about your gambling prowess and winnings, a continuous barrage of bullshit, and here you argue that's OK because unlike KJ, a soul with a conscience, you never fess up to lying?

Neither of you two birds have or will admit to being liars, but substantially all of us know that to be true, yet somehow your unrepentence gives you a bye?

Give me a break.

As for Duff jumping on KJ for the Jewish slurs: he says the board is about free speech but Jewish slurs are off the table?

WTF kind of fuzzy thinking is that?

He 's allowed various douchebags on this board to slam KJ and to a lesser degree myself and others with all sorts of lying bullshit and didn't lift a finger to object.

WTF is it about the Jews that warrants giving them protection, whereas in Dan's mind it's been open season on gays, blacks and other classes?

Fuck it: "Free speech" means EXACTLY that.

---

V, for you to say I've been lying for years is just another of the lies you utilize in your continuing feeble attempts to support the biggest liar, coward, and pretender the gaming forums has ever seen.

And just because you're just another jew and cop hater from ignorant and deteriorating Portland doesn't translate into it being wrong to denigrate loudmouth homos, weird transgender freaks, and black thugs (a precise labeling based on the fact that their population is only 13.5%, yet the PRISON population is 65% black).

Dispute that.

Rob, I've questioned your and the Dawg's claims long before this little bruhaha of KJ being caught lying.

My disbelief has zero to do with somehow wanting to prop up KJ: I only defend him, at least to a point, because I see some value to most of his posts, plus he's interesting.

In the defense of both you and the dawg, you are both interesting as well, which is a good thing.

Why you'd think I hate Jews is beyond me: I attended a buddy's bar mitzvah when I was young; my college girlfriend was Jewish, and my wife's father was Jewish.

Nor do I hate cops: my dad was in police reserve, then security at Bally's AC: the only cops I dislike are the narcs, and them not so much anymore as weed is legal and I stopped dealing long ago.

But keep pulling arrows out of your quivver, someday you might get lucky and hit the bulls eye.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The difference is that UNKewLyingJ gets nailed for outright lies that he himself even admits were lies, while he devotes tomes to why so and so's claims can't be true just because he says so.

---

Wait a minute, WTF kind of double standard are you espousing here?

It seems to me that you and Singer have lied through your teeth for years about your gambling prowess and winnings, a continuous barrage of bullshit, and here you argue that's OK because unlike KJ, a soul with a conscience, you never fess up to lying?

Neither of you two birds have or will admit to being liars, but substantially all of us know that to be true, yet somehow your unrepentence gives you a bye?

Give me a break.

As for Duff jumping on KJ for the Jewish slurs: he says the board is about free speech but Jewish slurs are off the table?

WTF kind of fuzzy thinking is that?

He 's allowed various douchebags on this board to slam KJ and to a lesser degree myself and others with all sorts of lying bullshit and didn't lift a finger to object.

WTF is it about the Jews that warrants giving them protection, whereas in Dan's mind it's been open season on gays, blacks and other classes?

Fuck it: "Free speech" means EXACTLY that.

---

Wait, what, you can't make Jewish slurs? Man, we are getting jewed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

You can't stop lying can you?

---

You clever dog, you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

But there may be something there that I just cannot see.

---

Oh there is my friend, there is.

MDawg said" to KJ....."your fearful tattle tale ass has to turn it into whether or not you're going to get kicked off this forum. You always think along the lines of a rat fink, which is why you're constantly crying to the Wizard about this or that, trying to get his ear."


Are you kidding me right now? BIG fucking pot, meet Kettle.

Are you kidding ME? You're the documented rat, not I.

You've filed many complaints and admitted to it more than a few times too.

https://i.imgur.com/98ORWpYh.jpg

When UNKewlJ and MisterV were the only ones who bought that line about how what the UNKewl one is doing is "trolling" (versus the truth – desperately hoping to be believed and credible and willing to lie to no end to back up his nonsense), the comments ranged from

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Lol epicly bad read.

---

to

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

A lot of people would like to play poker with you after seeing that post.

---

Similarly, MisterV was equally way off base with even half buying UNKewlJ's nonsensical “I was protecting myself” lie about why he lied about the backrooming lawsuit. (To that lie, DanDruff said it all with just few letters -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Huh??

---

)

So, it makes perfect sense that UNKewlJ and MisterV would walk hand in hand down that same complete MISread of people and matters, when both of them figured that Dan Druff wouldn’t put a stop to UNKewlJ's racist rant.

MisterV on how sure he is that Dan Druff won’t clamp down on UNKewlJ: he won't, of course

UNKewlJ was equally sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Maybe you can convince the "free speech" guy Dan Druff to silence me but I doubt it.

---

But…what happened in the end? UNKewlJ MUZZLED, but everyone else left, as usual, with a free hand to put the perennially UNKewl one down like the plague stricken rat he is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

kewlJ has to understand that he was caught in a lie, and spent a lot of time and effort fighting with people before admitting he lied (and only when his back was up against the wall). Therefore, he cannot play victim as if everyone is mean and picking on him. Nobody forced him to make up phony stories here. If you do that and get caught, expect the forum to make fun of you for awhile.

---

But I mean, what does it matter anyway, to the UNKewl one? After all,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I really don't care what people think about me.

---

In a pig's eye!

My, what a busy little lawyer you are these days, Dawg.

You have your staff searching for dirt on KJ, then emailing it to you?

Certainly a rich, powerful man such as you wish to present yourself as wouldn't spend endless hours trolling a lowly sin city homosexual card counter.

Oops,I guess you would.

Never mind, case closed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

When UNKewlJ and MisterV were the only ones who bought that line about how what the UNKewl one is doing is "trolling" (versus the truth – desperately hoping to be believed and credible and willing to lie to no end to back up his nonsense), the comments ranged from to
Similarly, MisterV was equally way off base with even half buying UNKewlJ's nonsensical “I was protecting myself” lie about why he lied about the backrooming lawsuit. (To that lie, DanDruff said it all with just few letters -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Huh??

---

So, it makes perfect sense that UNKewlJ and MisterV would walk hand in hand down that same complete MISread of people and matters, when both of them figured that Dan Druff wouldn’t put a stop to UNKewlJ's racist rant.

MisterV on how sure he is that Dan Druff won’t clamp down on UNKewlJ: he won't, of course

UNKewlJ was equally sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Maybe you can convince the "free speech" guy Dan Druff to silence me but I doubt it.

---

But…what happened in the end? UNKewlJ MUZZLED, but everyone else left, as usual, with a free hand to put the perennially UNKewl one down like the plague stricken rat he is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

kewlJ has to understand that he was caught in a lie, and spent a lot of time and effort fighting with people before admitting he lied (and only when his back was up against the wall). Therefore, he cannot play victim as if everyone is mean and picking on him. Nobody forced him to make up phony stories here. If you do that and get caught, expect the forum to make fun of you for awhile.

---

But I mean, what does it matter anyway, to the UNKewl one? After all,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I really don't care what people think about me.

---

In a pig's eye!

---

MDAWG, YOU'RE... HIRED! HA.

Nice. I guess that you get what you pay for.


But, supposedly, a lot of people, supposedly, were happy that they paid for something like ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

My, what a busy little lawyer you are these days, Dawg.

You have your staff searching for dirt on KJ, then emailing it to you?

Certainly a rich, powerful man such as you wish to present yourself as wouldn't spend endless hours trolling a lowly sin city homosexual card counter.

Oops, I guess you would.

Never mind, case closed.

---

A "mini V" of KJ.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Are you kidding ME? You're the documented rat, not I.

You've filed many complaints and admitted to it more than a few times too.

https://i.imgur.com/98ORWpYh.jpg

---

Nice butcher edit job on quoting me. I said When it comes to YOU. It was payback for EVERYONE you cried to Mike and the other Mods about and begged for suspensions. You wouldn't admit it, but I know for a fact the mods were sick of your constant crying and attempting to get people suspended.

I freely admit to getting you suspended multiple times, but only after your BullShit. I certainly won that game. Want to play some more?

FYI BBB said I could Quote her. You were one of the main reasons she left the forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

My, what a busy little lawyer you are these days, Dawg.

You have your staff searching for dirt on KJ, then emailing it to you?

Certainly a rich, powerful man such as you wish to present yourself as wouldn't spend endless hours trolling a lowly sin city homosexual card counter.

Oops,I guess you would.

Never mind, case closed.

---

Don't let him fool you, it's all an illusion. The M really stands for MastersDawg.

For whatever reason, "mini V" has been duped by UNKewlJ, on more than one score.

Just a note that I'm officially out of here for at least six weeks, after which time I will further package, and, next, submit the theory of everything for professional peer review. I can't ignore my previous obligations, but, it's enough for now to leave 'em with one of the gnawing problems with becoming a professional gambler. Such that zero good can truly come of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gottlob1

I guess, for those who didn't understand the above, the question was who goes where they aren't welcome? Businesses don't have the natural right to expect to serve only the welcome?

---

Today, 07:27 AM

Gottlob1 Gottlob1 is online now
Gold
Gottlob1's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
168

In spot-#38 = (1 + 37) ---> 137

168 is the product of the first two perfect numbers.

Quote:

---

Many ancient cultures endowed certain integers with special religious and magical significance. One example is the perfect numbers, those integers which are the sum of their positive proper divisors. The first three perfect numbers are: 6 = (1 + 2 + 3); 28 = (1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14); and 496 = (1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 31 + 62 + 124 + 248).

---

As well, 168 = 1*42*4*1 ---> 142_241

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The difference is that UNKewLyingJ gets nailed for outright lies that he himself even admits were lies, while he devotes tomes to why so and so's claims can't be true just because he says so.

---

Wait a minute, WTF kind of double standard are you espousing here?

It seems to me that you and Singer have lied through your teeth for years about your gambling prowess and winnings, a continuous barrage of bullshit, and here you argue that's OK because unlike KJ, a soul with a conscience, you never fess up to lying?

Neither of you two birds have or will admit to being liars, but substantially all of us know that to be true, yet somehow your unrepentence gives you a bye?

Give me a break.

As for Duff jumping on KJ for the Jewish slurs: he says the board is about free speech but Jewish slurs are off the table?

WTF kind of fuzzy thinking is that?

He 's allowed various douchebags on this board to slam KJ and to a lesser degree myself and others with all sorts of lying bullshit and didn't lift a finger to object.

WTF is it about the Jews that warrants giving them protection, whereas in Dan's mind it's been open season on gays, blacks and other classes?

Fuck it: "Free speech" means EXACTLY that.

---

Wait, what, you can't make Jewish slurs? Man, we are getting jewed.

---

Just call him, "Rabbi Todd." That'll help explain things.

By the way, I have never been clear on that phrase. Should the "j" in "jewed" be capitalized? What say you, V? From a legal perspective, if one says "I was Jewed," is that different from "I was jewed?" Does one have a more proper legal standing? Is one less religious and more profane than the other?

I think a separate thread for the correct spelling of "I was jewed/Jewed" would be appropriate. With the Rabbi's permission, of course. In the name of free speech.

I think that you'd be hard pressed to find a capitalized verb outside of a title for an essay, or something. Never heard of a "proper verb". You should satisfy yourself by asking it at Englishstackexchange.com, but expect to be laughed at. Apparently, no one has thus asked. Doing something positive could help you over your "problems with the world". For sure, though, the courts go by the dictionaries, the same as every one else. But, in the interest of you, and KJ, I'm sure that V will try to put forth another "legal" online argument. Sigh.


Double P.S.S. [The football pass] For the sake of completeness, check out, past participle: Jewed; and, gerund: Jewing. Ha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

For whatever reason, "mini V" has been duped by UNKewlJ, on more than one score.

---

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

My "support" or "belief" in KJ is an equal mix of belief of most of what he says and my disbelief of most of what you two birds chirp.

And yet ... I do not really dislike you or Rob; in a different milieu we might be cordial and respectful to one another.

Oh, Red, as for whether the "j" should be capitalized: not sure, not gonna research it, but I side with garnabby: no capitalization.

Garnabby, seriously, good luck with your theory of everything; that is likely more important, and of greater value than anything ever posted on this board (except Alan's 18 yo's in a row, i.e. his "theory of every yo.")

Whether you return festooned in academic glory, hailed as the Einstein of the 21st century, or ignored like shit on a shoe, you'll always have a supporter in me as I root for the underdog.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

My "support" or "belief" in KJ is an equal mix of belief of most of what he says and my disbelief of most of what you two birds chirp.

---

I can't fathom how you succeeded as an attorney and still believe most of what Kewl claims.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

---

Time passes...things change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Why bother to read what douchedawg posts?

I don't (blocked, on "ignore").

Not worth my time.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

My "support" or "belief" in KJ is an equal mix of belief of most of what he says and my disbelief of most of what you two birds chirp.

---

I can't fathom how you succeeded as an attorney and still believe most of what Kewl claims.

---

Pretty obvious. He has been trained, unlike some people, to "read thoroughly and carefully."

The thing about reading "thoroughly and carefully." If you ain't gonna do it, why read at all? Kinda defeats the purpose of reading altogether if you don't do it thoroughly and carefully.

And I'm speaking as someone with some experience, as I was tortured in my youth on speed reading machines. I think I was semi-competent up to 600-some wpm. No fun, but I got the gist. I don't recommend it. It's not thorough or careful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

For whatever reason, "mini V" has been duped by UNKewlJ, on more than one score.

---

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

My "support" or "belief" in KJ is an equal mix of belief of most of what he says and my disbelief of most of what you two birds chirp.

And yet ... I do not really dislike you or Rob; in a different milieu we might be cordial and respectful to one another.

Oh, Red, as for whether the "j" should be capitalized: not sure, not gonna research it, but I side with garnabby: no capitalization.

Garnabby, seriously, good luck with your theory of everything; that is likely more important, and of greater value than anything ever posted on this board (except Alan's 18 yo's in a row, i.e. his "theory of every yo.")

Whether you return festooned in academic glory, hailed as the Einstein of the 21st century, or ignored like shit on a shoe, you'll always have a supporter in me as I root for the underdog.

---

V, what you're really trying to say is you don't want to believe what we say. And again, you're mostly supportive of kew because of him being biologically confused due to his own foolish choice, because you see how low-class he is a d lives, and because he deserves deservedly punished here for being a proven serial liar.

As I said: the typical Portland blind perspective.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is your inability to see or even fathom my reasons for disenchantment with you and Rob that is most remarkable.

My "support" or "belief" in KJ is an equal mix of belief of most of what he says and my disbelief of most of what you two birds chirp.

---

I can't fathom how you succeeded as an attorney and still believe most of what Kewl claims.

---

Pretty obvious. He has been trained, unlike some people, to "read thoroughly and carefully."

The thing about reading "thoroughly and carefully." If you ain't gonna do it, why read at all? Kinda defeats the purpose of reading altogether if you don't do it thoroughly and carefully.

And I'm speaking as someone with some experience, as I was tortured in my youth on speed reading machines. I think I was semi-competent up to 600-some wpm. No fun, but I got the gist. I don't recommend it. It's not thorough or careful.

---

Yea, it defeats the purpose of reading to not read everything thoroughly. Genius.

You're really fairly stupid relative to most posters on here and I mean this sincerely.

Lets take your goofball blog. There is literally no reason to read what you write thoroughly. One skims over the bullshit. People smarter than you do this all the time.

But I understand, in your head this is your big gotcha moment.

You might not be so broke if you didn't spend too much on your shoes that appear to be a big source of pride for you. Wow $300 shoes. lol.

No clue what speed reading machines are but you always have to pump yourself up over something asinine. In this post we are introduced to "speed reading machines". Whatever the fuck that is!

Your insecurity is up there with the best of the insecure ones.

Oh yea, and where does Stanford recommend Ivermectin for long covid or at all? <crickets>

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I know for a fact the mods were sick of...

---

Hey little fella...that sounds just like something tewlj would say.

You fucking hypocrite phony...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Back that up with any legitimate source or facts

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I know for a fact the mods were sick of...

---

Hey little fella...that sounds just like something tewlj would say.

You fucking hypocrite phony...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Back that up with any legitimate source or facts

---

---

What kind of proof do you want and does it have to include ALL the moderators, a majority? Will you accept proof given to someone like Dan Druff to look over? If I show proof will you fuck off the forums forever?

I need to get some personal benefit for doing this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I need to get some personal benefit for doing this.

---

Your personal benefit is to not be considered a fucking hypocrite phony.

Post whatever proof you have right here.

You already divulged the info, so you broke the confidence.

What personal benefit did you get by telling that story without any backup?

He's currently not right in the head, I'd discount anything he has to say (more than usual, I mean). A combination of the Cap'n and pain meds for his cracked ribs.

https://i.imgur.com/u3QPbJRm.jpg

Monet on Axel’s terrible memory: The greatest AP Wolf on all Gambling Forums sure does have a hard time remembering all the time.
Must be all that Captain Morgan or just all the bullshit stories you keep mixing up.
You shouldn't be getting back roomed or security-ed for anything, anyways.
Poser!

Mdawg, please don't have a Feud with Axelwolf as well. You and Kewlj's feud is tiring and old as it is, please don't have a a feud with Axelwolf too. :/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I need to get some personal benefit for doing this.

---

Your personal benefit is to not be considered a fucking hypocrite phony.

Post whatever proof you have right here.

You already divulged the info, so you broke the confidence.

What personal benefit did you get by telling that story without any backup?

---

There's a huge difference between saying I know something for a fact vs claiming what KJ claimed. I can honestly say what I said and I know it is reasonably truthful. FYI it's even apparent reading various posts, but that might be open to interpretation.

What confidence did I break?
I was given permission by BBB.

I didn't reveal what anyone said or who said it if anything was even said. For all you know, I had access to someone's computer, and they "left for a while" while being logged in to their administrative account. Perhaps I read all their PMs.

Whatever the case, I'm not a hypocrite in this case, or lying, or fraudful. I told KJ to give Dan his evidence to judge.

Given the entire context, If people want to come to the conclusion I'm a fucking hypocrite phony by not providing evidence for that, I'm totally fine with it. Those are the kinds of people I want nothing to do with outside the forums anyway.

I'm only willing to waste my time and effort providing proof if the person/people are giving up something I deem worthy, or I gain something I deem worthy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Mdawg, please don't have a Feud with Axelwolf as well. You and Kewlj's feud is tiring and old as it is, please don't have a a feud with Axelwolf too. :/

---

Where have you been girl? The Mdawg and Axelwolf feud has been and always will be until I believe his BS isn't BS. If that ever happens, well fuck me. I will have to bow, kiss his ring, pay you to suck his micro dick and lick the pussy stank off his cochi-hidden Rolex.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I didn't reveal what anyone said or who said it if anything was even said.

---

You haven't been accused of revealing anything that was said...so denying it is a tell.

All I know is you wrote that you know. You brought it up, it's your claim.

If you can't back it up, that's on you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I know for a fact the mods were sick of your constant crying and attempting to get people suspended.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I didn't reveal what anyone said or who said it if anything was even said.

---

You haven't been accused of revealing anything that was said...so denying it is a tell.

All I know is you wrote that you know. You brought it up, it's your claim.

If you can't back it up, that's on you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I know for a fact the mods were sick of your constant crying and attempting to get people suspended.

---

---

I don't care enough about what you think to prove it. It's a huge nothing burger. Movdivate me by offering me something worthy.

I believe your only motivation is an attempt to goad me into outing/revealing my sources and information for nefarious reasons or intell for MDawg. I'm not falling for it unless I have the proper motivation. You'll have to toile away wishing you had this valuable(to you) information. I take much glee in knowing that.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...v-safe-program

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I take much glee in knowing that.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqKFPWC9RYI

He's obviously off his rocker, Cap'n Morgan and pain meds don't mix.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Axel drank a good amount of Captain Morgan and even fell asleep in my car.
I drove Axelwolf to a destination of his choice because he was fall down drunk and I have seen it for over 20 years in this city.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I can't fathom how you succeeded as an attorney and still believe most of what Kewl claims.

---

Pretty obvious. He has been trained, unlike some people, to "read thoroughly and carefully."

The thing about reading "thoroughly and carefully." If you ain't gonna do it, why read at all? Kinda defeats the purpose of reading altogether if you don't do it thoroughly and carefully.

And I'm speaking as someone with some experience, as I was tortured in my youth on speed reading machines. I think I was semi-competent up to 600-some wpm. No fun, but I got the gist. I don't recommend it. It's not thorough or careful.

---

Yea, it defeats the purpose of reading to not read everything thoroughly. Genius.

You're really fairly stupid relative to most posters on here and I mean this sincerely.

Lets take your goofball blog. There is literally no reason to read what you write thoroughly. One skims over the bullshit. People smarter than you do this all the time.

But I understand, in your head this is your big gotcha moment.

You might not be so broke if you didn't spend too much on your shoes that appear to be a big source of pride for you. Wow $300 shoes. lol.

No clue what speed reading machines are but you always have to pump yourself up over something asinine. In this post we are introduced to "speed reading machines". Whatever the fuck that is!

Your insecurity is up there with the best of the insecure ones.

Oh yea, and where does Stanford recommend Ivermectin for long covid or at all? <crickets>

---

LOL. So let me get this straight. I listed six or seven things regarding Ivermectin, all of which you presumably checked in your two-minute googling commitment to "finding the truth," and the only one you couldn't dig up was the Stanford use of Ivermectin for long Covid. I surmise this because you didn't mention any of the other items. Well, not my job to aid with your "research."

Let's be honest here -- how much time do you spend searching for something via google? Two minutes? Thirty minutes? Two hours? How many listings do you check when pages pop up as listings? The first 10 pages? The first five? The first three?

Don't be shy. Tell the audience what you consider thorough "research."

Bottom line -- you checked everything I wrote. Everything checked except the Stanford long Covid use of Ivermectin. But you reported the one thing you could not find, as opposed to saying, "Yeah, the other five things he said checked out, but I couldn't locate this one."

Your honesty is shot. You purposefully have not commented on anything I wrote that checked out via your "research," but you went after the one subject you couldn't easily find.

Did it occur to you to make phone calls and call Stanford? Or track down email addresses and try to contact appropriate departments there? I would think someone who really wanted to figure reality out would do that kind of thing. Or is it too much work?

You're a real honest "AP" there, account. You report your bottom line the same way? Report what's making your case and skip everything else?

And this is one example of why I think "AP" reporting of reality usually leaves a tad to be desired.

Speed reading machines presented a line or lines of text rather than paragraphs or pages so as to limit the words viewed per second and test the comprehension and memory without the reader's ability to go back and re-read what had previously been presented. They could be set for number of lines and speed. You were basically watching a film strip.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...v-safe-program

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RFMQEEmU8g&t=3s


There's a serious disconnect between the US and the majority of the rest of the world on this. Which you would expect, given these are primarily US companies making the money.

This video, with Campbell occasionally biting his tongue as he rolls his eyes, sums it up admirably.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

He's obviously off his rocker, Cap'n Morgan and pain meds don't mix.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Axel drank a good amount of Captain Morgan and even fell asleep in my car.
I drove Axelwolf to a destination of his choice because he was fall down drunk and I have seen it for over 20 years in this city.

---

---

Mdawg is just trying to smear and discredit Axelwolf, just as he has with me and every other real player or person that has challenged or questioned his bullshit story.

Mdawg, even if you could prove that Axelwolf is a drunk that lays around drinking all day while his wife supports him and that I am a 50-year-old guy living off welfare in Nebraska or Wyoming or Idaho, it changes nothing. Your story is still bullshit and just doesn't fly in accordance with how Las Vegas and the gambling industry actually works.

This isn't politics where you can win by tearing your opponent down. At some point your story and claims have to be able to stand on their own and they just don't, with any real players who know how things work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Pretty obvious. He has been trained, unlike some people, to "read thoroughly and carefully."

The thing about reading "thoroughly and carefully." If you ain't gonna do it, why read at all? Kinda defeats the purpose of reading altogether if you don't do it thoroughly and carefully.

And I'm speaking as someone with some experience, as I was tortured in my youth on speed reading machines. I think I was semi-competent up to 600-some wpm. No fun, but I got the gist. I don't recommend it. It's not thorough or careful.

---

Yea, it defeats the purpose of reading to not read everything thoroughly. Genius.

You're really fairly stupid relative to most posters on here and I mean this sincerely.

Lets take your goofball blog. There is literally no reason to read what you write thoroughly. One skims over the bullshit. People smarter than you do this all the time.

But I understand, in your head this is your big gotcha moment.

You might not be so broke if you didn't spend too much on your shoes that appear to be a big source of pride for you. Wow $300 shoes. lol.

No clue what speed reading machines are but you always have to pump yourself up over something asinine. In this post we are introduced to "speed reading machines". Whatever the fuck that is!

Your insecurity is up there with the best of the insecure ones.

Oh yea, and where does Stanford recommend Ivermectin for long covid or at all? <crickets>

---

LOL. So let me get this straight. I listed six or seven things regarding Ivermectin, all of which you presumably checked in your two-minute googling commitment to "finding the truth," and the only one you couldn't dig up was the Stanford use of Ivermectin for long Covid. I surmise this because you didn't mention any of the other items. Well, not my job to aid with your "research."

Let's be honest here -- how much time do you spend searching for something via google? Two minutes? Thirty minutes? Two hours? How many listings do you check when pages pop up as listings? The first 10 pages? The first five? The first three?

Don't be shy. Tell the audience what you consider thorough "research."

Bottom line -- you checked everything I wrote. Everything checked except the Stanford long Covid use of Ivermectin. But you reported the one thing you could not find, as opposed to saying, "Yeah, the other five things he said checked out, but I couldn't locate this one."

Your honesty is shot. You purposefully have not commented on anything I wrote that checked out via your "research," but you went after the one subject you couldn't easily find.

Did it occur to you to make phone calls and call Stanford? Or track down email addresses and try to contact appropriate departments there? I would think someone who really wanted to figure reality out would do that kind of thing. Or is it too much work?

You're a real honest "AP" there, account. You report your bottom line the same way? Report what's making your case and skip everything else?

And this is one example of why I think "AP" reporting of reality usually leaves a tad to be desired.

Speed reading machines presented a line or lines of text rather than paragraphs or pages so as to limit the words viewed per second and test the comprehension and memory without the reader's ability to go back and re-read what had previously been presented. They could be set for number of lines and speed. You were basically watching a film strip.

---

I have no clue where you listed 6 or 7 things and really why would I care? I have no clue where you posted this. Why would I research everything you say? You're a clown.

I'll admit I spent way too much time looking for the Stanford stuff knowing full well how full of shit you are.

You're sucha clown. I'm not even sure what I haven't commented on. Only important in your own head.

I just saw that you referenced Stanford to justify your bullshit and it struck me as exceptionally unlikely to be true. You even said something like "If Stanford says ..." but guess what? Stanford didn't say.

Maybe Sanford from Sanford and Son. Maybe you are confused? So are you sticking with Stanford backing up your claim?


I report my bottom line? What are you talking about? I've never said anything about money on here except how much I believe a low limit NLH grinder can make in the right market.

Really dude what sort of successful person talks about how much their shoes cost? No one. It is pathetic. You are pathetic.

Quote:

---

Did it occur to you to make phone calls and call Stanford? Or track down email addresses and try to contact appropriate departments there? I would think someone who really wanted to figure reality out would do that kind of thing. Or is it too much work?

---

The above is the best line. Like others have said - You're from a different planet. You seem to have very little grasp of how reality works. You truly have no clue. I don't need to go into why the above suggestion is asinine.

Redietz doesn't even realize there are books that have a sharp model and strive to have lines that are not beatable. The lines are not moved to balance action in the traditional sense. This is known all over the place by professional sports bettors. These books have existed for 20 years now. It is as if Redietz has really never learned about sports betting and is just regurgitating stuff he read back in the 80s.

Just like Kewl. You can't back down from your bullshit. Same tactic. "I'm not going to prove or demonstrate anything. Do your own work! What about all these other instances involving me that I have mentioned ! "

There clearly are reasons why you search for backers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tableplay

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...v-safe-program

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RFMQEEmU8g&t=3s


There's a serious disconnect between the US and the majority of the rest of the world on this. Which you would expect, given these are primarily US companies making the money.

This video, with Campbell occasionally biting his tongue as he rolls his eyes, sums it up admirably.

---

Lol you have belittled other people for using Youtube but here you are. You tried to backup your BS with something presumably not biased (Stanford) but when it comes to showing proof you go to some cherry-picking biased dude and ignore your claim.

That guy is a cut above most of those grifting/clout chasing/panderers. I've watched some of his videos but still... lol. Youtube? Just cite the fucking Stanford article.

Sucha clown. Instead of monk shoes you should buy these. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/195695546286477136/ Clown shoes made in a classy black leather. Definitely a step above the typical clown shoes and very fitting for Bob Dietz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

He's obviously off his rocker, Cap'n Morgan and pain meds don't mix.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Axel drank a good amount of Captain Morgan and even fell asleep in my car.
I drove Axelwolf to a destination of his choice because he was fall down drunk and I have seen it for over 20 years in this city.

---

---

Mdawg is just trying to smear and discredit Axelwolf, just as he has with me and every other real player or person that has challenged or questioned his bullshit story.

Mdawg, even if you could prove that Axelwolf is a drunk that lays around drinking all day while his wife supports him and that I am a 50-year-old guy living off welfare in Nebraska or Wyoming or Idaho, it changes nothing. Your story is still bullshit and just doesn't fly in accordance with how Las Vegas and the gambling industry actually works.

This isn't politics where you can win by tearing your opponent down. At some point your story and claims have to be able to stand on their own and they just don't, with any real players who know how things work.

---

ThongJ you are not real player. You are however a drunk, a cock drunk attention whore (literally)

Ok, so now I am a drunk as well? Add that to the mix. :D

Look, you people can make up whatever "shit" you want to make up. It doesn't change a thing. Not about me, or what I do, what I make or where I live. It says more about you that are doing this than me. It is shows how fucked up some of you really are.

next you will say that I am the real Giglo Beach murder, or some damn lunitic-carzy thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Ok, so now I am a drunk as well? Add that to the mix. :D

Look, you people can make up whatever "shit" you want to make up. It doesn't change a thing. Not about me, or what I do, what I make or where I live. It says more about you that are doing this than me. It is shows how fucked up some of you really are.

next you will say that I am the real Giglo Beach murder, or some damn lunitic-carzy thing.

---

Nothing about your online blackjack persona is real. However over the years you have in an attempt to legitimize this persona revealed personal information about yourself. Clearly you have a mental disorder stemming from the traumatic day spent with neighbor Guy as a young boy.

Kew, you brought all this upon yourself. Just take the beating, say thank-you to those administering it, then gently ask for more.

It's all you have left.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Ok, so now I am a drunk as well? Add that to the mix. :D

Look, you people can make up whatever "shit" you want to make up. It doesn't change a thing. Not about me, or what I do, what I make or where I live. It says more about you that are doing this than me. It is shows how fucked up some of you really are.

next you will say that I am the real Giglo Beach murder, or some damn lunitic-carzy thing.

---

Snap a pic of your pool with a "fuck VCT" sign in it. Otherwise quit lying about that too.

I wouldn't take a picture of a shit in the toilet bowl, MaxPen. Who the fuck do you think you are demanding anything of anyone?

Attaboy KJ, stick to your guns: "It don't mean nothin'."

Let your detractors pound sand, then their meat.

LOL

Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I wouldn't take a picture of a shit in the toilet bowl, MaxPen. Who the fuck do you think you are demanding anything of anyone?

---

That's what I thought. Tells us all we need to know.:cool:

No different than Singer with the Newell.....RIP

At least the tunnel walls should be clean from the recent rains. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I wouldn't take a picture of a shit in the toilet bowl, MaxPen. Who the fuck do you think you are demanding anything of anyone?

---

If you took a shit in a bowl and told us about it you'd probably be lying.

I can confirm that kewlJ is actually in LV. I can see that from his IP address, and it's not a proxy or VPN.

Great first step in debunking the bullshit spit out by the Katzenjammer kids.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Great first step in debunking the bullshit spit out by the Katzenjammer kids.

---

Who said kew was anywhere BUT in LV? He never LEAVES the place because he's stuck there. (think "east coast trip" and "S.Cal. surfing extravaganza" if you dare :) ). Just him being there is the bane of his pathetic existence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I can confirm that kewlJ is actually in LV. I can see that from his IP address, and it's not a proxy or VPN.

---

How about if UNKewlJ allows Dan the Dandruff Man to disclose to what address that IP address correlates because I guarantee it does not correlate to the apartments where UNKewlJ has been claiming he lives!

You people seriously think some of the things you are asked to be disclosed are appropriate?

One guy said I should show a bank account?

Now Mdawg want the forum owner to announce my address?

You people have allowed your hate to cause loss of common sense on this witch hunt you are engaged in.

KJ did you ever say who the mystery third person posting on your account is?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

You people seriously think some of the things you are asked to be disclosed are appropriate?

One guy said I should show a bank account?

Now Mdawg want the forum owner to announce my address?

You people have allowed your hate to cause loss of common sense on this witch hunt you are engaged in.

---

What's the problem unless it's just another lie? You have been announcing it.

The real problem FraudJ is you're a verified fraud. It's not a witch hunt. It's truth exposed....RIP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

KJ did you ever say who the mystery third person posting on your account is?

---

It's his close friend and attorney Bob N. Or maybe it's his sometimes employer James G. :rolleyes: