Nathan and WoV

Wow, it's getting interesting over there in the Land of the Lotus Eaters.

BBB just posted the following:

"I was of mixed thoughts about whether to respond to this, but heard it had been posted. I'm not willing to leave on an untruth. Mike did not communicate with me in any way he was going to, or considering going to, or any permutation of nathan returning as a subject of anything.

The best I can figure is he might be referencing something now out of context and out of memory from 6-7 years ago, among the couple hundred hours of work adminning her accounts.

I don't think it's a rule violation to say a PM didn't happen, as opposed to quoting one. Mike will have to look to himself as to why he would put a boot in my backside and say this.

If we HAD discussed it in private, I would never have posted my opinion on the matter, because once an admin decision is made, the admins should present a united front. But Mike might also have not done the reinstatement if he knew what I thought. Idk. I'm no longer green, and have heard nothing from him, so I guess we're done here."

__________________________________________________ ______________

She basically has accused him of lying.

How will the Wiz respond?

Posters have been nuked IIRC for calling members "liars," so this should be interesting.

At minimum it is incumbant upon Mike to explain all the circumstances surrounding his claim that he told her he was going to reinstate Nathan, i.e. when, how, and what was said.

Amazing...the foundation is crumbling...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Wow, it's getting interesting over there in the Land of the Lotus Eaters.

BBB just posted the following:

"I was of mixed thoughts about whether to respond to this, but heard it had been posted. I'm not willing to leave on an untruth. Mike did not communicate with me in any way he was going to, or considering going to, or any permutation of nathan returning as a subject of anything.

The best I can figure is he might be referencing something now out of context and out of memory from 6-7 years ago, among the couple hundred hours of work adminning her accounts.

I don't think it's a rule violation to say a PM didn't happen, as opposed to quoting one. Mike will have to look to himself as to why he would put a boot in my backside and say this.

If we HAD discussed it in private, I would never have posted my opinion on the matter, because once an admin decision is made, the admins should present a united front. But Mike might also have not done the reinstatement if he knew what I thought. Idk. I'm no longer green, and have heard nothing from him, so I guess we're done here."

__________________________________________________ ______________

She basically has accused him of lying.

How will the Wiz respond?

Posters have been nuked IIRC for calling members "liars," so this should be interesting.

At minimum it is incumbant upon Mike to explain all the circumstances surrounding his claim that he told her he was going to reinstate Nathan, i.e. when, how, and what was said.

Amazing...the foundation is crumbling...

---

Nobody gives a fuck. It should be obvious by now that anyone participating on that site is a neutered beta bitch...RIP

There is no question that MaxPen needs to be given respect for abandoning WOV without any weepy whiny (or other sort of) goodbye.

Compare that to UNKewlJ who makes all these dramatic femmie (he’s not even a queen, just a plain female) goodbyes only to crawl back again and again.

When I left VCT I didn’t say anything either I just stopped posting. I probably shouldn’t have even felt the need to explain why I returned when I did but I certainly didn’t cry into my milk like UNKewlJ about why I left was leaving.

As far as this alleged “do what you want” PM if Wizard posts a screen shot of it and it substantiates his statement BBB should be nuked. Plain and simple.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

There is no question that MaxPen needs to be given respect for abandoning WOV without any weepy whiny (or other sort of) goodbye.

Compare that to UNKewlJ who makes all these dramatic femmie (he’s not even a queen, just a plain female) goodbyes only to crawl back again and again.

When I left VCT I didn’t say anything either I just stopped posting. I probably shouldn’t have even felt the need to explain why I returned when I did but I certainly didn’t cry into my milk like UNKewlJ about why I left was leaving.

---

You are such a freaking retard. WOV used to be something special. It was real and it was about the math that is gambling and advantage play. And that is why so many APs and real players made WoV their home (so to speak) and participated and contributed. That is what made the forum part special. Real players, real gambling experiences using real math. And it was run and owned by a real math guy.

Back in the hey day if someone showed up even claiming something as mild as winning by martingale, Shackleford wouldn't stand for it. He himself would take the person a part.

And then he sold the forum and WoO and no longer gave a shit. He really should have stepped down at that time, but who can blame him for not doing so, even if his heart wasn't in it. Somebody was paying him to go through the motions.

Allowing you (Mdawg) and your shit, the old Mike Shackleford, the Mike Shackleford that was about the math, would have never done. he would have been the one fighting every claim you made every step of the way. But he allowed you to run rough shod because he just didn't give a shit anymore. He got his money.

Since the day he sold the forum it has been a slow burn to the ground. It's his house (forum) so if he wants to burn it to the ground, and the new owners don't seem to mind, I guess it is his call.

I don't know exactly what that forum is. really not all that different than here, except you can't even say when someone is making up claims that defy math. But what that forum isn't is the Gambling math based forum that it was when he started it.

Mdawg or BaccMaster or whatever previously handle you used, has an agenda from day 1 to mock the forum and Shackleford. I guess you have succeeded. Shacky is burning it down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

As far as this alleged “do what you want” PM if Wizard posts a screen shot of it and it substantiates his statement BBB should be nuked. Plain and simple.

---

If BBB posts a screenshot, should Shackleford be nuked? :confused:

I have never met BBB, nor Mike for that matter. I have avoided meeting him a couple times I have seen him. But I have spoken privately to both. Mike more than BBB.

BBB has never lied to me and I am not aware of her lying on the forum. Mike has lied directly to me. He has told me things in private and said the opposite on the public forum. I exposed some of this at the time by releasing private conversations.

I am not calling Mike a liar. But he has lied to me, intentionally or not. Hard for me to see how it was not intentional. :confused:

WHY would BBB have lied in this situation. If she was asked and didn't want Karen/tasha back, she would have said no.

Until proven otherwise, I think Mike assumed that BBB wouldn't care since she doesn't participate much anymore.

If Mike wanted to allow Tasha back because his so called friend was now advocating on behalf of Tahsa he could do so....and did. He should just say BBB isn't much of an active member here, so here opinion doesn't matter. But don't feed us this shit that she said it was ok, when she obviously didn't and still has strong feelings about the situation.

Maybe the fucking ponytail is pulling on the man's brain too much.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

As far as this alleged “do what you want” PM

---

I didn't see where Shack mentioned any PM.

As always, where there’s shit there’s coach smelly to roll around in it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Wow, it's getting interesting over there in the Land of the Lotus Eaters.

BBB just posted the following:

"I was of mixed thoughts about whether to respond to this, but heard it had been posted. I'm not willing to leave on an untruth. Mike did not communicate with me in any way he was going to, or considering going to, or any permutation of nathan returning as a subject of anything.

The best I can figure is he might be referencing something now out of context and out of memory from 6-7 years ago, among the couple hundred hours of work adminning her accounts.

I don't think it's a rule violation to say a PM didn't happen, as opposed to quoting one. Mike will have to look to himself as to why he would put a boot in my backside and say this.

If we HAD discussed it in private, I would never have posted my opinion on the matter, because once an admin decision is made, the admins should present a united front. But Mike might also have not done the reinstatement if he knew what I thought. Idk. I'm no longer green, and have heard nothing from him, so I guess we're done here."

__________________________________________________ ______________

She basically has accused him of lying.

How will the Wiz respond?

Posters have been nuked IIRC for calling members "liars," so this should be interesting.

At minimum it is incumbant upon Mike to explain all the circumstances surrounding his claim that he told her he was going to reinstate Nathan, i.e. when, how, and what was said.

Amazing...the foundation is crumbling...

---

Nobody gives a fuck. It should be obvious by now that anyone participating on that site is a neutered beta bitch...RIP

---

All the bitches there were, and still are, the worst sort of (cowardly) liars, and, POS. For a few additional bucks to Mike, who's still totally tied down there.

There never was much of any superstructure, for the supposed foundation to collapse. Lol.

So, instead of a "Wise-ard" he's now a "Lies-ard?"

Sorry. I will never believe even that he sold anything, to do with gambling, for a couple million. What he, and his clones, did from the start, and all along, was proof enough for me. Total joke, let alone any sort of academic. (He taught gambling math at UNLV.)

Quote:

---

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...Or-Not-1/page2

---

This woman needs to move along much like our Kewl needs to move along. If you've spent over a month of full time work dealing with Nathan then surely it is not healthy.

WoVs new owners told the Wiz to get some activity going on WoV. Wiz brought back Nathan since she reliably posts most days.
Wiz got a little more activity than he expected.

This may not be true but I can post it here without being banned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyberbabble

WoVs new owners told the Wiz to get some activity going on WoV. Wiz brought back Nathan since she reliably posts most days.
Wiz got a little more activity than he expected.

This may not be true but I can post it here without being banned.

---

I kind of figured this a strong possibility as well. As far as the forum, back in the heyday when I joined the active member visits for any given day were 300plus. That is not really an active number because many members like Axelwolf for example choose the "invisible" feature at WoV and don't show up in the active member list even if they posted several times that day. I don't know why people choose that feature or what the advantage is, but some choose it here as well. Come to think of it, I am invisible here I believe. :rolleyes:

So for the sake of comparison, lets just say that number members that visited is half what it really is. Back in the day, the 300+, really equated to 600. Just for the sake of this discussion.

So it dropped throughout the years, with several specific incidents resulting or showing significant dips. Some of those would be right after I was nuked, (we will call the Norm incident), When new ownership bought the forum (some AP's had a real problem with casino related ownership), When Dark oz reveal some AP info (sorry Darkoz, but there was a big backlash), When Mdawg started posting and the resulting dustup of people being suspended for simply saying they didn't believe his crazy story.

So that number that shows went to from 300+, settled for a period at around 220 or 225, settled for another period at around 180, settled again between 125 and 150 and now is around 100, and even below 100 of weekends and holidays.

Honestly I don't know how important, if any that forum part even was to the casino bonus dudes, but if it was, they might have asked Wizard to do something to build it up and get some members back. If Mikes response was to allow Karen Nathan back, he is an idiot. There are a lot of much better, more valuable members he should have tried to get back. Some one like Maxpen for instance, or Mickeycrimm. Mickey no longer has the issue that he was banned for (drunk posting :D). He has indicated he is not interested in a return, but that is the kind of think Mike should have gone for, not Karen.

And if I am Mike's issue, you don't have to worry, Shacky, you could throw open the doors to everyone and I wouldn't wander back. Not without major other changes anyway.

Damn it Nathan, look at all the trouble you've caused.

*golf clap*

You need to loosen them up and win them over by posting the continuing saga in the Axl Rose/time travel/doppelganger tale there in Nathan's Corner; but to keep it relevant, have Axl come from money, graduate from an unaccreditied law school, and brag about how rich he is and how he almost always wins.

They eat that bullshit up over there.

Most of WOV is like a self-fellatio contest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyberbabble

WoVs new owners told the Wiz to get some activity going on WoV. Wiz brought back Nathan since she reliably posts most days.
Wiz got a little more activity than he expected.

This may not be true but I can post it here without being banned.

---

I kind of figured this a strong possibility as well. As far as the forum, back in the heyday when I joined the active member visits for any given day were 300plus. That is not really an active number because many members like Axelwolf for example choose the "invisible" feature at WoV and don't show up in the active member list even if they posted several times that day. I don't know why people choose that feature or what the advantage is, but some choose it here as well. Come to think of it, I am invisible here I believe. :rolleyes:

So for the sake of comparison, lets just say that number members that visited is half what it really is. Back in the day, the 300+, really equated to 600. Just for the sake of this discussion.

So it dropped throughout the years, with several specific incidents resulting or showing significant dips. Some of those would be right after I was nuked, (we will call the Norm incident), When new ownership bought the forum (some AP's had a real problem with casino related ownership), When Dark oz reveal some AP info (sorry Darkoz, but there was a big backlash), When Mdawg started posting and the resulting dustup of people being suspended for simply saying they didn't believe his crazy story.

So that number that shows went to from 300+, settled for a period at around 220 or 225, settled for another period at around 180, settled again between 125 and 150 and now is around 100, and even below 100 of weekends and holidays.

Honestly I don't know how important, if any that forum part even was to the casino bonus dudes, but if it was, they might have asked Wizard to do something to build it up and get some members back. If Mikes response was to allow Karen Nathan back, he is an idiot. There are a lot of much better, more valuable members he should have tried to get back. Some one like Maxpen for instance, or Mickeycrimm. Mickey no longer has the issue that he was banned for (drunk posting :D). He has indicated he is not interested in a return, but that is the kind of think Mike should have gone for, not Karen.

And if I am Mike's issue, you don't have to worry, Shacky, you could throw open the doors to everyone and I wouldn't wander back. Not without major other changes anyway.

---

I can't say this with absolute certainty, but my tendency is to think that you guys are overestimating the level to which the owners care about forum activity. They're certainly not going to refuse increased activity (provided same is within the rules), but I seriously doubt that Wizard was specifically directed to bring Nathan back to increase activity...or even that Wizard received a directive to get forum activity up whatsoever.

Given that I write for the sites, and do not participate on the forums as much as I theoretically could...my inclination is to believe that the owners and/or Wizard would come directly to me and ask whether I could pick up my own forum participation a little bit, if that was a high priority objective, and no such conversation has ever happened.

I don't know why some people are invisible. I like people to know that I'm on as, the closer to real-time a discussion/debate that I'm having with someone is, then the more the situation is to my advantage; I don't generally need any time (brief research, when applicable, aside) to think of what to say. Anyone who knows me (off forum) would probably tell you that my brain is pretty quick and I can speak, in real time, just as eloquently as I'm capable of writing. I'm not trying to brag; that's just the truth of the matter---you can take it as bragging, if you wish.

With that, I think Wizard let Nathan back in because he wanted Nathan back in. I don't think it had anything to do with any sort of directive to bolster forum activity; I will say that is a harmless speculation to make, but not one that I think is particularly likely.

ADDED: Another quick point that I neglected to make is that, if the owners cared about forum activity for its own sake, then they wouldn't have restricted/would change course on and allow for political discussions again.

Good God, at WoV, Mmutt is making post after post in support of Wizard (obvious brown nosing) and the mess wizard has created. Dawgs nose and tongue are so far up Shackleford's ass, I hope for dawgs sake that Shackleford recently had something good to eat. :cool:

I stand by people unequivocally unless they prove unworthy of the support. Something you, who can't hold his tongue and varies between calling someone a friend or foe depending on whether you feel slighted, could not possibly comprehend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcap

You’re right, the story isn’t about Mdawg (or the wizard for that matter), it’s about YOU, always about someone once upon a time wronged you for something petty as fuck you’re seemingly incapable of moving past, it’s ALWAYS been primarily about you.

---

But then, when the whole world has always put you down for being an irritant, it makes sense that you have no friends or family left in your corner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

I stand by people unequivocally unless they prove unworthy of the support. Something you, who can't hold his tongue and varies between calling someone a friend or foe depending on whether you feel slighted, could not possibly comprehend.

---

I don't play that game. I told Tasha that a long time ago. If someone agrees or supports something I have said....GREAT. If not that is ok too. But either way, I am not forming teams, nor indebted to someone that may have supported me in some way. If you say something stupid or just wrong the next day, I will say that is stupid or wrong regardless of whether I like the person or they supported me.

I have done it with MrV. I have done it with Red. I like Red ok. I just didn't like or agree with a few things he has said over the past year and have said so. I still like maxpen. But when someone is wrong, they are wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

I stand by people unequivocally unless they prove unworthy of the support. Something you, who can't hold his tongue and varies between calling someone a friend or foe depending on whether you feel slighted, could not possibly comprehend.

---

I don't play that game. I told Tasha that a long time ago. If someone agrees or supports something I have said....GREAT. If not that is ok too. But either way, I am not forming teams, nor indebted to someone that may have supported me in some way. If you say something stupid or just wrong the next day, I will say that is stupid or wrong regardless of whether I like the person or they supported me.

I have done it with MrV. I have done it with Red. I like Red ok. I just didn't like or agree with a few things he has said over the past year and have said so. I still like maxpen. But when someone is wrong, they are wrong.

---

That's the complete opposite of the

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mdawg

thieving lying low down no good varmint

---

that you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Basically, this hypocrite whatever he accuses others of, you may be assured that he's done himself first, and worse.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcap

You’re right, the story isn’t about Mdawg (or the wizard for that matter), it’s about YOU, always about someone once upon a time wronged you for something petty as fuck you’re seemingly incapable of moving past, it’s ALWAYS been primarily about you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by macap

Kew is simply incapable of letting anything, however minor, go.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Okay, I read this whole thread.

What a mess

Here are my conclusions:

With that said, there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabcricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete. In any case, coming onto a gambling forum full of APs and acting in such a way is also bad form, and it angers people. This is especially true because the internet is so highly saturated with gambling phonies, everyone's bullshit detector is set off the minute anyone brags about any winning beyond the norm. You know what they say... extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. MDawg has never provided this evidence. The frustration with him is justified.....

....The funny thing is that MDawg could have been mildly interesting if he just stuck to "I'm a high roller, here's my trip reports" sort of posts, and just kept quiet about his results. Not all of us get to see the high end suites or other spoils of being a casino whale. That stuff is interesting, even if it's an overall loser posting it.

Do I think MDawg is winning? No. I think he probably has some money (maybe not as much as he claims), likes to gamble, likes the high roller treatment, and wants to present himself as a guy who gets all this AND wins, rather than just a chump who is getting lavish treatment because he's dumping money.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

For many -EV high rollers, being treated like a king is enough. For MDawg, it seems he also wants the forum gambling cred to go with it, and figures that posting evidence of big bets, big chips, and nice suites is somehow evidence that he's winning. Obviously only the most naive ploppy is gonna fall for that.

---

I can go ALL day long, fool.

Well, repeating the same thing over and over is what you're best at, no? Which anyway whatever Dan the Man Druff has to say about me supports that I am a High Roller. Thank you! He just doesn't know or can't know how or why I win.

As to you, he confirms that you are a liar. TOTAL fiction. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

a lot of what you write could be total fiction. You're definitely someone who isn't adverse to lying on forums if it suits you to do so.

---

In any case, Dan the Man Druff is just one person....

Whereas I come up with all sorts of evidence to support from a variety of sources that you're a

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mdawg

thieving lying low down no good varmint.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Which anyway whatever Dan the Man Druff has to say about me supports that I am a High Roller. Thank you!

---

NoBody has ever, EVER challenged that!

To be honest, I am not so sure you are as much a "high-roller", nor as wealthy as you claim. Something Dan Druff has made a point to say as well.

But I really don't care about that shit. I have never seen a wealthy person so hell bent on impressing people and trying to convince people he is wealthy, thinking that makes him better than everyone, like you do.

Well, now, I guess there is a former president that does all that. So I guess more accurately, is I never witnessed that until him. AND NOW YOU.

And here is something else similar about you and that former presidents' behavior: Non Disclosure Agreements. :D

Makes sense I guess. Neither of you can afford to have people that see inside the charade and know what is going on, say what they have seen and know.

To paraphrase Dan Druff: Why on earth could you not just tell your story of being a somewhat wealthy guy, who likes to gamble, plays higher limits, mostly loses, but gets comps that are worth it to him, and he enjoys. Maybe even plays the comp game strongly.

Every freaking person on every forum, AP to degenerate gambler, would have been a fan of that story and a glimpse into that lifestyle. But no, you had to pretend to be superman. Or super Pope.

And that is just insulting to players that really win and work hard at winning and except the real risks that go with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

I stand by people unequivocally unless they prove unworthy of the support. Something you, who can't hold his tongue and varies between calling someone a friend or foe depending on whether you feel slighted, could not possibly comprehend.

---

I don't play that game. I told Tasha that a long time ago. If someone agrees or supports something I have said....GREAT. If not that is ok too. But either way, I am not forming teams, nor indebted to someone that may have supported me in some way. If you say something stupid or just wrong the next day, I will say that is stupid or wrong regardless of whether I like the person or they supported me.

I have done it with MrV. I have done it with Red. I like Red ok. I just didn't like or agree with a few things he has said over the past year and have said so. I still like maxpen. But when someone is wrong, they are wrong.

---

There has never been a weakass little twit who nervously keeps on claiming "I'm OK with someone who doesn't believe me" and then goes off on rants and whining about not being believed as if someone just cut his tiny nuts off, as the serial lying kew.

Nothing more needs to be said.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

There has never been a weakass little twit who nervously keeps on claiming "I'm OK with someone who doesn't believe me" and then goes off on rants and whining about not being believed as if someone just cut his tiny nuts off, as the serial lying kew.

---

I'll tell you what there has never been. Never been someone that does the fucking retarded shit you do.

Top 3 I am not sure what order they should be in:

1) climbed into an RV at the dealership took pictures and pretended it was his. Complete with a picture behind the wheel of a vehicle not moving, just like a 6 year old boy in a fire truck at the fire station.

2) Paid for and ran an ad in a publication pretending to sell that same made up RV.

3) Self published/financed a book with his garbage.

My order is just what I put them in. Others may vary or even incldude some of your other nonsense.

And yes, there is some degree of funny with all this, but it is laughing AT you, not with you. And a few seconds later you really it really isn't funny, it is sad and sick.

You fucking live off your kids. THAT was your retirement play. Nothing more need be said about weakness, you ancient, fucktard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

There has never been a weakass little twit who nervously keeps on claiming "I'm OK with someone who doesn't believe me" and then goes off on rants and whining about not being believed as if someone just cut his tiny nuts off, as the serial lying kew.

Nothing more needs to be said.

---

Just the fact that the UNKewl one quoted you, means he realizes you're right, but his pathology of lying won't let him admit it!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

When I think of people who don't care what other people are saying about them on the Internet... I think of kewlJ.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'm not sure what is more deluded thinking - you believing anyone believes your stories or you telling everyone you don't really care.

---

Hey dawg, don't you have any CLIENTS to tend to?

Seems you post nearly non-stop.

Me, I'm retired, but you...

I guess you priotize bullying over helping people, eh?

Probably a cultural thing.

Nothing better than working a few numerals.

V, your sister and her husband may stick that boat where the sun don't shine. Ha.

You, retired? Harumph.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1Hit1der

V, your sister and her husband may stick that boat where the sun don't shine. Ha. .

---

No can do...they sold it and bought a nice RV.

Currently they're in Myrtle Beach for the winter, situated very near the ocean.

Both work remotely.

Yes boys and girls, if you play your cards right you too can enjoy the fruits of your labor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Yes boys and girls, if you play your cards right you too can enjoy the fruits of your labor.

---

Nice to see that you still haven't figured out that the only real fruit is in the labor. Ha.

Back to my numerals. Maybe, later today, I will be able to complete that post in response, to Druff, noting how useless to memorize the digits of pi.

V, of all the people I have encountered it seems like I am the most adept at handling a lot of different things at once. It doesn't occur to me that anything needs to be put off, I manage to get everything done every day or at least week. And that includes having fun putting UNKewlJ in his place.

Someone else: "you must have a lot of time on your hands." Me: "I can do a lot in a short amount of time."

Put it this way: at the moment I have six different cell phones, each sporting at least two (one has more than two) separate phone numbers and I do not mix up which one I am answering or texting from. Now, I don't carry all of them when I am out and about, just one or two, but when I am stationary I might have all of them in front of me. I am handling a lot of different business simultaneously and am far from retired.

One of my phones handles at least routed texts from about five of the lines, so that's why I am able to carry just one or two phones with me when I am mobile.

I do not have to be any place in particular to run my businesses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

You fucking live off your kids. THAT was your retirement play. Nothing more need be said about weakness, you ancient, fucktard.

---

My parents have an open invitation to come live in my home. I look forward to them accepting, I wish they would.

My neighbors just celebrated the birth of another grandchild. The child's family needs a bigger house. They've asked the grandparents (my neighbors) if they'd like to move into their new home, with their son, his wife, and their grandchildren.

You obviously have very little understanding, or regard, for the loving and caring relationships that may exist among families.

You seem to view family dynamics in terms of who is taking advantage of who.

That's not necessarily how life works.

Wise up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

V, of all the people I have encountered it seems like I am the most adept at handling a lot of different things at once.

---

That's you, and if it suits you, great.

Me, I do not own, want or need a smart phone: I have a clunky Alcatel flip-phone for calls when I am away from home, but otherwise it is turned off and I use our land line.

But my life is very uncomplicated, which is just how I want it to be.

You seem to revel in complexity and activity, whereas I prefer to kick back, smoke a bowl, and listen to my stereo.

Neither of us is right or wrong.

You're retired though. If I were, I'd probably need just one phone.

I will admit though that at times the UNKewl fables get out of hand as much as putting them down gets out of hand.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

I do not own, want or need a smart phone

---

You've written about this several times, you must be desperate for a reaction.

I'll abide out of kindness for an expatriate.

Good Lord, what an oddball.

It's even stranger than your affinity for flinging golfballs connected by a string.

"Expatriate?"

Oh, the Plainfield thing...

"Oddball" or even "Luddite:" What, me worry?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Oh, the Plainfield thing...

---

North Plainfield, FWIW

And Haddonfield, or did you make that up?

https://pressofatlanticcity.com/busi...a77bc3fa9.html

Viz. Plainfield: I thought the reference might have been to Seidler field, but yeah, NP and H were my home towns.

Seidler field, where John Patrick pitched some fast pitch soft ball, was near the railroad where we used to pick and steal the locks off the manual track switches.

Ah, down memory lane...

I'm surprised I never responded to this thread that was started about me. I'm just glad to be an Active Member of WOV again. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

I'm surprised I never responded to this thread that was started about me. I'm just glad to be an Active Member of WOV again. :)

---

Something else to read while you shit on the fried chicken joint floors?

Quote:

---

I am so sorry for you Michael, to have this site and what it's become be part of your legacy. You are so much better than this.

Last edited by: teliot on Mar 8, 2023

---

Amazingly, Jacobson, finally, came to his senses, and, pulled out a couple of weeks ago. Just goes to show how endlessly totally stupid even a retired math professor can be.

Meanwhile, Tasha thinks that she's hit the "big time". Ha.

All the inmates at WOV that don't like Nathan being back used to say "Shack's House, Shack's Rules." Now WTF? They are in a rampage. Hey, idiots, it's Shack's House....Shack's rules. Snap out of it. Don't read her shit if you don't like her. Nathan is harmless. You've never seen me trolling her. Do you know why? Because I have better things to do than pick on someone than ain't all there. But if you are a successful insolent smart ass high IQ motherfucker with a big mouth then I have no problem calling you a lame bitch.

MDawg has shown that he will throw anyone under the bus. He called me a racist on WOV. This always happens when idiots don't know all the facts.

Yeah, I fucked up some black bastards. Not all blacks are bastards. Just the ones I fucked up because they fucked with me.

MDawg doesn't know the situation. It was 50 years ago. It was in a prison. Do you think whites and blacks get along in prison? Try sitting your non-prejudiced white ass down to eat at a table of blacks in prison. They'll take your candy ass non-prejudiced head off.

White boys were the minority. The blacks hated our guts because we were white. We were surrounded by them motherfuckers. They terrorized us. You couldn't be caught alone. They would fuck you up. I was walking on pins and needles the whole time I was there. I slept under my bunk to keep from being knocked in the head, which was one of their favorite tactics.

So, yeah, some of us grew some balls and fucked a bunch of those black bastards up.

I don't know if you are or aren't prejudiced, but I didn't bring that up other than to show that BRyan's trying to bring you up in the context of "gordon is leaping to conclusions about me" wasn't the most compelling move.