I personally hate almost them all but let the voting begin. If you extra despise someone, you can vote for them twice.
Printable View
I personally hate almost them all but let the voting begin. If you extra despise someone, you can vote for them twice.
I don’t despise anyone on here since I don’t really know them as people.
However if the question was who are the most entertaining members here, then most of the above would get multiple votes from me.
Being despised by the little people? I welcome it!
Kew being despised by ANYONE? The end of the world to him.
IE: the difference between a winner and a loser. :)
WHY did you do double poll choices for everybody? :confused:
Oh the wonder of gracing the very same, short poll alongside the mighty MDawg! In sharp contrast to the eerily similar cognitive trajectories of MrV (KJ's18+18 lies from Hell), and, Alan (18 yo's in a row), who appear headed for around the very same ages. Mickey's string of shithole casinos scored not even an honorable mention.
Rather than latch onto such bits of unshakeable nonsense to thus explain "life, the universe and everything", say, its expansion accelerates things back to themselves while not expanding at all. In other words, to hold off thus conclusions until simultaneously acquired.
100% garnabby.
There you are, Abby.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
I don't despise anyone either and am unsure how to vote in this poll. Am I voting for whom I despise the most (nobody), or whom I perceive to be the most despised by others? If the latter, probably a tie between Tasha and Kewl.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
The main problem with me is the Socks and the Trolling I used to do. I trolled on here because when I was a Newbie I was told that VCT was an anarchy free for all, totally uncontrolled place where we can Troll as hard we want with absolutely no consequences. So I Trolled hard and ended up getting a nearly five year posting limit. I would NEVER have Trolled hard if I wasn't told we could Troll as hard as we want on VCT with absolutely no consequences. For instance, on Poker Fraud Alert, I NEVER Trolled there because I was never told we could Troll as hard as want of PFA with absolutely no consequences. And the last new Socks I made on different Websites where made over two years ago, and the last Sock I made on VCT was made 4 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballsThere you are, Abby.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
I don't despise anyone either and am unsure how to vote in this poll. Am I voting for whom I despise the most (nobody), or whom I perceive to be the most despised by others? If the latter, probably a tie between Tasha and Kewl.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Nobody cares what you babble.Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaThe main problem with me is the Socks and the Trolling I used to do. I trolled on here because when I was a Newbie I was told that VCT was an anarchy free for all, totally uncontrolled place where we can Troll as hard we want with absolutely no consequences. So I Trolled hard and ended up getting a nearly five year posting limit. I would NEVER have Trolled hard if I wasn't told we could Troll as hard as we want on VCT with absolutely no consequences. For instance, on Poker Fraud Alert, I NEVER Trolled there because I was never told we could Troll as hard as want of PFA with absolutely no consequences. And the last new Socks I made on different Websites where made over two years ago, and the last Sock I made on VCT was made 4 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballsThere you are, Abby.
I don't despise anyone either and am unsure how to vote in this poll. Am I voting for whom I despise the most (nobody), or whom I perceive to be the most despised by others? If the latter, probably a tie between Tasha and Kewl.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Right back at you grandpa dementia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerNobody cares what you babble.Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaThe main problem with me is the Socks and the Trolling I used to do. I trolled on here because when I was a Newbie I was told that VCT was an anarchy free for all, totally uncontrolled place where we can Troll as hard we want with absolutely no consequences. So I Trolled hard and ended up getting a nearly five year posting limit. I would NEVER have Trolled hard if I wasn't told we could Troll as hard as we want on VCT with absolutely no consequences. For instance, on Poker Fraud Alert, I NEVER Trolled there because I was never told we could Troll as hard as want of PFA with absolutely no consequences. And the last new Socks I made on different Websites where made over two years ago, and the last Sock I made on VCT was made 4 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballs
Tasha isn't one of my favorite people. And I guess at least part of that was the sockpuppet thing. But I am trying to be more tolerant of her and not hate.
But here is the thing, no matter how anyone may feel about Tasha, her little gambling stories are more real than anything YOU have ever posted. You are really useless. Although who knows, maybe you PMed AccountinQuestion some top secret information that he and his AP friends think are possible. :rolleyes:
The main problem with you, in a wholistic sense, is not your online shenanigans but instead your real life shenanigans, assuming what you post online about your real life shenanigans is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
So now theywontpay is starting multiple stupid threads instead of Tasha?
You're trying to be more "tolerant" of her because that's what diminished losers do.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJRight back at you grandpa dementia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerNobody cares what you babble.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Tasha isn't one of my favorite people. And I guess at least part of that was the sockpuppet thing. But I am trying to be more tolerant of her and not hate.
But here is the thing, no matter how anyone may feel about Tasha, her little gambling stories are more real than anything YOU have ever posted. You are really useless. Although who knows, maybe you PMed AccountinQuestion some top secret information that he and his AP friends think are possible. :rolleyes:
Tasha your e-boyfriends are fighting over you again.
I’m still 50/50 that Tasha is actually smart & just playing us all for fools to give herself a laugh.
Some evidence of this would be her radio interview with Todd, her counter trolling, and her recent description of slot creators which shows she was paying attention & fully understood those discussions.
Who knows though?
I have gone back and forth with this very thing myself over the years.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
I've tentatively concluded that she is what she seems to be.
But then again I'm contrarian, the only supporter of KJ on this board, so there is that.
On WOV, Posters said something like,"It would be funny if Nathan is actually a VERY knowledgeable Dark Side Advantage Player pretending to be a naive penny a slot spin player so she can fly under the radar! LMAO! :D
If you consider that theywontpay might also possibly be Tasha, it becomes very interesting. But if true I think she would have to have MPD, which is possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
MrV, while I greatly appreciate your "support" and rebuffing and fighting back at the trolls, I don't think you are the only KJ supporter on this forum. Maybe the only one that speaks up. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I KNOW that some of the AP's and real players on this forum or that even only occasionally visit KNOW the truth. Mickey even said so. They just don't get too involved with all the trolling. It is like everything else in life, a small minority of people yell and scream the loudest which appears to give more weight to their stupid ideas and conspiracy theories.
I am not Theywontpayontuesday. ONE person said they thought me and him might be the same person and then a few Posters jumped on the bandwagon. Absolutely no one thought that me and Theywontpayontuesday were the same person until ONE person made that post.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdogIf you consider that theywontpay might also possibly be Tasha, it becomes very interesting. But if true I think she would have to have MPD, which is possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
You were a little slow to vote against me weren't you tasha? You came around though. :)
When someone does one of these polls, if Singer and Dawg and Tasha, and a couple of other DIDNT vote against me, I would be concerned. :D
NoPayOnTuesdays, who started the poll is a bit of a surprise, but he has been trending more and more into the troll direction, so maybe not. :cool:
It, just, hit me that, perhaps, the initials MHF mean Medium High Frequency, as opposed to Ultra High Frequency, or, Very High Frequency. Sort of like that image that I posted, a while back, in a response to Mission146.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Medium, like the 5's in 555.
https://youtu.be/PKrCkpVPb8sQuote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Nah...the old boy is harmless, unlike a couple others whose hatred is toxic.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Garnabby may be too smart for his own good?
I'll give a quick run down on what mainly annoys VCT about each of the "Despised," members on the Poll
Rob. Singer. The roughly 9 inch penis, his Newell, the double up claim, his racism
Mdawg. People thinking he is lying about his massive wins.
Kewlj. Kewlj 's constant lying, his Lawsuit lie was the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of VCT Members including me. His constant quitting VCT and claiming to be gone for good and coming back soon after.
Garnabby. His hijacking threads with anagram and numerology garbage.
Me. My past Trolling and Socks.
So the disgust and dislike can be manipulated by voting up to two times for the same member.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
You're mental brother. Just fucked up, broken, abnormal, with glaring insecurities. Sorry mommy and daddy didn't love you enough or whatever set you on the wrong path. I will not speak well of you once you're gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Anagrams with gematria aren't per se garbage. Compared to posting on gambling forums, and, going gambling, and other daily destructive activities, they're really and actually a lot of fun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Garnabby has so many account people don't even consider them socks. Just the weirdo being a weirdo. Maybe needs meds adjusted. It isn't even the numerology that makes him a waste of time. It is his constant whining about others posting on these forums while creating countless accounts doing the same. So tedious. Then the fake math expertise. Look for when tableplay calls him out and Bills yammer and stammers coming up with an answer.
Worrying about what anonymous keyboard warriors say about me when I'm gone is something only weak people struggle with. Besides....I'll more than likely outlive you unless you're under 30. Most gamblers are not at all healthy or in good shape.Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesdayYou're mental brother. Just fucked up, broken, abnormal, with glaring insecurities. Sorry mommy and daddy didn't love you enough or whatever set you on the wrong path. I will not speak well of you once you're gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Mommy's boy AND daddy's boy. :)
Very thankfully, actually, 99% of what I so did here had to do with the anagrams with gematria. The other 1% was a poke at the crazies, like V, who will believe whichever he wants, to suit his very own internal narrative (as another superior specimen of the human race). As far as scholastic expertise, I did post up my grade-13 marks. About the only good thing proved about a poster, after years of the forums here and there. As well, my different usernames have to do with the anagrams. But thanks for clearing that up. Always something else to add about the anagrams.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And, sorry, that you guys have let also your minds deteriorate as far that you can surmise only the above, again to suit yourselves.
Hey, if you're really nice, I might post up my "uni" marks. More likely, I will write whichever, for more of the same reactions, which lock themselves in, each and every time. Here are some more commas for the supremely ding-a-ling Singer,,,,,,,,,, who has literally no one else to really talk to (other than KJ - No, those so-called visitors, at the bottom of each page, are what's as fake as the remainder of you).
Just like Tasha may be much smarter than she lets on to troll us all Garnabby may be a secret genius who ends up solving physics.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFVery thankfully, actually, 99% of what I so did here had to do with the anagrams with gematria. The other 1% was a poke at the crazies, like V, who will believe whichever he wants, to suit his very own internal narrative (as another superior specimen of the human race). As far as scholastic expertise, I did post up my grade-13 marks. About the only good thing proved about a poster, after years of the forums here and there. As well, my different usernames have to do with the anagrams. But thanks for clearing that up. Always something else to add about the anagrams.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And, sorry, that you guys have let also your minds deteriorate as far that you can surmise only the above, again to suit yourselves.
Hey, if you're really nice, I might post up my "uni" marks. More likely, I will write whichever, for more of the same reactions, which lock themselves in, each and every time. Here are some more commas for the supremely ding-a-ling Singer,,,,,,,,,, who has literally no one else to really talk to (other than KJ - No, those so-called visitors, at the bottom of each page, are what's as fake as the remainder of you).
While the things he posts may seem like nonsense to most people, much of the things he posts about physics actually check out.
Would be funny if we had 2 secret geniuses on here that have everyone fooled yeah?
Heck they may even be socks of each other.
Who knows?
Hated having Garnabby on the list even with the anagrams irritating people, but he voted for Mdawg in the other poll, so suspect.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Are you DGENderBENding?Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Good one!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesdayAre you DGENderBENding?Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
https://youtu.be/CTLE0Irv9vAQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterVNah...the old boy is harmless, unlike a couple others whose hatred is toxic.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Garnabby may be too smart for his own good?
Garnabby and I are NOT the same person. Posters saying stuff like this is exactly why Posters are wondering if Theywontpayontuesday and I are the same person when we aren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenJust like Tasha may be much smarter than she lets on to troll us all Garnabby may be a secret genius who ends up solving physics.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFVery thankfully, actually, 99% of what I so did here had to do with the anagrams with gematria. The other 1% was a poke at the crazies, like V, who will believe whichever he wants, to suit his very own internal narrative (as another superior specimen of the human race). As far as scholastic expertise, I did post up my grade-13 marks. About the only good thing proved about a poster, after years of the forums here and there. As well, my different usernames have to do with the anagrams. But thanks for clearing that up. Always something else to add about the anagrams.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And, sorry, that you guys have let also your minds deteriorate as far that you can surmise only the above, again to suit yourselves.
Hey, if you're really nice, I might post up my "uni" marks. More likely, I will write whichever, for more of the same reactions, which lock themselves in, each and every time. Here are some more commas for the supremely ding-a-ling Singer,,,,,,,,,, who has literally no one else to really talk to (other than KJ - No, those so-called visitors, at the bottom of each page, are what's as fake as the remainder of you).
While the things he posts may seem like nonsense to most people, much of the things he posts about physics actually check out.
Would be funny if we had 2 secret geniuses on here that have everyone fooled yeah?
Heck they may even be socks of each other.
Who knows?
And I embedded a clue in the post above to prove it!Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaGarnabby and I are NOT the same person. Posters saying stuff like this is exactly why Posters are wondering if Theywontpayontuesday and I are the same person when we aren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenJust like Tasha may be much smarter than she lets on to troll us all Garnabby may be a secret genius who ends up solving physics.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
While the things he posts may seem like nonsense to most people, much of the things he posts about physics actually check out.
Would be funny if we had 2 secret geniuses on here that have everyone fooled yeah?
Heck they may even be socks of each other.
Who knows?
---> My People Were Fair and Had Sky in Their Hair... But Now They're Content to Wear Stars on Their BrowsQuote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabbya...t?partial=true
Which is about the fifth mystical connection (as in 5 5 5) from the anagrams with gematria to the perpetually stoned, MrV.
The fourth, if memory serves me correctly, at https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post179759
Interestingly,Quote:
My People Were Fair and Had Sky in Their Hair... But Now They're Content to Wear Stars on Their Brows is the debut album by psychedelic folk band Tyrannosaurus Rex. The release of the album was planned for early May but delayed until 5 July 1968 by record label Regal Zonophone.
https://youtu.be/Lzyb_eq9Qg8Quote:
Prophets, Seers & Sages: The Angels of the Ages is the second studio album by English psychedelic folk band Tyrannosaurus Rex. It was released on 1 November 1968 by record label Regal Zonophone.
You'd have to be a genius, or stoned, to recall the other three thus connections.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFAnd I embedded a clue in the post above to prove it!Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaGarnabby and I are NOT the same person. Posters saying stuff like this is exactly why Posters are wondering if Theywontpayontuesday and I are the same person when we aren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Why did you vote for Garnabby twice? Are you not actually Garnabby?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
Two words: "self loathing."Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
Exactly the opposite, in the sense that last is first.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVTwo words: "self loathing."Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
https://youtu.be/mXsb7_llnT0
Hey Garnabby...how is it you are able to openly create and use socks and not draw the ire of Our Fearless Forum Owner?
By report Todd is computer savvy and should be able to "sniff out" any socks.
Whatever, we all like a good "cat and mouse" story, so keep it up, 'K?
Garnabby bragged that he is able to post under new Accounts with no consequences from Dan Stuff, while I got threatened with a permanent banning if I ever use another Sock after Cookie Monster Sock was banned. :/Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Dan Stuff?Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaGarnabby bragged that he is able to post under new Accounts with no consequences from Dan Stuff, while I got threatened with a permanent banning if I ever use another Sock after Cookie Monster Sock was banned. :/Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Just a guess, but it might be because you draw more attention to yourself, where he sort of flies under the radar with the anagram’s & numerology.
Most people don’t understand that so they don’t complain, but they do understand getting your checking account overdrawn by 55 cents when you forgot to deposit a dollar into it.
And then rightly or wrongly (No judgement from me) they question the value of a large number of posts regarding subjects like leaving your checking account 45 cents short.
Ah, but many do not care for Garnabby's gemetria and related posts, so one might think they'd have given Todd a "heads up."
I've no problem with the Canuck: at least he doesn't seem to lie about his gambling prowess, and his flames are pretty tame.
But yeah, how does he get away with it?
---> The Boy with Two Heads.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://anagram-solver.net/But%20yea...t?partial=true
Truly finding yourself is the secret to immortality.
Druff made it clear not long ago that he is no fan of Garnabby. By my estimation both of them are on thin ice... but the ice seems pretty thick around here lately lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
UNKewlJ has been banned from multiple forums, keeps ignoring Dan the Dandruff Man's requests to stop with the gratuitous racism, and Druff has said maybe he should leave the forums entirely if he doesn't like it here.
Plus UNKewlJ keeps quitting this (and all forums) repeatedly on his own anyway.
So my money would be on UNKewl's getting the boot first.
Notwithstanding the possibility that he just offs himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Yes hound, what you just said may be true but it is also equally true that Todd promulgates rules then ignores and does little or nothing to monitor and enforce them.
Todd has made his "laissez faire" point of view known now so KJ's concern has been responded to but not mollified.
The fact kj keeps coming back after all the bullshit and complaining he does shows you that at his core, he likes this place. Guess at however that works but it seems to be given. Nothing has changed for years and kewl always finds his way back here.
Yep, actions speak louder than words.
I don't think he "likes this place" given his recent comments.
Yes, he posts here, quits and returns to VCT so there is some "attraction" but it isn't because he "likes it" here.
Rather, he tolerates it, complains about it, but still hangs around.
A lot like being in a bad marriage, with the never-ending battle of conflicting forces always leading to one question: "Should I stay or should I go?"
Yes, he catches a lot of shit from his detractors but he hurls it back at them and I believe he enjoys doing that.
It is the board's lack of moderation that allows this free give and take which he takes advantage of while also complaining about.
Anyway, Todd clarified that KJ can howl at the moon if he wants but it will avail him nothing.
There are plenty of places he could post but he comes back here. Of course he doesn't like the place in the typical definition of the word. If so, I would have never made the point. Somewhere in his brain he gets more than loses.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Your need to find a way to side with him in some manner is impressive.
People "tolerate" unpleasant obligations. They indulge addictions.
My, but you're easily impressed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
It was nothing.
Although I have retired, perhaps it's "the lawyer in me" advocating for one side, regardless of my personal belief.
Nah, that dog won't hunt..KJ isn't my client and I ain't getting paid: never mind.
As a kid I always enjoyed watching the "Underdog" cartoon on Saturday morning cartoons: maybe that's part of it?
Sure, and I really DO like to "stir the pot" and keep things bubbling.
But I've no "need" to side with KJ: I simply choose to do so; you know, "The Man and the Challenge."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoJvzTwQKs0
It’s almost as if Druff has more important things to do then manage the adult kids on this forum lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdogDruff made it clear not long ago that he is no fan of Garnabby. By my estimation both of them are on thin ice... but the ice seems pretty thick around here lately lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgQuote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
*YAWN ....Same shit,different thread from Mdickbrain
Auto correct changed Druff to Stuff. Most likely because Druff isn't a full word, it's part of a word. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenDan Stuff?Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaGarnabby bragged that he is able to post under new Accounts with no consequences from Dan Stuff, while I got threatened with a permanent banning if I ever use another Sock after Cookie Monster Sock was banned. :/Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Just a guess, but it might be because you draw more attention to yourself, where he sort of flies under the radar with the anagram’s & numerology.
Most people don’t understand that so they don’t complain, but they do understand getting your checking account overdrawn by 55 cents when you forgot to deposit a dollar into it.
And then rightly or wrongly (No judgement from me) they question the value of a large number of posts regarding subjects like leaving your checking account 45 cents short.
Stupid thread I don't think so, it has been a nice party.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
Alan banned my ThomasClines account, for suggesting, along with Singer, that Alan had a gambling problem, and, Druff banned my OneHitWonder account, for posting up a picture of an "AP gun" with bent-backward barrel, in a newbie thread about the benefits of gambling. The latter OP, very likely, was the last bit of "fresh blood", before promptly "heading for the hills".Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
https://youtu.be/_vxvH9tevPU
Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.
And I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
Talking about your grandkids that haven't moved out yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerAnd I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
You are fucked up in your head. You are the ultimate little person, you may as well welcome us all to Munchkin land and park the Newell up your butt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerAnd I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
I still don't get how Garnabby got SIC votes for most Despised VCT Member. :confused: The ONLY things that Posters don't like about Garnabby is his hijacking threads with anagrams and numerology. Nothing too bad like Doxxing Posters or insulting them.
I can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthyQuote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119
Title at a quick glance reads as
Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -
which would of course be UNKewlJ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenI can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthyQuote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.Quote:
Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.Quote:
Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
It would be a tie between you and him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgTitle at a quick glance reads as
Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -
which would of course be UNKewlJ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenWell I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
I suppose it is a surprise Mdawg got no votes. I have nothing against him besides I don't like how he always uses quotes in much excess considering they aren't a part of the current thread. I have never been very interested reading his threads about whatever he claims his life is
true or false I care less.
But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenWell I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThis would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
But nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThis would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
As out of touch, with reality, as to be back in touch, with reality. In other words, the original/final expression, theme, or dimension, of the universe must somehow overlay, or coincide with, the stuff of the universe; so as not to be yet another thus extension of it. The theory of everything already exists among us. Something new, from the old, which remains a part of each.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF