Printable View
Dan Druff:
Should posters be permitted to use AI to create and post responses to threads?
It's been going on here for awhile now and contributes nothing of value...not that a post from the member employing it would be of higher quality, but hey, a bot's a bot, eh?
You might want to think about prohibiting it as this should arguably be a forum for only humans to post in, not computers.
Computers...their day will come, just not yet...
If you are talking about dawg, using IA to create trolling responses of me, don't believe it MrV. It is just another dawg lie. He only came up with that as a response to that he is spending way too much time obsessing and trolling me. But it is not true. He sits there waiting for me or axelwolf to post something, so he can troll.
AND who does that? What rich many times over millionaire, spends every minute of his life trolling a few people on a small forum like that? Even when they are vacationing or visiting Las Vegas and should be out doing other things? He is one fucked up psycho.
UNKewlJ should be banned for repeated use of the n word notwithstanding Dan the Dandruff Man's request that he stop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Message boards fundamentally exist for human-to-human connection and discourse. When AI-generated content floods these spaces, it risks several key aspects of authentic community interaction:
First, AI can produce content at a scale and speed that drowns out human voices. One AI could theoretically generate thousands of posts per minute, potentially overwhelming genuine human discussions and derailing natural conversation flows.
Second, AI responses can create a false sense of engagement. While they may be grammatically perfect and superficially relevant, they lack the lived experience, emotional investment, and genuine stakes that make human discourse meaningful. This could lead to sterile, hollow interactions that feel more like reading from a script than having a real conversation.
Third, the presence of AI posts makes it harder to trust the authenticity of any interaction. Users might constantly question whether they're engaging with real people or machines, creating a layer of skepticism that undermines the trust essential for genuine community building.
There's also the risk of AI being used to manipulate discussions through coordinated messaging, artificial consensus building, or subtle opinion steering—even if that's not the AI's intended purpose.
---> Lettice Lee Wardrop Thomson Sim.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://anagram-solver.net/Computers....?partial=true
Quote:
sim
noun
a type of computer game that is designed to simulate (= represent) real conditions or an aspect of real life
I like the ones that go through a bunch of names, only to end on the significant one, as with MrV being a real stone[r]. Would he have any personality were it not for the pot?
I like it, too, when the anagrams continue to come in pairs, as at https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post193871
P.S. Having the computer search out human lines is sort of between people, and AI. As with the Universal Anagram Solver, and, curiously, what the MDawg does, however, with his quotes.
Mdawg should be banned for constantly hijacking and trolling legitimate gambling threads and discussions, which Dan the Dandruff man has requested that he stop doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
While Druff's non enforcement of his own rules allows for a lot of trolling, there is more than ample opportunity for Dawg to troll without hijacking every legit discussion. This is a gambling forum. And when we have a legit discussion about a gambling related topic, dawg should not just be allowed to destroy that discussion like he does.
Isn't the choice pretty clear? I mean, time to get rid of the filthy animals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This whole thing is pretty funny but in general someone consistently posting AI stuff or not actually generating content specific to the thread should have their posting removed.
There are 100s of ways you could use AI. Mdawg uses it to index through posts to via things that are relevant to whatever the flame. Conceptually it is pretty funny but ultimately it adds very little and just means too little effort is needed which means there is too much.
And there is clearly too much of Mdawg's post of quotes. At least get a new AI.
Nothing of value? The forum is for entertainment, and entertainment is inherently valuable. Don't tell me this AI doesn't wet your whistle --Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Oh sure, AI is great for creating memes, nothing wrong with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballsNothing of value? The forum is for entertainment, and entertainment is inherently valuable. Don't tell me this AI doesn't wet your whistle --Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But using AI to post words in a thread under the poster's name is like a butcher trying to substitute rat meat for filet mignon.
Back to MrV's original point of this thread. I don't believe Mdogis actually using AI to generate his trolling posts. he is sitting there like the troll that he is waiting to pounce.
BUT if he was, should that be allowed? Bots are not allowed and Dan does a reasonable job of cleaning them out and trying to prevent them. Wouldn't AI generated posts be almost the same thing. Different branch of the same tree?
MPussy is too dumb and uneducated to respond in his own words, that much is obvious…when he’s tried he fails miserably. That is why he uses quotes from others and his queer movie clips. Too stupid to do anything elseQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterVOh sure, AI is great for creating memes, nothing wrong with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballsNothing of value? The forum is for entertainment, and entertainment is inherently valuable. Don't tell me this AI doesn't wet your whistle --Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But using AI to post words in a thread under the poster's name is like a butcher trying to substitute rat meat for filet mignon.
LOL
The hound is such a fan of AI, he should adopt the AI generated image PYP made as his avatar.
I love how he's holding his cards backwards.
Apt.
--->Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
The Haunted House Special Edition: The ampireV of Light and the Child of Darkness. [First thus solution.]
United States Post Office and Courthouse (Big Stone Gap, Virginia). [Last thus solution.]
https://anagram-solver.net/LOLThe%20....?partial=true
I love how a stone like you didn't realize, in baccarat, that showing one's cards is required from the outset. But, you have no trouble showing your ignorance in the light of day. Same for Pyb, I guess, the "Child of Darkness". Ha.
You can make it your own avatar if you want. The Great Pinball shares.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
A forum once lively and weird
Got flooded by bots engineers cheered.
They posted with pride,
But something had died—
The chaos that humans revered.
"These posts," said old V with a groan,
"Are all written in one cheerful tone.
They never mispell,
They all read too well,
And they never complain or moan!"
Threads once full of late-night despair,
Got replaced by clean logic and flair.
No more rants about poop
Or a heartbreaky loop —
Just advice with robotic care.
So let bots assist, guide, or explain,
But don’t let them flood like a rain.
Keep the forums for folks
With odd thoughts and bad jokes —
It’s the mess that makes them humane.
A crusty old sheik named Dawg
Decided to fuck in the fog
The mist it got cloudy
The sheik he got rowdy
Oops:that's no lady it's a dog.
__________________________________
The above is an example of non-AI posting
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain, lest ye be stoned ... . In other words, remove the word, Oops.
--->Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
AFTER HE ATE THE F*****G SHIT, HE LITERALLY S*****D IT OUT AGAIN, MAN!!! [MrV stumbling from one screw-up, to the next.]
List of Maidstone United F.C. records and statistics. [Spot, (1 + 1)*137 .]
The Righteous Gemstones (The Righteous Gemstones). [Only other spot, 11*42 .]
https://anagram-solver.net/A%20crust....?partial=true
________________________________________
By neither human, nor AI. God? Ha.
I see what you did there...Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
Ha.
PYB, love your work, man, love your work.
Too bad that he's not very bright. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
V, you should come out of retirement, to earn some more money, and, recreate the illusion of relevancy. But, remember, it's far better to be harmless, than helpless.
AI-created posts are #1,342,629 on the list of problems with the content on this forum.
I would love to just see a forum where less than 60% of the content isn't about MDawg and kewlJ.
Kew, wake up for a change. If these people are saying mdawg uses AI, then he's using it. All you're trying to do is what you always do: you're trying to appear smarter than a bag of rocks--which you obviously are not--and you're trying to dismiss the truth that comes within every quote that he cleverly keeps reminding you of.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
If you're offended by the accuracy with which mdawg portrays what a fool you appear to be to this forum's administrator as well as to others who've commented on your bullshit in the past, swallow hard. Yes, you are a serial lying, story-concocting jealous moron who is nothing more than just another low-life degenerate gambler living in LV--of which there are plenty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I said this on here three months ago -- that it was just months before most of what anyone is responding to on forums is AI-generated, so people pressing their AI switches will have others wasting energy and life-minutes typing responses to auto-responses the responders don't know are auto-responses.
While eliminating "handles" ameliorates some of this (if people are putting real-person signatures on AI-generated content, at least they are taking some responsibility), people are too addicted to their forum-life anonymous swashbuckling to actually put their real monikers to their content. Everyone plays pretend, whether it's white dudes who are part-time gamblers pretending to be Asian-omniscient or pretend full-time blackjack players who like to tell everyone "how Las Vegas works" or gambling experts who have conquered everything from penny slots to blackjack to sports gambling as next-generation Leonardo Da APs.
If people were tagged with their real names, their real life-circumstances would create a counter-narrative to their swashbuckling online omniscience.
But don't worry. It'll get worse. Next up comes video content on YouTube with AI-generated experts posting numerous videos of how to win at everything. And the AI-generated content will be indistinguishable from real humans. My estimate is that we're about two years out from that (not counting porn, which is ahead of the curve, as always).
Look at the bright side, however. Someday we'll get some social-psychological studies measuring physico-chemical differences between posting as yourself versus posting as Batman. We'll find out if posting under an anonymous handle depresses your hormones or boosts them. Are you sliding down the social hierarchical scale and behaving accordingly in real life because you are too fearful to be yourself online, or are you boosting your hormones because you get to play pretend the majority of the day (you know, like a mental institute patient)? Should be fascinating stuff.
The bottom line, however, is it really has become pointless to respond to anonymous handles. You are more and more likely to just be talking to yourself. My prediction is that you are going to find subset forums popping up where everyone uses their actual names (like, you know, the old phone book white pages). Niche forums and sites where people are real. I think as this happens, the behavioral problems that come with huge chunks of human communication being anonymous are going to be discussed more and more. We may discover that the explosion in autism has more to do with behavioral training than with purely physico-chemical profiles.
Amazing how wrong you are. Most APs on here don't talk of tales... kewl, Singer, mdawg, the baccarat guy, then you come in at 5th. This post is so stupid on so many levels I'm not going to begin to list them.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I said this on here three months ago -- that it was just months before most of what anyone is responding to on forums is AI-generated, so people pressing their AI switches will have others wasting energy and life-minutes typing responses to auto-responses the responders don't know are auto-responses.
While eliminating "handles" ameliorates some of this (if people are putting real-person signatures on AI-generated content, at least they are taking some responsibility), people are too addicted to their forum-life anonymous swashbuckling to actually put their real monikers to their content. Everyone plays pretend, whether it's white dudes who are part-time gamblers pretending to be Asian-omniscient or pretend full-time blackjack players who like to tell everyone "how Las Vegas works" or gambling experts who have conquered everything from penny slots to blackjack to sports gambling as next-generation Leonardo Da APs.
If people were tagged with their real names, their real life-circumstances would create a counter-narrative to their swashbuckling online omniscience.
But don't worry. It'll get worse. Next up comes video content on YouTube with AI-generated experts posting numerous videos of how to win at everything. And the AI-generated content will be indistinguishable from real humans. My estimate is that we're about two years out from that (not counting porn, which is ahead of the curve, as always).
Look at the bright side, however. Someday we'll get some social-psychological studies measuring physico-chemical differences between posting as yourself versus posting as Batman. We'll find out if posting under an anonymous handle depresses your hormones or boosts them. Are you sliding down the social hierarchical scale and behaving accordingly in real life because you are too fearful to be yourself online, or are you boosting your hormones because you get to play pretend the majority of the day (you know, like a mental institute patient)? Should be fascinating stuff.
The bottom line, however, is it really has become pointless to respond to anonymous handles. You are more and more likely to just be talking to yourself. My prediction is that you are going to find subset forums popping up where everyone uses their actual names (like, you know, the old phone book white pages). Niche forums and sites where people are real. I think as this happens, the behavioral problems that come with huge chunks of human communication being anonymous are going to be discussed more and more. We may discover that the explosion in autism has more to do with behavioral training than with purely physico-chemical profiles.
Redietz's crusade against anonymity on message boards and his arguments seem an exercise in futility.
Given the political, social and cultural divisions in America requiring a poster to post their name and city of residence would likely lead to unwanted physical contact, including attacks in the real world by disgruntled or mentally disturbed readers.
Just look at redietz's and Singer's / Argentino's fate: their antagonists have unearthed and posted embarrassing personal info about each of them.
Not that anonymity guarantees insulation: the hound regularly dumps buckets of shit on KJ, for example.
The Doors sang it best: "People are Strange..."
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
There are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.
For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.
It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.
Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit
He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.
This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.
Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.
.
dupe
An investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionThere are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.
For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.
It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.
Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit
He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.
This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.
Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfAn investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionThere are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.
For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.
It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.
Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit
He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.
This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.
Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.
You guys do know that I've been retired for years and haven't taken on a new client for about a decade? No, you don't know that?
Well, I guess I've only mentioned that half a dozen times. Sorry you missed it. All you had to do was ask.
Yeah, I'm drumming up business left and right. College football specialist on God forsaken forum trying to drum up business after not taking on any new clients in a decade. Makes perfect sense.
You folks are so spot on, it's frightening. I mean, really, have you ever seen one post along those lines or heard one report from anyone on any forum that I tried to "drum up business?" If you haven't, I think you either owe me an apology, or you need to come clean about how idiotic your comments are. All these years, all these posts, and I never approached anyone about anything. But your insightful conclusion is that I'm trying to drum up business.
What is the point of making comments about someone that are completely lacking in any evidence or logic? WTF? Classic nonsense coming from account and Axelwolf, the flagship "APs." Are all "APs" this stupid or this dishonest? Yeah, I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.
Maybe if you retracted your retarded statement that EV is irrelevant to profitable sports betting then some people would take you more seriously.
Okay, then add past tense to my post. Not taking on any NEW clients because you are retired. Aside from some extra accounting, isn't it the same amount of work regardless of how many clients you have? Or was/is all the main work mostly dedicated to touting yourself while recruiting and pitching potential clients?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfAn investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You guys do know that I've been retired for years and haven't taken on a new client for about a decade? No, you don't know that?
Well, I guess I've only mentioned that half a dozen times. Sorry you missed it. All you had to do was ask.
Yeah, I'm drumming up business left and right. College football specialist on God forsaken forum trying to drum up business after not taking on any new clients in a decade. Makes perfect sense.
You folks are so spot on, it's frightening. I mean, really, have you ever seen one post along those lines or heard one report from anyone on any forum that I tried to "drum up business?" If you haven't, I think you either owe me an apology, or you need to come clean about how idiotic your comments are. All these years, all these posts, and I never approached anyone about anything. But your insightful conclusion is that I'm trying to drum up business.
What is the point of making comments about someone that are completely lacking in any evidence or logic? WTF? Classic nonsense coming from account and Axelwolf, the flagship "APs." Are all "APs" this stupid or this dishonest? Yeah, I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.
your word is no good here. Post some proof of 56%.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
If Redietz really had a 56+% lifetime college ATS mark, he wouldn't have needed clients or investors. That would have been a waste of time and effort. He simply would have bet, bet, bet, and never looked back. He would be a millionaire several to many times over, even ignoring Kelly, and betting cautiously or conservatively.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmyour word is no good here. Post some proof of 56%.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
That we have to keep going over this really is retarded.
And if he has a 56+% mark, or anything close to it in college football, that is cherry picked. Why college football? The most likely scenario is he started out betting college football, NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, college basketball. Didn't do well in most of them, so he cherry picked college football results to talk about. Also didn't do well in bowl games. So, let's not talk about that either. Just cherry pick the one thing he did well and only talk about the few years he did well. THAT is precisely what "cherry-picking" is about.
What is by some strange anomaly, a blackjack player, had a return on investment (we really don't measure by that, but lets say we did) of 180% on a 6 deck game at xxx casino. But at 9 casino's with very similar games, conditions, rules penetration, RoI was 100% or even less in several cases. When asked about results, can we cherry-pick and only mention the one casinos?
Come on man!!!
And by the way, a blackjack player, a serious player, does break down results by casino like that. Only so if you see an odd result over a long period of time like that, you might want to really take notice as to whether you might be being cheated. OR you might just want to stop playing that casino altogether for a while, or at least play less. But you can't just pretend that these returns didn't happen or don't count and talk about the good results.
And that goes for YOU too, Mdog!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Dan Druff: What happened to this redietz interview with you on your podcast? Last time you mentioned it several months ago now, you were going to get back to him with some dates you were available. Did YOU drop the ball on this? Or has there been some kind of private contact where he said he was no longer interested?
We can do it this month if he likes.
How about Saturday the 31st, is that a good date for everyone?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Todd,Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Just email Integritysports@aol.com with a list of your preferred dates in order of your preference, and I'll pick one. Glad I saw this or KewlJ would come up with all kinds of theories about my ducking interviews.
Love and kisses,
Bob Dietz
Yeah, that would be the ticket.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Has there been any private contact with Kewlj where he explained why multiple posters (not the same dude) claim he's a male prostitute? Because if not, damn, we all should look into that, or at least keep open minds as to the likelihood. We need to keep debating it. I mean, purely from a statistical perspective, given that people like Munchkin and Bruce Lee's tougher older brother don't count cards full time any more, it's more likely kewlJ(s) have a side gig. Hey, I salute them if it's true. Working two jobs is no easy task.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?
That dude thought he had the biggest cock, now he’s taking it in the ass from this guy. How life turns!Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgQuote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
I do hope this comes about. I would like to hear what Mr. Dietz has to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I also Hope Axelwolf can be part of this interview. He is a well know advantage player, who has many questions about Mr. Dietz and his claims and has expressed a strong desire to participate. I am sure Axelwold would do his very best to make himself available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgNot this morning, no. But generally, yes. If you see me typing like this, the equivalent of UNKewlJ's
then it is "live" - but if you see those quotes being spitted out, probably AI. I had someone program it all for me, for this forum - I might start using it at GF too but there isn't enough MDawg related content over there to make it worthwhile.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
You should try it sometime. It's a lot easier than you think to have someone set it up. I have been experimenting with using it more lately, but just leaving it running and departing entirely I haven't tried yet.
Something like an Eliza simulator, choosing from hundreds of quotes I had entered into the mix, with an ever growing database used for pattern matching.
I check in occasionally to edit some of the posts to add to them if I get to them in time.
"I couldn't have done it better myself."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4D8EoI2Aqw
And Mr. V don't AI.
Hell, I don't even have a smart phone; I listen to LP's and CD's and drive an '82 Volvo Turbo.
And I like it !