Printable View
Tucker invited an alt-right college professor named Dave Collum. At 45 minutes, the wide-ranging discussion turned to Stephen Paddock.
https://youtu.be/orgvAk7JhBI?si=BbDC...fdj&t=2732
Rob, I'd be offended if I were you.Quote:
You stayed with the story for about two weeks, maybe, and you were bringing up, Ann Coulter jumped in. Paddock was making money how, playing video poker? That's his way of making a living? That's like saying I'm a professional crackhead.
"That's like saying I'm a professional crackhead"Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
That's actually pretty funny.
I’ve got Dumb Perigdom on ignore so didn’t know what this thread was about. Paddock wasn’t an AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf"That's like saying I'm a professional crackhead"Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
That's actually pretty funny.
And Paddock didn't make a living playing vp. In fact from my discussion with him, vp was draining his money, which I believe his frustration with that eventually caused him to snap.
I agree--that crackhead comment made me laugh.
lololQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Wait....Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You had a conversation with Paddock?
When and where?
Is this true, or is this another Newell story?
Just as with the Newell that you guys couldn't ever accept, I had a meet-up with Paddock at Mirage a few years earlier at his request--and as I told the FBI--as I described on this forum during the time we were all discussing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffWait....Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You had a conversation with Paddock?
When and where?
Is this true, or is this another Newell story?
You guys need to let go of your Newell Derangement Syndrome, which you attribute wholly because of my using interior pics here of a different rig so I wouldn't need to drive 55 miles thru Phx. traffic just for pics of ours. We had one, we used it for several years, we sold it, people were given an exact address where to see it in Gilbert when it was up for sale, and it was listed in RV Trader where it's required to provide proof-of-ownership on high-end vehicles prior to posting. Only those who dont want it to be that Singer had it, will forever deny it.
Oh....we have a new doggie reserved too. And we dont sit around all day either.
This guy lived in something for years and had no photos. So he drives an hour to take pictures of something he doesn't have to show people on the internet what he claims he once had.
He is actually so dumb he thought this would work. He cares enough about his internet image to have done it. He's just a different version of kewl. Different toolbox but same person.
. You can tell why a guy like Rob and is all MAGA. Had he been in most other countries he'd lived in a shack without opportunities in life given to him.
What an envious idiot. Next time subscribe to Gaming Today. Oh---and you missed when I posted one of my NINE filled passports :)
Don't like that Im on ANOTHER road trip? Have Dan do one of his "locaters" on this post. We were in Colorado, got 530 miles east when my wife discovered she left her glaucoma eyedrops in Black Hawk, so we scurried back and are leaving again today.
There's NDS and there's Singer Derangement Syndrome.
You've got both! ((and I kinda like it)
Infuriating, isn't it!
AQ, here's another teachable moment for you since you purport to be so smart--Phoenix area homes dont have basements :)
Driving an extra 1000 miles to save on buying eye-drops at the store.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Always making sense and winning.
So you're saying your fake casino is in a Phoenix location? lol ok. Not in a basement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You've proven once again you won at life.
Outside of Mickey Crimm who shares a very manly <ahem> love of Trump I don't think you can find one actual winning gambler anywhere that belives you beat VP.
If you did the glitch like you claim then sure but .. as we all know.. Kewl.. uhh uhmm I mean Rob .. lol get you 2 confused.
What is so funny is that when someone like Alan won a VP jackpot - his face and casino surroundings are clearly in the picture as he does a dance.
Why have we never seen Rob in any of these jackpot photos? Has that ever happened? Why not, when he brags so much.. Kinda like others who provide "photo" evidence. lol
oh well at least he/we are keeping this site alive. The circus needs a clown.
Rob says he's got it, so he flaunts it.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/E7aXK9AyUyc
AQ's a joke. He wants pictures so he can just claim they're fake so he'll feel better before he heads off for a cold shower and then into his little safe space where he can whine about how unfair his miserable life is. Just like with the $1.5m jackpot, our rig, the money in our safe, on & on.
V, maybe I'll put up a pic of my big guy just to see how it devastates the lonely loser.
I dont love Trump, idjut. But I do love most of his policies. With me its always been about policy. While your support of issues is based on whether Trump supports it or not. It Trump supports it, you dont, no matter what it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionSo you're saying your fake casino is in a Phoenix location? lol ok. Not in a basement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You've proven once again you won at life.
Outside of Mickey Crimm who shares a very manly <ahem> love of Trump I don't think you can find one actual winning gambler anywhere that belives you beat VP.
If you did the glitch like you claim then sure but .. as we all know.. Kewl.. uhh uhmm I mean Rob .. lol get you 2 confused.
If you were playing a glitch would you request they bring in the cameras, take pics, and put your face on the marquee? Just sayin’Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This is just another case of someone who "doesn't like it" trying to create a scenario that'll help him sleep at night. Just as with kew and max, who both VOWED to go over to Phoenix immediately the moment I posted an address where they could view our Newell while it was listed for sale in RV Trader....then ran away and hid the moment I posted the address. Why? So they could continue on with their ridiculous denials.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIf you were playing a glitch would you request they bring in the cameras, take pics, and put your face on the marquee? Just sayin’Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I do not believe for one second that AQ would have the spine or the reasoning and discipline abilities to have successfully played the DU bug as I did. And he got it wrong. Alan was a fool for posting a few pics of hitting royals. All everyone did was claim "he lost it all back--and more--anyway" just to keep their sanity.
Not to speak "ill" of the dead, but it was my impression that toward the end Alan DID lose it all back...that and more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
He certainly wasn't living the life of Riley.
That was my impression, anyway: notwithstanding his successful career in TV journalism and in e-marketing he seemed kind of tapped out there before his final dirtnap; I assumed his poor health contributed to depression and he gambled to briefly escape the misery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVNot to speak "ill" of the dead, but it was my impression that toward the end Alan DID lose it all back...that and more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
He certainly wasn't living the life of Riley.
That was my impression, anyway: notwithstanding his successful career in TV journalism and in e-marketing he seemed kind of tapped out there before his final dirtnap.
This is the kind of post that makes me want to vomit.
If "MrV" were in an actual room with Alan's son, would he "say" the same things. Because if not, that makes this online commentary all gutless posturing in the service of a fake devil-may-care self-presentation that would last about three seconds in bricks-and-mortar reality.
Nothing worse than online anonymity to foster this kind of insulting, stupid nonsense. Even if absolutely true, you wouldn't say this content this way to his son's face. Yet anyone and everyone in Alan's family can read this, which actually makes it worse than an insulting (and speculative) face-to-face comment to one person.
"MrV" -- another anonymous bon vivant of the online world.
I mentioned it as counterpoint to Singer's assertion.
Yeah, I'd say the same thing to his son's face...why the hell wouldn't I?
He knows the truth.
Many if not most gamblers fuck up their lives one way or another due to gambling, and the reports from Alan toward the end were not good.
Spare me your pontifications: voice them to your clueless clients and not to uncaring louts such as myself who revel in the absurdity of life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Is speaking the truth speaking ill?
Seems to me I wasn't / am not speaking ill of Alan, I am just being forthright.
I mean, it's not like I'm accusing him of anything illegal or immoral...he just was unsuccessful there toward the end.
What, you want to sugar coat a turd?
Where did you come by the truth, regarding Alan's final days?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
My conclusion was based upon Alan's own words, his report of what he was doing in his final couple years.
His health went to shit.
He'd moved to LV, failed marriage / or was it marriages?
Kept gambling but for much lower stakes than when he was firing on all cylinders.
I'm not criticizing him, I am simply calling it the way he saw it.
What, weren't you paying attention back then?.
You've made assumptions that are not based on Alan's own words.
And, you used your assumptions to criticize him...thus speaking ill of the dead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Yes I was, and I can even go back and read Alan's own words.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Singer has claimed many jackpots / royals since then. I'm talking about those, obviously. Rob loves to brag and we saw him nervously ham it up in the Newell. Of course he'd do it with his jackpot pictures too.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIf you were playing a glitch would you request they bring in the cameras, take pics, and put your face on the marquee? Just sayin’Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Unless of course they weren't pictures of his jackpot.
I personally don't care what you win or lose I just want to make everyone aware of what you really are .. just like the 1.5m , no pics. Pics are very hard to fake and if you took a few of them.. video clip.. whatever then we'd have to give you props. But you didnt lol.. everyone knows it didn't happen Rob. Everyone. Sorry to tell you as it is important to you to be respected as a gambler. This has been the case for your whole life. Sorry it hasn't worked out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Pshaw.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou've made assumptions that are not based on Alan's own words.
And, you used your assumptions to criticize him...thus speaking ill of the dead
The question is rhetorical: .
Yes I was, and I can even go back and read Alan's own words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Sure, he gambled for lesser stakes because he lacked the money to bet at the higher levels he once played at.
Riddle me this: if his gambling hadn't "hurt" him financially, why didn't he have more money at the end?
He was a celebrity earlier, he had an e-tail business...where was all the money from his lifetime?
The casinos got most of it.
Alan was a gamblin' man playing negative expectation games, often at a pretty high level, while not having an edge / not being an AP.
Which is how it goes...how it's gone for me...I've pissed away $70K to date gambling: it happens.
But $70K is pin money for me: with my savings, my investments, and my investment income I could lose a lot more and not sweat it.
We pays our money and makes our choices.
I don't know how much money he had at the end, and neither do you.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But as for why he didn't have more...well he had retired and then we were suddenly in a bear market, so it's likely that his nest egg was depleted quicker than expected after he retired.
He wasn't making 7 bills anymore, so not enough income to comfortably play $5/$10/$25 VP.
He was a recreational player, same as you, and he enjoyed playing, same as you.
No reason to deride him if he dialed it down according to his income...no reason unless your intent is to speak ill of the dead.
What’s an “e-tail” business?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVPshaw.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou've made assumptions that are not based on Alan's own words.
And, you used your assumptions to criticize him...thus speaking ill of the dead
The question is rhetorical: .
Yes I was, and I can even go back and read Alan's own words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Sure, he gambled for lesser stakes because he lacked the money to bet at the higher levels he once played at.
Riddle me this: if his gambling hadn't "hurt" him financially, why didn't he have more money at the end?
He was a celebrity earlier, he had an e-tail business...where was all the money from his lifetime?
The casinos got most of it.
Alan was a gamblin' man playing negative expectation games, often at a pretty high level, while not having an edge / not being an AP.
Which is how it goes...how it's gone for me...I've pissed away $70K to date gambling: it happens.
But $70K is pin money for me: with my savings, my investments, and my investment income I could lose a lot more and not sweat it.
We pays our money and makes our choices.
Is that like an online escort service?
IIRC he posted how things had gotten pretty shitty for him at the end.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
But I am not deriding / defaming Alan; fact is I liked the guy, he seemed to be a decent fellow.
Again, how is trying to be truthful "speaking ill of the dead?"
Just as we comment upon architecture and music critically, so should we examine a life, well-lived or not.
What, do you fear that old "Judge not, lest ye be judged?"
bwa ha ha ha
Life's a game...the only relevant question is "How well have you played it?"
You're not being truthful, you're formulating opinions based on assumptions, then presenting your opinions as the truth, when you know the guy can't defend himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You're such a punk.
Of course he cannot "defend himself," moron: he's dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou're not being truthful, you're formulating opinions based on assumptions, then presenting your opinions as the truth, when you know the guy can't defend himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You're such a punk.
No need to "defend himself:" it is what it is, or should I say it was what it was.
I've no malice; I am however a historian.
I comment based on what I've read and believe to be true: more than mere "assumptions."
Alan commented quite a bit about his circumstances over time, or have you conveniently "forgotten?"
That's the point retard, you're talking shit about a dead guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
And you prefaced your attack with this disclaimer...
I guess you didn't get enough cheap shots in while he was around to defend himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You are a genuine a piece of shit...exactly what we'd expect a divorce lawyer to be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You think you see an opening and you POUNCE...oops...sorry, but you missed.
I was responding to Singer, clarifying, when the can of worms erupted with redietz barging in.
Others are driving this car, I'm just along for the ride.
BTW: How is my being truthful "talking shit?"
Why should the dead get a bye that we, the living, don't have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Your response was not clarifying, it was a made-up shit-talking claim about a dead guy...you spoke ill of the dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You don't understand why because you are immoral...and classless to boot.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But then you did.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
What happened to you in NJ?..did your daddy not teach you how to be a man?
Whatever.
You see it your way, I see it mine.
what, is the subject of Alan off limits in your world?
Now go fuck off you craven pultroon.
No doubt that's your daily affirmation, recited while looking at yourself in the mirror.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
De mortuis nil nisi bonum dicendum est
I wouldn`t worry about the coach....looks like he binge watched too many Clint Eastwood and Steven Seagal movies again this weekendQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
LOL...so you must think he's worried. Are you worried for him?Quote:
Originally Posted by Keystone
Why would you worry about whether Keystone worries about whether I worry about you?
Don't worry, be happy.
Agreed. Much better to just point out the living retards that don't think EV is relevant to beating sports.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
People have no idea what they are looking at, so they dress it up with jargon that really, outside of bonus whoring or middles shooting, is not applicable. Now I'm a big fan of bonus whoring and middles shooting, but realistically, they account for maybe 5% of what gets wagered in this country. So if people want to wave a magic EV wand when discussing bonus whoring and middles shooting, that's completely justifiable and correct. But if you are wading into actual straight betting and think you have some "EV" insight, you have literally no idea what you are doing. In this latter case, "EV" is just jargon in service of self-aggrandizing.
The circus circus circlin coupon clipping one has a lot to say about sports bettors who crush him in terms of volume and profit.
Just give me two points either way on every game and I'll bet with you until the cows come home.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
People have no idea what they are looking at, so they dress it up with jargon that really, outside of bonus whoring or middles shooting, is not applicable. Now I'm a big fan of bonus whoring and middles shooting, but realistically, they account for maybe 5% of what gets wagered in this country. So if people want to wave a magic EV wand when discussing bonus whoring and middles shooting, that's completely justifiable and correct. But if you are wading into actual straight betting and think you have some "EV" insight, you have literally no idea what you are doing. In this latter case, "EV" is just jargon in service of self-aggrandizing.
My buddy Randy McKay plays the handicapping contests too, deetz. I've known him for almost 30 years. We used to work the same plays in Laughlin in the late 90's. I know him well enough that I know he has a big grip on risk of ruin. He plays the 50K's so I know his bankroll is at least 7 figures. He wouldn't play them otherwise. He's good friends with Krackomberger. He came to Laughlin as a substitute school teacher. He's come a long way since thenQuote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
People have no idea what they are looking at, so they dress it up with jargon that really, outside of bonus whoring or middles shooting, is not applicable. Now I'm a big fan of bonus whoring and middles shooting, but realistically, they account for maybe 5% of what gets wagered in this country. So if people want to wave a magic EV wand when discussing bonus whoring and middles shooting, that's completely justifiable and correct. But if you are wading into actual straight betting and think you have some "EV" insight, you have literally no idea what you are doing. In this latter case, "EV" is just jargon in service of self-aggrandizing.
This from X:
Randy Lee McKay
@RR39
Big contest year tied for 1st in DK 50k buy in mjscougar as an investor my 3rd major contest win. Circa millions finished 14 and 48 under my entry GS Patton both great and different contests. Thanks @CircaSports
@DerekJStevens
@JeffreyBenson12
and DK for these contests