Druff's note: I separated this into its own thread. These messages were previously part of the thread where VitalVegas blocked me for questioning a shady casino visitation record he promoted.
-------------------------------
This vital vegas guy was calling Charlie Kirk a racist and fascist just after the shooting.
Guy is a Dick. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis vital vegas guy was calling Charlie Kirk a racist and fascist just after the shooting, jdaepoo.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewooStop retarding up an interesting thread with something completely irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You know, this should probably have its own thread. I have a long-time friend who used one really tone-deaf Kirk line in a reply on a forum as a response to someone else. Well, ETSU is in the midst of firing him, and he has tenure, for that one line. And he preceded that one bad line with the statement that he never advocates violence. But that didn't matter because the line is being used in isolation as a reason to fire him.
I guess my point is, being momentarily stupid should not necessarily be a fire-able offense. If you can link exactly what the vital vegas guy said, that would be helpful in figuring out if he was a shrill nutcase or just in-the-moment exercising really bad judgement.
Calling someone a racist and fascist can be done in a Dragnet way. It may be mean-spirited and stupid, but if it's meant purely politically, then it's just a poorly-timed opinion.
Prior to the assassination I had watched Kirk for just a couple hours on tape doing his Q&A stuff and knew nothing else about him. I have been to two live Turning Point events in the last decade, one a year or so ago. Kirk was not at those events. I have no knowledge of Kirk beyond watching those two hours of taped Q&A, which I think he conducted reasonably and well.
I find all this "momentary stupidity" talk unconvincing, particularly after seeing wall-to-wall "momentary stupidity" online over the CEO shooting less than a year ago.
These people are expressing political opinions that seem true to them and even ordinary (within their online circles anyway).
Now for some of them it may be foolish to not foresee that there could be professional consequences, but that only applies to their decision to express themselves. The sentiments that they express are not the ravings of the temporarily deranged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
No, the sentiments are not "mistakes." They are their sentiments. The error, to me, is not reading the room. Or having a little common human sensitivity when online.
Another mistake is the assumption that a particular site or forum has a defined audience, as if you were in a room or at a club. All audiences are undefined and potentially unlimited.
Or, to be honest, the mistake is that they are expressing themselves in the moment as opposed to editing themselves after pausing. As a writing major (and journalism for two years), I see this as the most common problem with online communication. People don't pause to review what they just wrote. They just write and hit send. I kind of understand why because writing takes so much longer than speaking, and reading is faster than listening, so it is a self-damaging set-up. The loop is set up to make you an idiot. And because most people spend most of their time posting anonymously, when they actually post under their real-world identities, they lack that pause-and-review.
You are writing "anonymously." I use the parentheses because at some point coming soon, AI will be able to identify you pretty quickly and be able to attach your entire posting history to your real-world name. This may be only a few years away. I'm sure the CIA will be able to do this for 90% of the population shortly if they feel like looking. Scrubbing will be, at best, a partial and hit-or-miss strategy.
So everything you posted, even under an alleged pseudonymous handle, will come back to haunt you, if not next month, then certainly next decade.
I follow vital vegas on X. He follows me too. He’s in my feed. Thats where I saw it. The guy makes a gillion tweets a day so I dont feel like going through it to find the tweet. Besides, if he had any sense he would have taken it down.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis vital vegas guy was calling Charlie Kirk a racist and fascist just after the shooting, jdaepoo.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
You know, this should probably have its own thread. I have a long-time friend who used one really tone-deaf Kirk line in a reply on a forum as a response to someone else. Well, ETSU is in the midst of firing him, and he has tenure, for that one line. And he preceded that one bad line with the statement that he never advocates violence. But that didn't matter because the line is being used in isolation as a reason to fire him.
I guess my point is, being momentarily stupid should not necessarily be a fire-able offense. If you can link exactly what the vital vegas guy said, that would be helpful in figuring out if he was a shrill nutcase or just in-the-moment exercising really bad judgement.
Calling someone a racist and fascist can be done in a Dragnet way. It may be mean-spirited and stupid, but if it's meant purely politically, then it's just a poorly-timed opinion.
Prior to the assassination I had watched Kirk for just a couple hours on tape doing his Q&A stuff and knew nothing else about him. I have been to two live Turning Point events in the last decade, one a year or so ago. Kirk was not at those events. I have no knowledge of Kirk beyond watching those two hours of taped Q&A, which I think he conducted reasonably and well.
Something strage happened a few months ago. In my twitter feed it said vital vegas blocked me. I had no clue what it was about. I didnt care because i really didnt read his stuff anyway. But then one day his Kirk is a fascist tweet was in my feed. So I thought, well, the guy is a woke ass bitch, and probably read one of my anti woke tweets, blocked me, then later decided to unblock me.
You're so wrong about AI. AI will never be able to do that. It can barely tell if text was written by AI to begin with .. tons of errors and that is an easy problem to approach.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
No, the sentiments are not "mistakes." They are their sentiments. The error, to me, is not reading the room. Or having a little common human sensitivity when online.
Another mistake is the assumption that a particular site or forum has a defined audience, as if you were in a room or at a club. All audiences are undefined and potentially unlimited.
Or, to be honest, the mistake is that they are expressing themselves in the moment as opposed to editing themselves after pausing. As a writing major (and journalism for two years), I see this as the most common problem with online communication. People don't pause to review what they just wrote. They just write and hit send. I kind of understand why because writing takes so much longer than speaking, and reading is faster than listening, so it is a self-damaging set-up. The loop is set up to make you an idiot. And because most people spend most of their time posting anonymously, when they actually post under their real-world identities, they lack that pause-and-review.
You are writing "anonymously." I use the parentheses because at some point coming soon, AI will be able to identify you pretty quickly and be able to attach your entire posting history to your real-world name. This may be only a few years away. I'm sure the CIA will be able to do this for 90% of the population shortly if they feel like looking. Scrubbing will be, at best, a partial and hit-or-miss strategy.
So everything you posted, even under an alleged pseudonymous handle, will come back to haunt you, if not next month, then certainly next decade.
AI as we see it is basically a glorified auto-completion. It doesn't do what you think.
If you're worreid though you could have your talk fed through AI to modify it.
Your story about the guiness record was good. You should give us more stories. You old timers have great stories. Always why I liked playing poker with older dudes. They've lived a life. Kids these days have spent too much time sitting in front of a screen. Do that and stop ranting about APs and you'll be happier and better respeced, Redietz.
He is notorious for being thin-skinned. Kinda like you but taken to the next level. You block people too over silly things. This guy is just a ass-kisser of casinos - the very opposite of you.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI follow vital vegas on X. He follows me too. He’s in my feed. Thats where I saw it. The guy makes a gillion tweets a day so I dont feel like going through it to find the tweet. Besides, if he had any sense he would have taken it down.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You know, this should probably have its own thread. I have a long-time friend who used one really tone-deaf Kirk line in a reply on a forum as a response to someone else. Well, ETSU is in the midst of firing him, and he has tenure, for that one line. And he preceded that one bad line with the statement that he never advocates violence. But that didn't matter because the line is being used in isolation as a reason to fire him.
I guess my point is, being momentarily stupid should not necessarily be a fire-able offense. If you can link exactly what the vital vegas guy said, that would be helpful in figuring out if he was a shrill nutcase or just in-the-moment exercising really bad judgement.
Calling someone a racist and fascist can be done in a Dragnet way. It may be mean-spirited and stupid, but if it's meant purely politically, then it's just a poorly-timed opinion.
Prior to the assassination I had watched Kirk for just a couple hours on tape doing his Q&A stuff and knew nothing else about him. I have been to two live Turning Point events in the last decade, one a year or so ago. Kirk was not at those events. I have no knowledge of Kirk beyond watching those two hours of taped Q&A, which I think he conducted reasonably and well.
Something strage happened a few months ago. In my twitter feed it said vital vegas blocked me. I had no clue what it was about. I didnt care because i really didnt read his stuff anyway. But then one day his Kirk is a fascist tweet was in my feed. So I thought, well, the guy is a woke ass bitch, and probably read one of my anti woke tweets, blocked me, then later decided to unblock me.
The left did a big hit job on Kirk. Twisting his words around to make him appear racist/fascist. Even editing film to make him appear to be making racist statements. Run of the mill liberals see and think it's the truth so repeat it. But here's a short clip of Kirk on race:Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
https://youtube.com/shorts/gxTr5Tp6d...5McWr4Fr_c0MrH
I did a deep dive on one of the quotes the liberals spread around and it was basically what it said. He had a podcast you can cherry pick reasonable stuff from but he's pretty awful. His wife is incredibly fake. Won a beauty pageant of Trumps. Just very into her looks and now that weird fake crying and performance stuff where she raises her head to the heavens choreographed to the music. So fake and gay.
If thats what you think then you are depraved. Can’t even make a decent comment about the widow. And you wonder why we despise you lefties.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
She is what she is. You're not the victim here as much as you wish to claim fellow victimhood.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIf thats what you think then you are depraved. Can’t even make a decent comment about the widow. And you wonder why we despise you lefties.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
She's put herself out there in the spotlight. She's not some grieving widow. She's grabbin her glory while it's still freshly minted for hers to grab. The whole thing was just a huge production like her hugging on the corpse for a viral clip. Watch the Mexican halfling for more info. He's not a uhhh "lefty",.
They say - But he didn't say that about all black women - only about the most accomplished ones. But not about all of them!
Liberals twisting his words about !!!
Wait but they all said they were beneficiaries off DEI ! It was a statement about dei! Not about black women!
Except only 1 of the 4 said that.
Anyway kirk said a ton of shit. He argued with girls with blue hair and more emotions than sense. The he clickbaited edited that into rage inducing viral clips.
But at least he got out there and argued.. but he also had handlers that kept the smart debaters away.
In the end the only thing I can say positive about him is that he did get out and engage the other side in some capacity.
Fuck off with the victimhood shit, maggot. You are the lowest piece of shit scum on the planet. Scum like you should dropped off in Tehran with FUCK RAGHEADS tattoe’d on your forehead.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionShe is what she is. You're not the victim here as much as you wish to claim fellow victimhood.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIf thats what you think then you are depraved. Can’t even make a decent comment about the widow. And you wonder why we despise you lefties.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
She's put herself out there in the spotlight. She's not some grieving widow. She's grabbin her glory while it's still freshly minted for hers to grab. The whole thing was just a huge production like her hugging on the corpse for a viral clip. Watch the Mexican halfling for more info. He's not a uhhh "lefty",.
Lol. Watch the Mexican Halfling. It isn't just liberals who see it for what it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmFuck off with the victimhood shit, maggot. You are the lowest piece of shit scum on the planet. Scum like you should dropped off in Tehran with FUCK RAGHEADS tattoe’d on your forehead.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionShe is what she is. You're not the victim here as much as you wish to claim fellow victimhood.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
She's put herself out there in the spotlight. She's not some grieving widow. She's grabbin her glory while it's still freshly minted for hers to grab. The whole thing was just a huge production like her hugging on the corpse for a viral clip. Watch the Mexican halfling for more info. He's not a uhhh "lefty",.
You are on a free speech forum. I'm not sure that is a good idea for someone like you.
Get out of your liberal fake news hole Mickey. https://old.bitchute.com/video/8STaOXVXrUps/
Who is that woman? What is she? She met him well after he was famous I believe. She's just a fake person. I'm sorry to inform you of this. There are plenty plenty of fakes on the liberal side too. Once you commit to desiring to be famous and have power - you stop being a real person. Thats just how it is...
There are some people so morally depraved that they deserve no audience. I’ve given AQ seveal chance. But each time he comes back even worse. Disrespecting Kirk’s widow is the final straw for me. AQ is going back on ignore.
AND HE WILL NEVER BE TAKEN OFF IGNORE. I’m through with the moral dirt bag.
Dude come up with your own thoughts. She doesn't read this forum. No one is above question. You worship Trump and anything in that world of his. Ok, we get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
It is crazy how little Mick can't think for himself. Even if he disagrees - I said nothing that bad. The woman has put herself out there as a public figure. I can find some more clips of people dissecting her performances.
Look, she was the main character in a music video about being a pretty woman. She was in a beauty pageant. She is not your normal stay at home housewife.
I wonder what it is like to be Mickey and never grow up and see the world like an adult?
There is this moment where the music changes and she raises her head up and looks into the sky. It is a big performance. She keeps dabbing her eyes but do we see any tears? I'm not saying she killed him or anything like that but it is a ton of performance. Most people do not make viral videos of them holding their husband's corpse.
Anyway, I'm completely ok with bringing up some of Kirk's quotes. The bad ones. Of course he didn't say bad things 100% of the time and one can find plenty of reasonable statements. He did have a podcast.. I mean. you can't just be a ranting nut 100% of the time.
That however doesn't excuse the things he said otherwise. All this whining about lack of freespeech and lawfare! .. Cancel culture. It is all a joke. FaG as my friends say.
AQ, I'm not seeing that you even come close to comprehending why people like you don't like or appreciate people like Charlie Kirk...or even his wife.
First, they were happily married and they had two cute kids. Being alone and lonely your entire life, "getting it" doesn't ever enter into the equation for you.
Next: it seems to irk you that a self-educated Charlie Kirk could consistently out-debate--always while articulating facts--with however many strange mensa-level liberals the colleges could throw at him. And he did it with aplomb.
Next: without the amazing & non-stop efforts of TPUSA educating so many new and young voters, our great President Donald Trump would be a political prisoner, Spanish would be the country's official language, our female sports programs would all be in deterioration mode before ceasing to exist, we'd get even more obnoxious trans & faggot couples and minorities in TV commercials, shows, movies etc.
Lastly: Erika Kirk. You have no idea what the lady's going thru right now, first because you've never loved anyone but yourself, and then because you've no idea how much the surviving spouse's heart aches over knowing their children will never have really known their father--who is widely acknowledged world-wide as being a very good man.
Sure she's a former beauty contestant, a piece of ass as her critics stupidly call her trying their best to be derogatory, and a devout Christian (something else that irks you??) but she's held herself together pretty well with all the pressure she's under. All that nonsense of no tears and looking up to the sky blah blah blah----that's just losers venting bs who got continuously ticked off at Charlie Kirk's ripping liberals a new one.
And guess what? IT'S ALL RELATED TO A SERIOUS CASE OF TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!
And I love it!!! :)
Who gives a shit, Rob you big ugly doofus. It is supposed to be a gambling forum. No one cares about your man crush on Trump.
And some of you people are about to find out just what your hero has done for you in about 2 weeks when SS COLA is announced at about 2.7%, way less than half what inflation really is. And that is before a 12% raise in you medicate premium next year.
So Trump will be taking upwards of $100 from all retirees (including my mother), while continuing to enrich himself with every single thing he does. Hidden in the details of EVERY stroke of his pen is something that enriches Trump. EVERYTHING!
So go ahead and celebrate as Trump takes from you to enrich himself. Fucking moron!
lol avoiding the issues and attacking me. Why would we expect anything more?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
THe dude was a professional debater. "Self-educated", sure. He also uses debate tactics that are questionable. Regardless of that, this is the one thing I admired about the guy. So no - it doesn't irk me did that. This is what was admirable, chief doofus.
Again, my gf is almost guaranteed more accomplished and attractive than your wife. Who would marry a guy who looks like you and is a gambling addict in denial about how much they've lost their whole fucking life?
Seriously. Who?
You take pictures in the some monitor faking your big wins and concoct stories around that. Then you are mad because people believed Kewl for 10+ years. Don't take your failures out on him.
I'm not sure what you mean about "getting it" and how that relates to my views on her and this situation.
Where is the rest of his family in all this? Why aren't they involved? This woman is just a chief attention grabber.
I will say I've never had a spouse die but I understand the grieving of women because I've broke up with a few of them. You'll laugh hard and I get that too but it sucks for them. That isn't the same as death but I've seen it and never like putting women through that.
Also - Kirk very often got his facts wrong but you can make up infinite facts on the spot and if there isn't a way to be fact-checked - it is just passed over.
Me thinking this woman is a bit of a phoney has nothing to do with my opinions on Trump but you worship that idiot then fine, do so. He is a joke to the rest of the world with his UN speeches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.
So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.
And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.
And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.
You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?
This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."
Rob has the other side of TDS. Trump Dick Sucking. (thats for you, belly)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Trump is fucking hte lower classes and they're going to hate him in 3 years after inflation kicks in. The tech businesses will offshore the jobs over hiring lesser skilled AMericans in tech. These Trump people don't get that. India has 5x the people we do and tech companies were able to hire quality without paying as much. But all those jobs can be done overseas.
No one is going to invest in manufacturing because there is no guarantee the tariff will stick around to protect the business. It'll take years.
So many small businesses going to fail because they can't find the labor to do them. I was just talking the other day to my gf and her small business owner friend. That woman tries to hire white Americans but it never works out. Turns out white men don't want to work out in the hot sun of Summer for $22 an hour.
All these Trump people think if the wages are raised the jobs will magically be filled! But there aren't enough people around anymore. It is all just simple thinking. Point at immigrants and tell your followers they're victimizing you when in general we are taking advantage of them.
The worst of it all though are the tax cuts for the wealthy. Those are the reasons gold and BTC are going up - so many people understand all these things. All these extra taxes on the lower classes and wealthy just get more and more assets for Private Equity and to buy up every house that people want so they'll be enslaved as rentors.
It is all so fucked but in 3 years Trump will not be a popular man. He can hide it all he wants by fucking with government reports and firing anyoen who won't lie for him but it'll be painfully obvious.
He has done a few useful things .. and even the imimigration needed to be done .. I believe Singer was a government employee. Just some big thing wrote him a check and thats all he ever understood. Typical
You have dementia. Log off.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.
So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.
And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.
And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.
You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?
This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."
Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.
I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYou have dementia. Log off.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.
So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.
And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.
And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.
You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?
This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."
Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.
I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.
You have zero idea what you're talking about.
Here's a thought. I think you mentioned that your GF is a prosecutor or judge. Have her read what I just wrote.
She's going to agree with me.
To be clear - this idea of victimhood being pushed upon people by Trump and the right. You seem to feel victimized that I don't think this woman is grieving.
Oh I believe she is grieving. I am sure she is very upset. That is not what i am saying. I am saying the need for her to be in center of the spotlight is far more strong than it'd be in a normal great woman like she is portrayed to be. It is weird as fuck. I have rightwing friends who have told me the same. She is not like normal people. She wanted to be in the influencer game and be someone. Why else do you end up in videos for being pretty and at beauty pageants? It isn't that common. I'm not even sure she is faking it beyond having a feeling of "this is how I'm supposed to behave to rally the troops and keep his power in my clutches".
But you guys play the part you're told to play .. and you don't even know it.
What grieving widows go up in front of everyone and put on some big production? Where is the rest of the family? Whatever - I don't care ultimately. She isn't important to me.
What I find crazy is how everyone is rewriting all the stuff CHarlie Kirk was about. He was about a lot of things and he said some really nasty things. Sure, he'd be fine on VCT but the world shouldn't be modelled after VCT.
Unfortunately I seem to know more about sports betting and we'll leave it there. If I didn't - you'd ridiculed me for my questions but you knew I was right and your logic was flawed and so you ran off and avoided answering the questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYou have dementia. Log off.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.
I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.
You have zero idea what you're talking about.
Here's a thought. I think you mentioned that your GF is a prosecutor or judge. Have her read what I just wrote.
She's going to agree with me.
When the RAID can has sputtered empty the roaches come back out to play.
And no, she's an attorney. She doesn't do anything with criminal law. I don't think she goes to Youtube for expertise.
In prior times you ridiculed people for google searching and youtubing as "research". Now it is your gold standard.
Give us a break.
Don't invent reasons or interpretations of what I wrote. Stop that nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I am saying that your proclamations regarding Kirk's widow's self-presentation are, according to forensic body language and speech analysis experts, completely wrong.
You gave a strong opinion with no expertise to back it up. You get upset when I tell you that experts in the fields came to completely different conclusions than you did.
You do this stuff all the time. You presume expertise you do not have, and then attack people who point out that you have very little idea what you are talking about. It's ridiculous and gets old.
Go show your GF what I wrote and then report her reaction. You are just dead wrong on this. You decided to have an opinion out of the thin air of your mind, and you were wrong.
Ask your GF.
I have decades of experience observing people lol. gtfo.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzDon't invent reasons or interpretations of what I wrote. Stop that nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I am saying that your proclamations regarding Kirk's widow's self-presentation are, according to forensic body language and speech analysis experts, completely wrong.
You gave a strong opinion with no expertise to back it up. You get upset when I tell you that experts in the fields came to completely different conclusions than you did.
You do this stuff all the time. You presume expertise you do not have, and then attack people who point out that you have very little idea what you are talking about. It's ridiculous and gets old.
Go show your GF what I wrote and then report her reaction. You are just dead wrong on this. You decided to have an opinion out of the thin air of your mind, and you were wrong.
Ask your GF.
I'm the one who started to really call out poor kewl. I have a pretty eye for nonsense of various types.
Although I'm not believing what she is doing is bullshit but I don't think she behaves like a normal traditional wife would behave. Regardless of however it is wanting to be spun. I don't care what the FBI and CIA on Youtube tell you.
I'm curious who these experts are. The right pandering side if you want to gain longterm views is just to pander and not say anything critical. Oh they worked for the FBI ! They say she's a good honest hard working America.
You can tell who the shitty rats are when fascism starts to lower on your country.
Ma? The FBI? Just like on Tee Vee ?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
No son, like on Youtube.
If it wasn't so weird - I would ask my gf her opinion on Erika Kirk. She isn't as nice as I am to Charlie Kirk.
I'm kinda like .. he is my 2nd amendment brother, I pour one out for him. Most on the right just want to be victims these days. Crazy. It is so fucked how everything is framed as conservatives under attack when it is pretty fucking clear what is happening in this country.
Dude, you really are as delusional as Dietz and Singer. Not to mention the greatest gambler of all time.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
What exactly did you "call out about poor old Kewl"? You voiced an opinion or a feeling, with not a single shred of proof.
When I exposed Dawg, I got him to retract 7 months of lies with one line about "being even". He can spin that anyway he wants, but that was "proof" of his lies of all that winning.
When Singer posted those pictures in the Newell that didn't belong to him, MaxPen dug up where that Newel actually was at a dealership. I confirmed it with the manager of that dealership. These things are proof!
What you have is an opinion or feeling about something with not a single shred of proof. It would be like if I said, I think Mickeycrimm was the second shooter of JFK, but could offer not a single piece of evidence, other than my own feeling or opinion.
Until you can offer some kind of proof, don't come at me with this "I called Kewlj out" bullshit. As with most things about you, you are wrong. If this is your great talent, you might want to rethink your life.
And all those years you called redietz arrogant.....and he is! You are 10 times as arrogant as Dietz.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Return of the FucktardQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawgQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Thats fine bro if you want to act like you exist then knock yourself out.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJDude, you really are as delusional as Dietz and Singer. Not to mention the greatest gambler of all time.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
What exactly did you "call out about poor old Kewl"? You voiced an opinion or a feeling, with not a single shred of proof.
When I exposed Dawg, I got him to retract 7 months of lies with one line about "being even". He can spin that anyway he wants, but that was "proof" of his lies of all that winning.
When Singer posted those pictures in the Newell that didn't belong to him, MaxPen dug up where that Newel actually was at a dealership. I confirmed it with the manager of that dealership. These things are proof!
What you have is an opinion or feeling about something with not a single shred of proof. It would be like if I said, I think Mickeycrimm was the second shooter of JFK, but could offer not a single piece of evidence, other than my own feeling or opinion.
Until you can offer some kind of proof, don't come at me with this "I called Kewlj out" bullshit. As with most things about you, you are wrong. If this is your great talent, you might want to rethink your life.
And all those years you called redietz arrogant.....and he is! You are 10 times as arrogant as Dietz.
I remember really calling out the arm story was it was clearly in the 'did not happen' category of stories. Then your credibility took a huge swing down. Whatever. Kewl will be Kewl forever. Good luck at blackjack and whatedver else you are taking on.
Trump just got prescription drug prices cut in half for the middle class.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Are you saying kew LIED about something?? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmTrump just got prescription drug prices cut in half for the middle class.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Kew, COLA means nothing to me. It does to your mommy because your entire family is poor and struggling. AKA: losers.
One of the main democrat lies is Trump is enriching himself with "every stroke of the pen". Articulate accurately to us just 10 examples you've been tracking. C'mon. Just 10, you wimpy fartface.
Here are 7. honestly this shit is endless if you really want to go down the rabbitholes. Trump has signficantly moved the bar on what is considered corruption. Foreign capital will find its way out of the US if we're just as corrupt and now moreso than most countries.
1 Trump has hosted many things at his own property where his hotel charges crazy rates to the US gov.
2 https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/11/polit...-air-force-one. btw they have to dissassembl;e this thing. So many costs.
3 Launched businesses like a social media company. Silly past Presidents - they always looked at being President as a fulltime gig.
4 Scammy crypto currencies.
5 All those gifts of $1 million to his inaugeral ball.
6 Campaigns/PACs have been able to use his properties and real estate to give him money and skirt intent of the law.
7 All these guys settling court cases for big amounts. it is just another way to corrupt the whole system.
I dont' care that he gets even more wealthy but it sucks that we're just becoming a third world crap country by a bunch of poorly educated fools who are bitter that their standard of life didn't match their dads. So they blame the brown guys and vote this clown in when it is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain how bad he is for this country.
I mean didn't he somehow manage to have the deficit go up? Am I wrong? I don't specifically pay much attention to him because it is all settled. If you still think he is particularly competent then good luck. He has a few successes but he's also just a big embarassment. Israel owns him.
I could easily find 10 and they're all quite blatant. Even one of them is more than what we saw on Biden. I got up to 7 .. and ran out of steam but many things I've listed were many occurances put into one sentence.
Truly sad.
True, AccountInQuestion was among the first to dispute it in its entirety:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgWhat's incredible too is that UNKewlJ keeps trying to claim that he "lied only about that" and that the "rest" of the backrooming story is true, while at the same time he remainsand deliberately obtuse about theQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
UNKEWL OUTED FOR YET ANOTHER LIE ABOUT THE MDAWG ABOUT EVEN POST
refusing to acknowledge against all evidence including the Wizard's statement himself that MDawg posted the "about even" statement only as an accommodation to get his Adventures of MDawg thread unhidden, and that this was done before UNKewlJ ever posted the completely debunked and constantly shifting lie about having player records.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
This retard is a closeted homosexual.