Printable View
Moses says:
"Interesting there are about 35 places. So KJ just surfs through all these places and never gets backed off while making $100K and thumbing his nose at all of them. Plus many of these have been reported by others as not playable or noted for high heat."
I just counted the casinos listed in CBJN for Las Vegas. I counted 76 different casinos. That is a far cry from 35. Are you to cheap to buy a copy of CBJN?
Why are you looking at Las Vegas anyway?
The post/thread you are referencing is not about Las Vegas and or playable games, as you would think from the title. As usual with Moses, it is about me. He continues to be obsessed with me. Every post he makes mentions me numerous times. I don't even want to think about the wet dreams he is having about me. :( (no vomiting emoji, so I used sad).Quote:
Originally Posted by Midwest Player
The article that Moses linked to was not about playable games in Las Vegas. It was both entitled and about the best blackjack games. That is very different from "playable". 'Best' means the lowest house edge. Most games that fall into one of two catagories.
Either very low limit games, places like Longhorn/Bighorn, $3 minimum, double on 2 or 3 cards, or places like Joker's Wild, or Wild Wild West, where a $25 wager draws mega attention and a $100 cashout has to be verified. :rolleyes: Places like this (not necessarily these exact locations) have the lowest house edge, so they make a "best games in Vegas" list, but they aren't playable. Well not for any stakes above $5-20 spread.
The second category, would be high limit pits at some of the big strip and even off strip resort type casinos. These games, while also having very low house edge, qualify as "best of Vegas", but are also basically unplayable, because they are "Hawked" closely. At least at "regular times". A player like me (local) may be able to get some play in during busy weekends, holiday weekends, or big fight or other big event weekends, but NOT on a regular basis, so none of these casinos are part of my 'regular rotation".
What a player like myself looks for is a casino, that has not necessarily the best rules (lowest house edge), but playable conditions, but and this is the important part, will tolerate mid-level play. As a matter of fact, at times I specifically avoid the so called 'best game' in a casino. Often times the table right next door with slightly worse conditions, is the much better opportunity because of tolerance levels. That is something I learned from 'bigplayer'. :) I currently have 32 such 'playable' casino in my regular rotation and only a few are on that goofy list. I almost always have between 30-36.
Midwest Player, if you are going to continue to read moses, you really need to stop believing every thing he says. He just is not credible about anything that he says or claims, including his play in Reno. A small location like Reno, with a handful of playable games to begin with just is not going to allow a regular player to play any meaningful stakes on a regular basis. An out-of-town player might be able to roll in on a weekend a couple times a year and get some green/light black action down, but no local or "regular" player is going to be allowed to do that. The locals play low limit red chip. THAT is all they can get away with and I am sorry that my pointing this out has thrown Moses for a loop and sent him off the deep end, where he is obsessed with me and with the idea of discrediting me.
He just makes shit up. Did you read today where I stand behind a table back-counting and then jump in? He said Vegas casinos would not allow that for long and he is right. And that is precisely why I don't back-count. Never have. But it doesn't stop him from posting whatever he wants. He is a liar and quite frankly a really sick dude. He literally spends time on a forum that he is the only member. He re-posts discussions from numerous sites, including this one and then injects his opinion like he is part of the discussion. He literally is talking to himself like a mental patient. It is sort of funny, but mostly just really sad.
Moses isn't even an active Member anymore. Let's cut him a lot of slack. :)
Tasha, you don't know the situation. Moses is on a crusade to discredit me, That crusade has extended for 5+ years now and 6 different forums. All of which he is now banned from. And this crusade has included Moses using many, many sockpuppets (or alternative personalities) even after he is banned from the site. The most recent occurred JUST yesterday at blackjackinfo, where one of Moses Sockpuppets was yet again banned for starting numerous threads and threats against me. Those from or familiar with WoV may remember Moses's sockpuppet "sidthesquid", who asked members if anyone had any personal information on me, (pictures, address phone number). To his credit Mike banned Sidthesquid (moses).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Look this Moses thing isn't just internet trolling. This guy is trying to find information like my address and threatens that if he does, he will circulate a picture of me to Las Vegas Casinos. As well as his continuing physical threats. I have had to file reports with the police two different times. And this latest time The police informed me of who this person is. Yes, that is right I have his real name and personal information. The police provided me this for my protection.
And I could publicly share that info and let people see who he really is and just how sick he is. His history reveals that pretty clearly. But I generally don't do that kind of thing. I would never out an AP and while Moses isn't an AP, just an internet troll, I don't feel all that comfortable even doing that. And if that seems like a contradiction because I did share some personal info about Rob....so be it. I am not the one who revealed Rob's real identity. I did reveal some of Rob's personal history, and truth be told, I am not all that proud of that. But Rob has a way of pushing people too far.
And Moses is pushing me to that brink too. He isn't an AP, just an internet troll, who's trolling has become a legal matter, so I think I am within my right to reveal who he is, should I decide to. Then maybe people like you can read his history and won't think it is so cute and funny.
One other comment about this Midwest Player. Not all Casinos are created equal. It really isn't about number of casinos as much as different pits. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Midwest Player
Some casinos with multiple pits, some of the really big one, 3 or 4, count almost as multiple casinos.
But then on the other hand some of the smaller places not only have 1 pit, but that pit may only be open one shift, 6-8 hours a day (maybe 10) on a weekend.
Do successful people in life obsess over someone they never met before but only through internet boards? I don't think so, why should they? They are already too busy living life to even consider giving a second thought about such an insecure obsessive man living in Reno Nevada. Nobody, and I mean nobody gives a flying fuck whether or not the guy makes an average sports book bet of $2200 a game or $11. Who the fuck cares if he spreads from $5 to $15 or $25 to $75. Who cares what you have in the bank, whether or not you own a home, and if you do how much it is worth, Moses you sick insecure fuck. No one cares if you live under a bridge, and if you did that is not how someone should judge you. So Moses please stop obsessing over people. You made your own bed sleep in it.
Kj, quick question that you’ve probably answered before. How many of the casinos in your rotation do you play rated and how many unrated? Thanks.
I will say I found it odd that UCFX answered a question directly asked to Moses. "Moses, how old are you?" UCFX for some odd reason, answered,"60," rather than something like,"Moses is 60." When I questioned UCFX about the interesting answer, UCFX said, "Good catch," and then went on and on about volunteer work and being tired from volunteer work as if trying to distract me from the slipup. LMAO! SMH! I also suggested to UCFX that she take a selfie picture with Moses to prove that they are separate people, and UCFX balked on the idea. That's not suspicious at all. -.- ;)