Quote:
Originally Posted by
Deech
I will attempt to go back on the topic. While I will not speak for anyone, my belief for those who use mathematics, find obvious visual flaws in pay tables and seeking machines that have left optimal play from a previous player, are using parameters acknowledged for AP play.
I cannot speak for the case in question but it appears that a code was utilized to give out money above the recognized pay table. From all the comments I have read, this is the best I can ascertain at this point.
I have not weighted in on this case, because it is far above my level of even understanding. I am a salamander and have given up just about all of the little machine play AP that I was doing to return to my BJ roots.
I don't honestly know one way or the other if this was a legitimate AP play, or an inside job. But based on what I have read, I know that it hasn't been proven that it was an inside job and unfair advantage. And it even appears that the casinos involved were sort of advised that they should drop that angle because they couldn't prove it. But they chose to ignore that and file charges anyway.
THIS is the old bully mentality that the casino industry that Blob21 supports so vigorously, has taken for decades. They often figure individuals won't fight back and or won't pay the cost to fight back. Same mentality that they used against card counters for years with the illegal back-roomings and detentions. They were surprised as hell when card counters started fighting back and winning in courts.
And for decades the casino industry has labeled card counters as cheats, and Griffin lumped card counters into their "book of cheats and criminals" despite that every judge that ever rules on the situation has ruled that card counting is not cheating.
This upstanding industry that Blob21 admires so much is extremely dirty. And that's what it appears they have done here. They have labeled players cheaters that there is no proof that they are. Tell me again who the parasites are Blob21?