BOZ, UNKEwlj, MrV, REDietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pepe

People that believe in God are more likely to survive and reproduce than those who don't. So in certain respects disbelief in God can be considered a form of mental illness.
[spoilers]even though it's true. It is not necessarily beneficial to an organism, to have too accurate a view of reality.[/spoilers]

(what's the syntax for spoiler tags on here? i've tried [spoiler] and [spoilers] and neither work?)

---

Another interesting statistic is this pattern.
An individual should follow these steps in order.
Education, Work (Career), Marriage (No Pre-Marital Sex), Family.
With this formula or model it has over a 75% long term success rate.
If an individual breaks outside the pattern or steps the success rate drops down below 25%.
Needless to say this formula is Biblical.
If individuals don't want to believe in God, that's fine but numbers never lie.
When people say they do not believe in God I always think about the line from: The Count of Monte Cristo.
"I don't believe in God." .... "It doesn't matter, HE believes in you!"

It should be noted that I in no way followed these steps or rules but if I seen the statistics presented, I may have followed them better.
I learned this information, too late in life and once you get trapped into materialism (greed) and ego it isn't easy to get out.
We, as individuals, literally get brainwashed at an early age and it is very difficult to be reprogramed.

I guess if you were going to watch a movie and correlate some of this you could say It's a Wonderful Life and Click show this example of Family First.
As goofy as Click is as a movie, I have to admit that it makes a serious point about putting others needs in front of your own.
Oddly enough Adam Sandler follows up that message, 6 years later, with his movie, That's My Boy, which goes in the complete and opposite direction.
Even I found that movie too offensive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN5Kt_ILpi0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

under what conditions can one get a check after playing table games

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewG

I called the cage at one casino today and asked them about their check policy on table games.

The cage CONFIRMED what Messrs Mdawg and Belly have been saying:
that a check will be issued only for verified table game PROFITS.

---

But wait...there's more...

First, you fail to understand that casinos are very strict especially nowadays
with their anti-money laundering provisions.

31 CFR § 1021.210 provides that casinos must implement anti-money laundering provisions.
Allowing a check to be issued in exchange for cash, is definitely not anti-money laundering.

In general, a check issued by a casino is only pursuant to a win.

This was from 1996
https://lasvegassun.com/news/1996/ju...inos-in-check/

Nevada also bars certain transactions the Bank Secrecy Act allows.
Specifically, it says casinos can't:

* Exchange more than $2,500 in cash for bills of a larger denomination.

* Issue a casino check in exchange for more than $2,500 in cash.

* Transfer more than $2,500 by wire or other means.

Again, the above were the rules in 1996.

And the rules are MUCH stricter today.
Today they won't allow even one penny in cash to be converted to a casino check.
For example, back in the very early 2000s people could still "money play" at the tables.
Nowadays that is not allowed and only chips may be played at the tables.
Just in general everything is much stricter now than it was, but even in 1996
there was no way anyone could convert any meaningful sum of cash into a check at a casino.

These are representative of the newer, stricter guidelines in place today:
https://www.americangaming.org/sites...ice%202017.pdf

These are suggested rules for casinos, which have been adopted
by nearly all Nevada casinos these days:

https://imgur.com/zVtiv9F

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

under what conditions can one get a check after playing table games

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewG

I called the cage at one casino today and asked them about their check policy on table games.

The cage CONFIRMED what Messrs Mdawg and Belly have been saying:
that a check will be issued only for verified table game PROFITS.

---

But wait...there's more...

First, you fail to understand that casinos are very strict especially nowadays
with their anti-money laundering provisions.

31 CFR § 1021.210 provides that casinos must implement anti-money laundering provisions.
Allowing a check to be issued in exchange for cash, is definitely not anti-money laundering.

In general, a check issued by a casino is only pursuant to a win.

This was from 1996
https://lasvegassun.com/news/1996/ju...inos-in-check/

Nevada also bars certain transactions the Bank Secrecy Act allows.
Specifically, it says casinos can't:

* Exchange more than $2,500 in cash for bills of a larger denomination.

* Issue a casino check in exchange for more than $2,500 in cash.

* Transfer more than $2,500 by wire or other means.

Again, the above were the rules in 1996.

And the rules are MUCH stricter today.
Today they won't allow even one penny in cash to be converted to a casino check.
For example, back in the very early 2000s people could still "money play" at the tables.
Nowadays that is not allowed and only chips may be played at the tables.
Just in general everything is much stricter now than it was, but even in 1996
there was no way anyone could convert any meaningful sum of cash into a check at a casino.

These are representative of the newer, stricter guidelines in place today:
https://www.americangaming.org/sites...ice%202017.pdf

These are suggested rules for casinos, which have been adopted
by nearly all Nevada casinos these days:

https://imgur.com/zVtiv9F

---

Coach, far be it for me to assist you with definitions of simple words, but "stricter guidelines" and "suggested rules" are just that. Not laws. LOL. Not even regulations. And if MDawg is as big a player as Boz says, then guess who is first in line to not have to follow "guidelines" and "suggested rules."

So I'm waiting for the inestimable coach to bet me that I can't get a check from a casino for, let's say, 20K, without actually winning 20K. Or winning 10K. Or winning 5K.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I'm waiting for the inestimable coach to bet me that I can't get a check from a casino for, let's say, 20K, without actually winning 20K. Or winning 10K. Or winning 5K.

---

Not from table games you can't.

If you have an idea for a bet, just spell it out right here.

The people who create immigration laws in the United States do so because it generates votes that keep them in power (and the plush life that goes along with it) and because they are not the ones that suffer the repercussions of overpopulation due to their ability to comfortably sequester themselves with their massive wealth (and power as just mentioned). Runaway inflation caused by the stimulus money given to the newly-immigrated for their votes and the dog-shit healthcare resulting from not being able to handle such a large population are of no concern to these evil cunts.

It is no longer sensible or in the national interest to allow many immigrants.

Made sense when the country was new, but not now, we'll plumb filled up.

Most especially keep the riff raff from south of the border out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is no longer sensible or in the national interest to allow many immigrants.

Made sense when the country was new, but not now, we'll plumb filled up.

Most especially keep the riff raff from south of the border out.

---

Countries like Poland, The Czech Republic and Hungary probably have the best long term prospects since their immigration policies are quite penurious.

Nice Job Fellas.
Now you upset tableplay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monet

Nice Job Fellas.
Now you upset tableplay.

---

LOL, good one Monet ;-)