Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
Dan and KJ....simple minds think alike. Yes we've seen that. Once a mind is made up that +EV means you win and -EV means you lose, the struggle begins.
And what you're doing is making the same critical mistake all AP's make: applying long term rules to short term play. That is, by definition, just plain dumb.
A session is a session. It is bound by the actions and results of that session alone. Just like one single hand is. A percent or two or three is very rarely going to make any difference whatsoever to the results being positive or negative for any given session. So for you fools to keep saying the same misguided point that "it's very easy for you to win a single session or five straight using your strategy" but then contradict yourselves repeatedly by adding in the feel-good but misinformed caveat "however, because you're playing at under 100% EV, you'll lose overall" it only shows how mathematically challenged you really are and how you rely on vague contradictions to try and make your point.
This, you people never explain. And that's because what you're trying to get past everyone is how, when I get ahead, I'm DUE to lose because you say so. Do you even realize how stupid that sounds? You're saying there's a good chance I'll win a single session, but after playing 50 or 6 or 10 or 8 or 20 or whatever, suddenly that "good chance" at some point has to be reduced to a "not so good a chance" for a bunch of sessions. In other words, you're arbitrarily changing the math probability for the outcome of a single session. That's another word for "due".
Yes, there's a difference between advanced college math and street math.