Most critics of "dice influencing" are absolutely clueless

I can't believe how ignorant the critics of the dice influencing theory actually are.

They throw around statements that dice influencing is impossible because of physics. Well, the laws of physics say dice influencing is in fact very possible.

The critics of dice influencing say that dice thrown on axis will be randomized once they hit the pyramids. What they don't understand is that in "dice influencing" the goal is to hit the back wall under the pyramids.

The critics say the dice will be randomized when they hit the table. Again, the critics don't understand that a soft throw with dice on axis and the dice hitting the table on their edges -- and not their points -- will help to keep the dice on axis.

For the most part the critics are ignorant of the entire theory and this ignorance leads to their proclamations that dice influencing is impossible.

It is not impossible. It is in fact, very difficult and for the most part you probably can't go to a school and in two days come out a skilled dice influencer.

But it's possible and those with the skill, albeit very few, can achieve better results.

Alan,
I dont remember if I asked you, but do you set and try to influence in card craps?

Absolutely pointless to set dice or try to use an influenced throw in card craps UNLESS you are practicing to throw dice where the dice determine the bets.

As you know, casinos that use dice in card craps have the dice "point" to the cards and the value shown on the cards determines the actual bet. So, your dice might show 4-4 but the cards might show 5-2.

The exception is if a casino happens to deal the cards "face up," and I understand that Barona used to deal the cards face up. I don't know if they still do. Anybody with info?

Question: if a great baseball player has a 300 batting average what percentage of good throws does an expert dice influencer need?

If you limit your potential losses on random rollers by not betting on them or by using the 5-Count on them reducing the number of random rolls you bet on by about 57 percent and you bet only one bet on them at table minimum here we go:

Say I go up on three numbers. A Pass line and two Comes with full odds. That is all I can lose (one, two or three bets) if I immediately seven out. However, I can win much, much more on long rolls. I can also win on repeating numbers --- even just a few of them. So losses are contained (bets on random rollers are negligible). I'd say a 300 dice controller would be a winning dice controller.