Warning: pure fabrication
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best
1. Grateful Dead
2. Beyoncé/Mariah Carey/Rihanna (three way tie)
3. Smokey Robinson
4. Whispers
5. Temptations
6. Gallagher (no longer available - deceased)
7. Grateful Dead tribute bands
Worst
1. Dennis Miller
2. Talking Heads
3. Rush
4. Pink Floyd
5. Radiohead
6. Beethoven tribute bands
7. Mozart tribute bands
What does this mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Attempted clarification by example:Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWhat does this mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Suppose the Grateful Dead are playing at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. A large group of people (aka, the audience) who have tickets to this concert play slots in the MGM Grand casino before the concert and/or after the concert and some of them leave plays. For example, this no brainer play on Tiki Fortune (not mine, I took this one from the net) that is impossible to lose money on that a Rihanna attendee might leave. The two lists shown in the first post of this thread rank the attendees of various bands/acts (please keep in mind that these audiences are not necessarily mutually exclusive) by their conjectured propensities (by conjectured I mean fabricated for humor purposes) to leave advantage plays like the Tiki Fortune example.
Suppose Jerry Garcia hadn't died.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
The Dead haven't played together since then, their last show was on July 9, 1995.
I was going by this (aside from the fact that I stated plainly in the first post that it was a total fabrication):Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVSuppose Jerry Garcia hadn't died.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
The Dead haven't played together since then, their last show was on July 9, 1995.
https://www.concertarchives.org/bands/grateful-dead
You mean "Dead and Company."
Promoters may stupidly bill it as the Grateful Dead but that's a lie.
Note in the first post in this thread that number 1 is listed as Grateful Dead, not The Grateful Dead. I then refer in my clarification example to the band the Grateful Dead, not The Grateful Dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
For whatever reason, the promoters make a distinction between Dead and Company and The Grateful Dead (probably because The Grateful Dead and Grateful Dead are different bands - in any case I already stated in the first post that it was a total fabrication and the Grateful Dead as a clarification example was presented as a supposition;thus the usage of the word suppose):
(https://www.concertarchives.org/conc...-matthews-band)
Fabrication be damned.
Twice you listed the Grateful Dead, and they haven't existed for decades.
Not trying to bust your balls, just clarifying.
That's correct, I listed the "Grateful Dead". Not the "The Grateful Dead". Furthermore, I stated that it was a total fabrication and you can dismiss that, but that statement is present whether you do so or not. Also, in this post, https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post155631 you will see that The Grateful Dead (August 18th 2021) and Grateful Dead (December 29th 2022) are listed in separate appearances. Whatever the makeup of these bands' cast members are - the statement stands (in jest, as the thread was meant to be comedic) that the audience who watches these persons have the greatest propensity of leaving plays - it matters not if Jerry Garcia is dead;that group of people who witnessed this band (who doesn't have the original band members in it) have the greatest propensity to leave plays. It's all moot of course since I gave a warning that it was total fabrication.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
The only real grateful dead fan I know is a successful IP attorney. The burnouts selling grilled cheese in the parking lot probably don't have the money to see the show let alone gamble. Bad read.
Yeah the tie-died shirt folks with dreadlocks leaving one and dones all over the place that I later saw chilling with their feet hanging out in a Volkswagen Van (circa '68) painted dead-head style as I was leaving were probably just posers. Regardless, the thread was meant in jest.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
If it wasn't serious then why are you taking it seriously? I wish dead related bands performed at a casino I frequent.
Dreadlocks and the 68 vw van... funny never see that either. Well into their 60s with dreadlocks. These people must only exist in Cali.
Or returning from Burning Man through Northern Nevada a couple years back. You said it was a bad read - so I'm giving you an example of what lead to the bad read.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Don't take yourself so seriously. Still caught up on 2 words 2 posts back.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayOr returning from Burning Man through Northern Nevada a couple years back. You said it was a bad read - so I'm giving you an example of what lead to the bad read.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This bitterness must come from some underlying trauma.
Says the person who gets anal to the point of calling a bad read on a jest first post in this thread. Now the humor in this thread is coming from how pathetic you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
To All the Girls You've Loved Before, Who traveled in and out your door :Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVq0ONrSH-Q
Yes, you're now referring to irrelevant things in other threads. Yes, not pathetic.
I'm the anal one, the one taking this thread so seriously, AND I am the pathetic one here.
Yes 100%. You wouldn't have tried to get after me over a bad read if you weren't taking the content seriously and were taking the two ranking lists as the jokes they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Coach, what TP is talking about is the overall knowledge of a crowd of slot players. In TP's pic I quickly recognized that columns 2, 3, and 4 are going to turn wild on the next spin and the next two spins after that, plus there are multipliers involved. I can't remember how many lines on a Tiki Fortune but every line is going to pay for at least a 4 in a Row and possibly some 5 in a Rows. It's a 75 cent bet, but with all those wilds and multipliers the next 3 spins are going to pay probably more than $100. There is no way to lose on the next 3 spins.
Are their gamblers dumb enough to walk off and leave a machine in that state? It's rare to find a play as juicy as the one in the pic but there are gamblers dumb enough to walk off and leave a machine in that state. The dumber the slot players the more money the slot pro makes.
My experience is the dumbest slot players are out on New Year's Eve weekend.
[/QUOTE]
Ditto (thanks for the nice explanation for Coach and others who might be unfamiliar BTW). What a fun week between just before Christmas and NYE weekend in terms of picking off lots of no-brainers. Just before Thanksgiving through the weekend that follows isn't too bad either as you would probably agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Joking has a lot of nuance. I'm not sure I took it seriously even if I responded seriously? Mainly I was just being defensive lol. If I had to listen to one band for the rest of my life it'd be the dead. Was never a deadhead and Jerry was gone by the time I started to like them so never saw him as part of it. I KNOW my response wasn't particularly humorous.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYes 100%. You wouldn't have tried to get after me over a bad read if you weren't taking the content seriously and were taking the two ranking lists as the jokes they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You are such a weirdo. One of the greats. Thats why I love this place. Gives me perspective.
You are still stuck on the words "bad read". I feel like those 2 words should be disallowed for not being fair-play when going at it with you. Wind you up like a Singer to a Kewl with those 2 magic words.
Anyway, I'd stop being defensive and just realize this thread was fail going off your original intent. Half the people don't even know what your autistic ass means by "persistent state plays". I gave you input and have learned myself. Will never use those 2 magic words.
Good read.
When you respond seriously, most people, including me, will assume you are taking it seriously. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
But most people won't get so goddam twisted over someone choosing to interact with them in their thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayWhen you respond seriously, most people, including me, will assume you are taking it seriously. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
That's right, they will just sit back and let someone insult them. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionBut most people won't get so goddam twisted over someone choosing to interact with them in their thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayWhen you respond seriously, most people, including me, will assume you are taking it seriously. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Oh but just don't do it by taking it all so seriously. Crazy man, you are up there.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThat's right, they will just sit back and let someone insult them. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionBut most people won't get so goddam twisted over someone choosing to interact with them in their thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
You're delusional if you think I am going to sit back and let you insult me without responding in kind. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionOh but just don't do it by taking it all so seriously. Crazy man, you are up there.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThat's right, they will just sit back and let someone insult them. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Oh I expected you to respond just to not get so aggro about it. Take another shot at me sure but going on and on about irrelevant things while all flailing about doesn't really look like "responding in kind".Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou're delusional if you think I am going to sit back and let you insult me without responding in kind. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionOh but just don't do it by taking it all so seriously. Crazy man, you are up there.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I will be responding to your attempted insults regardless of if you think it is unreasonable or crazy to do so. All of this back and forth is probably getting in the way of you showing your dates around your mom's basement and/or your pop-up camper as you sit at your phone and/or computer screen replying to my posts instead of attending to their needs, but that's just the way it's going to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionOh I expected you to respond just to not get so aggro about it. Take another shot at me sure but going on and on about irrelevant things while all flailing about doesn't really look like "responding in kind".Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou're delusional if you think I am going to sit back and let you insult me without responding in kind. Fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Lol jealousy. The only reason I said that was in response to Rob implying I didn't have a wife because of some defect. Not really true. My last 3 gfs have become quite saddened when they realize it isn't working out with us. It really doesn't mean much except as a lolz response to Rob. It is actually unfortunate and not something I'm actually proud of. I wish it'd just work out....Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI will be responding to your attempted insults regardless of if you think it is unreasonable or crazy to do so. All of this back and forth is probably getting in the way of you showing your dates around your mom's basement and/or your pop-up camper as you sit at your phone and/or computer screen replying to my posts instead of attending to their needs, but that's just the way it's going to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionOh I expected you to respond just to not get so aggro about it. Take another shot at me sure but going on and on about irrelevant things while all flailing about doesn't really look like "responding in kind".Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
You have to glom onto something, I understand.
No jealousy whatsoever. I think you're pathetic.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionLol jealousy. The only reason I said that was in response to Rob implying I didn't have a wife because of some defect. Not really true. My last 3 gfs have become quite saddened when they realize it isn't working out with us. It really doesn't mean much except as a lolz response to Rob. It is actually unfortunate and not something I'm actually proud of. I wish it'd just work out....Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI will be responding to your attempted insults regardless of if you think it is unreasonable or crazy to do so. All of this back and forth is probably getting in the way of you showing your dates around your mom's basement and/or your pop-up camper as you sit at your phone and/or computer screen replying to my posts instead of attending to their needs, but that's just the way it's going to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You have to glom onto something, I understand.
@ tableplay & accountinquestion.
Most of the time I know how or why a feud got started I haven't any clue why/what happen between you guys. Neither of you two seem like you would be at odds with one another. Yeah, I know.." cus he's a twat"
Just curious.
Very strange indeed. I knew account and Mickey were at odds, after having a friendly meet up 2 years ago. I knew you and Monet don't see eye to eye and of course the funniest by far and would be worth a fortune would be an UKKOOL vs Singer meet up. Singer would own him in real life being 34 years his senior. !! Can you imagine all the laughs that would take place observing this milestone event ��Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I'm not sure why the clown started trying to get after me. I suspect it was because he doesn't like alternatives to his woke view on the cause of climate change presented for discussion. The king expects an echo chamber when he presents his views. The king also expects people to not reply back to his insults which of course is delusional. Now, as you can see, what was originally presented as an attempt at plain humor in the first post of this thread, including stating verbatim that the whole deal was a fabrication in that post, has now turned into dark humor as he tries to get after me for this innocuous post.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Anyway, I do hope that he doesn't have to spend a lot of time spackling the holes in the wall of his mom's basement or re-upholstering the interior of his pop-up camper - because I strongly suspect that he is not having gentle words to the less attractive members of his harem when he lets them go in favor of more attractive new members as he slowly he improves the attractiveness of the group as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I never got after Tableplay outside of him sucking off Monet because he needs mental backup for his stupid youtube based beliefs. He calls global warming "woke" - I call it decades of science. Global warming was around way before he'd even considered the word "woke" in its current meaning and likely before he was conceived. This is just more example of him being a fucking muppet. Applying "woke" to everything. That is why I stick with empirical observations in that thread. I want plenty of responses and challenges. I have no respect for regurgitated youtube videos put out by pandering grifters aimed at simps who are in no way trying to find the actual truth. That is where my issue with Monet and Tableplay come in. Also Tableplay sucks Monet off for posting these youtube videos. Hate it'. We got a little bit of latent homophobia in all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm not sure why the clown started trying to get after me. I suspect it was because he doesn't like alternatives to his woke view on the cause of climate change presented for discussion. The king expects an echo chamber when he presents his views. The king also expects people to not reply back to his insults which of course is delusional. Now, as you can see, what was originally presented as an attempt at plain humor in the first post of this thread, including stating verbatim that the whole deal was a fabrication in that post, has now turned into dark humor as he tries to get after me for this innocuous post.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Anyway, I do hope that he doesn't have to spend a lot of time spackling the holes in the wall of his mom's basement or re-upholstering the interior of his pop-up camper - because I strongly suspect that he is not having gentle words to the less attractive members of his harem when he lets them go in favor of more attractive new members as he slowly he improves the attractiveness of the group as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
BTW TP, I dont' think I ever said you shouldn't respond to me but just not with so much multi-post conviction. I'm not going the pedantic route but you yell strawman WHENEVER you can mentally contort something into the semblance of one. Yet you do that shit all the time. You have a complete lack of self-awareness or your arguments are simply not sincere.
He is another "man" with an ego so weak he'll never admit he is wrong. Thats how this escalated. I misread a UX screen in a RS thread. (Well I never really hustled UX and didn't read the screen that closely). I believe I got the multipliers reversed but as soon as I realized it was like oops. Embarassing. I was wrong and admitted it and end of that thread of disccusion. He (lol) later was on some mission to prove it without a doubt that I have no clue what I was talking about and wanted me to go through my math for him. I offered if he put up a $500 for me to figure out the math I used. (it required looking up hand frequencies on a poker table) He wouldnt do that as he wasn't confident in his own bullshit but oh man he was thinking he was proving something to someone. So later I did the same idiotic shit back to him but I understand context enough to realize I was being a goof. He calls me delusional for something I never requested (he not respond to me) but he sure was expecting me to go over math for him that I'd already said was wrong. lol who is delusional
I'm so deep in his head that even saying "bad read" to him sends him off into the moon like singer does to Kewl.
If you read above he says "he tried to get after me" - because I said "bad read". I could have tried to make up something else on the list ? Oh ICP !!! I could have said ICP and been funny but this whole thread wasn't ever funny. (at least to me). I'm a dead fan so I defended the dead and now he thinks I've crucified him. I even explained legitimately and politely that I was mainly defending the dead and deadheads.
He really isn't very creative though. He's literally taking the Singer insults and regurgitating them directly at me. Good stuff. Yes! Got me! I'm broke and live in a pop-up camper. At least get the story straight. It is the basement. A basement in the part of the country without basements.
Mickey and I get along to the extent that is needed. I'm pretty much over complaining about Trump once Trump ceased being President and that was where most of our bad energy came from.
The problem with this forum is that it is free speech. Which I love but it also attracts people who have been pushed away from other places. Then I argue with them. Only people on here I have issues with are those who have had some pro-Trump or anti-science view at which point the directive is - 'Engage'. (that sound kinda Trekkie for ya, tp?) TP, I bought the NG boxed DVD set and was hopin' you'd have some time off this week to spend time with me watching them in the pop-up.
anyway, thats the gist of the shit. Too long.
You're completely full of shit. You started the trolling long before I called you out on your total lack of understanding of how UX worked at the time. Now you are lying about that and saying it was just a screen misreading you fucking cunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI never got after Tableplay outside of him sucking off Monet because he needs mental backup for his stupid youtube based beliefs. He calls global warming "woke" - I call it decades of science. Global warming was around way before he'd even considered the word "woke" in its current meaning and likely before he was conceived. This is just more example of him being a fucking muppet. Applying "woke" to everything. That is why I stick with empirical observations in that thread. I want plenty of responses and challenges. I have no respect for regurgitated youtube videos put out by pandering grifters aimed at simps who are in no way trying to find the actual truth. That is where my issue with Monet and Tableplay come in. Also Tableplay sucks Monet off for posting these youtube videos. Hate it'. We got a little bit of latent homophobia in all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm not sure why the clown started trying to get after me. I suspect it was because he doesn't like alternatives to his woke view on the cause of climate change presented for discussion. The king expects an echo chamber when he presents his views. The king also expects people to not reply back to his insults which of course is delusional. Now, as you can see, what was originally presented as an attempt at plain humor in the first post of this thread, including stating verbatim that the whole deal was a fabrication in that post, has now turned into dark humor as he tries to get after me for this innocuous post.
Anyway, I do hope that he doesn't have to spend a lot of time spackling the holes in the wall of his mom's basement or re-upholstering the interior of his pop-up camper - because I strongly suspect that he is not having gentle words to the less attractive members of his harem when he lets them go in favor of more attractive new members as he slowly he improves the attractiveness of the group as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
BTW TP, I dont' think I ever said you shouldn't respond to me but just not with so much multi-post conviction. I'm not going the pedantic route but you yell strawman WHENEVER you can mentally contort something into the semblance of one. Yet you do that shit all the time. You have a complete lack of self-awareness or your arguments are simply not sincere.
He is another "man" with an ego so weak he'll never admit he is wrong. Thats how this escalated. I misread a UX screen in a RS thread. (Well I never really hustled UX and didn't read the screen that closely). I believe I got the multipliers reversed but as soon as I realized it was like oops. Embarassing. I was wrong and admitted it and end of that thread of disccusion. He (lol) later was on some mission to prove it without a doubt that I have no clue what I was talking about and wanted me to go through my math for him. I offered if he put up a $500 for me to figure out the math I used. (it required looking up hand frequencies on a poker table) He wouldnt do that as he wasn't confident in his own bullshit but oh man he was thinking he was proving something to someone. So later I did the same idiotic shit back to him but I understand context enough to realize I was being a goof. He calls me delusional for something I never requested (he not respond to me) but he sure was expecting me to go over math for him that I'd already said was wrong. lol who is delusional
I'm so deep in his head that even saying "bad read" to him sends him off into the moon like singer does to Kewl.
If you read above he says "he tried to get after me" - because I said "bad read". I could have tried to make up something else on the list ? Oh ICP !!! I could have said ICP and been funny but this whole thread wasn't ever funny. (at least to me). I'm a dead fan so I defended the dead and now he thinks I've crucified him. I even explained legitimately and politely that I was mainly defending the dead and deadheads.
He really isn't very creative though. He's literally taking the Singer insults and regurgitating them directly at me. Good stuff. Yes! Got me! I'm broke and live in a pop-up camper. At least get the story straight. It is the basement. A basement in the part of the country without basements.
Mickey and I get along to the extent that is needed. I'm pretty much over complaining about Trump once Trump ceased being President and that was where most of our bad energy came from.
The problem with this forum is that it is free speech. Which I love but it also attracts people who have been pushed away from other places. Then I argue with them. Only people on here I have issues with are those who have had some pro-Trump or anti-science view at which point the directive is - 'Engage'. (that sound kinda Trekkie for ya, tp?) TP, I bought the NG boxed DVD set and was hopin' you'd have some time off this week to spend time with me watching them in the pop-up.
anyway, thats the gist of the shit. Too long.
Tableplay, you can't call someone out on something they've already admitted to and it is the same goddam thing I've been saying as it was the truth. I was smoking weed, glanced at the screen, got the multiplier flipped around (I believe). Anyway, I offered to try and recreate my mistake to show where the actual mistake was but I'd need to be paid to demonstrate that. If you weren't yourself, you would have screamed deluded at yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I didn't say I didn't troll you before that. I said that is how it escalated. Oh man, like I said.. a pedantic ocd autist screaming you lied! strawman! reading comprehension! yet you do these same things yourself just at a far higher frequency.
TRUMP/SCOTT 2024Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI never got after Tableplay outside of him sucking off Monet because he needs mental backup for his stupid youtube based beliefs. He calls global warming "woke" - I call it decades of science. Global warming was around way before he'd even considered the word "woke" in its current meaning and likely before he was conceived. This is just more example of him being a fucking muppet. Applying "woke" to everything. That is why I stick with empirical observations in that thread. I want plenty of responses and challenges. I have no respect for regurgitated youtube videos put out by pandering grifters aimed at simps who are in no way trying to find the actual truth. That is where my issue with Monet and Tableplay come in. Also Tableplay sucks Monet off for posting these youtube videos. Hate it'. We got a little bit of latent homophobia in all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm not sure why the clown started trying to get after me. I suspect it was because he doesn't like alternatives to his woke view on the cause of climate change presented for discussion. The king expects an echo chamber when he presents his views. The king also expects people to not reply back to his insults which of course is delusional. Now, as you can see, what was originally presented as an attempt at plain humor in the first post of this thread, including stating verbatim that the whole deal was a fabrication in that post, has now turned into dark humor as he tries to get after me for this innocuous post.
Anyway, I do hope that he doesn't have to spend a lot of time spackling the holes in the wall of his mom's basement or re-upholstering the interior of his pop-up camper - because I strongly suspect that he is not having gentle words to the less attractive members of his harem when he lets them go in favor of more attractive new members as he slowly he improves the attractiveness of the group as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
BTW TP, I dont' think I ever said you shouldn't respond to me but just not with so much multi-post conviction. I'm not going the pedantic route but you yell strawman WHENEVER you can mentally contort something into the semblance of one. Yet you do that shit all the time. You have a complete lack of self-awareness or your arguments are simply not sincere.
He is another "man" with an ego so weak he'll never admit he is wrong. Thats how this escalated. I misread a UX screen in a RS thread. (Well I never really hustled UX and didn't read the screen that closely). I believe I got the multipliers reversed but as soon as I realized it was like oops. Embarassing. I was wrong and admitted it and end of that thread of disccusion. He (lol) later was on some mission to prove it without a doubt that I have no clue what I was talking about and wanted me to go through my math for him. I offered if he put up a $500 for me to figure out the math I used. (it required looking up hand frequencies on a poker table) He wouldnt do that as he wasn't confident in his own bullshit but oh man he was thinking he was proving something to someone. So later I did the same idiotic shit back to him but I understand context enough to realize I was being a goof. He calls me delusional for something I never requested (he not respond to me) but he sure was expecting me to go over math for him that I'd already said was wrong. lol who is delusional
I'm so deep in his head that even saying "bad read" to him sends him off into the moon like singer does to Kewl.
If you read above he says "he tried to get after me" - because I said "bad read". I could have tried to make up something else on the list ? Oh ICP !!! I could have said ICP and been funny but this whole thread wasn't ever funny. (at least to me). I'm a dead fan so I defended the dead and now he thinks I've crucified him. I even explained legitimately and politely that I was mainly defending the dead and deadheads.
He really isn't very creative though. He's literally taking the Singer insults and regurgitating them directly at me. Good stuff. Yes! Got me! I'm broke and live in a pop-up camper. At least get the story straight. It is the basement. A basement in the part of the country without basements.
Mickey and I get along to the extent that is needed. I'm pretty much over complaining about Trump once Trump ceased being President and that was where most of our bad energy came from.
The problem with this forum is that it is free speech. Which I love but it also attracts people who have been pushed away from other places. Then I argue with them. Only people on here I have issues with are those who have had some pro-Trump or anti-science view at which point the directive is - 'Engage'. (that sound kinda Trekkie for ya, tp?) TP, I bought the NG boxed DVD set and was hopin' you'd have some time off this week to spend time with me watching them in the pop-up.
anyway, thats the gist of the shit. Too long.
MAGA
His magic is played. I'm also hoping he runs. Although with diaper wearing Biden.. wtf. Who knows. Another sign of collapse? Regardless, here's to Trump getting the nomination. Still prefer democrats over republicans just because they actually make some attempt at things that I value. Can't really figure out where I'm at politically because i really detest the Democratic party.. but they just align more with my values. Yell about wokeism and I'd agree but it really isn't affecting much but climate issues will. As much as I am a doomer, I still hold out hope there is some sustainable future. State should subsidize abortion in places where welfare rate is above certain level. I can come up with all sorts of politically questionable ideas I'd support.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
MAGA ! MAGA !Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmTRUMP/SCOTT 2024Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI never got after Tableplay outside of him sucking off Monet because he needs mental backup for his stupid youtube based beliefs. He calls global warming "woke" - I call it decades of science. Global warming was around way before he'd even considered the word "woke" in its current meaning and likely before he was conceived. This is just more example of him being a fucking muppet. Applying "woke" to everything. That is why I stick with empirical observations in that thread. I want plenty of responses and challenges. I have no respect for regurgitated youtube videos put out by pandering grifters aimed at simps who are in no way trying to find the actual truth. That is where my issue with Monet and Tableplay come in. Also Tableplay sucks Monet off for posting these youtube videos. Hate it'. We got a little bit of latent homophobia in all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
BTW TP, I dont' think I ever said you shouldn't respond to me but just not with so much multi-post conviction. I'm not going the pedantic route but you yell strawman WHENEVER you can mentally contort something into the semblance of one. Yet you do that shit all the time. You have a complete lack of self-awareness or your arguments are simply not sincere.
He is another "man" with an ego so weak he'll never admit he is wrong. Thats how this escalated. I misread a UX screen in a RS thread. (Well I never really hustled UX and didn't read the screen that closely). I believe I got the multipliers reversed but as soon as I realized it was like oops. Embarassing. I was wrong and admitted it and end of that thread of disccusion. He (lol) later was on some mission to prove it without a doubt that I have no clue what I was talking about and wanted me to go through my math for him. I offered if he put up a $500 for me to figure out the math I used. (it required looking up hand frequencies on a poker table) He wouldnt do that as he wasn't confident in his own bullshit but oh man he was thinking he was proving something to someone. So later I did the same idiotic shit back to him but I understand context enough to realize I was being a goof. He calls me delusional for something I never requested (he not respond to me) but he sure was expecting me to go over math for him that I'd already said was wrong. lol who is delusional
I'm so deep in his head that even saying "bad read" to him sends him off into the moon like singer does to Kewl.
If you read above he says "he tried to get after me" - because I said "bad read". I could have tried to make up something else on the list ? Oh ICP !!! I could have said ICP and been funny but this whole thread wasn't ever funny. (at least to me). I'm a dead fan so I defended the dead and now he thinks I've crucified him. I even explained legitimately and politely that I was mainly defending the dead and deadheads.
He really isn't very creative though. He's literally taking the Singer insults and regurgitating them directly at me. Good stuff. Yes! Got me! I'm broke and live in a pop-up camper. At least get the story straight. It is the basement. A basement in the part of the country without basements.
Mickey and I get along to the extent that is needed. I'm pretty much over complaining about Trump once Trump ceased being President and that was where most of our bad energy came from.
The problem with this forum is that it is free speech. Which I love but it also attracts people who have been pushed away from other places. Then I argue with them. Only people on here I have issues with are those who have had some pro-Trump or anti-science view at which point the directive is - 'Engage'. (that sound kinda Trekkie for ya, tp?) TP, I bought the NG boxed DVD set and was hopin' you'd have some time off this week to spend time with me watching them in the pop-up.
anyway, thats the gist of the shit. Too long.
MAGA
lol Democrats don't care about Climate Change.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHis magic is played. I'm also hoping he runs. Although with diaper wearing Biden.. wtf. Who knows. Another sign of collapse? Regardless, here's to Trump getting the nomination. Still prefer democrats over republicans just because they actually make some attempt at things that I value. Can't really figure out where I'm at politically because i really detest the Democratic party.. but they just align more with my values. Yell about wokeism and I'd agree but it really isn't affecting much but climate issues will. As much as I am a doomer, I still hold out hope there is some sustainable future. State should subsidize abortion in places where welfare rate is above certain level. I can come up with all sorts of politically questionable ideas I'd support.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
They care about making money just like the Republicans.
It's a one party system that is controlled by the Oligarchs and Corporations.
Wise Up!
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHis magic is played. I'm also hoping he runs. Although with diaper wearing Biden.. wtf. Who knows. Another sign of collapse? Regardless, here's to Trump getting the nomination. Still prefer democrats over republicans just because they actually make some attempt at things that I value. Can't really figure out where I'm at politically because i really detest the Democratic party.. but they just align more with my values. Yell about wokeism and I'd agree but it really isn't affecting much but climate issues will. As much as I am a doomer, I still hold out hope there is some sustainable future. State should subsidize abortion in places where welfare rate is above certain level. I can come up with all sorts of politically questionable ideas I'd support.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Climate!!!!!!! Lololllool
Hahahahahahahahhahaha
Hahahahahahahahhahaha
Hahahahananananan
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI never got after Tableplay outside of him sucking off Monet because he needs mental backup for his stupid youtube based beliefs. He calls global warming "woke" - I call it decades of science. Global warming was around way before he'd even considered the word "woke" in its current meaning and likely before he was conceived. This is just more example of him being a fucking muppet. Applying "woke" to everything. That is why I stick with empirical observations in that thread. I want plenty of responses and challenges. I have no respect for regurgitated youtube videos put out by pandering grifters aimed at simps who are in no way trying to find the actual truth. That is where my issue with Monet and Tableplay come in. Also Tableplay sucks Monet off for posting these youtube videos. Hate it'. We got a little bit of latent homophobia in all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm not sure why the clown started trying to get after me. I suspect it was because he doesn't like alternatives to his woke view on the cause of climate change presented for discussion. The king expects an echo chamber when he presents his views. The king also expects people to not reply back to his insults which of course is delusional. Now, as you can see, what was originally presented as an attempt at plain humor in the first post of this thread, including stating verbatim that the whole deal was a fabrication in that post, has now turned into dark humor as he tries to get after me for this innocuous post.
Anyway, I do hope that he doesn't have to spend a lot of time spackling the holes in the wall of his mom's basement or re-upholstering the interior of his pop-up camper - because I strongly suspect that he is not having gentle words to the less attractive members of his harem when he lets them go in favor of more attractive new members as he slowly he improves the attractiveness of the group as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
BTW TP, I dont' think I ever said you shouldn't respond to me but just not with so much multi-post conviction. I'm not going the pedantic route but you yell strawman WHENEVER you can mentally contort something into the semblance of one. Yet you do that shit all the time. You have a complete lack of self-awareness or your arguments are simply not sincere.
He is another "man" with an ego so weak he'll never admit he is wrong. Thats how this escalated. I misread a UX screen in a RS thread. (Well I never really hustled UX and didn't read the screen that closely). I believe I got the multipliers reversed but as soon as I realized it was like oops. Embarassing. I was wrong and admitted it and end of that thread of disccusion. He (lol) later was on some mission to prove it without a doubt that I have no clue what I was talking about and wanted me to go through my math for him. I offered if he put up a $500 for me to figure out the math I used. (it required looking up hand frequencies on a poker table) He wouldnt do that as he wasn't confident in his own bullshit but oh man he was thinking he was proving something to someone. So later I did the same idiotic shit back to him but I understand context enough to realize I was being a goof. He calls me delusional for something I never requested (he not respond to me) but he sure was expecting me to go over math for him that I'd already said was wrong. lol who is delusional
I'm so deep in his head that even saying "bad read" to him sends him off into the moon like singer does to Kewl.
If you read above he says "he tried to get after me" - because I said "bad read". I could have tried to make up something else on the list ? Oh ICP !!! I could have said ICP and been funny but this whole thread wasn't ever funny. (at least to me). I'm a dead fan so I defended the dead and now he thinks I've crucified him. I even explained legitimately and politely that I was mainly defending the dead and deadheads.
He really isn't very creative though. He's literally taking the Singer insults and regurgitating them directly at me. Good stuff. Yes! Got me! I'm broke and live in a pop-up camper. At least get the story straight. It is the basement. A basement in the part of the country without basements.
Mickey and I get along to the extent that is needed. I'm pretty much over complaining about Trump once Trump ceased being President and that was where most of our bad energy came from.
The problem with this forum is that it is free speech. Which I love but it also attracts people who have been pushed away from other places. Then I argue with them. Only people on here I have issues with are those who have had some pro-Trump or anti-science view at which point the directive is - 'Engage'. (that sound kinda Trekkie for ya, tp?) TP, I bought the NG boxed DVD set and was hopin' you'd have some time off this week to spend time with me watching them in the pop-up.
anyway, thats the gist of the shit. Too long.
Woke muppets like you don’t have a woman and never leave their house Long enough to experience weather
The ramblings of this already crazy as fuck person, seedvalue, now off his medication, is making Garnabby look sane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionLol jealousy. The only reason I said that was in response to Rob implying I didn't have a wife because of some defect. Not really true. My last 3 gfs have become quite saddened when they realize it isn't working out with us. It really doesn't mean much except as a lolz response to Rob. It is actually unfortunate and not something I'm actually proud of. I wish it'd just work out....Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI will be responding to your attempted insults regardless of if you think it is unreasonable or crazy to do so. All of this back and forth is probably getting in the way of you showing your dates around your mom's basement and/or your pop-up camper as you sit at your phone and/or computer screen replying to my posts instead of attending to their needs, but that's just the way it's going to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You have to glom onto something, I understand.
Did you notice Bart Hanson and his tits moved to Boston ? Do you have tits bigger then his ?
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYep.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
So thats a yes to your tits matching the size of barts ? Is that a fact pussyfree ?
I'd rather have pussy and not brag about such a standard thing than not have any and go on about how you're called the gaper or whatever lunatic nutball shit that no one believes.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionYep.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
So thats a yes to your tits matching the size of barts ? Is that a fact pussyfree ?
Easily confirmed for free. I will gape your female family members for free if you likeQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI'd rather have pussy and not brag about such a standard thing than not have any and go on about how you're called the gaper or whatever lunatic nutball shit that no one believes.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So thats a yes to your tits matching the size of barts ? Is that a fact pussyfree ?