You complained about your hurt vag and got me a yellow card over there, and I don't even know what the insult was.
But over here the kid gloves come off...so don't you be yellow.
Printable View
You complained about your hurt vag and got me a yellow card over there, and I don't even know what the insult was.
But over here the kid gloves come off...so don't you be yellow.
Coach, As an observer and none AP I somehow at some time stumbled into the WOV forum, and then from there ended up in a couple of other gambling forums to include here. Having gambled all over the world I occasionally shared an experience or two or three. But, for the most part (and being retired now with lots of spare time) I seem to be addicted to reading the endless (unconfirmed) bullshit on these sites. It’s obvious all entertainment to me, especially when I participate with personal input. (Usually with combative but honest personal opinion).
No doubt certain AP’s made millions with well known and written about plays. But, for the most part all others likely are making a few bucks here or there, or may even be able to support themselves AP’ing. I’m guessing with all the AP stories you read about on these forums maybe 2% could be true. That would be 2 out of a 100 for you people not good with math.
Even Mike Shank (the king of gaming math) that all AP’s seem to look up to went broke but got bailed out by online gaming interests. If online casinos thought Mike Shanks fans and members posting on his sites were the cream of the crop gamblers able to beat casinos (like Mike S. did lol) why would they spend the alleged million plus dollars to get their hands on them to gamble and take money from their casinos.
Why would you even think about taking on an argument with the likes of Axel or that stupid bitch BBB. Wizard of Nothing (remember him) one of WOV own superstar members turned out to be one of the biggest online shysters ever.
After reading tons of Axel posts all over the place and sharing personal pm’s with him, I can’t help but reach the conclusion that he’s one of the biggest bullshit artists going. I’m not saying he’s not making AP money but to the extent he seems to always be trying to convince everyone that he is convinces me he’s actually not. There were tons of people who claim to know him said he was a drunk. The amount of posts he has made over the years with 99 percent of them being stupid comments or insults to others, is another indication he has problems. I’m talking about what is it 20K posts? Just not adding up. I wanted to meet him in Vegas while I was staying at a hotel there for two weeks. He claimed he didn’t trust me and was busy anyway. I think he didn’t in fear of me being able to expose the truth. Something familiar happened with WON in A.C., he was a no show. I would add that while I always trashed and challenged Redietz with many different exchanges, his posts about sports betting seem to be clever. In addition, he reached out to meet me in person in Vegas. As soon as this cancer shit is squared away, I plan on taking him up on it. This is the season I should be in Nevada and am looking forward to getting back there.
You deserve being banned from WOV just for going there and trying to make a different point than the masses.
Don’t waste your time with Axel. You’ve already been blacklisted from all the phonies so why waste time. Then again if you enjoy the fight like I do with plenty time to kill, then just have a good time.
Look at the math that Top Dog put up in the thread. A 46% chance to be ahead at bacc after 10 hands. At one hand you would be at about 49%. So why the drop to 46% after 10 hands. It called the "compound effect of negative expectation gambling." Each hand you play has a negative expectation so multiplied out 10 times gives one just a 45% chance of being at breakeven or ahead. Another way to look at it is with 100 players playing 10 hands each over and over again it will average to 46 players being ahead after 10 hands and 54 players being behind after 10 hands.
It is wrong to say it is "impossible to beat a negative expectation game." That might be true through infinity but no one plays through infinity. Everyone has a chance to win thru a given number of games played. The more games played the less chance you have of winning. With Top Dog's math 13 out of every 100 players will be ahead at bacc thru 10,000 hands. So it's not impossible and people need to quit using that terminology.
But Top Dog's math glaringly shows why you shouldn't be beating your head against the wall trying to beat a negative expectation game. You have little chance to win....and the more you play the less that chance becomes.
I won't get involved in any gambling game unless at least 51% of the players have a chance to be ahead after a given number of games.
PS: As applied to bacc whoever said 70% of players are ahead at some point during their gambling session is full of shit.
A couple of points...
If you are talking about the math that "Dog Hand" put up in the thread, it was for 100 hands of flat-betting on Banker.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/info...on-parodies/7/
I was suspended before I could press him to consider the effect of alternating bets between Banker and Player, and increasing bets to press into streaks, or "runs" as MDawg calls them, whereby the winning bets pay 2X (or more) than the table min, where the min would be the flat-bet amount.
The screen shots that MDawg posted representing "good shoes" indicate that he's pressing up the streaks (both Banker & Player streaks) and winning up to 80% of those bets, so he's not flat-betting on the Banker.
In a VCT thread discussing the merits of "quitting when ahead", Mission calculated that the probability of a player behind ahead at some point during a max-bet VP session was pretty high, and especially high when considering short sessions. My recollection is that he estimated 70% or so.
This was not applied to Baccarat, it was for VP.
But there is no opportunity to alternate bets (ala Bacc) in VP...you can only bet on the Player in VP.
Does the opportunity to alternate bets on Banker & Player, plus the opportunity to press bets into streaks, affect the probability of winning for a session...even if the session is one million hands or more?
This is "pedantry"...excessive concern with minor details and rules, like those who insist there is a difference between "quitting when ahead" and "pausing when ahead".
I'm banned for a period of 3 days...OK?
The "personal insult" was referring to Axel as "Captain Morgan".
Manchild Axel was absorbing quite a beating, so much so that he was becoming hysterical and could not adequately defend himself.
His vag got hurt, he cried that calling him "Captain Morgan" was an illegal blow, and his big sister came to his rescue and stopped the fight.
coach belly wrote:
"Does the opportunity to alternate bets on Banker & Player, plus the opportunity to press bets into streaks, affect the probability of winning for a session...even if the session is one million hands or more?"
Coach belly, I think you better forget about that line of thinking, as that is how casinos pay their bills. You cannot predict the occurrence of when a streak starts or ends. No one can do this.
Relax...casinos won't be paying their bills by me thinking along one line or another.
I understand that the streaks cannot be predicted.
But looking at the screen shots that MDawg posted, I see that streaks of 5 winners in a row did occur multiple times during several different shoes.
These are what he calls "good shoes"...where multiple winning streaks occur.
Having declared beforehand that his strategy was to press into streaks, it's likely that's exactly what he did during those shoes...he ended up betting more on the winning hands, and won overall for the shoe.
Is there a method to mathematically analyze this playing strategy, or is flat-betting on one-side the only strategy that can be analyzed?
There's nothing like bringing up and reading topics from a different forum to give this place some life.
First, it was the typical chickenshit move for that useless retard BBB to give coach one of those stupid WoV suspensions. So he called axel Captain Morgan? Axel supposedly has a past history of being a bit too close to the Captain? BFD. He can handle it. What a bunch of snowflake pussies over there.
You people get too entangled over what and how Alan (AM) thinks and operates for your own good. What he does is throw things out there without some sort of backup, and hopes some will disagree and/or challenge/badmouth him which allows him to follow up with non-stop antagonistic postings just so the topic can go on and on and on. The more he infuriates, the bigger his win percentages. He doesn't care one bit if anyone believes him or not.
1. 18 yo's in a row. Beyond comprehension--but physically & mathematically possible. People can rightfully claim he's full of it, but because it's a remotely, remotely possible event, whenever anyone calls him names or says anything negative about him regarding it directly or indirectly, he scores more points. And the topic never ends.
2. No one has yet proven he's this AndrewG poster, so bringing up any of his claims and saying "it's Alan!" is irrelevant. There are some likenesses, but having been the victim of MANY such false claims in the past, let's leave it to Dan to investigate this if he chooses to.
3. As usual, redietz just had to interject himself into that WoV thread to both tout himself with zero proof as always....and to make his ongoing moronic claim about it being possible to count 2 tables accurately simultaneously. So he used "tape measures" in a controlled environment without players being in the line-of-site, without him having to have his money on the line at the table he's sitting at, and without drink servers or other moving customers getting in the way. Red knows all this, yet because Alan said the opposite and that wussie kew cowardly refused to get with Alan to prove what a crock this all was, Red and his "journalistic integrity" decided to put together this lie. Just because.
Most importantly, I see the topic of being able to win on -EV games came up again....which OF COURSE is possible. But first, someone said there's a 70% chance of being ahead at some point within the first 100 hands of VP, which was defined as a "guess". Well, that's a very poor guess, and it was presented to the WoV group of Mensa and math "geniuses" w/o parameters or challenge, probably bcause one of their government subsidized libtard "moderators" created that number. I wrote a GT article on this in the past and reiterated the findings several times online over the years. Flat betting JoB VP, I can't say. But I CAN say that being ahead any amount at any time within 100 hands of 8/5BP in a continuous climb from $1 to $125 of play (one $1 credit to five $25 credits--as in bet $1, bet$2, bet $5, bet $10, bet $25, bet $50, bet $125) and going back to get $1 whenever two-pair or higher is hit, is in the 94% range.
In vp, whether you play a 99.2% game or a 100.2% game EVERY TIME YOU PLAY, there will rarely if ever be any difference in the amount of cash in your pocket when you walk back out onto the street. And this is especially true if you use win and loss goals. And that's just for flat betting. Switch over to a complex strategy like mine and you can expect all that -EV blather to be nothing but another criticism to laugh at as you're homeward bound.
As I've said many times, when there's an 85% chance of winning ANY session played, why would anyone expect to end up a loser after any amount of time? And the most ridiculous part of this is there's people out there who claim I lose (somehow) but IF I were playing games that were ONE POINT TWO PERCENT HIGHER, then I'd win! Sessions that don't usually last very long at all! It's really an incomprehensible argument they're making.
Having known Alan since I first posted here, I have never known him to lie. And playing free play artt style has always been my favorite way to play. On some occasions, when I played this way I have had 30 or more hands on just $10-playing 1,2,&5 credits playing nickels.
I also don't see Alan as a liar. He may remember things a little differently than he saw them and gave a general recollection greased with a bit of personal enhancement just to yank a few chains. I can see how when his son "hit 5 royals in 24 hrs. and lost overall" it was him simply recounting how his son had one helluva up and down day, highlighted by a glaring weakness shown by way too many vp players--running into the high limit rooms after a mid-range royal with a ton of false confidence.
Hey--if a guy can get married half a dozen times and anonymous people believe he's still breathing breathable air, then they shouldn't have too much trouble with 18 yo's.
Flip-flopping and pressing bets will not change the fact that every bet is negative. Put up screenshots of results of flipping coins and you will see instances of five heads in a row or five tails in a row. That’s the thing. If flip-flopping and pressing bets will work at bacc it will also work at flipping coins.
DOES ANYONE WANT TO BUY A WINNING BETTING SYSTEM FOR FLIPPING COINS? Just use mdawgs bacc system instead for free and all your dreams will come true.
Two things these bacc guys with the fancy claims of winning never do is (1. Never quantify their edge percentage wise (2. Never give up their day job and play bacc full time.
Mickey, if any poster were seriously interested in knowing anything about probability, they wouldn't ask anonymous people on the internet questions, rhetorical or otherwise. They would, if they had any money and actually did serious wagering:
1) Buy some certified probability courses and watch/read them. I recommend as a starting point "What Are The Chances? Probability Made Simple" by Michael Starbird from the University of Texas at Austin.
2) Either sign up for live courses at local universities or consulting probability professors at local universities. Call them, offer to pay some consulting fees, and then listen to what they have to say or hire them to provide worksheets describing the questions. If they live near Atlantic City, for example, Rutgers would be a good school. If Ivy League schools in the Philadelphia area have expensive professors, maybe try Temple, St. Joe's, or a Penn State branch campus.
3) Ask Shackleford over at Wizard of Vegas.
4) All of the above.
If posters prefer to believe that they are more expert than professional mathematicians, then why are they asking anonymous, uncredentialled internet folks, anyway? It makes no sense. If posters are somehow trying to demonstrate that they know more than anonymous, uncredentialled forum members, well, that's fine, but it certainly isn't going to provide accurate answers to statistical questions.
If posters refuse to do (1) through (4) above, the only logical conclusions are:
(A) They consider themselves more expert than credentialed experts or
(B) They know what experts will say and do not want to hear it or
(C) They full well know what experts will say and prefer to work in the casinos' best interests or
(D) They need to expose family members or other people who might frown on their behavior to non-expert summaries and explanations.
I'm going to do a blog entry on this very curious subject. It is fascinating. One possibility: any poster asking these questions has already consulted mathematicians and prefers to not publicly report what has been said or learned. If someone is asking similar odd questions for years to a parade of anonymous posters, doesn't it make sense, especially if they themselves continued high stakes gambling, that they would have gotten around to hiring some experts for minimal fees to provide them advice?
There is a meta-element to this that I'll explore in my blog in the months ahead. The posters asking these kinds of questions take the tack that the posters reporting continual repetitive wins are "not lying," but are merely the surviving tip of the winning iceberg as probability theory would predict must exist somewhere. This is, in essence, something that can't be refuted. But then the same posters, from that point forward, continue with the same stories of continual winning, making them longer and longer odds-against, So what started as a 1 in 1000 survivor becomes, years later, a 1 in 100,000 survivor, then a 1 in a million. And somehow the posters defending the systems winners don't question the problematic aspect of this vis-à-vis reality. The systems winners who were end-of-the-bell-curve survivors/winners should revert to chance going forward unless blessed by God. But, guess what, they almost never do. Hard to explain, eh?
To quote Stanford Wong in his book Professional Blackjack page 241:
"Trying to bet more when you are winning or less when you are losing is an exercise in futility; it will not win any money. Streaks occur, but they cannot be predicted."
He backs this up with a study of 2 million hands-on table 94 page 241.
You don't need a casino. You can hustle your friends and acquaintences. Everyone has flipped coins before. Everyone knows how to play. Everyone thinks it's fifty-fifty. But those that know how to read the flips for streaks and press bets accordingly will be the big winners right, right? If it will work in bacc it will definitely work flipping coins.
The comparison between bacc and flipping coins is a good one. Whether the casinos flip coins or not is irrelevant. If pressing bets during streaks will work in bacc it will work flipping coins. So imagine you are flipping coins with someone. Do you think pressing bets during streaks will gain you an edge?
No, pressing the bets did not help him win. He had the same chances whether he pressed or not. It's great to say "Hey, I won 80% of my bets after pressing them." But you have the same chance of saying "Hey, I lost 80% of my bets after pressing them." Streaks are not in the future. They are in the past. And they have no bearing on the future. The cards don't have any memory.
Mdawg is a voodoo gambler. He's going to stick a pin in it. He's playing a game that is essentially a coin flip with a little bit of juice on one side. Just enough to be deceptive as hell. One can ride a winning streak for quite awhile. But can you make a living doing it? These guys that push the "I'm a regular winner at bacc" schtick never quit there job and play the game full time for a living. When I figured out how to beat gambling I quit working for others and went full time. These bacc guys should do the same if they think they got it figured out.
I am talking about the past...I wrote "helped him win"...that's the past.
Did winning his pressed-up bets help him win overall for the shoes that he posted photos of?
I'm not asking what might happen, I'm asking what did happen.
What are you saying here, that having a "regular" job proves that he doesn't win regularly at baccarat?
Is that how it works?
Has it ever occurred to you that some people don't want to commit their lives to working in a casino for a living?
I guess not.
Do you have life all figured out for everybody?...as if your life is the best life for you and everybody else too?
Is your gambling advice good life advice?...that if somebody knows how to win at gambling, then they should not prefer or even consider any other career?
What did happen was a short term inconsequential meaningless event or said in another way selective memory.
Originally Posted by coach belly[/QUOTE]
What are you saying here, that having a "regular" job proves that he doesn't win regularly at baccarat?[/QUOTE]
No, he is not, all Mickey is saying is the truth. You don't like it learn the hard way.
The events were the shoes that he posted photos of. I was asking if pressing up the bets during the streaks as shown was a major factor in the overall win for those shoes.
You answered by talking about memory.
The photos are on WOV to view, so memory wouldn't be a factor.
He implied that since they don't quit their jobs and play full time, then that proves they are not winning consistently.
Do you believe that to be the truth?
He wrote that those who claim to be consistent winners at bacc should quit their jobs and play full time...like he did.
Is that good advice for a lawyer? To quit their path in life and follow mickeycrimm's?
Anybody playing baccarat is likely already doing better in their vocation than mickeycrimm is doing in his...plenty that I've seen probably have more than his life's savings on the table in front of them.
Originally Posted by coach belly
[/QUOTE]Anybody playing baccarat is likely already doing better in their vocation than mickeycrimm is doing in his...plenty that I've seen probably have more than his life's savings on the table in front of them.[/QUOTE]
Talk about a diversion answer that has absolutely nothing to do about the math of the game.
If you could win regularly at a gambling game you play for fun, chances are you'd put your boring career behind you.
CB seems like a real troll or not very intelligent. Mickey says you can't beat baccarat and if people could then they'd quit their day job to beat it. CB seems to think Micky suggests someone quit their job to play bacc when it was the opposite.
CB is slow.
It’s amazing to read the arguments going on between alleged AP’s and everyone else on these forums. It appears AP’s are on these forums just to criticize and condemn anyone who isn’t one. Other than Micky who exposed some harmless plays here, the rest of the AP's seem to be members just to blow smoke up everyone’s asses including their own about all the un-confirmed/alleged money they make.
The character DarkOz exposed an alleged play at WOV. I read that play and first thing that came to my mind was “are you fucking kidding me”? I would rather jump on a knife before I would even attempt to go through all of that. Then he wants to show off I think it was two 5K free play tickets which still aren't cash in the pocket yet, and better yet it's spread over like 20 different dates to even get the shot at changing it to cash. My only guess why people could even consider this something special is because they don’t have a clue about the real world, or they didn’t have the smarts to actually give the real world a chance in the first place.
To make it even more special the alleged AP’s want to dox him and in so many words are telling him to watch his back. Apparently, they want to beat the shit out of him for talking about it. Then 14 or more of their top posters said their checking out of the forum because of it, declaring many livelihoods are now in jeopardy. Of course, the bullshit artist Axel is in the middle of all of it. And it wouldn’t be the same without Mission coming in and posting his long short stories confirming the loser he really is. Then the real kicker was Mike S. basically said to his valued AP’s promising to leave including Axel his star member to take a fucking walk and do what they have to do. I’m telling you folks; you CAN’T MAKE THIS SHIT UP.
In addition, MDawg is posting nothing more than having a good time claiming he knows what he’s doing with his baccarat play. Obviously, he has money and is showing it off while everyone knows the facts about long term and I’m sure he does also. He didn’t make his money gambling or searching out deposit bottles while homeless. But the alleged pro AP’s just can’t let it go and apparently out of jealously of his position in life are all over him.
I’m not sure what happened or care to look into it, but both MDawg and DarkOz are both banned.
Now the argument is coming here. Where can you get this type of entertainment without paying for it?
I'm looking forward to the idiots here taking this to even a different level.
Spoken like somebody who hated their working life.
There are many heavy-hitters in the business world who keep working, even after they have already earned many times more than it would take to retire to Tahiti.
How can you not be aware of that?
I'm watching a 70-something one of them walking on the field at the Superdome right now.
You don't even understand what you type.
Mickey said if someone could beat baccarat they would quit their day jobs. Mickey doesn't believe people are beating baccarat. From that Coach Belly says the Mickey thinks people should quit their job to beat baccarat because Mickey gambles. lol.
Like I said.... sllooooooooowwwwww.
Everyone knows including Mdawg that you could beat baccarat on any given day or days but you’ll lose even more over consistent play. And let’s just say that a person who seems to always have their stars aligned with their lucky rabbits foot hanging from their neck and are consistently beating the game. How long would the casino put up with it till they rid that person? I don’t care how much money that person has.
The fucking guy is posting on a gambling forum for crying out loud. He’s an alleged lawyer with obvious plenty of money. Do you really think he don’t understand the facts about the game?
Mickey like the rest of the envious AP’s want to make an argument about what everyone knows is a fact. They just can’t stomach people that make them look like two-bit degenerate gamblers because they were able to make a ton completely outside of gambling.
MDawg took all those fucking AP jealous assholes at WOV for a long ride. Not only did he make a fool of them, he exposed their envious jealous asses. They were literally posting they couldn’t wait till he lost, like the biggest envious bitch Once Dear. There’s over a hundred pages of posts in that thread of alleged AP’s telling him over and over again how lucky he was and how much of an idiot he was. Meanwhile he played them and exposed them for what they really are about.
You have to give Mdawg credit for keeping all those envious idiots on the hook that long and it was still going while they all were waiting and praying for him to actually post losing everything. If you didn’t know the ending of that trip after reading his first post, you’re a bigger asshole then I could even imagine. Apparently, there is an endless amount of big assholes over there.
Alleged AP’s might be good at making alleged money off casinos, but that thread confirms they’re just a bunch of jealous skumbags. Anyone who could drop more cash in one weekend while being treated like a king, while AP’s could only dream of making in the same time makes that person enemy #1. Especially when they could come back and do it all over again without blinking. They found a way to cut him off (ban him) before he was able to finish his last day there. They just couldn’t stomach him closing the trip bragging about all the money he allegedly made. They were to stupid to realize there wasn’t a camera following him around exposing the actual facts whatever they actually were.
I have private insider information that Mdawg was being baited, harassed,and insulted on purpose because they thought he was a Sock of a banned Member. It was obvious that something was going on when Mdawg got called a Fraud and a Liar and he lightly stood up for himself and he got suspended for a month. That is not normal. Now he is suspended for two months after Doxxing someone. He admitted he didn't know he was doing anything wrong until he was dragged through the mud for doing that and he subsequently removed the Doxxing link. Someone else Doxxed someone too like in 2018 and got a 7 day Suspension. 7 day Suspension vs a 60 day Suspension for doing the same thing. Seems very fair to me. WTF?!
Tasha, MDawg has been martingale to a 2 month suspension. I don’t follow his thread but read the posts he gets suspended for. He’s an asshole.
And Stinkyblackhole, up until my retirement I was making about 3 times what the average Montanan makes. But there are plenty of Montanans making 5, 10, 20 times the average. If I want to be jealous I don’t have to look for an mdawg. People that make more than you and me are all around us. I could care less how much they make. I’m happy with my own position whether you like it or not.
Stinkhole you think being treated like a king while blowing your money gambling is a joyful experience. But you could buy all those amenities for a fraction of what you pay gambling on negative games. It’s that illusion of winning and getting the freebies to that sucks compulsive gamblers like you in. You’re nothing more than a sucker to casino execs.
Sounds like you are not talking about Mdawg but yourself, and the truth hurts doesen't it. Just like the late Rodney Dangerfield poor little blackhole gets no respect on a gaming board. No one is jealous of, or even cares about someone with money who can afford to blow it any way they care, and that is the reality of it all. The board is all about gaming not how you made your lot in life. What is there not to understand? Why should anyone appreciate and adore someone who won a lot of money in a casino one day, all because he got lucky? Anyway it is all meaningless to the insecure individual who has the need to let everyone know how wonderful,and prosperous of a person he is. Of course meaning you.
Blackhole is obviously reflecting. The effort he puts into putting down APs is funny. What sort of successful person puts effort into that like he does?
Blackhole strikes me as someone who has lost a lot of $$ gambling over the years. He wants to say "oh everyone is jealous of me" when I'd bet a lot of money it is more the other way around. "oh I am jealous of every AP". Reflect reflect reflect. Seen it too many times at this point in my life.
Listen acuntinquestion and BOBO,
MDawg made a fool of everyone over there and you two jackasses know it. Now you want to twist this into some phycological thing to do with me.
Can’t wait to read what the rest of the fucking fools will say to try and pile on.
Bottom line is, we all know oh so well what this is about, and it has nothing to do with me.
The Martingale sucks. I got a two week Martingale from WOV for the Alimony thing. Still angry about that Alimony Suspension. My first Suspension was for the Bad Casino Giveaways? Thread where I mistakenly claimed that Gulfstream Park Casino was giving a guaranteed $100 Macy's gift card for $500 coin in. I called this a bad Giveaway, because I figured,"Why would you want to play $500 coin in for a $100 Macy's gift card?" I was asked over and over if the Macy's gift card was GUARANTEED. I said,"Yes," and one particular skeptical Poster looked up the Giveaway and.... It turns out, CANDLES were what you got for $500 coin in. There were like 50 CANDLE boxes and ONE candle box had a $100 Macy's gift card and a candle. I mistakenly thought ALL of the boxes had the gift card in it. I was dragged so hard for that. I meant to say "I am so sorry. I honestly thought that ALL of the boxes had the gift card. I didn't know that only one box had it," but I fell asleep. When I woke up, I immediately thought,"Time to explain my mistake and apologize!" But it was too late as I got a rare one week suspension for Trolling Members and Admins for a very long thread. I knew something was wrong as soon as BOTH my BCG? Thread to AND The Suspension Discussion list were replied to just a little while apart from each other. My suspicions were confirmed as I saw my name was Red and saw that I was suspended for a week.
I got a two week Suspension for hijacking a thread with Alimony twice that was about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot. Two different people brought up Alimony first, and I responded to both of them and I got a two week Suspension for mentioning Alimony twice. Hello? I was responding to two different people who brought it up first and I get the two week Martingale Suspension. Even other Posters mentioned that was a fucked up and unfair Suspension and I didn't deserve it, but I still had to serve the full two werks. I mentioned occasionally still being mad about that Alimony Suspension. At least one Person said they were surprised I didn't just leave WOV for good after that unfair Alimony Suspension.
No that's not what he wrote.
He didn't say they would quit their day jobs, he said that they should quit their day jobs.
He wrote "should", he is encouraging those that claim to win at bacc to quit their day jobs and play full time.
His inference is that because they continue to work, they must not be winning...as though winning at bacc and working for a living are mutually exclusive.
Actually, I agree with the second line here, me included. The most reasonable take on MDawg is that he's "making a prick" out of everybody. His continual winning tales are absurd, and his focus on little details may also be poking fun. So he gets to make asses out of the people who ooh and aah at modest suites and tales of $400 per hand bets. Plus he never loses, so he gets to tweak all of the math people in an obvious fashion. Then he holds court on personal minutia like shaving accessories, which I find really funny. If you're gonna be mesmerized by his gambling tales and gambling recommendations, here's some shaving strategy as a bonus.
If you take it as some tongue-in-cheek presentation, and the fact it's the top thread, it's all hilarious. It exposes WoV as a collection of "little bettors," wannabees, and math experts who don't recognize sarcasm. I fell for it (of course, I'd never read any MDawg stuff before, so I have half an excuse). And I'm occasionally dumb as a rock. What made me realize was when I decided I wanted to do a parody and, upon close reading, I realized how do I parody a parody? He makes stuff up as he goes along. Last year, he said he was betting 15K a hand; now it's $400. People ooh and ahh. Why? I know guys who bet a lot more than that. His posts expose other posters as not terribly big bettors.
And he never loses. It's comical. All poking and prodding. Yet he "follows the rules," so mods have to bend over backwards to suspend him. He exposes management as hamstrung by its own rules.
There is no way I could beat his parody with a parody.
And on top of it, when coach belly props up MDawg's arguments or defends the possibility of MDawg's veracity, MDawg is making a prick out of his defender(s). It's really, really funny. Coach belly is basically tilting at a windmill.
Actually I don't know as I don't read that forum with any sort of regularity. I read the links there and sometimes look for active posts. I don't believe I even have an account. Good try though.
Were you the one telling me I'd go bust or whatever because I went on a little VBJ excursion and ran good ? Maybe it was bosox, but if it was you it just goes to show how even more full of it you are. You just post stuff to get attention and be contrarian, whether on the side of the APs or the side of the ploppy gamblers. Whatevers. People should give you less attention that Tasha.
No need to pile on, I'm just pointing out to me what was obvious.
What the fuck are you talking about here acuntinquestion???
I think your cunt needs a good cunt cleaning. Here are a few tips I found for you.
• When showering or bathing, wash your vulva with warm water and mild or unscented soap. ...
• Separate your labia and let the warm soapy water clean all around the clitoral hood and between your labia. ...
• Rinse completely and pat dry your vulva with a soft dry towel.
I hadn't considered that the MDawg thread might be a hoax.
Trip reports are common enough as not to routinely question their veracity, or impugn anyone just for sharing their travel experiences with others online.
But MDawg sure did post a lot of content, would anyone make such an extraordinary effort to prank a bunch of anonymous forum members that he doesn't know?
And why would he duplicate everything on another forum that has no other members, and almost no viewers?
Seems too irrationally ambitious, it doesn't make sense that it's a hoax.
But you never make much sense anyway, ditz.
Finally....something more entertaining to read than Pelosi making an impeachment fool of herself or liberals mourning an "influential and respected" Iranian terrorist's death.
I know nothing about Mdawg or bacc. and from the little I've read, this guy could be just another internet character concoction courtesy of none other than THE most insecure poster on gaming forums: Kew....for the sole purpose of desperately seeking that much needed but elusive relevancy and attention. He's tried presenting himself as a queer "BJ pro". Why not also create the opposite end of the spectrum: the world's most successful but irritating baccarat savant? And if the pussies at WoV have trouble sleeping over it, call Hillary Clinton and ask her what it feels like spending night after night with a pervert.
But it makes sense that someone never, ever loses? LOL. I think blackhole and I may be on the same page here, coach.
Why would anyone with money post pics of Residence Inn-level suites and shaving equipment? Yeah, coach, that makes a lot of sense. Let's just ask the question, a la coach, "Would anyone make such an extraordinary effort to (fill in here - impress, entertain, report to) a bunch of anonymous forum members he doesn't know?" But coach never makes much sense, anyway, eh?
You know any semi-high rollers who post like MDawg? Never losing while expounding on the details of their shaving? Why would anyone make such an extraordinary effort indeed?
Coach, I think you've been punked, man. Join the club. Only you decided to defend the "Dawg Who Never Loses." Pretty funny. Maybe pick a more realistic windmill to defend next time.
Then go read everything about Baccarat79. He did much if the same stuff and was proven a fraud.
The owner of the company he worked for was successful. His boss would invite him to Vegas with his comps and stuff. He used that information, pictures and whatnot and put a spin on it and made it his own and just make up shit as he went.
With just a little effort I could produce all the pictures and documents making it look like I was beating Baccarat without spending a dime.
I never said I would do that, I said I could.
If you're asking me why he would do that. I can't say 100% sure why. People do all kinds of crazy stupid stuff for whatever reason. Why did b79 do it? Why have other people done it? He's not the only one I remember all the details at this point on each one of them. There was some guy that claimed he could prove he was winning millions of dollars blah blah blah via players card and even send it to my core some b******* like that. If I recall correctly but turns out there was some technical error or some other b*******.
I couldn't read everything.
Where was this revealed?
Here are some things that stood out from my trip down your memory lane...
Mr V gave seasoned and sage advice to the persecuted, yet benign B79 about the WOV forum..."you can continue to post as you have, but expect increasing hostility and criticism."
On 4/24/15 eternally insecure she-male Axel wrote about B79..."He could've been a legend on the forum like he seemingly wanted, instead he will be forgotten."
Now 5 years later...he's forgotten? Not by you, Captain Morgan.
"Retired" WOV arrogant asshole and uber-nerd Eliot Jacobson attempted to wise everyone up with the following..."after 478480 hands, one perfect basic strategy player in 100 will still be beating the house! This is more than a lifetime of blackjack hands for most players. In simple terms, if a player is using perfect basic strategy, there can be no reasonable long-term expectation of beating the player."
Most striking was what a nice guy MaxPen was back then, before he started sucking on Axel's clit for table scraps to feed his family.
5 years later, and he is the the #1 bitter asshole on the forums...maybe that's what happens, Max, when your wife realizes that you're some drunk midget's bitch.
He did the same to me here. That's the way Coach is. If he can't put together a cogent argument, which he can't when it comes to beating bacc, he goes for the insults. As if that will prove him right. It's actually more of a reflection of him than us. He knows he's been wrong but refuses to admit it to himself. He lashes out at others to compensate. But no amount of insults will prove him right.
Axel and I weren't arguing on WOV about baccarat, we were discussing whether he made up stories about Alan.
He was cornered, caught in his lies, and his vag hurt so he weaseled his way out by bitching that he was insulted by me calling him Captain Morgan.
Now...I insulted you earlier in this thread? Where?
Your episode must have really turned you soft.
Is that too insulting for me to say, snowflake?
I never presented an argument for beating baccarat, so there's nothing to prove right, nothing to admit, and nothing that I've been wrong about.
I just asked a bunch of questions which you ducked, dodged and side-stepped for the most part.
I didn’t dodge anything. You didn’t get the answers that you wanted. You want someone to validate your craving to beat negative expectation games. You think you can stick a pin in it and get it done. When you don’t get the answers you want you snivel about it by hurling insults. One thing the heart attack made me realize is life is to short to waste it arguing with idiots. Do hurl away with the insults. You can argue with yourself from here on out.