Quote:
Originally Posted by
MaxPen
Why don't one of you offer to mirror bank an agreed upon number of sessions against MDawg? He can still play at any casino of his choosing. You will just have a witness present.
Because MDawg won't agree to people witnessing his play. He wants the "proof" to be statements from the casino via his host, that can be manipulated and phony. He doesn't want actual witnesses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MaxPen
I'm amazed that so many people take any of it seriously.
I see your point, but personally I just don't like these phony claims of huge successes via gambling that are obviously phony because they defy the mathematics of gambling. I have never called out anyone that I don't beleive is doing what they claim as long as the math works. THAT is the very low bar that must be met.
And frankly I believe AP's and people known for their expertise in gambling mathematics have not only a right, but a responsibility to call out shit that just can't be. And that is why this case of MDawg is so frustrating to me. Why isn't Wizard calling this out? He has called out 18 y.o.'s in a row and Singers progressive claims and almost immediately calls out any claims involving martingales. This is right there with those things. It defies the math. The very math that Mike made his name and reputation with. And now he is not only remaining silent, but suspending people who do call out MDawg with very questionable infractions. I mean it really appears to be that he has now escalated to "protecting" MDawg and these false claims.
I have been through this whole thing before on Norms blackjack form. A forum owner, who is all about the math, inexplicably protecting a member making claims that defy the math. I don't know exactly what is going on other than these forum owners have a different agenda...whatever generates more traffic for their forum, even at the expense of the math they themselves believe in.