Quote:
Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
This is in fact very incorrect Mickey. While I have an opinion and have expressed it in no uncertain terms, which is my right, this discussion on multiple threads has died several times now and each time it is Rob Singer that posts something to resurrect the discussion debate. And each time he mentions me by name (handle) knowing and hoping that I will respond.
Your new buddy is an attention whore. That is what these discussions are about and that is even what all his name-calling is about. He just can't stand when he is not the center of attention and always comes up with something to stir the pot and get everyone 'going' again.
He has played you and you either don't realize it or don't want to realize it and sadly that is putting you at odds with everyone else that does see it.
What, do you think a thread dies just after you make the last post? GTFO! The site has reduced to nothing but a troll site far worse than it was before Singer made his claim. And it's all coming from people other than the Singer faction. You are now the main troll. Fuck you telling me when a thread is dead. You keep on with this "new found friend" bullshit. I'm not and have never been on anyone's side but my own. That's the problem with you. You think everyone has to be on a side. You should see that I'm now being trolled by people that never trolled me before. All because idiots like you think I should be on a side and call Singer phony on the double up bug. You bags of shit can't stand for anyone to have their own independent opinion. That makes you and your "Singer is phony on the double up bug" faction the head king trolls of this now piece of shit site. All Singer is doing is firing back at your troll posts. But I'm glad you finally showed your true colors. I now know that I'm dealing with a complete bag of shit. Getting played by Singer? Fuck you. YOU'RE THE ONE THAT'S TRYING TO PLAY ME. My opinions don't change because of dickhead trolls like the others and you.
I've tried to stay out of this, mainly because I think "Singer" lying about the origins of his money to thousands of readers makes him worse than if he hadn't, so I'm rooting for the story to be true. But I think, mickey, that you're off kilter for the following simple statistical reason.
"Singer" has 7500 posts. About 7400 of them promoted his systems, which were not (according to the glitch story) the origins of his money. About 7400 of them were anti-AP. Dozens of them talked about arci, and mine, and kewlJ's "deservedly dead" spouses.
Now we have 100 posts with a different tone (although, if you'll notice, "Singer" went on another bizarre spiel about me being anonymous). "Singer" is now an AP. "Singer" is now telling the truth.
You have decided you are best served by a truce, and people who don't buy that are "trolling." Frankly, I don't even know what exactly "trolling" is supposed to be, but bear with me. Why should you get to make that call? Why should anyone reading these pages emphasize the last couple of months over a decade? Why should anyone prioritize 100 posts over 7400? Why should anyone agree to a truce? Because you say so?
I think most people would simply say, "no thank you" to a truce. You say "okay," that's fine, but realistically, almost nobody is going to agree with you. So now you perceive it as a worse "trolling" site than before. That's your right, but you cannot realistically expect people to agree with you. Just ain't gonna happen, whether "Singer" used the glitch play or not.
Now here's a question. KewlJ has mentioned what he would consider evidence for the glitch having happened. That evidence may be out there somewhere or maybe not. What evidence (or coincidence) would you consider convincing to demonstrate that the glitch did not happen? And I'm gonna shoot down the "offer a reward" angle. If somebody told "Singer" the play, they probably were not supposed to, so I wouldn't be surprised if they wound up in the desert with their dick in their mouth. If you do not have an answer to what would disconfirm the story, then we are in the realm of preferred beliefs, and not theories that can be disproven. Personally, I have some ideas that I would consider disconfirming, but I'll keep them to myself. I have no interest in pursuing them because I think "Singer" having done this makes him worse than if he hadn't. So let him live with his glitch story. It's a fitting cap to his career.