Long Article About HCQ

Source: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/s...-morality-tale

Key paragraph:

“... we were told hydroxychloroquine was likely ineffective, and also dangerous, and that that French study was flawed and the scientist behind it worthy of mockery. More studies followed, with contradictory results, and then out came what was hailed by some as a definitive study of 96,000 patients showing the drug was most certainly dangerous and ineffective, and indeed that it killed 30% more people than those who didn’t take it. Within days, that study was retracted, with the editor of one of the two most respected medical journals in the Western world conceding it was “a monumental fraud.”

We have studies that tell us HCQ is effective against Wuhan Virus & we have studied that show or suggest HCQ has no effect in the treatment of the Wuhan Virus. These studies do not cancel each other out. What we need is a 3rd theory that explains why these two types of studies are valid.

As stated earlier, it’s a long article and helps explain the need to use HCQ early in the treatment process. It also covers the politics along with HCQ.

Btw, MWP et al won’t like what the article is saying.