The UNKewl Challenge - did UNKewlJ receive any settlement money for his fictional backrooming incident?

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

---

Why haven't you taken the next logical leap that Regnis is actually Singer? :rolleyes:

Red makes a big thing of anonymity, but, when it really matters, he has nothing to say about his big online chum, Regnis.

I'm actually quite glad that Regnis didn't officially confirm anything. Ha. Things remain where they were, with KJ merely another piece of online garbage. Sigh.

Say, perhaps Regnis can "confirm" that Red doesn't hold down the family house with the old man buried out back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

---

Why haven't you taken the next logical leap that Regnis is actually Singer? :rolleyes:

---

Do you think it is coincidental ?

Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

No one is more desperate to prove himself than UNKewlJ. That he won't, is because he can't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

KJ, I might believe you, however, you just have way too many interesting things/stories Etc that for some reason or another you can never provide any proof. There's always some, for lack of a better word, Bullshit reason why you can't/won't. It seems as if it would be in your best interest to not mention anything in the first place if you can't provide one iota of proof for whatever reason.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobSinger

If there's ever been anybody more incapable of trying and trying to change other people's opinions about himself, that person hasn't been born yet.

---

---

Among the more ridiculous lies UNKewlJ told this weekend, is that violating his fictional settlement agreement privately versus publicly was somehow okay. Every time he opens his mouth he confirms further that he is lying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I can say whatever I want privately.

---

:eek: As if that would make any difference (if any of this were real, that is), lol.

Yes, he'd better head out it's the weekend, and there are UNKewl tricks to be turned. The more he opens his mouth the more he gets caught in contradictions and lies.

---

**yawn**

"no soup for you"....troll. :cool:

**yawn** says kewl.

Still hard for me to take the cat serious when the boy claim to bed the dices-"influencer", hey hey.

KJ has serious real life stuff to do, like shoot hoops with the boys and book his 20th consecutive year card counting in LV.

He's clearly not a guy with time to spend on the forums.

Does Kewl ever sit around and smirk at any of this? Or is it 100% all serious business in his brain?

I'd like to think he finds some humor in his bs but I tend to give people too much credit. He's probably 100% serious about all of it.

The kewl-J is one of them 3-cards monte cats and that's how he makes his cake. I don't begrudge him, though, as to me the 3-crads monte is no worse than 6-5 21 or 3-zero roulettes, hey hey.

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Do you think it is coincidental ? Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

---

AIQ, you need a bit of background info.

Robert Argentino changed the last name on his internet handle to Singer as a spoof on his then nemesis, Bob Dancer.

Get it? singer ---> dancer

Regnis similarly spoofed Singer by choosing to reverse the letters from SINGER to REGNIS, just because; obviously he wanted to remain anonymous so why not?

No, has ZERO to do with whether regnis, a lawyer, is trustworthy, and everything to do with forum humor.

As for how regnis could confirm things: independent investigation via asking casino personnel would be a good start; he would need "connections."

You're out of your mind V. You should take more drugs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Does Kewl ever sit around and smirk at any of this? Or is it 100% all serious business in his brain?

I'd like to think he finds some humor in his bs but I tend to give people too much credit. He's probably 100% serious about all of it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'm not sure what to think of Singer but at the end of the day he laughs most of this shit off. You can't. That's pretty much the sum of this whole situation between you 2.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

---

I quoted you earlier in this thread. You said you were busy watching and playing basketball.

I guess that one just slipped out?

Lets get something else straight, because you trolls that comment on 20 winning years seem clueless. If you are a professional card counter playing high stakes, traveling a lot, with limited actual play, you might encounter a losing year now and then. It is a simple case of not getting in enough play to overcome the occasional bad variance.

But if you are a grinder type player, who plays a lot, 50, 60 thousand rounds, you shouldn't have a losing year. You have enough trials to overcome any bad variance, 92, 3 standard deviations). In the case of this grinder type player that plays enough to overcome variance, a "bad" year will be a year some level below expectation but likely still a "winning year".

And even though I currently play a little higher stakes and a little less than I used to, I am still in this grinder type catagory. I play enough that it is unlikely that I will have a losing year (not impossible but unlikely). A bad year is a year way below expectation. And I have had a number of those, most recently 2020 (covid year) when my blackjack results were less than 15k vs expectation of 80k. THAT is a bad year for a grinder type player that puts in enough play to overcome variance. Kapeesh? :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

---

I quoted you earlier in this thread. You said you were busy watching and playing basketball.

I guess that one just slipped out?

---

Where? Where did I say I was playing basketball? Please link or quote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The above post is a classic example of an UNKewlJ typical lying post:

1. Provides no evidence - other than sometimes mentioning that, "the math works" or "the math doesn't work."

2. Repeats the same things over and over - "manually rephrase the same old nervous essays over and over."

3. Tries to shoe horn his now worn smooth fable about being a multi year blackjack player into the topic. "I've been a professional player for X years and made X million dollars already blah blah blah so I know how it works."

3. Includes some kind of rant about MDawg / Singer / etc.

4. Misstates most of what he even references. Frequently contradicts himself.

5. Refers to unknown never will be seen APs or other experts who know him, will vouch for whatever it is he is claiming, or work with him.

6. Tries to distill any opposition to whatever it is he claims to "trolling" and "a witch hunt." – “poor poor KJ always the victim.” *

* 7. (Optional) Mentions that he doesn't really care what people think about him and that no one need prove anything.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Do you think it is coincidental ? Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

---

AIQ, you need a bit of background info.

Robert Argentino changed the last name on his internet handle to Singer as a spoof on his then nemesis, Bob Dancer.

Get it? singer ---> dancer

Regnis similarly spoofed Singer by choosing to reverse the letters from SINGER to REGNIS, just because; obviously he wanted to remain anonymous so why not?

No, has ZERO to do with whether regnis, a lawyer, is trustworthy, and everything to do with forum humor.

As for how regnis could confirm things: independent investigation via asking casino personnel would be a good start; he would need "connections."

---

Who has these random connections to casino employees that could actually verify both the incident, the substance of the incident, and that it was connected to KJ (whose name regnis doesn't even know)? And this almost a year after the "fact".

Although to be fair that's actually setting a higher bar, unlike Mdawg I don't think the incident is even halfway grounded in reality so I would be very surprised if there is a roughly correspondent incident that just involved someone other than KJ.