Quote:
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
Mickey, why are you being so nasty all of the sudden. So some of us don't find Rob all that credible. Why does that send you into these homophobic rages?
You assholes started attacking me first. If you don't believe Singer I don't care. But your repeated attempts to discredit me over an objective opinion I made is beyond despicable. In your own words I "got blinders on" "no objectivity" "impressed by Singer." You're full of shit.
I put all the past BS aside and made an unbiased judgement. The in depth knowledge of types of machines and years of their manufacture, machine denoms and their spreads, which games to select, working conditions, avoiding the heat, the feeling of being watched, knowing that feeding a bill in eliminated the double up question, knowing that feeding a bill in allowed one to change denoms, knowing that the sequence published in the Wired article was incorrect, and announcing his retirement the year Kane and Nestor got busted. And me knowing that Rob is not foolish enough to have learned the information from someone else then concocting a story knowing full well that someone he learned it from could come forward and easily shoot his story down.
Now, what have you put up, KJ? Nothing but speculation "he could have learned it from someone else." Well, who is this person or persons? Since you are to chickenshit to do it I'll put up a $1000 cash reward for this person or persons to come forward and show with convincing evidence that they taught Rob the play after the fact. Rob couldn't have learned all of the above in just a casual one-off conversation. Rob would have had follow up questions. In other words this person or persons would have had extensive contact with Rob. So it shouldn't be so hard to prove.