I hadn't even thought of Mdog until you mentioned him.
Printable View
I hadn't even thought of Mdog until you mentioned him.
Blackhole has been right yet again.
Just look at these clowns posing as "professional gamblers" struggling to come up with their takes on the theory of it. Kew, of course, eludes to his "superiority" of the profession without ever once offering to clarify anything about it. Then we have the forum weirdo serving up mounds of intelligence about mdawg in the most obtuse of ways, while opening with a gay part about him supposedly being a "runner". And all this....while he continuously stumbles over his own feet time and time again right here! At least max held back his usual be claims by not wanting to offer anything about his knowledge of so-called professional gamblers....because that's what losers do :)
If any of you idiots ever really filed as professional gamblers, there'd be no guessing, no stories, no theories, and no questions. You'd know EXACTLY what it was all about and how to explain what it is and why certain things are done.
And it has nothing to do with redietz running after some gay guys with only his My Slippers on.
I mentioned Nikola in my post about running, so since it's LV related (and mcap would therefore approve), I'll follow up with a link to a short film about his Serbian running team, part of the 442 Crew as they're called, who compete each year in the annual The Speed Project. The Speed Project is a relay from the Santa Monica Pier to Las Vegas, rotating among a six-person crew.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/s...d&action=click
Note: Although my friend's name is Nikola, he is not the Nikola who appears as the opening credit for the film. I also want to mention that the RV in the film was not borrowed from an Israeli who discovered he couldn't drive it home.
Also, I have no idea if Rob ever filed as a professional gambler. I have, and I've filed in many other categories as well so as to maximize returns for Integrity Sports, which actually is a real thing.
Finally, I did look up the original definition of "double up." The first known use was in 1789, and it meant, according to Merriam-Webster, "to share accommodations designed for one." Nothing wrong with that, of course. Rob may indeed be expert, and I apologize for doubting him. I also defer to Rob's declared expertise regarding various kinds of sexuality. I don't have the experience to challenge any of his sexual assertions.