Originally Posted by
LarryS
again, when anonymous people give your the business, really so what. He is willingly known. He wants us to know who he is , or else he could have arranged a moniker.
Again I had someone callling me a liar daily on GF,...whether I was known or was anonymous it would effect me the same. The person calling the names did not impress me so I didnt generate angst over it.
So if I give him a hard time or you do, or someone else here or at wov.......we all carry no weight. Just as the moron at GF who hated jews . We only have ower over you if you give us that power. Otherwise we are just dogs howling at the moon. I carry no weight. I am an expert on my own opinion..thats all I claim. And Alan can tell me that my opinion is flawed or he can run away.
Alan needs to learn to laugh at himself. He needs to see how what he claims does have "fibbing" written all over it. And maybe the people he hangs with in real life pretend to believe him and shrug it off. Thats fine. But the message boards are a different animal.
KJ perpetrated a lie about his death, he came clean, and gave reasons for it, and he may even regret it, and I dont use that to question believably of current comments by him.
However Alan never came clean, he still holds to the tale, and for that its fair game to question authenticity of other things he says. And thats the position HE put himself in.
Yet its no reason to keep running away. Especially from anonymous people who have no credibility in gambling established. I know I DONT. Most people on this board have no credibility established.....totally anonymous with unproven backgrounds. Maybe KJ and Mickey have some cred ...but thats about it for me. I dont know about the credentials of others.
So who cares is a self proclaimed umproven lawyer,and a self proclaimed unproven pharmacist, and other self proclaimed folks give him a hard time. Whatever we say carries little weight. Its not like the great John Patrick criticized him. Just a bunch of nobodies. He didnt feel the sting of being criticized on this board by gambling scholars