Quote:
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
2 takeaways from Rob's above ramblings.
1.) Rob continues to try to push the erroneous narrative, that while players can win playing -EV over a very short period of time, this can be duplicated over and over, resulting in long-term winning. The best example against what Rob is claiming continues to be that it is very possible to walk into a casino and win 3 of 4 rounds of roulette betting black. But try doing that every day for a year.
2.) I guess Rob is now saying that his longterm -EV winning claims, which he has pushed as a legitimate winning strategy for years, are now due to his results being on the far outer edges of the bell curve, rather than a legitimate winning strategy. I guess that is a concession that these claimed winnings are not really possible via a legitimate winning strategy.
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."