Search:

Here is Eliot consulting:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmQAYBtxdf0

Eliot did not invent any of this, and barely even played. Instead, it was a self-promoting business model. He gave newspaper interviews about blackjack "heat" despite being a mere red-chip player! ...

He basically tries to ratchet his bankroll up for a small win. If he loses, then he escalates denominations until he hits his goal or busts his session bankroll. So he usually gets a small win, and...

I take it back. Alan's biggest advantage play would be to just stop getting married.

Alan has a point (echoing Rob Singer) that if advantage play opportunities were easy and lucrative, then everybody would be exploiting them.

I find it interesting how Alan knows he loses every...

KewlJ will have to hurry if he wants to build a career based on youthful looks! Sorry I can't help his dating situation.

Old-time poker players like Doyle Brunson had to travel to find high...

I have personal knowledge of some advantage play winnings, and my trusted advantage play friends have knowledge of others. The people I mentioned are objectively worth hundreds of millions of...

Congrats to KewlJ. I believe him and hope he crosses the million dollar threshold only one more time.



The annual Blackjack Hall of Fame party in Las Vegas hosts around 100 guests, and the...

I don't have a good handle on the drama in this forum.

I see nothing unusual about Robert Dietz presenting a paper at a conference. It would help if he gave the year of the conference and title...

If your largest losses were $33K and $11K, and your 74 losses averaged $3,523, then you regularly walked away with losses under $3,000. Were you "pocketing" 40-unit wins, and quitting after a 400...

Here Rob Singer claims a session bankroll of $57,200 = 400 units times ($1+$2+$5+$10+$25+$100).



Then Rob must only play $10 machines because $7,200 = 400*($1+$2+$5+$10).



The 74 losing...

The largest winning session was basically a royal flush on a $25 machine. The largest losing session was approximately two session bankrolls of 400*($1+$2+$5+$10+$25). He lost 17% of the time, and...

You first wrote that your session bankroll for $100 machines is 400*($1+$2+$5+$10+$25+$100) = $57,200. But $10 machines require only $7,200, which matches your average loss.

So you basically...

Cool. How much escrow will you post? You wanted me to post $400K for you to play $1 machines, in case you escalated to $100 machines. That is an absurd ratio; can you do this without $100 machines?

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/rob-singer.4966/page-2


I e-mailed them. Huntington Press says it is highly unlikely. Fezzik says you ducked the challenge. You look phony now.

You...

Unlike you, I don't spend all my time monitoring this forum. You obviously have enough time to arrange escrow with Nersesian.

You have ducked challenges for many years. I see a $25K challenge...

That is fine. Please contact attorney Bob Nersesian to arrange escrow for that amount. I will escrow after you. It appears you have already ducked this offer from Fezzik and Dan Druff, so I will...

Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when...

There was a simpler challenge. Fezzik offered to meet Rob Singer at his favorite licensed casino machines, and match any wins and losses. For example, if Singer won $2,000, then Singer would keep...

Kewlj has always provided remarkably consistent explanations. Suppose his expected value is $50 per hour with a standard deviation of $2,000 per hour. Then in a four-hour playing day, he will...