Page 106 of 194 FirstFirst ... 65696102103104105106107108109110116156 ... LastLast
Results 2,101 to 2,120 of 3862

Thread: Big Casino Wins and Jackpots

  1. #2101
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Quick note regarding wins: my girlfriend tied for first this week in Heritage Sports' Race to the Superbowl Contest with an 18-2 record. She lost the Saints/Seahawks and the Vikings/Bears games. While it wasn't a boatload of money (six people tied), it is something to win versus a couple thousand people. She's listed as "Betty" on the results page.

    We're now tied in the season-long contest, both sitting in about 120th place out of a couple thousand. So no 25K win on the horizon this year for me. I'll be lucky to beat her.
    Of course, nothing but more claims of superstar anonymity. Once again, you should first provide proof of your identity when making these type of claims by you or for anybody else that you're seeking online kudos for.

    And yet another "successful gambler" in his declining years with a "girlfriend". She have any kids that you call "your son or daughter"?
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 11-05-2016 at 02:58 PM.

  2. #2102
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Rob's mathematical proof of his system has never been published. I believe it's in the storage locker. If we ever saw it then this line of attack would be over either because it was correct or because it's wrong. Rob?
    Close, but incomplete.

    In my storage is the fifth card flipover proof. The so-called "mathematical proof" of my play strategy is simply the math of the games I play with calculated factors incorporated. And I tried to get the wizard's crew together in LV to analyze how I came up with everything, but as I wrote about in GT and elsewhere, they all chickened out in the 11th hour. Other than that, I have never published anything since it would require to be done face-to-face due to its complexity.

  3. #2103
    Originally Posted by ddb1 View Post
    The problem with EV is that you just can't spend it, or even put it in the bank.

    The proceeds (results) from a winning session, be it -EV or +Ev, are gladly accepted everywhere.
    And thus the term "phantom bucks" was invented....

  4. #2104
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    25c thru $1 9/6 job, & 8/5 BP with triple pay for four 7's, which (both) included at least 1.5% in cash back and at least 3% in comps.
    Why 25c through $1? Why not just $1?

    Is that really all you played? Or at least was that at the higher end of what you played? Yeah, I can see why you failed to AP.. How many hours did you play on that?
    Last edited by RS__; 11-05-2016 at 04:30 PM.

  5. #2105
    And why video poker and not table games?

  6. #2106
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Of course, nothing but more claims of superstar anonymity. Once again, you should first provide proof of your identity when making these type of claims by you or for anybody else that you're seeking online kudos for.

    And yet another "successful gambler" in his declining years with a "girlfriend". She have any kids that you call "your son or daughter"?
    Proof of my identity? You've gotta be kidding.

    1) My handle is my name.
    2) I've offered to meet you umpteen times at any parking garage of your choosing (except the Plaza; I gotta have class).
    3) As usual, if you want to place a wager on anything I "claim" here, be my guest. Alan or Dan can officiate the wager. You won't do it, because you'll lose.
    4) This was a small prize, but it was an accomplishment.

    P.S. I took the lead against her after today's games. I had Air Force. She had Army.

  7. #2107
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Why 25c through $1? Why not just $1?

    Is that really all you played? Or at least was that at the higher end of what you played? Yeah, I can see why you failed to AP.. How many hours did you play on that?
    There's plenty of self-proclaimed AP's who only play quarters. I played those 3 denoms depending on what was available where I played. The years were from 1990-1996. These were the best available combo of games and benefits at the time. And please don't talk about progressives and teams and that sort of nonsense. I never needed anyone else's money to gamble with, and progressives were something I never chased because I never had the time it took.

  8. #2108
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    And why video poker and not table games?
    Table games both bore me, and I can't stand many of the people who play them.

  9. #2109
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Proof of my identity? You've gotta be kidding.

    1) My handle is my name.
    2) I've offered to meet you umpteen times at any parking garage of your choosing (except the Plaza; I gotta have class).
    3) As usual, if you want to place a wager on anything I "claim" here, be my guest. Alan or Dan can officiate the wager. You won't do it, because you'll lose.
    4) This was a small prize, but it was an accomplishment.

    P.S. I took the lead against her after today's games. I had Air Force. She had Army.
    You can assume anyone's identity on the internet unless and until you provide documentation with a picture. For instance, jbjb can claim all day long that he's really Phil Ivey, but unless he provides documented proof then it isn't worth beans.

  10. #2110
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    You can assume anyone's identity on the internet unless and until you provide documentation with a picture. For instance, jbjb can claim all day long that he's really Phil Ivey, but unless he provides documented proof then it isn't worth beans.
    Rob, all you have to do is make a wager, my friend. Don't be shy.

  11. #2111
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Table games both bore me, and I can't stand many of the people who play them.
    Fair enough. I don't find them boring though. But I can agree about not standing many of the other players.

    Also, I don't claim to be anyone other than me. I do my thing, it works, and I'm happy with it. I'm not trying to get rich, although we had one great year with a couple stupid dealers who were dealing a certain game completely wrong. As Alan would say, we got "lucky." :-)

  12. #2112
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Rob, all you have to do is make a wager, my friend. Don't be shy.
    Make a wager about what?

    All you have to do is put up a pic of your DL. How difficult could that really be....

  13. #2113
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Fair enough. I don't find them boring though. But I can agree about not standing many of the other players.

    Also, I don't claim to be anyone other than me. I do my thing, it works, and I'm happy with it. I'm not trying to get rich, although we had one great year with a couple stupid dealers who were dealing a certain game completely wrong. As Alan would say, we got "lucky." :-)
    What are you meaning by "dealers who were dealing a game completely wrong"? Is this on BJ?

  14. #2114
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Make a wager about what?

    All you have to do is put up a pic of your DL. How difficult could that really be....
    What's my motivation, Rob? Have you, the king of vp, believe me?

    By the way, Rob stopped posting over at www.gamblingforums after saying I had stolen my identity. I brought up the legal ramifications of accusing someone posting under their real name of a federal crime, and offered to provide ID to the site owners. Rob hasn't been heard from since. Very odd.

  15. #2115
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    There's plenty of self-proclaimed AP's who only play quarters. I played those 3 denoms depending on what was available where I played. The years were from 1990-1996. These were the best available combo of games and benefits at the time. And please don't talk about progressives and teams and that sort of nonsense. I never needed anyone else's money to gamble with, and progressives were something I never chased because I never had the time it took.
    Progressives are usually no good, I agree. Don't need a team if you have plenty of money, except there are other reasons why team play makes sense. Covering more ground at once, lower variance (higher chance of making money instead of straight up losing with +EV, ie bob dancer).

    But it strikes me as odd that you'd play THAT promotion in '90-'96. An extra 250 credits on 7777 adds like 0.8% without strategy change, maybe up to 1% (guess) with strategy changes, if any exist (perhaps 77 over 4-flush, can't think of any others). With 1.5% CB you're looking at a 2% play on $1 denom......which isnt all that great, even by today's standards, IMO.

    Shouldn't be looking to play the best promo at your local/frequent casino, but look for the best promo and go to that casino.

    I hope you had some much better plays back then, for your sake.

  16. #2116
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    You can assume anyone's identity on the internet unless and until you provide documentation with a picture. For instance, jbjb can claim all day long that he's really Phil Ivey, but unless he provides documented proof then it isn't worth beans.
    There was someone on Twitter using my name and tried to impersonate me. Twitter removed them after I complained.

    There is a real problem with posters on the Internet.

  17. #2117
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    What's my motivation, Rob? Have you, the king of vp, believe me?

    By the way, Rob stopped posting over at www.gamblingforums after saying I had stolen my identity. I brought up the legal ramifications of accusing someone posting under their real name of a federal crime, and offered to provide ID to the site owners. Rob hasn't been heard from since. Very odd.
    I thought your true identity had been outed by his crack staff ages ago. I'm confused how someone using an alias is asking someone using their real name for proof.

    A picture of a DL as proof of identity? Man these old guys are out of touch. Give me 10 minutes and I can have any name, face attached to any state DL you want, international if you like. Real enough to pass any internet test.

    The only person on here who has shown actual winnings is Alan as he includes his picture with the win. All others have the same validity, zero.

  18. #2118
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    There was someone on Twitter using my name and tried to impersonate me. Twitter removed them after I complained.

    There is a real problem with posters on the Internet.
    I sold a house last year, while waiting for an offer, a friend of sent me a link to my house posted on craigslist. Yep, they had grabbed pictures and descriptions of the house from the real estate website added their own phone numbers and were looking to scam renters. I shot them an email and told them I was the owner and to take the house down or I would follow up with legal action and then I sent everything off to the police and CL It was removed, but I was left wondering how prevalent the scam is?

    The internet is a cesspool, full of false bravado and scammers.

  19. #2119
    I don't think anyone here is trying to scam another out of any money. I don't see the relevance to anything.

  20. #2120
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    What's my motivation, Rob? Have you, the king of vp, believe me?

    By the way, Rob stopped posting over at www.gamblingforums after saying I had stolen my identity. I brought up the legal ramifications of accusing someone posting under their real name of a federal crime, and offered to provide ID to the site owners. Rob hasn't been heard from since. Very odd.
    Huh? I haven't bothered with that place because it has less traffic than here. Never saw whatever you're saying.

    All your doing is stalling. I ask for proof only because you keep making claims of being somebody that you have never verified, and it seems you so desperately need others to believe what you say. It's way more important to you than it is to me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 23 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 23 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •