And there you have it--mickey making it up in his own inimitable babbling way as the beer bottles pile up on the side. More "blast from the past" nonsense about Nv. that can't be verified today....and more reasons why this internet slug continues to live a life laden with gov't handouts in his declining years. Not really surprising that his rambling piques the interest of no one....
Let's all have a six-pack, some smokes, and celebrate this wonderful moment with good 'ol Rosie Palmer!
Who didn't know you would show up trolling again. Your ignorant blather is not going to stop me from posting up what I know about video poker. Rob when are you ever going to put up even a simple little equation on video poker? Oh yeah, that's right, according to you math doesn't apply to video poker....but Rob's voodoo strategy does. Rob, is ignorance bliss?
Some people write about gaining fortune and fame in gambling. How to hit the bigtime. How to win untold riches. I don't know anything about that because I've never been anything like that. I was a down in the trenches working pro. My main gig, Flush Attacks, from the late nineties into the early 2000's was worth about $40 an hour. You don't get rich working for $40 an hour. And I had to put in the time to get the money.
I can write about the nuts and bolts of these kinds of plays all day long because they were my niche. Not get rich quick stuff. Low risk for a decent reward. That was my style and it still is. I'm still a down in the trenches working pro.
Did I miss something? How did you know where in the flush cycle you were when you sat down at a machine?
Take off that stupid mask you big baby.
While I have confidence in the math as laid out by mickey, RS, and arci, if I really need to pin something down and understand it, I go and ask someone with a doctorate who teaches or has taught college level probability. Then I ask someone else with a doctorate who teaches or has taught college probability. If they agree, I then ask a couple of people who have done stats for professional papers if my understanding makes sense. If the original two math professors don't agree, I keep asking until I have a sense of consensus.
But that's just me.
It speaks to the concept and strategy of loss limits.
Also, RS didn't reveal whether the people who win almost every session are playing a -EV game.
I originally asked about a friend, but looking back RS wrote that he knew some people who win frequently.
They apparently all lose infrequently...almost never...but when they do they lose back all their winnings plus some.
They all play this way?...none are able to stop after losing a fraction of their winnings?
I'm curious about that, that's why I ask.
Last edited by coach belly; 02-03-2017 at 10:58 AM.
There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 19 guests)