Originally Posted by
redietz
Think about the process of obsessing about win goals. I'll borrow from Rob here and assume I can get inside other people's heads. It would go something like this, spread over hours of play.
"I'd like to win x amount, then I'll quit. Unless I win x amount early, then I'll use a fancy stock strategy to try to win more. If I do win x amount, then I need to quit. Oh, I'm losing. Now I need to increase my bets to hit my win goal. Then I'll quit. Wait, I won something. But I'm not at my win goal. I better keep playing. Wait, now I'm losing. What was my win goal? Can I still use a rising strategy to win more? Hold on, I'm losing. What was my stop loss? Was that for one session or two? If I quit for a cup of coffee and a visit to the men's room, I can then start session two. Let's do that. I started session two. I have a clear win goal. Wait, I won. Should I quit? I better use my stock thingy again so I can win more. Or maybe not. Wait, I lost. What was my loss limit?"
As opposed to the AP, whose thought process goes like: "Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz; tough hand -- pull out strategy card, check it -- zzzzzzzzzzzzzz."
Win goals are great if you need to entertain yourself. The win goals don't actually help you win if you're playing negative expectation games unless it reduces your number of hours or hands played. Can you imagine a football team setting win goals and then skipping crucial elements necessary to win? They don't lift, they don't watch film, they don't learn the playbook. But they've set win goals, and by god those goals are helpful! Preparing to win playing video poker entails playing games that have a positive expectation, scouting the games, playing optimally. Setting win goals on negative expectation games is like figuring out how to make the frosting when you're too lazy to bake the cake.