The dawg likes to believe machine players are low-level scum.Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Nice! I didn't now you played UX. Must be a retirement thing. Looks like you have 160K on that machine. But how could that be? According to MDawg the rest of us are broke.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
I never seen $10 denom in a casino.Originally Posted by dannyj
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
What payout percentage was that machine programmed for Rob?
See MDawg a math person does not discriminate.
Ditto. The highest I've ever seen is $2 denom (I guess on the strip they have these in the high limit rooms and in places like Macau)Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI never seen $10 denom in a casino.Originally Posted by dannyj
Odd set up on top. What kin d of casino has higher denom's with a second rate set up, or am I missing something?Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Most casinos don't want the exposure of a flopped full house followed by a flopped royal flush at high denom. In the case of $10 denom I think the flopped royal after a flopped full house would pay 4.8 million.Originally Posted by tableplayDitto. The highest I've ever seen is $2 denom (I guess on the strip they have these in the high limit rooms and in places like Macau)Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI never seen $10 denom in a casino.Originally Posted by dannyj
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
That's exactly right. Imagine the damage that could be done on a UX Bonus Streak after a 10-coin dealt FH (DDB), followed by a ladder of 12X's on each of the ten hands, LOL. That's why I love vulturing UXBS's even though it costs 10 coins per play to access the multipliers and even though it is rarer to find plays since the sum of the multipliers divided by two has to be greater than the # of hands (3,5, or 10 from my experience).Originally Posted by mickeycrimmMost casinos don't want the exposure of a flopped full house followed by a flopped royal flush at high denom. In the case of $10 denom I think the flopped royal after a flopped full house would pay 4.8 million.Originally Posted by tableplayDitto. The highest I've ever seen is $2 denom (I guess on the strip they have these in the high limit rooms and in places like Macau)Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
This photo does not appear legitimate to me. I'm sure the credits are correct but not the dollar value.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The win was $120,000? That would mean about $40,000 was on the machine?
Look at the numeral 6 in the credit total. One 6 is squeezed as you might see in a doctored photo.
Of course if we knew the casino we could easily call to see if the $10 denomination is offered.
Of course it isn't.Originally Posted by AndrewGLong history of this with this poster.
This is such a stupid post it deserves a mocking reply.Originally Posted by AndrewGThis photo does not appear legitimate to me. I'm sure the credits are correct but not the dollar value.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The win was $120,000? That would mean about $40,000 was on the machine?
Look at the numeral 6 in the credit total. One 6 is squeezed as you might see in a doctored photo.
Of course if we knew the casino we could easily call to see if the $10 denomination is offered.
The win wasn't $120,000--it was $120,250. And if you can see that 6 you can see there was OVER $40,000 in credits at the time of the hit.
So explain how the 6 was "doctored". Then explain how the 12025 was doctored in relation to the $10 denomination, because one or both of those would have had to been doctored too. You're as dense as they say you are.
You appear to be implying no machine can have the "incredible" amount of over $40,000 in credits on it. That tells me you have zero consistent experience playing in high limit slot rooms. In this case, it was loaded with a $50k ticket exchanged for cash at the HLR cashier. There's also other possibilities: #1 is the room allows W2G wins to tally up in the machine after you sign.
Finally, have you heard the casinos are all CLOSED, genius. When they re-open call them all. Do your "investigation". You've got time.
More weakness and self-confidence lacking, kew. If you believed that you'd have said it the second you tortured yourself by looking at the picture.Originally Posted by kewlJOf course it isn't.Originally Posted by AndrewG
Should we do a poll and see who believes your little picture and who doesn't?Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
And the timing was completely expected. I have been expecting this for a couple weeks now. You are feeling completely irrelevant again, with MDawg stealing the spotlight. You are just way beyond predictable Singer.
This jackpot could easily have been at the $1 denomination then doctored to show a $10 denomination.
Make it simple for us. Since you're indicating this was indeed a brick and mortar casino which one was it?
Aren't there websites which report the availability of various games and denominations? The availability of a $10 UX game should easily be confirmed.
So now, after I coached you, the Total Credits AND the Denomination have been doctored?Originally Posted by AndrewG
Why don't you just ask for the W2G? Again, the casinos are closed. Have you heard? And how much are you paying to see it? Just for your amount of thickness and animosity, we're close to five figure territory.
What is it with you people--are you THAT much of a loser(s) and THAT jealous that other people win? If I had said "it was a nice hot and win but the session was an overall $10k loser" there'd be none of this "doctored" nonsense, etc.
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 03-31-2020 at 12:05 PM.
Just tell us the name of the casino. It would be simple to find out if $10 UX is offered. No need for a W2.
When it comes to credibility, I would go with Trump, over Singer. Ha.
Rob has already been thru all this. Remember the $25 denom pic he put up? He was accused of doctoring the pic. That that particular game didn't have $25 denom. I think they found it at Wynn Las Vegas. So Rob was proven right at least that the game and denom existed.
Also, it looks like we have a problem with AndrewG being Alan Mendelson. I don't think Alan would be making these charges against Rob. He didn't over the $25 denom pic. IIRC, Alan actually supported Rob on it.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Why is it you so desperately need something like that? It's called the Mahogany Room by a few of us. Go find it.Originally Posted by AndrewG
That hit was a $100k AAAAkicker on TDBP. The accusation was the same--the $25 denom designator was doctored because it was off-center. Alan went to Wynn and found that's exactly the way it looked on that machine.Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I don't know who's who here--just going by what others say because it's not important to me.
I'm not a high roller and I certainly don't know any Mahogany Room. So help a poor fella out. What's the name of the casino? What's there to hide... or play games about?
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
