Silly, obviously misguided and grossly inexperienced stuff. You can tell that rap came from a self-proclaimed "AP" who's never had a winning year. Kinda like the wizard--only he's not an anonymous coward.
Silly, obviously misguided and grossly inexperienced stuff. You can tell that rap came from a self-proclaimed "AP" who's never had a winning year. Kinda like the wizard--only he's not an anonymous coward.
jbjb "claims": I've got plenty of $12k hits too, so what?
Here's what: think back about how many times you've said you "only play vp and usually nickels at that" when "I'm out there vulturing (yes, I know--a really stupid term) for good plays on table games".
And here's what else: you always show how SORE you get over people who hit big winners. We all have to be losers for you to even begin to be able to deal with it. Oh that's right....unless we're "AP's".
Moving up in denomination with hot cycle
I experienced a hot cycle yesterday. It started at a craps table when I was the shooter. I hit the ALL at Caesars with $25 on each position plus it was a lengthy roll with lots of repeaters and pressing. The last number needed was the 10 which I considered "laying" for about $3000 -- about $1,000 of which was profit -- but I'm glad I didn't. It came 6-4.
Next to video poker where I had a long cold cycle. I couldn't get a quad and couldn't even get a full house. I went thru about $2,000 and I was lucky if I got two pair at 8/5 Bonus.
Then I hit my first quad -- 8s. Then came 9s and Kings. Suddenly I said to myself "this is a Rob Singer hot cycle" and I moved up in denomination. In fact I moved way up. Then I hit quad 7s and some full houses and then... my second royal flush of the year. Yep, I've only had two royals so far this year but this one came after holding just two cards. It came on my favorite machine at Caesars which is the machine I got my 100k royal on last year which also came in hearts.
I will post the photo of this royal when I'm at a computer -- can't do it with my cell phone.
Sure I know that there really isn't such a thing as hot and cold cycles... but it's funny how we think there are.
Oh jbjb -- don't worry, I still don't have a profit.
Congratulations, Alan. I want to see that baby.
Oh, and I'll say what I did to regnis. Put a couple bucks on LSU to win the SEC.
Alan, since you believe in this "hot and cold" garbage and the infamous "18 yos in a row", we already know you're delusional. Must be whatever meds you're on.
Again, quit your media career and play -EV craps and VP and rely on nothing else and we'll see where you're at in five years. I'm sure you'll throw in some lame excuse not to like you always do.
Why so nasty?Originally Posted by jbjb
He's nasty because now that he knows what's coming and from whom, he can concentrate his losing gambler's hatred and jealousy right where it feels best, so he can cope with the punch in the gut that it is.
You hit a $400k royal this time, Alan?
Nope. Just another $100k.Originally Posted by RS__
Nice.
You must be the luckiest person out here, or play a whole hell of a lot more than you lead on. A royal always nice though (on single line that is).
This was my second time playing a $25/coin game. It was a multi denomination machine. Had I still been playing at the $5 level it would have been a $20,000 royal. On this machine the same cards show on all three levels which are $5, $10 and $25.
Alan's not a regular denominational climber, but I've been one for years. I also only have two $100k hits--in a lot more hands of $25 vp though than he's played. However, I remain far ahead at that denomination because the higher in denomination I play within my strategy, the less hands get played, and I have other "smaller" big winners to go along with the two.
Alan has't just been lucky, he's been extremely lucky--and good luck is, as I've been trying to pound into hard vp heads for years, the ONLY way any regular player can and will ever win over any amount of time. And if there is any skill at all required beyond having a basic knowledge of poker and how to operate the machines, it's in understanding the roles proper bankroll, proper games, and good discipline play in your aspirations to be a consistent winner.
RS__ is already eluding to the hope that you play--and by design, lose--a "hell of a lot more than you lead on" Alan. In other words, you can see the envy just oozing from his thin skin as he types. Clearly, you're yet someone else here who just doesn't cooperate with the sacred math models. Such a thing must be very disturbing to people who the more they play, the more they lose. And they just can't stop playing.
Rob, there's another way to say "sacred math models." The word is "math."
Perhaps you could explain how "math" is wrong. Take your time and understand there are major corporations out there that will pay you way, way more than any 400K royal for demonstrating that "math" is incorrect.
Alan, congrats on the big winner. Don't spend it all on the same babe. Spread it around.
And guys, I middled that game I mentioned in this thread a few posts back -- the -12/+17 Kansas State/Stanford game. But nary a congrats. How about a three cheers or something? It's hard to middle a game.
Middling a game involves betting both sides, risking the vigorish on one side, and winning both bets. It's a fine thing.
A Bronx cheer for the ditz... three rasberries!Originally Posted by redietz
Bad form, ditz, trying to one-up your one-armed donkey pal.
But you're still a long way from the bet-posting big leagues...
"Boz's Football Bets
Season O/U's to start
10 million on Tampa over 6 1/2 wins
30 million on Arizona under 10 wins
40 million on Cleveland over 5 wins
Sorry no tickets to show, just believe me and ride along."
Originally Posted by redietz
Coach, if you really thought I didn't do stuff, one assumes you would have taken me up on my offer to verify all claims made here at the meager wager of 1K per claim. Or do I need to post a partial resume for you again?
I mentioned what I did because regnis asked about LSU odds. I'm in the same contests as last year, so if you want to follow along, I'm sure you can locate them with your fine research skills. Of course, that would require looking at last year's results:
1) Won Heritage Sports' race to the SuperBowl Contest. Don't believe me? Call them. This contest had thousands of entrants.
2) Finished third (technically, I lost a tiebreaker for second) in Northbet's Pick the Pros Contest. Don't believe me? Call them. Again, this contest had thousands of entrants.
3) Finished second in Linemasters bowl contest.
4) Won Heritage's Race to the Super Bowl weekly prize. I know, against thousands of entrants. Sorry to repeat myself.
5) Won Northbet's weekly prize.
6) Had winning record in invitation-only Wise Guys contest. I am, as they say in the blurbs, a past champion.
But that's all history. Here we go again, moving forward.
Coach, thanks for the opportunity to mention this stuff. It does indeed belong in Big Casino Wins if you count offshore casinos.
Last edited by redietz; 09-04-2016 at 09:56 AM.
I love this reasoning: Even tho I went thru a $2000 cold streak, and then upped my denom on an apparent hot streak, I know there is no such thing. Sounds like a Hillary quote.
Once again, you're incorrectly saying I claim that the math is wrong. And all that simply means is you've never paid attention--or you don't want to hear the right wording because it's somehow uncomfortable to you.Originally Posted by redietz
How many times have you seen Alan explain how I've detailed the amount of EV I sacrifice when I give big winning hands the opportunity to be hit over the secondary winners? How often have you seen me say I play negative EV games almost exclusively because few 100%+ games remain, and I don't ever add self-valued slot club fluff into my results the way every "math guy" does in order to theoretically justify playing vp these days? And how often have I said that NO ONE will EVER beat the math the casinos hold as a constant advantage without being consistently lucky?
Your problem with me lies in my reported results. You believe I've rewritten the math books because I have won every year since I left the AP world. You think it can't happen, yet you refuse to understand that no matter how specific the math models are, our playing time at any machine is not required to be bounded by the terms of the model. Probability theory has no idea where any particular machine is at in its lifelong cycle when we're playing it, and anything can and does happen. Sometimes bad, yes, but when you increase in denomination and game volatility while giving the session-ending winners more opportunities to appear via the special plays--REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY LESS HANDS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT PLAY BECAUSE OF THEM--you will experience far more winning and far more large hits and bigger winners than large losses.
It's all about luck red--always has been. If you can find any of these math professors who can confirm what I do is because I've twisted the math around, bring him or her on here. When the strategy was developed the math supported the basic models. We used factoring to determine the most probable outcomes. That is the only part that could be questioned. I stand by it though, based on my consistent winning. Why wouldn't I?
Bill Yung already tried to research your claims and couldn't find anything about you anywhere on the web.Originally Posted by redietz
So go right ahead and post links to the current contests, or a link to verify any of your claims.
Otherwise your claims remain, obviously, unsubstantiated...just like that one-armed retard who you befriended (and fed information to) here when he was known as the Texas jackass.
You're dodo birds of the same feather...always seeking attention and approval.
Go for it, ditz.
Originally Posted by redietz
Last edited by coach belly; 09-04-2016 at 02:42 PM.
LOL -- you mean unsubstantiated to you, coach. That's fine with me. If you're so interested, do the research.Originally Posted by coach belly
Thousands of people saw the results last year. If you're not one of them, so be it. My heart is breaking.
Unless, of course, you'd like to make those wagers I suggested -- 1 K on all claims, to be verified by Alan or Dan. Hell, I only listed six things in this post. That's a measly 6K for a high roller like yourself.
I await your wagers, my friend. Set it up, baby.
P.S. "Always seeking attention and approval?" Coach, at least get my personal history correct. I was posting here for four years and 2000 posts before I even mentioned any of this stuff. That's doesn't quite fit the definition of "always." Or maybe you'd like to correct your statement. Go ahead, my friend, research it.
Last edited by redietz; 09-04-2016 at 02:49 PM.
I followed the math. It was full pay 8/5 Bonus Poker. I didn't care that it was $25 per tier point because I don't play for comps.
There are currently 20 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 20 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote