The most interesting aspect of the Casino Catfishing thread is that Rob made the comment that his government training enabled him to render polygraph testing inconclusive.

Now what is the point of that comment? If Rob's truth-telling, he'd have no motive for rendering results inconclusive. Rob, are you saying that somehow anything you answer on a polygraph shows as inconclusive, whether you want it to or not? Or what exactly are you saying?

I guess we could find out.

I still think a polygraph is the best way to examine these questions. If Rob's lying tests as inconclusive, well, good for him. If his truth-telling tests as inconclusive, well, that's a shame, because I frankly want to believe him.