Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 101 to 119 of 119

Thread: Jumping the Shark

  1. #101
    All you have to do arci is explain your own code, you know, prove what you claim, because what you say in posts is not what you claim is clear in the code. Or is that in my storage shed as well?

  2. #102
    So, it appears speedo is now admitting he cannot understand the code. One must then ask why he was making assertions about what the code did or did not do. Why didn't he ask me to explain the code right away? The answer is obvious, he never thinks before he spews his lies. That is why he gets caught so often.

    Here's a clue for speedo. There's a label called "reset_level". That is the point where the code returns when a big win causes a reset to a previous label. I already told you about the "pocketed" variable where the 40 credit wins are saved. There's also a variable called "softwin" which is used to temporarily hold a win until the code determines how many levels to go back.

    Of course, none of this is going to help a dufus who doesn't understand squat about programming.

  3. #103
    This programming and code talk is getting me too hot. Gonna sign off and go wake my wife.

  4. #104
    Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
    So, it appears speedo is now admitting he cannot understand the code. One must then ask why he was making assertions about what the code did or did not do. Why didn't he ask me to explain the code right away? The answer is obvious, he never thinks before he spews his lies. That is why he gets caught so often.

    Here's a clue for speedo. There's a label called "reset_level". That is the point where the code returns when a big win causes a reset to a previous label. I already told you about the "pocketed" variable where the 40 credit wins are saved. There's also a variable called "softwin" which is used to temporarily hold a win until the code determines how many levels to go back.

    Of course, none of this is going to help a dufus who doesn't understand squat about programming.
    Was it nerves that caused that ramble and the namecalling, or was it you thinking someone else cares what you're lying about this time? Besides, whenever you do lie or lose it and start calling me names, I simply smile as I think of my healthy, fully functional wife!....vs., well, one guess will do the trick.

    Me a programmer? Aren't those the guys who got their pants pulled down and were shoved into the girls' locker room in high school? Of course, we always hid their slide rules from them when they got thrown back out, then watched as the crocodile tears came streaming down.
    Anyway, even after I explained the entire structure to you, you still can't get your lies right about what you claim is in there. That is so funny. The 40 credits is a baseline and your "wordsmithing" explains nothing about how many go where, when, anything over 40 and not "40" as you seem to be stuck on, or their values. Your "reset_level" and other obscure nonsense was only inserted to make believe you know more than you do...what else is new.

    As anal as you are, you'll keep trying, so I don't have to command you to
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 05-25-2013 at 10:18 PM.

  5. #105
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Your code shows nothing even close to how, when, and where the 40+ credits are "pocketed", and it ignores multiple levels of recovery. You're having trouble with this so let me help. You lose 400 credits on levels 1,2,&3 ($3200) with no cashouts. On level 4 (the $10 level in my case) you lose the 100 credits ($1000) with no cashouts on BP. You are now down $4200. You then lose 145 credits on $10 SDBP--vp's most superior game--still with no session cashouts yet, and you are now down $5650. On your next hand, you are dealt 7s 8d Jc Qs 4h. Now, because of the very slightly advantageous special play opportunity presented, you hold only the Jc, three more J's are drawn, and you have a $6000 hit.

    You were down $5700 at the inception of your winning hand. Now you are UP $300. But how did you apply that $6000? That's what's important here, because it dictates how you'll proceed to your $2500 minimum session win goal. Almost everyone believes you "pocket" the $6k into the soft profit pool and play on at the $10 SDBP level with the remaining 150 credits before going to the $25 level. But because SPS was developed with mini-win goals being as important as the overall session win goal, this $6000 hit brings you BACK DOWN to the $2 BP level since your big hit allowed you to recover the $2500 lost on the $10 level, the $2000 lost at the $5 level, and the $800 lost at the $2 level, PLUS you are able to put at least 40 credits (70 @ the $10 level, or $700) into the soft profit pool. You cannot go back to $1 because with the recovery, there would not have been the ability to put at least 40 credits ($400) into soft profit. This is very important, and it is unlikely anyone who programmed punch cards could do anything more than try to pretend you understand it---just like you did with your unintelligible nonsense here on the other steps that stupify the "tested genius".

    You made a fool out of yourself. The only reason SPS was developed was to win any given single session. You're clearly out of your league here. BTW, this is a holiday weekend. I hope you saved time to get another gourmet meal for home at KFC

    And #5: that jibberish has nothing to do with how the strategy is played. You skip the $100 level if you lost thru the $100 level in the preceeding session, or two of the last four; and you skip it if, after losing in THIS session thru the $25 level, your avg. profit remains at least $2500 per session played YTD.
    I really love it when this gets going. I understand a little more each day as I prepare for the day I get the required bankroll free and clear. Can't wait for the third book, but I understand all the steps were in "What's wrong with a positive progression" on the vptruth site.

  6. #106
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Of course, we always hid their slide rules
    Just in case some of our younger readers don't know what a slide rule is, I posted a photo of my slide rule from elementary school below. It is the AcuMath slide rule, which I am guessing my Uncle Eddie (an engineer for the City of New York) got me as a gift when I was in the fourth grade which was probably around 1960-61. Uncle Eddie also taught me to play chess and introduced me to Dannon Coffee Yogurt which I still eat to this day.

    Name:  20130525_232624.jpg
Views: 898
Size:  91.5 KB

  7. #107
    I clearly ruffled poor speedos feathers. It is so obvious that he is trying to scramble out of the embarrassment he feels for making claims that I easily destroyed. The funny thing is he makes a long drawn out childish attempt to attack me which is nothing but name calling. He could have used the word nerd or geek to accomplish the same thing.

    BTW, given speedos proclivity to project I suspect he is actually relating an experience of his own. Maybe that's why his development was arrested and he still acts like a grade schooler. Chuckle, chuckle.

  8. #108
    This is a real giggle Alan has his pants on, RS and the missus are going for a 3 mile hike up at beautiful Lake Tahoe today, and arci....poor arci. Not only can't he explain his own code he claims to have used to run simulations--he has to wash his own pants, and he's never gonna do anything "together" again. Tsk tsk tsk....such P-A-I-N, and such sweet justice!

    Guess it's back to the drawing board arci--lots of time awaits!!

  9. #109
    You know Singer is feeling sick. He always tries to claim things about my life that he fantasizes about. Unfortunately, he fails miserably. My wife and I went for a couple of walks last week and played cards with friends. We are playing cards again next week. I also bowled once and played 3 rounds of golf. Oh, I'll also hit the casino once.

    I suspect much of it has to do with his living a miserable existence. gnaw, gnaw.

  10. #110
    Arc, let me ask you this: the rest of us have Rob all figured out. Why do you stoop to his level?

    Rob: knock it off already. The rest of us are bored with your back and forth with Arc.

  11. #111
    I will be washing my own pants later today. I'm sure this has something to do with my failings as a gambler, but I'm at a loss as to exactly what those are.

    Should I be hiring someone to wash my pants?
    Should they be dry cleaned instead?
    Is it worse if I wash my own underwear?
    How about if I wear women's underwear?

    I think these kinds of questions bring into focus the level of gambling expertise available on this site. Here I am, after 40 years in the biz, and I had no idea my pants were a dead giveaway to my level of gambling expertise.

    Thank God for Rob Argentino for helping me grasp the relevance of washing my pants.

  12. #112
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Anyway, even after I explained the entire structure to you, you still can't get your lies right about what you claim is in there. That is so funny. The 40 credits is a baseline and your "wordsmithing" explains nothing about how many go where, when, anything over 40 and not "40" as you seem to be stuck on, or their values. Your "reset_level" and other obscure nonsense was only inserted to make believe you know more than you do...what else is new.
    I thought I'd get back to this as ... once again speedo shows his true capabilities. Here's what the code does:

    if (softwin >= subgoal)

    Notice there is no mention of "40". The amount is input to the program. Hence, I can run the simulation with 40, 41 or 50 or whatever. And, notice the ">=" ... it does exactly the check that speedo asserted simply by specifying the wanted value as input.

    Once again we see my program does exactly what speedo claims his system does. This is getting more hilarious everyday. The more he tries to attack my simulation the more evidence he provides that it does exactly what he claims his system does. You gotta love it.

    Of course, an intelligent person would wonder what is so special about "40". Is it something just picked out of the air? If you run the program with different values this becomes clear. The ER is exactly the same for any value. The only thing that changes is the percentage of session wins. It is another example of a magical elixir that brings nothing to the table and adds complexity. The only possible reason to add needless complexity is to fool people into thinking the system is more than just silly nonsense. Looks like speedo failed again. Chuckle, chuckle.

  13. #113
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I will be washing my own pants later today. I'm sure this has something to do with my failings as a gambler, but I'm at a loss as to exactly what those are.

    Should I be hiring someone to wash my pants?
    Should they be dry cleaned instead?
    Is it worse if I wash my own underwear?
    How about if I wear women's underwear?

    I think these kinds of questions bring into focus the level of gambling expertise available on this site. Here I am, after 40 years in the biz, and I had no idea my pants were a dead giveaway to my level of gambling expertise.

    Thank God for Rob Argentino for helping me grasp the relevance of washing my pants.
    Red-don't let them hijack this thread. I may have to wash my pants some day. Do you use bleach or a softener? Anything special I should know? Warm or cold cycle?

  14. #114
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Just in case some of our younger readers don't know what a slide rule is, I posted a photo of my slide rule from elementary school below. It is the AcuMath slide rule, which I am guessing my Uncle Eddie (an engineer for the City of New York) got me as a gift when I was in the fourth grade which was probably around 1960-61. Uncle Eddie also taught me to play chess and introduced me to Dannon Coffee Yogurt which I still eat to this day.

    Name:  20130525_232624.jpg
Views: 898
Size:  91.5 KB
    Our high school math/algebra/calculus teacher had a huge slide rule that spanned almost 1/3 of the back wall where the blackboard was. I loved to watch him go through all the problems of our homework by working the giant sliderule as he talked.

  15. #115
    Mrs. Quinn would have whacked us with that.

  16. #116
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Arc, let me ask you this: the rest of us have Rob all figured out. Why do you stoop to his level?

    Rob: knock it off already. The rest of us are bored with your back and forth with Arc.
    Oh Alan, I do it because he enjoys it! You can tell how much it means to him with how he makes up "walks" when one of them rolls, and then brings up playing cards as if it were like a vacation. I am his BFF. It gives him an escape, and he can say whatever makes him feel good. The ONLY reason he's here is because I'm here, obviously. Don't make him have buyer's remorse

  17. #117
    Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
    I thought I'd get back to this as ... once again speedo shows his true capabilities. Here's what the code does:

    if (softwin >= subgoal)

    Notice there is no mention of "40". The amount is input to the program. Hence, I can run the simulation with 40, 41 or 50 or whatever. And, notice the ">=" ... it does exactly the check that speedo asserted simply by specifying the wanted value as input.

    Once again we see my program does exactly what speedo claims his system does. This is getting more hilarious everyday. The more he tries to attack my simulation the more evidence he provides that it does exactly what he claims his system does. You gotta love it.

    Of course, an intelligent person would wonder what is so special about "40". Is it something just picked out of the air? If you run the program with different values this becomes clear. The ER is exactly the same for any value. The only thing that changes is the percentage of session wins. It is another example of a magical elixir that brings nothing to the table and adds complexity. The only possible reason to add needless complexity is to fool people into thinking the system is more than just silly nonsense. Looks like speedo failed again. Chuckle, chuckle.
    Yes....you certainly did need to "give this another thought" showing how much your bothered by not being to understand it Your ramble as usual makes no sense and has nothing to do with what I spelled out to you in plain English. It is just so funny that, even after clearly explaining everything to you, you still have to lie about it as you comically stumble thru trying to match it to your "code". Sooo funny....

  18. #118
    Bwah haha haha haha haha

    Good old speedo can't refute a single thing I said so in his obvious distress he projects "you still have to lie" which perfectly describes his response. Singer is a projection machine.

    Bwah haha haha haha haha

  19. #119
    Why, I'm your BFF arci....try to control yourself!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •