I don't know how to put this in any simpler, clearer way, and I think it puts things in this forum in perspective. The forum host, Alan Mendelson, does not win gambling. He has made this clear by his own admission. He has been gambling for decades, and he does not win gambling.

So I ask the simple question -- why would anyone expect someone who has not won and does not win to provide them with insights on how to win? That kind of expectation is kind of silly.

Expecting Alan Mendelson to be able to evaluate gambling systems and the math of gambling is somewhat irrational. I mean, do you ask coaches who have lost way more than they've won the secrets of winning coaching? Do you ask doctors whose patients die for the best methods of treatment?

There's a bizarro world aspect to this -- if Alan endorses a gambling system, it's probably a bad one. Otherwise, he'd be winning.