Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: New Rule For Vegas

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Why do some people act as if CET is the only "gambling provider" in the known universe
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Why is it that whenever casinos are discussed here it's almost exclusively CET properties?
    Two peas in the same pod, or the same pea? It has to make you wonder??

  2. #22
    At least we've found a way to keep you away from Rincon for a few moments in your day....

  3. #23
    I am going to the Magic Show Saturday night. I love magic. I think a great magic trick would be making Rob disappear.

    But wait... I don't need a cape, or a black hat, or a cane to make Rob disappear! All I need to do is push a button. Yes!

    I can do that! I have the magic finger that can push the magic button! Abracadabra, prestro, kaboom!

    I think tomorrow I'm going to do some finger exercises... just to get ready.

  4. #24
    Maybe as fast as your money disappears at CET?

  5. #25
    Rob do you realize that you have admitted to losing more money in one session of video poker than 90 percent of Americans earn in a year and more than I lost playing VP over perhaps five years?

  6. #26
    Gold
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    322
    Well, it was a great weekend in Vegas. We went for the tv offer and I got lucky on the video poker. Had a Royal dealt to me on quarters and I hit a jackpot on a slot machine.


  7. #27
    Nash, congratulations on the dealt royal.

    As rare as dealt royals are (one in 649,739) they do hit. I was dealt a royal twice in my life, and I've seen two players at Rincon in the last year who were dealt royals.

  8. #28
    Gold
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    322
    Thanks Alan. That's my 3rd. Had one on dollars at Harrah's Vegas and one at Rincon at few months ago and now this one at Caesars.

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Rob do you realize that you have admitted to losing more money in one session of video poker than 90 percent of Americans earn in a year and more than I lost playing VP over perhaps five years?
    And I also bought an RV that I paid more than 15 times the average new RV price. Why? BECAUSE I KNOW HOW TO CONSISTENTLY WIN, and part of that is due to being able to play higher limits than the majority of players.

    There's plenty of people with RV's that cost over a million and even two million dollars. It doesn't bother me Alan. Quit being worried over my losing $33,000 once, and look at the big picture. How about comparing my overall winnings over the years, which is now about $1.1million not counting my disastrous ap years, to how much people make working or how much you might have won?

  10. #30
    Be careful Rob, because you are opening up yourself to criticism with statements such as these:

    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    There's plenty of people with RV's that cost over a million and even two million dollars.
    With the exception of a couple of well known Hollywood stars, these mega RV owners also have mega mansions to go with their RVs.

    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Quit being worried over my losing $33,000 once,
    If I recall, you've written about even bigger losses.

    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    How about comparing my overall winnings over the years, which is now about $1.1million not counting my disastrous ap years, to how much people make working or how much you might have won?
    Unfortunately Rob you cannot separate your "disastrous ap years" from the $1.1 million you won using the Singer methods. That would be like me talking about that one session at Rincon three years ago when I hit quad aces with a kicker for $10k and a half hour later hit the progressive for $36K and separating it from the next three months when I lost and lost and lost.

    And while I don't doubt your wins you will also face the skeptics.

    I've been following VP author John Grochowski for years, and while he has written about hitting royals and winning at video poker, he has had a very successful career without ever claiming any dollar amounts. In fact, I think the royals he talks about were all 25-cent, single line.

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Be careful Rob, because you are opening up yourself to criticism with statements such as these:
    With the exception of a couple of well known Hollywood stars, these mega RV owners also have mega mansions to go with their RVs.
    If I recall, you've written about even bigger losses.
    Unfortunately Rob you cannot separate your "disastrous ap years" from the $1.1 million you won using the Singer methods. That would be like me talking about that one session at Rincon three years ago when I hit quad aces with a kicker for $10k and a half hour later hit the progressive for $36K and separating it from the next three months when I lost and lost and lost.
    And while I don't doubt your wins you will also face the skeptics.

    I've been following VP author John Grochowski for years, and while he has written about hitting royals and winning at video poker, he has had a very successful career without ever claiming any dollar amounts. In fact, I think the royals he talks about were all 25-cent, single line.
    I don't get the point about the rich. They have big homes and the fanciest of RV's. I'm not wealthy so we bought what we could afford. Just like anyone would. ??

    Not surprising that you can't remember $33k as my single biggest session loss ever. But maybe I'm wrong on that. You've never been able to get your focus off that and onto how other things happen much more often. Like a $49700 winning trip perhaps?

    OK, subtract $250k from $1.1million.

    Your point on Grochowski proves mine. He writes about winning just as I do. He wins small because that's probably all he can afford. No problem with that. I win bigger because I play bigger. And I'm sure there are bigger players and winners out there because they have more money than me. I don't let that bother me. Why be bothered about me?

  12. #32
    I'm not bothered. As I wrote above "Be careful Rob, because you are opening up yourself to criticism with statements such as these:"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •