Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Thread: A reminder about the high limit room at Wynn

  1. #1
    This is an open email to all Forum members:

    If you happen to be in the vicinity of the Wynn casinos in Vegas, please stop in to the high limit slots area and if you can snap a photo of the video poker machines that show a $25 denomination.

    We are interested in how the $25 denomination appears in the "oval" similar to the photo below. If you don't want to post the photo yourself, please send me a Private Message and I will give you an email address to send it to me.

    The reason we are interested in the appearance of the $25 in the oval is because of allegations that a particular jackpot photo was bogus and the image of the denomination was altered.

    Thanks.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    I wonder why redietz didn't just do this. Was it because the high limit room at Wynn wasn't up to snuff for all his high roller clients?

    Alan, you'll need to do this task yourself. None of the paupers here can afford walking into Wynn, let alone the trip to LV.Besides, which of these tunas would have the courage to post a picture of any machine in there with a non-centered $25 decal? Then, we'll need one of these geniuses to explain how I got the perfectly fitted $100,000 verification screen to overlay the hit. So funny....

  3. #3
    Dang, I was at Wynn (well, Encore) on the 25th and 26th. I walked through the high limit room and saw several high limit slots, but wasn't paying attention enough to notice a $25 video poker. Probably because I know I'll never be able to play them.

    As for those who think they can't afford to stay at Wynn, don't be so sure. We played slots there for about 2 hours one day last August, 2 players on the same card. We earned 300 points which was enough to get us a free buffet for 2. It didn't take long and they were sending us letters for mid-week comps with $150 free play. We used it this week for 2 nights and was offered a 3rd day with an additional $50 free play, but couldn't stay longer. We chose Encore over Wynn as they are all suites. Had a great time. Didn't have to pay the resort fee, but did use the internet for $13.99.

    Expecting the machines at Wynn/Encore to be tight, I actually held my own there. They tend to be highly volatile machines, but larger payouts. Since I went with the idea to loose, I actually came out ahead.

  4. #4
    Left the Wynn this evening. Stopped by the high limit room and noticed the $25 machines. The symbol is 100% OFF center.

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    Left the Wynn this evening. Stopped by the high limit room and noticed the $25 machines. The symbol is 100% OFF center.
    Thank you.

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by jbatdorf View Post
    Dang, I was at Wynn (well, Encore) on the 25th and 26th. I walked through the high limit room and saw several high limit slots, but wasn't paying attention enough to notice a $25 video poker. Probably because I know I'll never be able to play them.

    As for those who think they can't afford to stay at Wynn, don't be so sure. We played slots there for about 2 hours one day last August, 2 players on the same card. We earned 300 points which was enough to get us a free buffet for 2. It didn't take long and they were sending us letters for mid-week comps with $150 free play. We used it this week for 2 nights and was offered a 3rd day with an additional $50 free play, but couldn't stay longer. We chose Encore over Wynn as they are all suites. Had a great time. Didn't have to pay the resort fee, but did use the internet for $13.99.

    Expecting the machines at Wynn/Encore to be tight, I actually held my own there. They tend to be highly volatile machines, but larger payouts. Since I went with the idea to loose, I actually came out ahead.
    Wynn/Encore has always been a fairly easy comp for those not afraid to go in there. So your experience seems to be spot-on to what I've known and had many others tell me. The scary part is the prices in the restaurants, at their bars, and how they do not comp drinks at the bars even if playing vp at $50/hand. It's as if Steve Wynn built these places for foreigners who get their five or six week "holidays" each year and flock to the properties not really caring how much they piss away on food or drinks, because they can't get anything like it where they come from.

  7. #7
    BTW, does anybody think they'll ever see mickeycrimm Nv. or LV again, let alone Wynn?

  8. #8
    I made a quick trip to the Wynn casino when I was in Las Vegas for a short time and I went into the high limit room and took a photo that confirms that the $25 symbol is off center. See the photo below.

    And compare it to the original photo posted by Rob. Rob's original photo appears first. My photo taken at the Wynn is below Rob's.

    Attached Images Attached Images  

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I made a quick trip to the Wynn casino when I was in Las Vegas for a short time and I went into the high limit room and took a photo that confirms that the $25 symbol is off center. See the photo below.

    And compare it to the original photo posted by Rob. Rob's original photo appears first. My photo taken at the Wynn is below Rob's.

    Do you think there will ever be an apology forthcoming from eddie? Or will he prefer to continue to be stunned by the truth? And how about all-logic, no-BS, it's-all-just-a-fabrication Mr. Spock. Imagine how stupid he feels right now.....

  10. #10
    Why would anyone apologize or feel stupid? The image looked odd before, and still does now. The only thing this proves is that IGT doesn't appear to be very particular about the quality of their graphics, which I do find surprising.

    And none of this makes any difference with the REAL issue surrounding this image, the one you keep trying to ignore:

    That image was used to support your claim that it was won in early February of 2014 but the file name on the image clearly shows that the picture was actually taken in mid January.

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    Why would anyone apologize or feel stupid? The image looked odd before, and still does now. The only thing this proves is that IGT doesn't appear to be very particular about the quality of their graphics, which I do find surprising.

    And none of this makes any difference with the REAL issue surrounding this image, the one you keep trying to ignore:

    That image was used to support your claim that it was won in early February of 2014 but the file name on the image clearly shows that the picture was actually taken in mid January.
    You're funny Spock. This one bothered you, so you jumped into damage control mode in a flash. Usually, you comb thru, study, and bide your time while trying to come up with your stupid conspiracy theories about my wins. Your "photoshopped" theory and eddie's "altered" silliness got shot down by the undeniable truth, so you divert and deflect that into criticizing IGT which means absolutely nothing here. It's all about sour grapes and you know it. So whatcha got left? Time travelling. Get over it, and wise up. If I really hit it in Jan. instead of Feb., just think of how much more time I'd have had to win even more, which would have burned you up no end!

  12. #12
    Actually the photo and confirmation of the $25 graphic proves nothing except that's how the graphic looks at Wynn.

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Actually the photo and confirmation of the $25 graphic proves nothing except that's how the graphic looks at Wynn.
    But that doesn't stop Robbie from throwing in another round of insults.

  14. #14
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Actually the photo and confirmation of the $25 graphic proves nothing except that's how the graphic looks at Wynn.
    If that's REALLY the case Alan, then why didn't you go to Mandalay Bay or Treasure Island and take a picture of their $25 graphics instead? Oh wait....BINGO! It's because I hit the winner at Wynn!

    Now we get to sum this up: Alan's claim of "inconsistencies" took another hit, as did the entire case from the two dufuses. So rather than capitulate to the facts, Alan prefers to keep the silly controversy going, and he does so only because he just can't come to grips with how I don't sit for hours and hours like he does, losing, after hitting big winners.

    Calling regnis! You see my friend, this is the stuff I love. People in obvious pain over someone who's outperformed even their collective dreams. These are weak people who give themselves no chance whatsoever of ever overcoming the flaw. I gave them a chance, yet they prefer to writhe in agony instead of accept that which they do not want to and could never conceive of accepting. So instead of fighting it, I mock them. And after a while, I start to enjoy it. So sit back, relax, and enjoy! (unless, of course, forum etiquette and addiction is the end all in your life too--which I highly doubt)

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    If that's REALLY the case Alan, then why didn't you go to Mandalay Bay or Treasure Island and take a picture of their $25 graphics instead? Oh wait....BINGO! It's because I hit the winner at Wynn!

    Now we get to sum this up: Alan's claim of "inconsistencies" took another hit, as did the entire case from the two dufuses. So rather than capitulate to the facts, Alan prefers to keep the silly controversy going, and he does so only because he just can't come to grips with how I don't sit for hours and hours like he does, losing, after hitting big winners.

    Calling regnis! You see my friend, this is the stuff I love. People in obvious pain over someone who's outperformed even their collective dreams. These are weak people who give themselves no chance whatsoever of ever overcoming the flaw. I gave them a chance, yet they prefer to writhe in agony instead of accept that which they do not want to and could never conceive of accepting. So instead of fighting it, I mock them. And after a while, I start to enjoy it. So sit back, relax, and enjoy! (unless, of course, forum etiquette and addiction is the end all in your life too--which I highly doubt)
    Ahhh more insults. Now there's something new. Hey Alan, this "ignoring" stuff is working like a charm

  16. #16
    Rob all I could do is confirm the appearance of the graphic. The controversy about your wins will continue because you want them to continue.

    I never doubted your win -- only your claims about how long you play and now I also challenge your accounting of soft profits.

    Frankly Rob when all of the evidence or lack of evidence is laid out I don't know what to believe.

  17. #17
    Rob, why won't you comment about the date of the picture?

    Clearly it was taken in mid-January, not February like you claimed.

    Why is that?
    Check out my poker forum, and weekly internet radio show at http://pokerfraudalert.com

  18. #18
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Rob all I could do is confirm the appearance of the graphic. The controversy about your wins will continue because you want them to continue.

    I never doubted your win -- only your claims about how long you play and now I also challenge your accounting of soft profits.

    Frankly Rob when all of the evidence or lack of evidence is laid out I don't know what to believe.
    The "controversy" continues because there's too much jealousy over some big wins, and you can't stop feeding into it. You just won't accept how little I''ve played between the hits because it doesn't fit into your version of not being able to leave a casino when I do. You could learn, but you won't do that either.

    What do you mean "challenge" about soft profits? I'm taking that as you don't understand them even after 50 times explaining them. So what's new. Then explain what confuses you.

    I'll say it because you're afraid of humiliating your members--who you've already done that to by going into Wynn if you haven't figured it out yet. The crybabies said I altered the $25 decal, which to them was absolute proof I "fabricated" my largest win at Wynn. But here comes Alan, with camera in hand, seeking out the undeniable truth about if I actually played a machine there that had an imperfect decal. Alas, it matches up, when most or all other machines everyone's looked at elsewhere had "perfect" decals. Oops! RS wasn't making this up!!

    Tough love people.

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Rob, why won't you comment about the date of the picture?

    Clearly it was taken in mid-January, not February like you claimed.

    Why is that?
    Now onto these sour grapes. You couldn't do a thing about my offers, you are dumbfounded over Alan making a fool out of you over the decal, so we're time travelling again.

    Why is the date a bit off? You tell me. Are all cameras technically perfect? Hmmm.... And if I "altered" the date to spoof you? More fun for me. But did I REALLY play on a different date for some reason and chose not to give anonymous critics exact finite details? Well, my only comment is when Shackleford saw this he chose to congratulate me without any whining whatsoever. (Maybe because he's met me?--get it?). So I'll leave it to you and your disappointments over the decal etc.to answer the "date" question. But you should get over it. You might make yourself sick again and make the missus work more overtime.

  20. #20
    Rob, you're right. I can't accept how little you've played between the big hits. Especially when you tell us that you are not always playing at the high denominations and some or perhaps much of your play is at lower denominations-- and then miraculously with only a few hundred dollars left you hit the monsters at the $25 denominations.

    Your strategy about banking soft profits also no longer makes sense because in your last accounting of your net win you failed to list the value of your soft profits that you cashed out -- and that is a big oversight and an error because it means you didn't have any soft profits, doesn't it? Are we to believe that you pumped your soft profits back in? And if so, what does that say about your soft profits strategy?

    Yes, Rob, you have too many inconsistencies. There is no jealousy here, but there is a lot of doubt.

    I don't think you fabricated your big wins, but I think you weren't forthcoming about the true time and denominations that you played. Because what you claim just doesn't add up.

    So save your talk about pain and jealousy because it's meaningless talk now. The graphic of the $25 means nothing -- period. It was only one small piece of the jigsaw puzzle that you created for yourself. Meanwhile the rest of the jigsaw puzzle still cannot be put together.

    If you won't come up with verifiable facts, then no one can believe your claims. It's just that simple. And as long as you don't come up with verifiable facts, but substitute name calling for them, no one will believe you and the animosity will only increase.

    So I am going to put this question to you: do you want to be believed? If you do, you will present the information to make your claims about big wins in short periods of time believable. Or, do you just want to continue hurling insults without responding to valid questions? The choice is yours.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •