Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
How do I know the uneducated trash talking you do about me? How about I READ it?! Tell me when you are able to figure that out.
Please allow ME to help You with the math. 30 hours of my single-play strategy can yield results of winning anywhere from $2500 to well over $400,000. And YOU'RE the one who said HOW I play cannot and will not win. The fact that I've never hit a $100 royal is irrelevant for such a challenge--it could happen. Seeing that you're a very vocal RS crtic, I don't trust you or believe you would pay me on credit. Your posts smack of a deep-seated jealousy, and I would never believe you'd just "pay up" after being humiliated in front of those you like to pretend you're constantly impressing with your AP nonsense.
Your friend on LVA is making every excuse in the book so you can exit gracefully and make believe I don't want to play. He has no other choice. But here, now, you can accept and abide by your own rules that I play "the RS way". Either that or you're just afraid. That's why I'm asking you, if you really cannot come up with $300k, get all those AP's who YOU say all they do is win every year and you shouldn't have any trouble at all getting the funds together.
How can I surpass a $30k win? Well, let's talk about a $10, $25, or other big winner that's possible to hit. Let's talk about how many of my winning sessions were much higher than $2500. I've had dollar royals on my 4th hand into the session, and $10 royals within 2 hours. Once again, it was YOU who blabbed that I can't possibly win, it was YOU who asserted that I cannot win against the math (whatever that means) and it was YOU who purported to understand what my play strategy entailed by bad-mouthing it. So now, you propose a challenge directly relating to it, only you want me to believe you're good for anything over $30k--which after all the scampering around and looking for support and sympathy from your LVA friends, I seriously doubt you have even $30k. So we're down to it being YOUR choice: you can either man up to your challenge....or take the escape route laid out by your friend over there and claim I proposed an unreasonable term that even I couldn't handle. Your choice.
I would certainly love to do all the play in Laughlin, only there are no $100 machines there. Common sense Dan, common sense.
I already said if you have a reasonable alternative to AC and the $5k then let's hear it. But if we do use AC we should pay him something.
1. Again, I'll only play BP & SDBP, so if you know of any casino in LV that has those games on $1 to $25 machines--and they don't all have to be on the same machine--then I'm open. Otherwise I will play up to $25 at the Aquarius and $100 in LV. It's a nice drive, I do it all the time.
2. Escrow agent--I gave you my proposal so what's yours?
3. Like a broken record....AGAIN, you criticized the results attained by me using my play strategy, you challenged that "system", and now it's time to walk the walk. I will only play it and nothing else. If it's too rich for your AP blood then just come out and say it.
Your #4 is nebulous at best. I explained why the escrow amount is required. I did the same thing when I made the Fezzik challenge that made the front page of Gaming Today in 2006, only it was $640,000 and I put the cash up with the casino who I had signed up as the agent. Fezzik blabbed on the radio and on LVA that I was a liar and a fraud--kinda like what you do. So I challenged him, I identified in my column where the cash was escrowed, and he walked. So your friend claiming I'm rusing you when I don't have even $300k is nothing more than AP sour grapes.
RS