Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 188

Thread: To my friend: stop going to casinos.

  1. #41
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Dannyj I "read" Rob's comments as telling us only what he wants to tell us. His system does not have any monopoly or edge on luck. In fact he could be winning more with conventional play which is pretty much what he's been doing lately. A system which is a variable system is no system at all. He is playing video poker just as Dancer, Scott and Grochowski would. The day he told us he held kickers it was all over.
    Alan, I'm trying to figure how you don't lose your mind over how confused you always are after crystal clear explanations. Remember when I told you TDBP was never played as part of my strategy during the years when I filed as a professional gambler? Then do you remember how I said I got interested in it the past few years, so I studied what the optimal plays should be in it vs. any use of my special plays? Has it sunk in yet? Do you get it yet? Are you able to come to terms with the facts yet?

    To you, and probably because of how you portray a very limited VP IQ, any variations in a strategy that includes changess because of different games, different levels of goals, and different plays when losing vs. winning, is going to seem impossible because it's just too far over your head, and you just don't have what it takes to want to take the time to learn something you don't understand. That's a little frustrating to me because I've always offered to do whatever it takes to help you be a better, happier, and wealthier player.

    This is like how I've tried to explain how I've been no luckier than the avg. player except for the past 18 mos., which immediately led to the forum clown to show how little he also doesn't comprehend. So let me school you two once again. You, Dancer, and we'll even throw in VL so he doesn't get so shook up about being ignored again....you all have a normal year in the luck dept. And so do I, only what is it you all have in common that I don't. BINGO! Yes, you ALL play on, and because after a lucky win many players suddenly get hit with a fresh bolt of confidence (ask "winner"Jason about this one) some jump up to a denomination they really shouldn't be playing. And what overwhelmingly happens now? Yup, all or most of the winnings are LOST (your "slowly diminishing win goal" is an excellent example of that).

    Bbbbut....what does RS do after a big win when playing my strategy? Yup again--he quits and leaves until the next session, which can be played STARTING AT THE LOWEST STARTING DENOMINATION for the strategy either immediately, or whenever I choose. So why do you & Spock want to believe I had better-than-avg. good fortune when I usually do not play NEARLY as many hands as the standard player? Listen up. BECAUSE MY OVERALL STRATEGY, INCLUDING SPECIAL PLAYS, GIVE ME MORE OPPORTUNITY TO HIT THE WINNING HANDS. Playing games that increase in denomination & volatility do that, as do the special plays. Four 3's to you and the other amateurs here may seem to be a regular winning hit when you're playing $2, but when you're playing $10 TBP+ it's a session-ending hit. So when you get a standard winner, you consider it to be just another hand in the overall scheme of things. But guess what? That "winner" that Spock labels as good luck for me, is really nothing more than just another regular winner BECAUSE of my strategy. AND SO AREN'T THE MANY WINNERS I've received because of my special plays. You see, I EXPECT to hit more big winners because of my strategy so the bar for avg. luck is set higher, and without that strategy I would be doing no better or worse than you or he or anybody else.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 06-19-2014 at 06:42 PM.

  2. #42
    Rob it is becoming increasingly difficult to ascertain what are "facts" with you.

  3. #43
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Rob it is becoming increasingly difficult to ascertain what are "facts" with you.
    Which is EXACTLY why I've offered to sit and explain the whole thing to you so many times. What you're saying is not unlike what the majority conclude, because what I do and how I do it are indeed very complex and challenging. I know that, and I get why people like arci have said I purposely make it confusing so no one can ever get it. In his case he actually WANTS to understand, but his ego has always kept him from taking the needed steps to get there. Thus the constant arguing with me.This is not something any forum or email can turn into workable knowledge. Frank learned that but vanished. Wizard was offered the desired opportunity, but succumbed to his forum mensa-wannabees. I'm hoping you can rise above all that.

  4. #44
    No Rob. What I want you to respond to is Spock's report about your claims for so many royals and big wins in so little play. Your strategy is well known. It's "the facts" we need.

  5. #45
    I have a great idea.

    Alan sees Rob in Vegas every so often.

    Why doesn't Alan accompany Rob to CET and various other properties, have Rob ask them for a 2013 win/loss statement, and then verify the results?

    That should put an end to these nonsensical claims once and for all, or by some fluke, validate them.
    Check out my poker forum, and weekly internet radio show at http://pokerfraudalert.com

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I appreciate the attention along with how very much I have to be inside your head Spock (and if you had any of those "brains" you're trying to display, you'd have first realized how that's what I mainly attempt to do to you just to antagonize such a fool as much as possible!)....however, your nonsense has more spin included than the liberals when they lie, flip flop, then lie about the lie again. Pick any one of those made up assertions, and I'll make you look as dumb as you are in front of the other five posting members here, one at a time. Go ahead, pick your strongest lie first!
    LMAO! I'm so deep in your head that when you came back after being banned you STILL had to mention me within the first 24 hours of your return even though I had not posted a thing about you in more than a month. Everyone who reads the forum has seen you follow people around like a puppy dog trying to diss anyone who doesn't bow down before you. Despite your protestations, THAT is truly being PWNed.

    I try not to post very often about you because I worry about your health when I do so. It's patently obvious that you get extremely irritated over them and the last thing you need is to have a stroke, putting a crimp on all those "fabulous experiences" you constantly squawk about.

    Your unintentional humor regarding the viewing audience is equally amusing. There may only be a few regular posters, but if you watched the post "views" count you'd realize that there are hundreds of readers. I've tried to educate you before about this aspect but since it doesn't seem to penetrate your thick skull I'll do it in a monosyllabic manner so you can fully comprehend it.

    I do not post for you, I post for them. It is they who need to know and all I post is your own "facts". They can make up their own minds as to what is true.

    And don't forget that all of this is archived by the search engines so people will be able to find it for years and years to come.

    "Made up assertions"? Everything I posted was based on YOUR words, not mine. Everything I wrote is completely documented. If you want to confront the person who wrote them you only need to look in a mirror.

    BTW, great explanation of "sessions". I can't wait for the video confirmation of that:
    Rob stands up and states "I just won a huge jackpot and every one of you is envious about it and now I'm leaving"

    Rob sits down and starts playing again.
    The fact that you can't even comprehend why you are being questioned about this says far more about you than anything else.

    By all means keep it up Robocchio. The world, and this forum, would not be nearly as amusing without you.


  7. #47
    Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Why doesn't Alan accompany Rob to CET and various other properties, have Rob ask them for a 2013 win/loss statement, and then verify the results?
    Wearing my "investigative reporter hat" for a moment:

    Dan haven't you figured it out yet? Rob conveniently avoids playing with a "card" so that there is no win/loss statement. Despite his recent claims that he has made 7Stars we don't know if that is true or even if a card was used all or part of the time.

    Rob, by telling us, that he has offset his taxable wins with "business expenses" also eliminates the chance that any tax records would verify his claims.

    Now, in all fairness to Rob, I am sure he has had his share of big winners. The reality is that all video poker players have some big winners including royals and quads with kickers. My son hit five (5) royals in 24 hours one weekend. I saw my offers from Pechanga collapse when I hit two $20K royals one month apart plus a multitude of quad Aces with kickers during the same time frame. The point is people do win.

    The only question here is actually the frequency of Rob's wins. I am sure his photos in Gaming Today were valid. I am sure he recently had a "rush" of quads with kickers. But Rob probably will never be able to prove to any reasonable person's satisfaction that these big winners came with the limited amount of play that Rob has claimed. I am sure that he has his "true believers" who will believe anything he says -- but I am not one of them.

    Spock has done an excellent job of pinpointing some of the claims that Rob made and while I would like to see Rob verify his claims, it would be impossible because we know Rob can't produce tax records or even win/loss statements. And because he can't produce any reasonable proof he will continue his belligerent attacks and insults and probably will also make crazy demands for his challengers to put up "cash" in some sort of contest or challenge to see his proof.

    I wish I had the money for such a challenge -- because I really doubt Rob has any proof outside of photos or W2Gs of particular wins which by themselves do not constitute any proof at all of his performance level.

    To be blunt, we are arguing with a ghost and with a fairy tale.

    If Rob really were the "big winner" he would have had the proof to show it. But alas, he avoided any attempt at maintaining proof.

    That's how I see it.

  8. #48
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    So let me school you two once again. You, Dancer, and we'll even throw in VL so he doesn't get so shook up about being ignored again....
    You really are dumber than a doorknob aren't you? Here's a challenge for ya: don't respond to any of my posts, don't respond to anything I say, don't refer to me in any of your contributions. We both know that's not going to last.........I've asked you before but somehow you have memory problems, poor soul.

  9. #49
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    No Rob. What I want you to respond to is Spock's report about your claims for so many royals and big wins in so little play. Your strategy is well known. It's "the facts" we need.
    You again are selectively reading your own forum, or you just don't have what it takes. All of your answers are very clearly delineated in my above post yesterday. I won't line item veto it, because there's too much that he showed only the parts he wanted to and predictably, as with any weakly spun argument, left out the parts that gutted him. I suggest if you really want to know FACTS, you read what I said.

  10. #50
    Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I have a great idea.

    Alan sees Rob in Vegas every so often.

    Why doesn't Alan accompany Rob to CET and various other properties, have Rob ask them for a 2013 win/loss statement, and then verify the results?

    That should put an end to these nonsensical claims once and for all, or by some fluke, validate them.
    Dan, you wear your jealousy on your sleeve. With all the other issues being discussed, it always comes back to how much my big wins have hurt you. Here's a flash: LEARN TO WIN AND PLAY MORE INTELLIGENTLY, and begin to comprehend that all your stupid crybabying and whining over how much CET has taken away from poor baby Dan, is something NOBODY CARES ABOUT!--especially others here that are hopelessly and helplessly addicted to the same TR program you're cursed with being owned by.

    As for those win statements, I've got the same comment as with doing or posting anything else the envious want. Alan started posting pictures of his jackpots, so I did. Arci wanted IRS filings that I agreed to do and rapidly moved on, but when he dithered and gave excuses on why he hadn't yet requested them, when I got them I kept them. So if there's any other documents, pictures etc. that are for some reason desperately wanted, others will need to do it first before I will. It is that simple. So until that time, work on saving two bucks on your next "free" Harrahs cruise.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 06-20-2014 at 06:44 PM.

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Wearing my "investigative reporter hat" for a moment:

    Dan haven't you figured it out yet? Rob conveniently avoids playing with a "card" so that there is no win/loss statement. Despite his recent claims that he has made 7Stars we don't know if that is true or even if a card was used all or part of the time.

    Rob, by telling us, that he has offset his taxable wins with "business expenses" also eliminates the chance that any tax records would verify his claims.

    Now, in all fairness to Rob, I am sure he has had his share of big winners. The reality is that all video poker players have some big winners including royals and quads with kickers. My son hit five (5) royals in 24 hours one weekend. I saw my offers from Pechanga collapse when I hit two $20K royals one month apart plus a multitude of quad Aces with kickers during the same time frame. The point is people do win.

    The only question here is actually the frequency of Rob's wins. I am sure his photos in Gaming Today were valid. I am sure he recently had a "rush" of quads with kickers. But Rob probably will never be able to prove to any reasonable person's satisfaction that these big winners came with the limited amount of play that Rob has claimed. I am sure that he has his "true believers" who will believe anything he says -- but I am not one of them.

    Spock has done an excellent job of pinpointing some of the claims that Rob made and while I would like to see Rob verify his claims, it would be impossible because we know Rob can't produce tax records or even win/loss statements. And because he can't produce any reasonable proof he will continue his belligerent attacks and insults and probably will also make crazy demands for his challengers to put up "cash" in some sort of contest or challenge to see his proof.

    I wish I had the money for such a challenge -- because I really doubt Rob has any proof outside of photos or W2Gs of particular wins which by themselves do not constitute any proof at all of his performance level.

    To be blunt, we are arguing with a ghost and with a fairy tale.

    If Rob really were the "big winner" he would have had the proof to show it. But alas, he avoided any attempt at maintaining proof.

    That's how I see it.
    Alan, I believe you simply can't follow any discussion that you don't want to or don't understand. Is that why you are no longer one of those "investigative journalists"? And I know you get consistently embarrassed every time I have to point this out, but I look at it in a positive way--that you're actually going to read with some type of understanding this time.

    You remain so very fascinated with the fact that I've said how I reached a point around 2004/2005 where I stopped using a slot card while playing ONLY MY SINGLE PLAY STRATEGY, that the mere horrific thought of that, to you because of the passed-up "freebies" has somehow made you keep believing that I don't use a card at times these days. Do you yet see how ridiculous that assumption is....and why?

    I see your and that jealous soul Spock's issue lies totally in my winning. With you, you at least believe my posted pictures, because you know lots of players hit lots of big W2G winners. Your issue is you can't believe anyone could ever play so little and win the amounts I've stated. I can't do anything about that short of doing my taxes with you there, mailing the return with you there, then making a sworn statement punishable by death that I did not and will not ever submit a true, revised return. And for sure I'd do that....if others also do. But do you think a hater like Spock would or even COULD afford to do that? How about anyone else? Yes my wins and winnings are extraordinary and the argument is that "extraordinary claims should require extraordinary proof". But this is not a business with me any longer, and I don't care who believes what.

    Sure I poke fun at clowns like Spock who spend so much time looking up and providing partial statements, incomplete analyses, and his resulting lies even though he does what they all do when faced with the real facts, and denies it all. Kind of mirrors what the IRS is going thru today. Remember, I'm the celebrity here, and anonymous cowards like Spock and anyone else who throws out unsupportable assertions and claims, only do so out of what they see as failure in a part of their life that is not so in mine. Once you understand what happiness and success does for someone and what the other end of the struggle does to others, who have no choice but to remain unknown, you'll see how easy all this back & forth really is.

  12. #52
    Originally Posted by Vegas_lover View Post
    You really are dumber than a doorknob aren't you? Here's a challenge for ya: don't respond to any of my posts, don't respond to anything I say, don't refer to me in any of your contributions. We both know that's not going to last.........I've asked you before but somehow you have memory problems, poor soul.
    OK. But how dumb is a doorknob? Any insight??

  13. #53
    Rob, try to let this soak in before you respond:

    The issue is not your strategy. The issue is did you really win as much as you claim to have won with so little play?

    The point is you cannot prove that you won so much with so little play. You made it impossible for anyone to verify your claims because you didn't use a player's card and/or you don't have win/loss statements that would only be possible with a player's card.

    I don't care about your strategies. I don't care if your special plays work. I hope your strategies do work. I hope your special plays are successful. It's just that it is impossible to have any independent, verifiable proof of your claims.

    Having w2Gs only shows what you won. They dont show what you lost or how long you played. Therefore, you cannot claim to have the magnificent results you say you have because there is no way of proving your results.

    To put it simply, your "facts" cannot be verified. They may be true but we will never know -- nor can you prove your claims to us.

  14. #54
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    OK. But how dumb is a doorknob? Any insight??
    Thank you for proving my point Robbie. See, you couldn't even let this one alone. You're under my skin right???? Hahaha, you can't even ignore my request to not respond to me anymore. You're so obvious and you're such an easy prey I almost feel sorry for you. Keep digging that hole, you're doing an awesome job.

  15. #55
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Remember, I'm the celebrity here
    The fact that you actually believe this is proof of your mental issues. Outside of a couple of gambling forums nobody in the world knows or cares about Rob Singer. Even within the gambling community, very few people care about you. I would change famous into infamous because of your horrible personality. You've lost touch with reality a long time ago. Again, poor soul

  16. #56
    While this doesn't apply to VL although he bleeds red, white & blue, I thought I'd tick the minions here off some more. They already can't deal with the amounts I've won over the years since dumping that foolish "AP" state of mind, they can't fathom or handle the comparatively HUGE amounts of the jackpots I've hit, and they can't come to grips with the relatively few # of hands I've played to achieve such unprecedented successes--to which I offer unequaled tough love.

    So now I thought it an appropriate time to come on and THANK each and every one of you who work. Next month will be the FIRST month I'll receive a social security payment from the 15 years I spent in corporate America....and a tidy sum it is. Add to that my wife, who spent 33 years at Honeywell before retiring, has also begun receiving payments in April, choosing to begin getting hers at 62 since Obama is completely untrustworthy with his racism and his pen.

    So please all you fine workers out there---while there may be NOTHING left in the coffers for you "poor souls" when you can finally escape the life of working that you keep trying to convince yourselves is "enjoyable", please accept our gratitude and sincere THANKS! for paying us now and for the rest of our lives. It just doesn't get any better than having big-mouth, angry, hateful & lying critics contributing to us doing whatever we want to do, wherever we want to go, and whenever we choose to do it.

    Ain't life great!
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 06-21-2014 at 11:01 AM.

  17. #57
    Just some logical points:

    1) Won/loss statements don't prove or disprove Rob's systems. Somebody, somewhere in this vast universe has won as much or more than Rob with the same or less play. Pulling their won/loss statements doesn't validate or invalidate any strategy they used. That's pretty obvious.

    2) The proof lies in the proofs, as Arci would say. Now perhaps Rob has discovered heretofore unknown laws of mathematics. I do not know, as I am not a mathematician, although I do know a handful of people who teach college mathematics. Now, Alan could simply consult professional mathematicians and report their opinions, but he has not done so, for whatever reasons. Maybe he feels silly doing so. I don't know. Logic and math should pre-empt won-loss statements, but some folks have a hard time subordinating their opinions to logic and math.

    3) Did those Gaming Today articles by Rob ever make the light of day? I pick up copies whenever I'm in LV, but haven't spied one yet. I do need to drop by the GT offices in July to get the lowdown on that stuff.
    Last edited by redietz; 06-21-2014 at 11:19 AM.

  18. #58
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    While this doesn't apply to VL although he bleeds red, white & blue
    Second time Rob feels the need to "give me some attention" after I clearly requested to completely ignore me. And that's 100% of his posts after I made this request (for the second time). Boy I really, really got under your skin didn't I Robbie. Poor baby

    The rest of your post was just another episode of "drunk man talking".

  19. #59
    Hey Rob, save some for me. I have another 9 years before I'm 62.

  20. #60
    Originally Posted by dannyj View Post
    Hey Rob, save some for me. I have another 9 years before I'm 62.
    As much as I'm gloating about all the working stiffs helping us with enjoying our retirement, nothing beats a younger age. That's for sure. However, these days spells likely a lot of trouble for those who work for the next 9 years and more, and you'll be lucky to get a portion of what you've been pouring into the SS system. Best to prepare for it somehow Danny.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •