An Open email to me about Rob Singer and the debate on this and the LVA Forums

[Vegas_lover]

Alan,

You're missing the point I'm trying to make. The chance of winning big by breaking up a hand which you shouldn't break up according to AP, or math if you will, is VERY and I mean VERY small. Now, according to Singer's "system" he does these break ups when he's behind, HE HAS ALREADY LOST!!! He has stated very clearly that he uses AP for 95% of the times. That means, that when he's behind, he starts taking long shots. Long shots with a VERY small chance of winning big. And hoopla, as a white bunny out of a black hat, he hits luck continiously over ten years and ends up winning millions..............Right......... There's really nothing more to it than this.

Throwing in win goals and loss limits is just a way to make this thing look like a "system". Now, all people out there already have a loss limit: bancruptcy! Most people just don't have a win goal and when they win they just continue to play too long. And in the end they just lost again. That's what makes casino's rich.

[Rob.Singer]

Alan,

You're missing the point I'm trying to make. The chance of winning big by breaking up a hand which you shouldn't break up according to AP, or math if you will, is VERY and I mean VERY small. Now, according to Singer's "system" he does these break ups when he's behind, HE HAS ALREADY LOST!!! He has stated very clearly that he uses AP for 95% of the times. That means, that when he's behind, he starts taking long shots. Long shots with a VERY small chance of winning big. And hoopla, as a white bunny out of a black hat, he hits luck continiously over ten years and ends up winning millions..............Right......... There's really nothing more to it than this.

Throwing in win goals and loss limits is just a way to make this thing look like a "system". Now, all people out there already have a loss limit: bancruptcy! Most people just don't have a win goal and when they win they just continue to play too long. And in the end they just lost again. That's what makes casino's rich.

Not surprisingly, you're making statements about my strategy that are not true. I do not use the special plays only when I'm behind. I use them ALL the time whether ahead, even, or behind. Where are you getting your information from....or is it just more convenient to make these things up?

[Vegas_lover]

Not surprisingly, you're making statements about my strategy that are not true. I do not use the special plays only when I'm behind. I use them ALL the time whether ahead, even, or behind. Where are you getting your information from....or is it just more convenient to make these things up?

Alan,
Here you have your proof. Mr. Singer is so full of BULL ***** I'm surprised he can still breath. I now know why nobody can figure out his sytem. It changes every single day hahaha. WHAT A HOAX! He applies 95% math play and then all of a sudden he uses his "special plays" all the time?

[Rob.Singer]

Alan,
Here you have your proof. Mr. Singer is so full of BULL ***** I'm surprised he can still breath. I now know why nobody can figure out his sytem. It changes every single day hahaha. WHAT A HOAX! He applies 95% math play and then all of a sudden he uses his "special plays" all the time?

Thank you for still being here, Vic. Either you're a very confused person or you're acting confused on purpose because your crazy theories and accusations are falling apart fast.

Let's see if you can grasp this: I use optimal play on ~95% of the hands I play, so about 5% of the hands are special plays. If I'm ahead I use them about 5% of the time; if I'm even I use them about 5% of the time; if I'm behind I use them about 5% of the time. I.E., they get used ALL THE TIME. Duh!!