What is the relevance your question about the percentage of session wins Arcimede$?

I know someone who lost and lost and lost gambling at casinos, until one day he bet $2 on a $1 Wheel of Fortune slot and hit for $4+ million.

Arc, you yourself said you win only 30% of your sessions and you claim to have a long term net win. And I would venture a guess that had I quit at the moment when I was ahead in each session play, I could claim a 100% session win rate... but few of us know when the wins will stop coming so we keep playing till we lose more sessions than we do win.

So the bottom line for me is that saying you've won 70% of your sessions is just as believable as saying you only won one session out of 400 or 30% of your sessions. I'm more interested in the bottom line.

And from Rob's "system" it seems to me we would all have better bottom lines if we set a win goal and stuck to it.

Now, regarding the claim of winning 70% of the higher denomination sessions let me mention this: hitting quads once on a $25 machine goes a long way to wiping out all of the losses you've had playing $1 and $5 video poker. And I've never read anything that says you are less likely to hit quads on higher denomination machines.

With that said, I can easily understand how someone like Singer could move up to a $25, score one big hit that wipes out his previous losses for that session and score his win goal of $2500 -- and leave. Remember, Rob is playing games that can deliver 600 coins for a quad. So let him break up one full house to get one quad paying 600 $25 coins and he scores quite a nice payoff.