I subscribe to the online Casino City Times and to several of the regular columnists including John Grochowski and Frank Scoblete. I appreciate their knowledge and insights.
But in the column today, I was a bit surprised by what Frank wrote. Frank primarily writes about craps and in the column he talked about the importance of math above everything else. Well, that wasn't the surprise. The surprise was what he left out: no mention of "dice influencing" as a way to beat the game of craps. Not a word about it. Oh, he did mention his Golden Touch dice control group but only in the context that they understand the "math" of craps. In fact, dice influencers do follow the math at craps but believe that dice influencing can give them a slight edge over the math that always favors the house.
But that was it. There was no sales pitch for dice influencing beating the house.
Frank, as you may know, is the author who told the world about "The Captain" and dice influencing -- which some mistakenly call dice controlling or dice control. (Actually Frank refers to it as dice "control" but I don't know how anyone can "control" dice but I can understand how someone might "influence" the dice.)
Does this signal a change in the philosophy of the dice influencers?
Here is a link to the article: http://scoblete.casinocitytimes.com/...annoying-59986
Reply With Quote
