Originally Posted by
arcimede$
"What is the relevance your question about the percentage of session wins Arcimede$? "
The relevance is simple. No one wins 70% of their sessions. So, without any doubt you know the person is lying if they claim to win 70%. If they are lying about one thing then you can pretty much assume anything else they say is questionable.
Remember we're not talking about the entire progression. We are talking about one denomination. That is equivalent to any normal session played by you, me or anyone. Also, he cannot be just slightly ahead, he would have to recoup all of his previous losses. And, as he progresses through the session, it includes everything lost up until that point in the session being played.
If you can't understand how ridiculous such a claim is then it's not surprising you will believe the rest of the nonsense Singer spreads. Think about your own experiences, that should tell you what he claims is impossible.
"Now, regarding the claim of winning 70% of the higher denomination sessions let me mention this: hitting quads once on a $25 machine goes a long way to wiping out all of the losses you've had playing $1 and $5 video poker. And I've never read anything that says you are less likely to hit quads on higher denomination machines."
No, not less likely, but not more likely either. I would venture he'd hit a quad about once every 3 sessions ... and some of those would be at the end of that level and would not recoup previous losses so he'd need another quad to claim a win. That's why the 70% number is ridiculous.