VP Strategy

[Alan Mendelson]

Redietz, I'm afraid you came late to the party but thanks for the lengthy post above about gross and net wins, anyway.

But let's cut to the chase:

Rob can quite legally claim to have won a million dollars over 10 years, even if his net is significantly less.

Rob has been asked this before and he specifically claims his million dollars of wins were NET WINS.

[Alan Mendelson]

I imagine that this hit while Rob was in the video poker room, and he strolled over, asking the person if he could take a picture because he had never seen a jackpot that high before, and the person said yes.

This made me smile. A couple of years ago when I hit a $4,000 royal at Caesars the player next to me asked me if he could take a picture of my machine. He said he never saw a royal before. And now I wonder if he showed that photo to his friends back in his home town and claimed it was his royal?

[Count Room]

Anyway, I still don't believe that $100k hit was Rob's. I never believed it. The whiting out of the information on the slot card screen was strange, because it doesn't give away any personal info aside from your name, and Rob's name is known here.

I imagine that this hit while Rob was in the video poker room, and he strolled over, asking the person if he could take a picture because he had never seen a jackpot that high before, and the person said yes. Then Rob had an ear-to-ear grin and realized how much mileage his "special plays" nonsense would get out of that picture.

Unfortunately Dan, that angle has already discussed by another poster (Spock) and shot down like a dirty dog by Rob. Eventually you will have to discover the hard way that Rob is impenetrable in all these similar concerns. There are no chinks in his armor.

Alan bans Rob on occasion because us mere mortals can only handle the undeniable truth in measured doses.

[Alan Mendelson]

I know Rob. I have been with Rob when he has talked to casino managers. I don't doubt that he plays high limit slots. I also don't doubt that he has won big jackpots. My only question has been: How much does he play in order to hit so many big jackpots? I doubt they come as quickly as he claims with as little play as he claims.

Even players at 5-cent machines get hands such as quad aces with a kicker. Hitting quad aces with a kicker is not some magical feat when you are playing through thousands of hands. Rob has never been forthcoming about the number of hands played or the amount of time played except to say that he has these magical short sessions that always result in big jackpots.

The bottom line is I don't bother questioning whether or not he really hit these big hands. Rather, I'd just like to see some sort of log about the number of hands it took for him to hit these big winners.

[arcimede$]

Rob won so much money he was forced to live in a small one or two bedroom apartment and then got kicked out for not making payments. He now lives in a trailer. Yeah, that's what one experts for someone making $100K a year. LOL.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob won so much money he was forced to live in a small one or two bedroom apartment and then got kicked out for not making payments. He now lives in a trailer. Yeah, that's what one experts for someone making $100K a year. LOL.

And guess what the "what goes around comes around" happens to be as a result of those lies you just repeated? ANYONE who would be doing any of that, would be FAR better off than you are as you have to endure the pain of caring for and watching the only woman you've ever been with, waste away in agony as a result of your uncontrolled gambling selfishness. Health come s first arci.....always

[Rob.Singer]

This made me smile. A couple of years ago when I hit a $4,000 royal at Caesars the player next to me asked me if he could take a picture of my machine. He said he never saw a royal before. And now I wonder if he showed that photo to his friends back in his home town and claimed it was his royal?

That happens at times if a tourist or not regular player happens to be walking by and see what to them is a big, spectacular win. I've always said no. But here's where Dan needs to be further educated on how casinos operate, and how their players operate.

This picture-taking by "naive passers by" doesn't happen in the high limit rooms, and if it does it would be VERY infrequently. Especially in a room like Wynn's. Serious high level players do not want or appreciate being made the center of attention, and the more mature employees who work those exclusive areas would not allow such photo-happy strollers to bother their players. Plus a possibly recognized person like myself would have to be a complete moron to be cruising such a room for such a stupid reason. Further, is this how Dan wants to believe my $20,000 & multiple $50,000 winning pics were obtained also? By a stalking, high-limit room CRUISER?

And here's yet another teachable gaming moment for Dan to try to come to grips with. He thinks running around Wynn's ultra HL room asking/trying to snap up-close pictures is a "snap". And that whited out part? I wasn't blocking my name, idiot. (or what you want, someone else's name, which unfortunately wasn't the case....sorry again). I took the picture, then was told by a suit that I wasn't allowed to do that, so I did not get a chance to get one of the actual hand that has you all tied in knots about me not remembering it. (Funny how you believe I could be a high limit room/big win picture-taking groupie when that guy wouldn't even let me take a picture of my OWN win!). So when I first posted it I thought it best to keep the casino's name out of it. They got wind of this big hit at Wizard's forum so when I sent it to Mike S. I didn't send the blocked version. Those clowns hate me worse than you do, so I thought I'd make them hate me even more by sending them the original. Learn from all this.

I know Dan wants and needs none of this to be "real", that's for sure. But what does his sense really tell him? What does he go to sleep every night telling himself? It's a very cruel world sometimes.

[Alan Mendelson]

Rob, you realize that at Wynn there is a guard at the front entrance of the high limit room that just doesn't let passersby enter? It's a relatively small high limit room with one door/entranceway.

This is one reason why I doubt you were in there taking pictures of someone else's jackpot.

I managed to get a picture of the $25 symbol only because I was sitting at the machine, had my Wynn card in, had cash on the game top, and looked like I was ready to play. (I didn't.)

[arcimede$]

And guess what the "what goes around comes around" happens to be as a result of those lies you just repeated? ANYONE who would be doing any of that, would be FAR better off than you are as you have to endure the pain of caring for and watching the only woman you've ever been with, waste away in agony as a result of your uncontrolled gambling selfishness. Health come s first arci.....always

It's always obvious when Singer is exposed and he knows it. He immediately tries to change the subject. Come on, tell us why you chose to live in a small apartment and now a trailer if you made so much money? Of course, anyone that has ever read a Singer comment knows he would live in the nicest place he could. His jealousy of those with money has always been apparent.

[arcimede$]

Rob, you realize that at Wynn there is a guard at the front entrance of the high limit room that just doesn't let passersby enter? It's a relatively small high limit room with one door/entranceway.

This is one reason why I doubt you were in there taking pictures of someone else's jackpot.

I managed to get a picture of the $25 symbol only because I was sitting at the machine, had my Wynn card in, had cash on the game top, and looked like I was ready to play. (I didn't.)

There are plenty of suckers out there. I suspect it was just another one of Singer's education sessions where a true high roller was at the machine and Singer was helping them learn his scam system. At least the high roller didn't let Singer use his own player's card like he often tries to do.

[Dan Druff]

There are plenty of suckers out there. I suspect it was just another one of Singer's education sessions where a true high roller was at the machine and Singer was helping them learn his scam system. At least the high roller didn't let Singer use his own player's card like he often tries to do.

Yeah, very possible it was someone Singer knew personally and he was sitting next to them when it happened.

Alan, can you explain why Rob whited out the players card info screen? What possible information could it have revealed that he wouldn't want us to see, given that we know his real name?

Even if he didn't approach a stranger and ask to take a picture of their win, there are so many other ways he could have gotten that picture.

The fact that he whited out the only part that would prove it was his (the players card screen) shows that it obviously wasn't his.

Rob, how about showing us the unaltered version of that picture?

[Alan Mendelson]

Rob, how about showing us the unaltered version of that picture?

This would, of course, end the debate once and for all. It's already been established that this was at Wynn, so I don't know what Rob needs to cover up now?
Just in case the photo no longer exists I think the W2G would satisfy everyone and personal info can be obscured, of course.

By the way, I have all of my photos of big jackpots stored on my phone and on my computer. I'm sure Rob still has his $100,000 winner since he has only hit two $100K winners.

[arcimede$]

By the way, I have all of my photos of big jackpots stored on my phone and on my computer. I'm sure Rob still has his $100,000 winner since he has only hit two $100K winners.

LOL. BTW, I just hit a couple $500,000 winners and I'll the photos to you right after Singer provides his unedited version.

[BAGGINS]

Stumbled upon the Rob Singer 100K jackpot controversy with Dan Druff and had to comment.

The solution is simple. Druff, you have the money. You can also share the risk by having others share in the wager if you can't accept Singer's 20K challenge alone. Spread it around to as many here as will accept. Go to the Wynn and see who wins. Since it is unlikely that Singer would be a gentleman regarding this bet, the escrow will be necessary.

Also, Rob Singer, it's only fair that since you've proposed the bet that you get your 20k into the escrow first. Show the money. Easy money for you! If you aren't called on it, if no one comes forth with 20k, then you can boast atop the mountaintop what cowards everyone is and gain credibility in the process. You can show everyone how big that 65 year old sac of yours is.

But we all know what will happen here. Rob Singer will never put his 20k in the escrow. He will back out of the bet in one way or another. His dry shriveled sac is out of juice. He should be promplty kicked off this site, his reputation spread, and his VP anecdotes ignored for all of eternity, having proved himself to be what all suspect; a blatant liar. It can all be put to bed once and for all. No more wasted time reading useless drivel which creates the controversy that gives him reason to live.

Is there any better solution?
Of course there's always the 0.0001% chance he's telling the truth. There's also a chance he puts the money into escrow (while knowing it's a lie) because he'll gamble that no one will come forward to take up his challenge thus giving him the bragging rights he'd rightfully deserve for such a bluff.

But are you not gamblers? How can you pass up these odds?

[Alan Mendelson]

Hi Baggins and thanks for joining the forum. An interesting first post, to say the least.

[Rob.Singer]

Yes, how interesting. But comments about Singer challenges from this and other critics fizzled very fast once my GT article "Gaming Today Columnist Lays Down The Gauntlet" was run after Chuck DiRocco confirmed the $640,000 escrow I put up at the Westin Casuarina Casino prior to publication, and Anthony Curtis along with Fezzik verified it. The escaping was hilarious! Redietz may remember this fondly.

[BAGGINS]

A simple Google search for any of the terms; chuck dirocco, 640,000 escrow, gaming today columnist lays down the gauntlet, yields- well, nothing. I suppose google's algorithms are 'escaping' you as well. In any case this is a new challenge and compared to 640k, this should be like laying a twenty dollar bill on the table. Why not just set it up?

[Rob.Singer]

What an idiot. Chuck DiRocco is the founder and was for 36 years the Publisher of Gaming Today.

You must be another of those self-proclaimed "math guys" who can't figure out how to do things without some help.

[Alan Mendelson]

I just want to say that Google hasn't archived everything yet. The articles I wrote for Barrons and New York Magazine and the Columbia Journalism Review in the 1970s do not show up in Google.