Playing "end" machines

[Alan Mendelson]

I'll even go out on a limb and say I bet Alan didn't angrily slap the button on any of his royals. No negativity, just positive energy.

I never slap the machines and when a slapper sits next to me I often chide them about it. It's distracting. It's worse when they hit the screen -- and I've seen that many times.

Funny thing about the $8.000 royal this past weekend: I was DEALT four to the royal no less than SIX times in that session and I kept saying to myself "it has to come, it has to come." If you notice the photo -- I was dealt four to the royal in that one as well.

[dannyj]

Slappers and screen hitters are distracting and so annoying. Never seen one hit anything of consequence.

[Dan Druff]

And the really FUN part is watching Dan, a self-described failure in gambling, relationships, and inter-acting with the most basic hard working people on the planet, constantly rant over how he's been mistreated by this person or dissed by that company--and all the while, anyone who's not been blistered by this "loser's touch" finds themselves far under his skin.

BTW Dan, with your poor aptitude for the game of vp, I never believed you had the resources to play enuf in order to attain 7-Stars anyway. Why don't you explain to us on THIS forum exactly how that anomaly happened anyway. Then maybe we'll see the REAL reason you aren't able to come up with the cash to be playing on trips to LV, and instead, have to bring a kid to the casinos while struggling to get everything comped. No wonder you made such a big deal out of Caesar's not handing you a free bottle of Gatorade.

Learn from this lesson Dan. All your constant whining about "mistreatment" does is inadvertently expose you for what you really are.

VP is a mathematical game. There is no such thing as an "aptitude" for it. It's sad that your entire identity is derived from false claims of mathematical impossibilities -- beating -EV machines in the long term.

Without your mythical VP wins, there is no Rob Singer. And since those wins don't really exist (or are dwarfed by your losses), indeed the entire Rob Singer identity is a fraud and a facade.

I'm not playing VP this year because I don't have to. I can maintain my status and benefits without putting a single penny of my own into VP machines in 2014, so therefore I don't. I'm sorry that this concept is lost on a gambling addict such as yourself.

Funny you bring up relationship failures, because in the one picture you posted of your wife, she looks miserable. She has a visible scowl on her face, despite being photographed in a picturesque area of Lake Tahoe. I'm guessing that her sad sack husband just lost more money at VP using his "winning plays", and she wondered how she got to this spot in her life, riding around in a trailer with an addicted gambler who has deluded himself that he can beat random mathematics. I guess you're fortunate that she's likely one of those women who doesn't want to start over after age 60, so she's just tolerating her unpalatable circumstance and trying to make the best of it.

If you are still convinced that I am such a "loser" in gambling, let me know and we can make a nice wager regarding the actual status of my net worth.

Keep attacking anyone who rightfully calls you out as a liar and a fraud. You did it on this forum before I arrived, you did it on other forums, and you will keep doing it because it's literally all you have to live for.

[Rob.Singer]

The aptitude, Dan, pertains to whether one has the competence to be playing the game in the first place. You clearly do not....And your results confirm that fact.

There's no "attacking" you--sorry you feel that way. You've put a lot of time elsewhere ranting and whining about how you've been "done wrong" by working class people. Here, you spend virtually all your time complaining how you're being "mistreated" by CET, when all it obviously is is agitation over losing so much money to them. I'm wondering just whom you blame for being a loser in love also.

Unfortunately, you can't seem to help yourself by blabbing about what a sour life you lead all over social media, and others pick up on it. But it's not too late, you still have time to right the ship. You can begin by losing a few pounds. Now THERE'S a loss you can live with!

[Dan Druff]

The aptitude, Dan, pertains to whether one has the competence to be playing the game in the first place. You clearly do not....And your results confirm that fact.

There's no "attacking" you--sorry you feel that way. You've put a lot of time elsewhere ranting and whining about how you've been "done wrong" by working class people. Here, you spend virtually all your time complaining how you're being "mistreated" by CET, when all it obviously is is agitation over losing so much money to them. I'm wondering just whom you blame for being a loser in love also.

Unfortunately, you can't seem to help yourself by blabbing about what a sour life you lead all over social media, and others pick up on it. But it's not too late, you still have time to right the ship. You can begin by losing a few pounds. Now THERE'S a loss you can live with!

Pretty sad that you are trying to troll me with items being fed to you by another user here. Not even creative enough to come up with anything on your own.

I guess producing your own material has never been your strong suit. Where are those Gaming Today articles, again?

Also it's pretty funny having my looks insulted by a frumpy old man who looks like he was transplanted from 1979.

[Rob.Singer]

Dan you do it to yourself--that's what I've been trying to get across to you. You can't see that you give away all this info all by yourself--you're your own worst enemy. I don't know dente and that person doesn't even like me or my "system". What you need to do is work on why it is you just can't help yourself divulge what a sour life you lead. And just how long do you think it is before you find fault with Alan over some little "injustice" your poor soul has to suffer, and you float out of here too? Oh well, there's always that single-parent kid to brow-beat.

Now go back to bed and give that illness time to recover. Do I have to school you on something like THIS too?

[Dan Druff]

Dan you do it to yourself--that's what I've been trying to get across to you. You can't see that you give away all this info all by yourself--you're your own worst enemy. I don't know dente and that person doesn't even like me or my "system". What you need to do is work on why it is you just can't help yourself divulge what a sour life you lead.

Now go back to bed and give that illness time to recover. Do I have to school you on something like THIS too?

So now you're lurking on my forum just to get material to troll me over here?

Sad, Rob. Really sad.

62 years old and this is what you're doing with your life.

[Rob.Singer]

What's the matter Dan, no girlfriend to pick on today?

Man up loser! Silver lining time: They say getting sick does wonderful things for the overweight.

[mickeycrimm]

What's the matter Dan, no girlfriend to pick on today?

Man up loser! Silver lining time: They say getting sick does wonderful things for the overweight.

So Dan and Rob in a head up holdem game. Let me know if you want to sell a piece of your action, Dan. I'll take a piece. Robbie boy is about as dumb as they come in a poker game.

[arcimede$]

62 years old and this is what you're doing with your life.

I believe Rob is 65 years old. I'm not surprised he didn't correct this as he still lives in the past. Given his current status as trailer trash, it's not surprising.

[Alan Mendelson]

For the record: I am 62 years old according to my birth certificate, but if you average-in my replacement parts then my blended age is about 29. I intend to live another 120 years, thank you.

[ThomasClines]

I intend to live another 120 years, thank you.

You see a lot of really old people at the casinos. Are they old because they found the casinos, or they found the casinos because all of their spouses and friends died?

I hope that your infomercial isn't about a geriatric cure-all.

[Rob.Singer]

arci, why are you calling me names again? I am 65 and you're 68? And given the fact that I'll be stopping in for that dinner invitation you promised, wouldn't it be a better gesture to call an RV an RV? I'll bring alcohol-free wine over if the missus' kidneys can't take the alcohol. See how kind I am?

[Vegas Vic]

I can state without hesitation that the high majority of all my royals have occurred on end machines. Does that mean that end machines produce more?

No. It's because I choose to sit at end machines more than other locations (if possible). By being on either end, I can cut in half the number of smokers, key slappers, chatty Cathy's, smelly drunks and any other such annoyances who can distract me.

[ThomasClines]

By being on either end, I can cut in half the number of smokers, key slappers, chatty Cathy's, smelly drunks and any other such annoyances who can distract me.

Let's say that each machine hits evenly. If you play only one machine, then you will even out with your share of the hits, less the house edge or HE. But, if you mix it up, then you allow for the possibility that you will hit on all, or none, of those. This generates an extreme in results, which is more easily exploitable by some sort of a valid strategy.

Another problem with playing only the end spot at the table games, or the slots, is that you forgo the often profitable interactions with others. After all, who else do you have to work with in a casino? And, ultimately, it's a lot easier to profit by others than the casinos.

[Alan Mendelson]

you forgo the often profitable interactions with others.

What profitable interactions with others?

[ThomasClines]

What profitable interactions with others?

I cringe when I read the so-called experts who write of cryptically unnecessary math which has no application in the field.

Most of my upside has come from other players, but not by hustling them at the poker tables.

Coach 'em a bit here and there, and you'll have a friend for life. Help them make the big bets when called for. Protect them from the casino's pitfalls and "ringers". On down to the small things, like stopping someone from spilling a drink (which would result in a good table being closed). Let them approach you for advice, etc, by taking control of the game from w/i.

The "eye in the sky" has no ears, so no one up there will think other than a fun game going on. Eg, there are ways to get particular dealers to "accidentally" not collect a losing bet... the pit phone won't ring. Just that $50 here and there adds up.

I've had "the card" from time to time, but it's a lot better to be invited by all of these people to the VIP rooms. Shared such dinners with guys with bankrolls or BR's of hundreds of thousands of dollars. A very good way to exchange information as well with the top players. And, to meet others in a league of their own.

As for the slots, there are lots of plays you can make.

Wouldn't it be better to play back and forth with a partner, so that when one hits, both of you didn't have to be putting in money separately or simultaneously? Such will also extend the BR by double, in time, so that you're more likely to be around when it hits. Ie, you might be the one around who hits. Get the time down, then worry about the space. The casinos would love to have a million players on the same bank of machines, even as it hits the first or second roll. Still only one winner.

The number of plays are endless. But you have to stop and think, and then try some goofy experiments. Would take years for me to explain even only the best stuff.

Once you've sat around long enough to see things like an old lady being dragged upside down up an escalator, you'll know what I mean.

[Vegas Vic]

Let's say that each machine hits evenly. If you play only one machine, then you will even out with your share of the hits, less the house edge or HE. But, if you mix it up, then you allow for the possibility that you will hit on all, or none, of those. This generates an extreme in results, which is more easily exploitable by some sort of a valid strategy.

Another problem with playing only the end spot at the table games, or the slots, is that you forgo the often profitable interactions with others. After all, who else do you have to work with in a casino? And, ultimately, it's a lot easier to profit by others than the casinos.

Every one of your posts are nothing but authentic frontier gibberish.

[quahaug]

I agree this guys posts make no sense whatsoever, maybe He's talking in code or to the "insiders" who get what the #$& he's saying.

[carolinajacket]

I was down in New Orleans last weekend and there was a guy next to me who literally hit the machine (much like Marciano would) about every other hand.