Originally Posted by
redietz
One thing Dan just said grated on me, not that it was Dan's fault. The "moving target" definition of games as "full pay" really must end sometime. It's gotten to the point that each time there's an industry-wide downgrading of pay tables, whatever pay table survives as the best available automatically gets the "full pay" nickname. So at what point in time does this become completely absurd?
Back in the 90's, virtually everyone agreed that "full pay"meant 100% or more if played perfectly. Now people have been hypnotized into believing it's whatever is the highest generally available payoff for a particular game.