Originally Posted by
redietz
Ah, arci asked, what can we learn by asking such questions? Science, he says, is not a democracy. What are we to infer from such a statement, other than arci's superiority to the mere mortals who arrive at 1/6?
It's not that the 1/11ers argue their answer that's of interest; it's how they argue their answer. And what they choose to ignore both about the question and about their self presentation and about the public in which they seem to find themselves distastefully immersed.
Arci, care to answer the questions, or are they beneath you?