The naysayers -- those who say there is no such thing as dice influencing or dice control in the game of craps -- are always asking for proof that someone can really influence or "control" the dice.
I'd like to turn the question around. How can the naysayers prove no one has the ability to influence or control the dice in the game of craps?
I will submit to you that the naysayers can't -- probably because they never really tried or practiced. I will submit to you that even among those who have tried and practiced very few can actually do it. But to say that dice influencing and dice control is impossible or can't be done I think is absolutely wrong.
Personally, I don't like the name "dice control" because I don't think anyone actually "controls" dice to the point where they can roll certain numbers on demand with a legal throw. Sure, with a dice slide, which is an illegal throw, anything can be done.
But I do think dice can be influenced to limit the range of results after a legal throw has been made.
I also think that dice influencing has different levels.
Throwing two dice, having them hit the table and then hit the back wall is a certain amount of influence -- as opposed to throwing the dice and having them hit the table and then bounce out the front door of the casino.
I also think that dice influence to the extent that the dice are set and softly rolled to the back wall to limit the dice rotation is also very possible.
The naysayers, the critics of dice influencing and controlled throwing, are always asking for proof that it works. Well, show me proof that it can't work.