Professional gambler deductions

[arcimede$]

Thanks for the link, which shows exactly what I suspected....you called him a "crook and a fake", to which he responded by calling you a cry-baby..etc.

> I see you can't help but continue to denigrate others. It really is
>a personality flaw with you. Personally, I know very little about
>Jean and the others you call gurus. However, everyone you choose to
>flame on these forums appear to conduct themselves with proper
>decorum. I think that alone is enough evidence to point out who is
>the "crook and a fake". It's you Rob!

This completely backs up what Rob wrote earlier

No, I quoted his own words that he used to describe others. Notice the quote marks. It is obvious. I picked this quote intentionally to see if you had any intention of being honest. You failed. You've been outed.

[coach belly]

One example. On LVA Sports Rob made a long post on how he was in Hawaii on an extended vacation...Not long after he posted the owner of LVA, Anthony Curtis posted that he traced the IP address and Rob's post came from Arizona.

Rob can provide the official explanation of this discrepancy, but my understanding is that your IP address reveals the physical location of your ISP (Internet Service Provider), not the location of your computer.

I don't know how long ago this event occurred, or how he was connected to the internet, but if it involved a dialup or cellular connection, then the IP address would reveal the geographic location of Singer's ISP, which would likely be near his home. Did he live in Arizona at the time?

[coach belly]

No, I quoted his own words that he used to describe others. Notice the quote marks. It is obvious. I picked this quote intentionally to see if you had any intention of being honest. You failed. You've been outed.

Who is being dishonest here?

This is what you wrote..."I think that alone is enough evidence to point out who is the "crook and a fake". It's you Rob!"

"crook and a fake"...even if that's what he called others, you are applying these terms to him when you wrote "It's you Rob!"

Do you deny calling him a "crook and a fake" ? To me it's clear that you did.

[RS__]

It's also clear Rob is, in fact, a crook & a fake!

[coach belly]

It's also clear Rob is, in fact, a crook & a fake!

I understand that you think he is a fake...but a crook? Why is that?

[slobdinger]

Rob can provide the official explanation of this discrepancy, but my understanding is that your IP address reveals the physical location of your ISP (Internet Service Provider), not the location of your computer.

I don't know how long ago this event occurred, or how he was connected to the internet, but if it involved a dialup or cellular connection, then the IP address would reveal the geographic location of Singer's ISP, which would likely be near his home. Did he live in Arizona at the time?

LOL. You have no intention of getting to the bottom of anything. Why are you covering so hard for Rob? Maybe you ARE Rob.

[slobdinger]

Rob can provide the official explanation of this discrepancy?

How would you know, Rob, er, belly.

[coach belly]

LOL. You have no intention of getting to the bottom of anything. Why are you covering so hard for Rob? Maybe you ARE Rob.

I provided a plausible explanation of the discrepancy in an IP address in AZ vs a claimed location of HI.

Your response to my explanation of how IP addresses work is...that I AM Rob?

You just tapped out.

[coach belly]

How would you know, Rob, er, belly.

As in Rob can provide the explanation, if he chooses to, who else could?

[slobdinger]

I provided a plausible explanation of the discrepancy in an IP address in AZ vs a claimed location of HI.

Your response to my explanation of how IP addresses work is...that I AM Rob?

You just tapped out.

Yeah, they are all nitwits that run Las Vegas Adviser. They don't know anything about where posts come from, right?

[regnis]

Yawn!!!!!!

[slobdinger]

As in Rob can provide the explanation, if he chooses to, who else could?

If Rob doesn't have a plausible explanation he'll make one up.

[Alan Mendelson]

I have always objected to the use of "crook" or "conman" unless proof of criminal activity is shown. This is because in my career I put real crooks and con men in prison.

[arcimede$]

Too late, belly. You've proven you are faking your claimed unbiased position. No one cares what you say. We now know you are just as dishonest as Singer.

[Alan Mendelson]

It's also clear Rob is, in fact, a crook & a fake!

I don't want to single out RS___ and I am only using his excerpt above as an example. Let's be clear about this: Someone can be called a "fake" if indeed what they present about themselves is not true. They can also be called a "fraud" if indeed what they present about themselves is not true. But you have to prove it's not true.

There are also conditions to say someone is a "crook" or that someone committed "fraud" and those terms cannot be used if there isn't proof.

I would appreciate that no one be called a crook or a con man, or a fake or that they committed fraud unless there is proof.

If you don't believe what they say or claim, simply saying you don't believe what they say should suffice for purposes of discussion. For the purposes of discussion you can also ask that proof for claims be presented. Let's keep the libelous comments out of the discussion unless you have proof and present it -- and you're willing to use your own name just as you would in a court of law or before a grand jury.

There are a lot of things said here that I don't believe, but I am not going to call anyone a fake or a fraud and I am certainly not going to call anyone a crook unless they stole something and defrauded someone and took their money or property.

I know it's easy to type things without thinking twice, but as a courtesy, please think twice.

Thanks.

[Rob.Singer]

I am not an addicted gambler. I consider being called an addicted gambler not only insulting but also libelous and made to damage my good name, reputation and business. There you have it, coach.

And that's exactly why we disagree. I sincerely believe you are a person very addicted to gambling action. It's never been an insult, and by you saying you take it as such only adds to the common sense of my belief. Why don't you just step back and take a good long look at how you constantly tell us all how you operate? You say you're not playing any more vp here or there, yet you get reeled right back in with a simple, expected free play offer. You've made claim upon claim about not going back to Caesar's from time to time, yet you continually have come up with "business" reasons that made you go back and play. The list can go on and on but regular readers know what you've said and done.

Obviously, no one really enjoys seeing their name in the same sentence as "addict" so they turn to denial--in much the same way arci denies it as well as how agitated he gets whenever I address his poor life choices of brow-beating an ill person into her grave and his long time addiction to video poker.

It's all about what's common sense Alan and what's not--and none of it is about name-calling. As for the divorces, my belief from what you've said here over the years is that, while no one would ever expect you to admit it, it's your extreme penchant to be around gambling action that caused at least one or two of them. C'Mon, who gets married after two divorces AT A CRAPS TABLE INSIDE A CASINO!? Again, simple common sense.

[Rob.Singer]

I provided a plausible explanation of the discrepancy in an IP address in AZ vs a claimed location of HI.

Your response to my explanation of how IP addresses work is...that I AM Rob?

You just tapped out.

Doesn't matter coach. When arci, mickey or any of his aliases feel it "slipping away" they turn to claiming it's just got to be me....even when an administrator tells everyone it absolutely is not. These guys have been doing this for years. I kind of enjoy it, because it shows all readers just how much I get under their lying skin.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob can provide the official explanation of this discrepancy, but my understanding is that your IP address reveals the physical location of your ISP (Internet Service Provider), not the location of your computer.

I don't know how long ago this event occurred, or how he was connected to the internet, but if it involved a dialup or cellular connection, then the IP address would reveal the geographic location of Singer's ISP, which would likely be near his home. Did he live in Arizona at the time?

This silliness again. The lva sports hacks were so sore over how I publicly made fools of Fezzik and the Huntington Press bunch that they decided to downplay my vacation. Yes, we were in Hawaii, and we had a home we rented out on the Big Island at the time too. And yes, I obviously lived in Az. I clearly explained every detail, but all facts and details do is irritate attackers. Ask arci. And it was simple. I couldn't get some posts thru to lva (a notoriously slow posting forum) so I sent them to my daughter and told her how to post on lva. She did, and the geniuses went into their usual rage over me. Again, just ask the #1 person I antagonize: arci.

[Alan Mendelson]

And that's exactly why we disagree. I sincerely believe you are a person very addicted to gambling action. It's never been an insult, and by you saying you take it as such only adds to the common sense of my belief. Why don't you just step back and take a good long look at how you constantly tell us all how you operate? You say you're not playing any more vp here or there, yet you get reeled right back in with a simple, expected free play offer. You've made claim upon claim about not going back to Caesar's from time to time, yet you continually have come up with "business" reasons that made you go back and play. The list can go on and on but regular readers know what you've said and done.

Obviously, no one really enjoys seeing their name in the same sentence as "addict" so they turn to denial--in much the same way arci denies it as well as how agitated he gets whenever I address his poor life choices of brow-beating an ill person into her grave and his long time addiction to video poker.

It's all about what's common sense Alan and what's not--and none of it is about name-calling. As for the divorces, my belief from what you've said here over the years is that, while no one would ever expect you to admit it, it's your extreme penchant to be around gambling action that caused at least one or two of them. C'Mon, who gets married after two divorces AT A CRAPS TABLE INSIDE A CASINO!? Again, simple common sense.

Not only did you insult me, but you libeled me. Do you understand the damage you cause me professionally by calling me an addict? Of course you don't. But I tolerate it because I have tolerated other libel in the past. And I excuse you because you don't realize how you hurt people.

[Rob.Singer]

Get real. Name one person here or who knows you who isn't inclined to believe you are a gambling addict. I admitted to being one and truthfully/respectfully, you make me look like Mother Teresa's priest.

I'm certainly not trying to insult you. It's simply an observation based on experience.